Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Can You Tell the Difference? 4K Galaxy Note 3 vs. Canon 5D Mark III Video

Posted by timothy on from the but-magic-lantern dept.

Iddo Genuth (903542) writes "Photographer and videographer Alec Weinstein was in the market for a new smartphone. He realized that the new Samsung Galaxy S5 and the Note 3 both have 4K video recording capabilities and decided to compare those to his 1080p 5D MKIII pro DSLR camera – the results are extremely interesting — Can you tell the difference between a Canon 5D MKIII shooting 1080p video and a Samsung Galaxy Note III smartphone shooting 4K video?"

8 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. DOF by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The site is slow to load (surprise?)

    I assume the obvious difference is going to be the depth of field or DOF.
    The Galaxy will have oodles of it but lacks the ability to isolate the subject, the Canon will make a nice sharp shot on the subject leaving the surroundings vague.

    And then there's this thing with zoom/ interchangeable lenses...

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  2. No different than asking... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can Joe Sixpack tell the difference between a $10 glass of house wine vs. a $100 glass of 1982 Chateau Gruaud Larose?

    Besides, why would I use a DSLR to shoot video? Wrong tool for the job. That's like using a Ferrari to haul construction equipment or using an F-150 on racing day.

    On the other hand, just try to use a smartphone to take pictures of fireworks at night or shoot a picture of your child making a layup at his basketball game in an indoor gym. Then tell me how the two compare.

    1. Re:No different than asking... by dagamer34 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are we assuming perfect world or what the average enthusiast might have? Because I'd rather shoot video on a dSLR which has far better optics and real physical zoom than a smartphone that has to cram everything into 7mm or less of space.

    2. Re:No different than asking... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still think the primary reason people use DSLRs to shoot video is even simpler, overlapping jobs and overlapping skill set. I mean if you want someone to make a video of your wedding, you probably want wedding photos as well. Pretty much everything about making a good photo (focus, exposure, composition, lighting etc.) can be applied to making a good video. So when you're thousands of dollars invested in camera, lenses and you know it inside and out, you'll still be a better man on your DSLR than a rental broadcast cam with cine lenses. While still cams can make decent video dedicated video cameras generally can't take stills any professional photographer would want to use, so if you buy one you're deeply committed to being a film maker. Most simply aren't so purebred.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  3. Re:I could presumably count the pixels? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ANSWER?

    Lenses, lenses, lenses...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  4. Someone should kick the guy in the balls by toxygen01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is most likely a promo for galaxy. Aperture and focus were intentionally set wrong so that 5D mkIII looks just a bit worse. marketing at its best.

  5. Re:OMGPWNIES by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's also see which one fits in your pocket, making it available at all times..

    Cell phone cameras have their place. However, if you're actually going someplace to take photos, they're not the tool you should be reaching for.

    I have a leatherman for situations where I just need a bunch of tools handy, but when I do maintenance on my car, I grab my toolbox and not my leatherman. Sure, I could probably manage to get the oil plug out using the pliers tool on it, but I own a socket wrench and a set of metric sockets for a reason. When I'm going to change tires, I grab my breaker bar too, and my torque wrench for putting them back on.

    That doesn't mean that there aren't situations where the leatherman is handy to have.

  6. Re:I could presumably count the pixels? by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ANSWER?

    Lenses, lenses, lenses...

    Ah, true, but only half-right.

    In today's world, the much more relevant factor is playback, playback, playback...

    (In other words, how many of your 100 friends have the hardware even remotely capable of true 4K playback...needless to say, this is a solution without a problem...)