Slashdot Mirror


Students Remember Lectures Better Taking Notes Longhand Than Using Laptops

Hugh Pickens DOT Com (2995471) writes "Walk into any university lecture hall and you're likely to see row upon row of students sitting behind glowing laptop screens. Laptops in class have been controversial, due mostly to the many opportunities for distraction that they provide (online shopping, browsing Reddit, or playing solitaire, just to name a few). But few studies have examined how effective laptops are for the students who diligently take notes. Now Robinson Meyer writes at The Atlantic that a new study finds that people remember lectures better when they've taken handwritten notes, rather than typed ones. The research suggests that even when laptops are used solely to take notes, they may still be impairing learning because their use results in shallower processing. 'Our new findings suggest that even when laptops are used as intended — and not for buying things on Amazon during class — they may still be harming academic performance,' says psychological scientist Pam Mueller of Princeton University, lead author of the study. Laptop note takers' tendency to transcribe lectures verbatim rather than processing information and reframing it in their own words is detrimental to learning. If you can type quickly enough, word-for-word transcription is possible, whereas writing by hand usually rules out capturing every word. 'We don't write longhand as fast as we type these days, but people who were typing just tended to transcribe large parts of lecture content verbatim,' says Mueller. 'The people who were taking notes on the laptops don't have to be judicious in what they write down.'"

5 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. You know what worked better for me then longhand? by Minupla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know what worked better for me then longhand notes? No notes. Listening to the teacher instead of writing worked best for me. Turns out I recalled things better when I spent my attention listening to the teacher rather then trying to write legible notes so I could read then later.

    Just goes to show that people learn differently and making blanket statements for all people gets you into trouble :)

    Min

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  2. Re:Not suprising by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's hard to remember what's in the lecture while you're reading Slashdot.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  3. Re:Equations by docmordin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're using Word or OpenOffice, that might be a problem. If you're using LaTeX, it's not, provided that you're a reasonably quick typist and have memorized the standard mathematical commands. I ended up typing all of my lecture notes for my statistics Ph.D. classes without much of a hassle. In fact, most of the students in my classes came to me for portions of my lecture notes, as I was able to capture all of the important comments that the professors would make in haste while continuing on with a derivation or proof.

    As for a comment on the article, since very little information was given about their testing protocols there may be some inherent bias in their findings. Specifically, their testing methodology seems to hinge on showing that short-term conceptual recall rates decrease when using laptops. That is, the authors don't bother addressing long-term retention and generalization.

  4. Re:You know what worked better for me then longhan by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is the key in working with any population.

    Some people don't need notes.
    Some need anchor notes
    Some need to read the book ahead of time and ask questions.
    And some need to type things down because they can't write fast enough and miss portions of the lecture.
    And some use digitial recorders.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  5. Re:Equations by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're using LaTeX, it's not, provided that you're a reasonably quick typist and have memorized the standard mathematical commands.

    No.

    I use LaTeX Professionally. Moreover I use AucTex with in editor previews, split panes with docview and a heavily customised yasnippets installation made to work on Lyx-type input shortcuts. Everything is designed to speed up LaTeX document creation(Believe me I've tried it using vanilla LaTeX).

    On average, it still takes me five times longer to type up a page of mathematics than to simply write it down with a pen. If there is so much as a single image, this extends to fifteen to twenty times longer -- literally.

    LaTeX can very easily fool you into believing you are actually getting work done, but in reality you are simply wasting time typesetting mathematics instead of actually writing it. The only positive side to LaTeX'ed mathematics is that the equations look nice. Everything else is a huge waste of time.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!