Slashdot Mirror


In SF: an App For Auctioning Off Your Public Parking Spot

trbdavies (979982) writes 'Only in San Francisco' used to refer to issues like whether public nudity should be restricted to certain hours of the day. Now I hear it most often in connection with the interplay between the city and tech companies. SF Weekly reports on one such development: 'Anyone who's visited San Francisco for 35 minutes knows that easy parking is a rare find. Enter Paolo Dobrowolny, an Italian tech bro who decided San Francisco was the perfect spot to test out his new experiment. Here's how it works: You find a parking spot, revel a little, let Monkey Parking know where you're located, and watch the bidding begin. Finally, give your spot to the wealthiest victim willing to pay the highest price for your spot. Drive away that much richer.'" Update: 05/08 15:52 GMT by T : I suspect that Dobrowolny's a tech pro, rather than bro, or at least that's what I suspect the Weekly meant to say.

8 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. "Tech bro"? by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Tech bro"?

    Go home, Slashdot, you're drunk.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:"Tech bro"? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Informative

      While I hate the term, the SF Weekly assuredly did use "tech bro" intentionally. You can see that it's not the first time they've used it, nor are they the only ones using it. The term usually refers to the SOMA, app-of-the-week startup crowd that's more interested in pitching VCs than building something useful.

  2. Legally questionable, doomed to fail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You pay your parking fee to park there.
    You are not entitled to resell that right. Only the townhall can.
    And finally, I just need to locat the bidder, go there with my car first and wait for the parking fee(s) to expire.
    As soon as the car moves away, I get the spot. All legal!
    Ah!

    1. Re:Legally questionable, doomed to fail! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not legally questionable at all - you are being paid to vacate a spot, not resell anything you have purchased from the city.

      Not sure what you mean by "locating the bidder" - I assume you mean "locate the spot occupier who is auctioning the spot vacancy", which is far from easy as their location would be hidden behind the apps paywall (with the minimum information you would have up front being the general area the spot is located in, so you aren't bidding on something 10 miles away from where you want to visit), so you would have to win the auction, pay up and only then get the parking spots actual exact location.

      Besides, waiting on a public highway for anywhere up to an hour for a parking spot to be vacated isn't exactly what I would call "winning" in your scenario...
       

  3. Perfect for every kind of cunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love this idea!

    It helps to connect the rich cunt demographic with the thieving cunt demographic.

    Leaving less cuntiness in the world for non-cunts.

  4. Re:Innovative Concept by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an interesting idea. It creates a possibility of earning a living simply by being a douchebag, driving around, taking spots and auctioning them off.

    High-speed parkers provide liquidity, you insensitive clod!

  5. Re:I don't understand big cities - off topic by Schezar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have to truck in everything and truck out everything,

    The suburbs also have to truck everything in and out: it's not like local farmland and local factories provide even a tiny percentage of the goods and foodstuffs used there.

    Rural areas also have to truck most things in and out, for mostly the same reasons. The way the world economy is structured, pretty-much EVERYTHING is trucked in and out from somewhere else. It's a myth that non-urban areas somehow are less reliant on the "outside" than urban areas.

    More to the point, there is a massive economy of scale in cities. New brings in goods in bulk, which then require minimal internal redistribution compared to, say, strip malls in suburbia.

    All of that aside, cities are where basically all jobs are. Why would anyone start a company that requires skilled workers in a place with a small talent pool? How many coders or engineers live in any rural town, or even within a day's commute of one? How many live within walking distance of a building in New York?

    Look at the job listings in any small town, and then look at the job listings in New York or Boston or San Fran. There's nothing to do in exchange for money in small towns and rural places for most of us. There's no career path at all.

    Hell, there's also just NOTHING TO DO. We live in New York because we can walk to one of two dozen brunch places on Sunday morning. We can see opera, musical theatre, the symphony, an off-broadway play, slam poetry, a puppet show, or basically anything we want any day of the week. Want to play an obscure German board game? Thousands of people live basically next do and also want to do so. How many people would be interested in that kind of game in a town of 2000 people?

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
  6. Re:I don't understand big cities - off topic by NemoinSpace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Culture is the guy who PLAYS the violin. People that scurry around in ovecrowded cities arguing over parking spots and the regulations thereof is... something else.