BlackBerry To Allow Rivals To Manage Its Smartphones
jfruh (300774) writes "BlackBerry broke its longstanding business model recently by announcing that its BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10 management platform would be able to manage not just BlackBerry devices, but Android and iOS gadgets as well. Now, in a new announcement, the company is also exploring the flipside of that coin, allowing software from other companies to manage BlackBerry phones. The moves acknowledge a world in which fewer and fewer people are interested in a vertical BlackBerry solution — but also seem to kill the last things that make BlackBerry special."
RIM/BlackBerry has been in decline for years.
The stuff they played a role in pioneering are now pretty much commodities. They rested on their laurels for way too long, and eventually got lapped by the rest of the market. Apple and Android have huge market shares compared to what BlackBerry still has.
They've been laying off people, closing buildings, and putting out products hardly anybody buys, and they've been saddled with ineffective management for years.
They're well on their way to becoming a footnote. Their founders all got rich and moved on.
What we're watching is the dying days of a once cool company.
Sad to see them go, but this is largely a mess of their own creation, even if they don't realize it.
I know people who owned their PlayBook tablet -- and, quite frankly, they were crap. There was nothing in the store, their Android support was a joke, and then they stopped giving updates for it. I'm betting most of the people who ever owned that tablet wouldn't ever own another product from them.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Why would allowing others to use the APIs, rather than keeping them super-secret as a rent extraction strategy, 'kill' their specialness?
Presumably the same management options as before will still exist, you'll just be able to use other software to actually set those options, should it please you. If the actual security of the management process depended on the APIs being secret than it was horribly broken long ago (reverse-engineering a proprietary system well enough to build a competing application is either superior or you can profitably sell for less is hard, especially if the vendor is willing to mess with you; reverse engineering just enough of it that basing its security on the assumption of its secrecy is substantially easier). If BES remains superior, you can still use it. If you don't elect to, your blackberries are now not nearly unmanageable bricks(and, hopefully, won't suffer the shit that is BIS...)
That might produce some additional revenue. They're suing the makers of a look a like solution for the iphone. Why not just take a cut of everyone that wants to do it, and help them do it as well? It might revitalize physical keyboard handsets.
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
but also seem to kill the last things that make BlackBerry special.
You think the competing management platforms driven to be as generic as possible and manage multiple vendors' phones will be "better" at managing BB devices, than their own product?
I see a few ways this may not hurt BB... (1) It makes their smartphones more attractive, if they will be compatible with customers' existing management solution.
(2) Potential licensing fees from developers of management software for access to SDKs and advanced APIs.
and (3) They may still provide superior manageability/functionality for their own management platform, by using undocumented APIs, or by introducing new APIs to their devices and management platform simultaneously --- so they always leverage new management and security features first..
BES was always finicky, but generally issues I recall seeing tended to be self inflicted. Im not sure what you mean by "they changed cryptography keys"-- the entire point of the BES is that the company alone holds the per-device keys, and if they change its because someone did something with their profile.
Calling BES awful when there basically werent any viable competitors for ~10 years is a bit ridiculous. Sure there was activesync, but that was even more finicky and screwed up, and until recently (last ~5 years) anything else was just a nightmare to manage. Anyone ever have the joy of trying to get an iPhone 3 hooked up to a server with a self-signed cert?
BB is done. Some of their new products are interesting but BB has been irrelevant for too long. At one time they made the best smartphone on the market, certainly the most secure. Then they got fat and lazy and Apple and Android sped past them.
I had one of the older BB phones with the small screen and physical keyboard. Loved it. Great battery life, good call quality, secure. But no apps to speak of. Poor quality handsets (I know a lot of people that had to return them due to hardware failures). Then I got an iPhone and never looked back. Well, never looked back at BB. I did look at (and own) Android phones.
Now it's a two horse race. To me, BB is kind of like Windows phones. Yeah, some nice features but I'm not about to buy one. So long BB...we hardly knew ya.
This is the real issue.
If you're not already an all BlackBerry shop, or you're not big enough that you can dedicate resources to running BES in addition to your other solution, you need a different solution to manage your mobile devices before someone loses a phone on a plane and you're writing HIPAA checks.
None of the good multi-platform enterprise class solutions support BlackBerry
So you implement Mobile Iron as your one mobile management solution, and tell people they can't have a BlackBerry if they want enterprise mail, and the 3% of your people with BB's becomes 0% as you issue them Androids and iPhones. [Because giving everyone who actually has a personal BlackBerry a new Galaxy costs less than the server for BES.] And like that, BlackBerry's market share goes from 3% to 2.99%.
Comparing BES to ActiveSync (EAS) is like comparing Exchange to IIS. While BlackBerry's bread and butter was its push email functionality the things you could do with a BlackBerry connected to a BES were impressive even by today's standards. Because of BlackBerry's end to end encryption a BB phone connected to a BES is always connected to the corporate network just like any PC sitting in your office. Meaning if I left an important file on the computer at the office I could connect to it from my phone and open/save it. Applications which need to fetch data from the corporate DB can be installed to the phone and work without the need to constantly log in. Even today with every MDM I have worked with I still have to manually connect over VPN when I want to do anything on the company network with an Android or iOS device. And if the screen times out it disconnects the VPN connection forcing me to start over. Good, Mobile Iron, Knox, et al are still some distance from providing such a robust feature set.
This is a good move for BlackBerry but if a company truly wants a secure and robust solution they should still choose BES IMHO.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
"...but also seem to kill the last things that make BlackBerry special."
Shouldn't that be made Blackberry special? I mean, I loved my old crackberry as much as the next geek back-in-the-day... but pretty nearly everyone has moved on, at this point.