Slashdot Mirror


eBay Compromised

New submitter bobsta22 (583801) writes "eBay has suffered a security compromise requiring them to have all users change their passwords. As yet only a press release. Lets hope there's more juice on this." From the press release: "Cyberattackers compromised a small number of employee log-in credentials, allowing unauthorized access to eBay's corporate network, the company said. ... The database, which was compromised between late February and early March, included eBay customers’ name, encrypted password, email address, physical address, phone number and date of birth. However, the database did not contain financial information or other confidential personal information. The company said that the compromised employee log-in credentials were first detected about two weeks ago."

193 comments

  1. link? by Imabug · · Score: 2

    what, no link to the press release?

    --
    "For I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and Long Words Bother Me"
    1. Re:link? by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      what, no link to the press release?

      The press link is in right in the summary.....

    2. Re:link? by ZiakII · · Score: 5, Informative

      Better yet, just logged into my ebay acct. and there's NOTHING in the communications there either.

      Slashdot, now with less actual news and information, but nearly 100% sensational!


      I understand reading is hard so I highlighted the important parts for you.

      eBay Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY) said beginning later today it will be asking eBay users to change their passwords because of a cyberattack that compromised a database containing encrypted passwords and other non-financial data.

    3. Re:link? by Imabug · · Score: 1

      ahh, there it is now. wasn't there when i first looked at the story

      --
      "For I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and Long Words Bother Me"
    4. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, I realize he's using big words, but you understand what "later today" means, right? So, of course there are no alerts in your account. Reading is hard.

    5. Re:link? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem badly broken retech. Your posts indicate that you mistakenly believe that this is some kind of hoax, and you called a person who pointed out your error an asshole. It's clear that someone here is an asshole, but it isn't ziakll.

    6. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So perhaps you should learn to read. Since you missed the major portion of what I wrote. "

      Wow. Please take your own advice. He specifically stated, if you had bothered to read it, that the user alerts will begin __LATER_TODAY__. That means that alerts would not have begun prior to you checking your account __EARLIER_TODAY__.

      Again: Later today.

    7. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://blog.ebay.com/ebay-inc-ask-ebay-users-change-passwords/

    8. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So perhaps you should learn to read. . . . Perhaps 4chan is more your thing.

      No. If he cannot read, Slashdot is EXACTLY the right place for him.

    9. Re:link? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      As I stated, NO ALERTS in my account. So perhaps you should learn to read. Since you missed the major portion of what I wrote.

      So you can read stuff from the future, but instead of checking lottery results or the Daily Racing Form, you're reading your eBay messages?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    10. Re:link? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Better yet. I just logged in and I cannot find where to change my password.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    11. Re:link? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      OK. I found it on the third go round, behind the locked door with the sign saying "beware of the leopard".
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:link? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Better yet. I just logged in and I cannot find where to change my password.

      See where it says "Hi, [yourname]!" at the top left? Click it, then Account Settings -> Personal Information -> "Edit" on the Password line.

      There, was that so hard?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    13. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, just logged into my ebay acct. and there's NOTHING in the communications there either.

      Slashdot, now with less actual news and information, but nearly 100% sensational!

      I understand reading is hard so I highlighted the important parts for you.

      eBay Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY) said beginning later today it will be asking eBay users to change their passwords because of a cyberattack that compromised a database containing encrypted passwords and other non-financial data.

      For Slashdot, I would have thought that there would be less confusion over eBay's pullback of their notice....

      I'm willing to bet that eBay is in the middle of validating that they have closed all of the security holes before sending out a communication to their customers. The message that was posted was likely either a draft or was posted prematurely. What's the sense of asking people to change their password now if there is still a breach?

    14. Re:link? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Well I looked many places and found that after the third go round. Not hard, but not obvious.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    15. Re:link? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      user alerts will begin __LATER_TODAY__. That means that alerts would not have begun prior to you checking your account __EARLIER_TODAY__.

      Again: Later today.

      though risking karma getting into this fray, I must ask why LATER? If ebay knows problem occurred, they should send out notice immediately instead letting the forums run wild (if I see lots of stuff on forums but nothing from ebay then I would think it is a hoax. There's lots of similar crap on forums). Not all ebay users read slashdot, cnet, reddit, or ebayinc.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    16. Re:link? by twdorris · · Score: 1

      This retech user has provided advice in his signature as to how to best respond to his posts.

    17. Re:link? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Well I looked many places and found that after the third go round. Not hard, but not obvious.

      I definitely agree that it's pretty buried for such an important function.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    18. Re:link? by airdweller · · Score: 1

      ...Grandma? ;)

    19. Re:link? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Better yet. I just logged in and I cannot find where to change my password.

      See where it says "Hi, [yourname]!" at the top left? Click it, then Account Settings -> Personal Information -> "Edit" on the Password line.There, was that so hard?

      Yes. That's a stupid place to hide it. Clicking "Hi [username]" is not an obvious place to look-- to me, this counts as "hide this menu item as far away from the user as possible". I did in fact find it, but "just keep clicking menu and submenu and sub-submenu items at random and eventually you'll get there" is not really a good user interface strategy. (although it seems to be a very common user interface strategy).

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    20. Re:link? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Not until the sex change.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    21. Re:link? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Logged into eBay, in a foreign language (and not English), and found it trivially :)

    22. Re:link? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      though risking karma getting into this fray, I must ask why LATER?

      Because Ebay are cunts and don't give a fuck about their "customers"?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    23. Re:link? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

      I suspect because the part of their system which changes passwords is seriously overloaded. I'm trying to change mine, but so far can't even get the page to load.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    24. Re:link? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      Agreed...took me going through a few menus to actually find it. One would think it'd be more intuitive.

    25. Re:link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm pretty sure the option to change password doesn't even exist on the mobile site, or in the iOS app.

    26. Re:link? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      It's at least more obvious than changing a gmail password nowadays... at least ebay has your name, indicating that clicking there may be vaguely related to your account. Gmail I had to click on a silouette, then something account sounding, then finally a "security" tab. Forget buried, you need an archaeologist to find that one...

    27. Re:link? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... , but "just keep clicking menu and submenu and sub-submenu items at random and eventually you'll get there" is not really a good user interface strategy. (although it seems to be a very common user interface strategy).

      It's not just common; it's the standard approach that's pretty much hard-wired into the entire GUI approach. And the designers are openly proud of the fact that they did it this way. And if you managed to memorize the location of something important in the menu tree, chances are that one of those "upgrades" that you clicked on has moved it to someplace else by now. If you don't like this, you can use the CLI approach, except that most "consumer" computer systems have done a good job of hiding that from their users. We're all too stupid to understand something without pretty pictures, y'know. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    28. Re:link? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Well that's later YESTERDAY.. It is now Thursday!

    29. Re:link? by doccus · · Score: 1

      As I stated, NO ALERTS in my account. So perhaps you should learn to read. Since you missed the major portion of what I wrote. This may indicate that a specified group of ebay users are affected and is NOT site wide. But you'll miss this too since it's obviously implied and not spelled out letter by letter. I appreciate that you're an asshole and Aspergers makes it hard to communicate. Perhaps 4chan is more your thing.

      Me neither.. not a word of contact. Thank goodness,. I just changed all my passwords already because I made the mistake of using craigslist.. and PS I have Aspergers, but I got it ;-)

    30. Re:link? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Me neither.. not a word of contact.

      It's there when I logged in on Saturday morning.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  2. So... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2

    A major news story, about a ginormous compromise gets published on Slashdot and there is NO source or link?

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:So... by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait for the dupes.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a link to the press release in the article before there were any posts... so if it was omitted initially, it was added pdq.

  3. Since February and just now hearing about it?! by sbrown123 · · Score: 2

    How much you want to bet they have been sitting on this? Probably waited until X number of people were compromised and they couldn't cover it up any longer.

    1. Re:Since February and just now hearing about it?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably not that they've been sitting on it since February, it's that they didn't DETECT it until two weeks ago. What probably happened is that they got compromised, and then whoever compromised it tried to sell the account information to the highest bidder. While I'm sure there are plenty of people on the black market who might have reason to buy one, it's probably not as lucrative as, say, stolen credit card numbers or bank account info. It probably took them the two to three month time gap to find a buyer. The buyer would've been the one to set off the alarms, since they'd actually be using the account info for something.

    2. Re:Since February and just now hearing about it?! by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 4, Funny

      What probably happened is that they got compromised, and then whoever compromised it tried to sell the account information to the highest bidder.

      "3 Million Stolen Ebay Accounts BNIB FREE SHIPPING NR US SELLER L@@K"

    3. Re:Since February and just now hearing about it?! by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's a dangerous game. There's a legal precedent that they could be fined as much as one hundred thousand pounds in UK court for data protection breaches. It could take them days to find that much money in the sofa.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Since February and just now hearing about it?! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      The breach happened in February, was discovered two weeks ago (According to Radio 4 last night), and is now being published to everyone. I'd guess that they sat on it for a short while so they could monitor for any strange behaviour (Mass changing of passwords from one network, for example).

      I'd like to know why we need to change our passwords, though. Unless they're stored in plaintext, or using a really badly implemented encryption scheme, what's the problem? I expect a company as large as eBay to have competent IT staff who know how about PBKDF2, bcrypt etc.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  4. Wow, pasword security policy fail by anolisporcatus · · Score: 2

    Things like this would not happen if security policies were in place to force password changes.

    1. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by radiumsoup · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes, they would. keyloggers don't care how old your password is, nor does social engineering.

    2. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by anolisporcatus · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

    3. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, they force password changes, and it didn't help in this case.

      I work for eBay (contracted) so I will not go in detail (and stay anon) , but it baffles me that you seem to think that password change policies are some sort of silver bullet.

    4. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      They probably also wouldn't happen if eBay used database systems with per-column access privileges. (Why should human accounts to any business software regularly need access to masses of encrypted password data?)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet his password was under 6 characteres and dictionary based all lower case :D

    6. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Tridus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you an ebay employee? It was employee accounts that were compromised.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    7. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory XKCD. Now, it would be ironic if they actually bought the "hacking device" from eBay.

    8. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. eBay does not enforce password changes.

    9. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it is very difficult when you know the previous password was "superman1" to guess what tomorrow's password will be. Or, if you got creative, if last month's password was "g0dOctober", I can only guess what November's password will be.

      After that, I just write it on a stick note for my monitor, cuz ain't nobody got time for your crazy password schemes.

    10. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Working for another large company that enforces a password change policy, i can tell you that it leads to less secure passwords.

      In a survey around the office, ~90% of the people admitted that since the policy got put in place they use a short capitalized word and either an incrementing number or the current month/year at the end.

    11. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      -employee- password were compromised. Again, employee password are most definitely forced to update.

    12. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working for another large company that enforces a password change policy, i can tell you that it leads to less secure passwords.

      In a survey around the office, ~90% of the people admitted that since the policy got put in place they use a short capitalized word and either an incrementing number or the current month/year at the end.

      Yep, nobody wants to relearn a new password nor waste time getting locked out of their computer because they can't remember the new one and/or keep typing in the old one by reflex.

    13. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only. Please read the summary carefully. Some compromised employee credentials were used to access the internal systems, which then was used to grab the database of all normal users.

    14. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work for eBay until last year. They require all employees to change the passwords for their corporate accounts every 90 days. I guess this would make mass compromise more difficult, but personally it made my passwords weaker as I just used an incrementing number after a standard prefix. There's no way I could remember a truly unique password every three months

      I do wonder how the hackers managed to get into eBay's network. As far as I was aware, the corporate account credentials were only used for accessing webmail. Any further access required being onsite or logging into the VPN with a SecureID hardware or software token. The SecureID system has a 60 second window for each code, so it would require a cracker actively watching an employee logging into the VPN with a keylogger and then logging into the VPN immediately themselves (which would kick off the employee).

    15. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Actually, once a code is used, it cannot be reused. So even if you watched me login, and typed in the exact same thing within seconds, SecureID would deny the second login, and most likely flag the account -- your next login would be answered with a "next code" challenge. (I've worked at a place that would disable your account if that happens.)

    16. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Cramer · · Score: 1

      There has been volumes of research proving the exact opposite. Increased complexity and forced password changes invariably lead to much weaker passwords. People find a password they can remember that passes the (often idiotic) complexity rules, and add a rotating tag (0, A, symbol, etc.) to the beginning or end every time they're forced to change it. Or WORSE, they write it down and stick it on the monitor, wall next to the monitor, side of the computer, etc.

    17. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is interesting. Please link to research.

    18. Re:Wow, pasword security policy fail by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Too lazy (or stupid) to use a search engine?

      Here's one to get you started... http://cs.unc.edu/~fabian/pape... Feel free to continue down the rabbit hole from their references.

    19. Re: Wow, pasword security policy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it would be impossible to compromise an app account password or the password of a DBA. Those are known to be the two strongest passwords anywhere.

  5. Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are companies the size of eBay still using passwords for their internal systems? FFS, it's amateur hour wherever you look.

    1. Re:Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously it's for the NSA's benefit....

    2. Re:Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it's amateur hour wherever you look.

      And turtles all the way down.

  6. Not even storing hashes?! by BaronM · · Score: 2

    Got to love a major ecommerce vendor who can't even get THAT right!

    At some point, that has to count as negligence, and some sort of liability ought to attach.

    1. Re:Not even storing hashes?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you should sue them for the cost of changing your password.

    2. Re:Not even storing hashes?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually, what press releases mean by "encrypted passwords" is "password hashes".

  7. But nothing on their homepage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went to ebay and logged in, and was surprised to see nothing regarding this on their main page. How do they expect most people to see this!?

    1. Re: But nothing on their homepage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, Slashdot!

    2. Re:But nothing on their homepage? by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1

      I just went to ebay and logged in, and was surprised to see nothing regarding this on their main page.

      “eBay Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY) said beginning later today it will be asking eBay users to change their passwords...”

  8. Since February and just now hearing about it?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As said in the article -> 2 weeks (or more)

  9. And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by lazarus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So they didn't get payment information, but they got everything they needed to apply for credit in your name. Perfect. It took me an hour to buy my last laptop in a retail store with my credit card in my hand because my card company was so totally paranoid about fraud that they put me through the third degree to ensure I was who I said I was. And it's just going to get worse.

    At this rate cash will be king again. Oh no, wait, that can be fraudulent too. Essentially, it is getting impossible to spend your own money.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to pay with my credit card. Pay with cash. Where'd you get that much cash? Did you steal it? CRIMINAL!

    2. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Essentially, it is getting impossible to spend your own money.

      First of all, if you're using a credit card, it's not your money. You're borrowing from someone else. Second, WTF? Companies want to get paid, so spending money is only getting easier. NFCs, RFID keypasses, POS readers everywhere, even the vending machines take credit and debit cards now.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First of all, if you're using a credit card, it's not your money. You're borrowing from someone else."

      Yes. That said, I pay off my bill every month.

      It's been a long time since I've been denied or slowed down because of fraud protection measures.

    4. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Dude , the very same information " Name ,Address, Phone Number" is in the local phone book. Has been for 50+ plus years

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    5. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope not. The only reason one doesn't get a gun to their head or a knife to the throat when walking city streets these days is that muggers know that almost nobody carries cash, and that credit card fraud doesn't earn much for the drug habit. If people started carrying cash again, mugging cases will be back as almost daily occurrence as they were in 1970s-era NYC.

    6. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      I have not noticed date of birth being in the phone book. It actually bothers me that companies such as eBay think that they need or should even ask for a date of birth. All they need to know is that I am over 18, then piss off with the intrusive data gathering.

    7. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      It actually bothers me that companies such as eBay think that they need or should even ask for a date of birth.

      They need to ask because of those quaint things known as laws created by lots of different places they operate in. Those laws differ as to what ages people must be to do certain things, or what companies can do.

      All they need to know is that I am over 18,

      So when do you change to "over 21" so you can do the things that you need to be 21 to do? Or do you just want to be "over 18" for the rest of your life and will you be upset when you can't do the things adults can do on their site?

      If all you want to be is "over 18", give them a fake birthday that makes you "over 18". Problem solved.

    8. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Hi this is so and so and you have won a prize we just need your birthdate so you get your prize............ not hard at all. Phone scammers have been doing this for 50+ years as well. And its information I wouldn't mind ebay having they can send me stuff on my birthday they have the CC encrypted I say they shouldn't store CC info at all so im with you on that. But are we all going to stuff our heard in the sand because we are scared a hacker might get my birthdate??na

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    9. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by Mark+of+the+North · · Score: 1

      I got something similar yesterday: Picked up the phone and get a long pause before an employee of "Visa" greets me from an obviously packed and busy call-center. At this point, my Spidey senses were tingling. I would call his accent East Indian, which is fine. He tells me that I had qualified for a lowered interest rate. "Great!", I says. He then confirms my name and address, which didn't bother me as they are all over the place. But I hang up as soon as he asks for my date-of-birth.

      They must get a bunch of people with this scam.

      It occurs to me that several discussion forums I'm on know my date of birth. That now seems like an unacceptable risk.

    10. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      D.O.B. should never be used for security as it is public record.

      My bank uses it as a security question!! Fucking idiots.

      Normally I make up a D.O.B. and stick it in passwordsafe with other info, my pet dog 86igwsv3fmyqeu agrees that this is a good idea, so does my girlfriend who I met in Antares!

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    11. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At this rate cash will be king again. Oh no, wait, that can be fraudulent too. Essentially, it is getting impossible to spend your own money.

      I bought a car with cash. Later they tried to claim that I owed them more money for the registration, but that was bullshit so I didn't pay them anything. Since they didn't have access to any of my bank account etc information, they had to go fuck themselves. They didn't even do the brakes like they claimed they did, assholes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:And Everything Just Get's More Inconvenient by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      I have not noticed date of birth being in the phone book. It actually bothers me that companies such as eBay think that they need or should even ask for a date of birth. All they need to know is that I am over 18, then piss off with the intrusive data gathering.

      You're right, but who the hell gives their right date of birth anyway, unless it's to someone like the government, life insurance company etc?

  10. Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    If eBay US was using a static salt like eBay Japan was, this is a big deal. If they were using a proper (random) salt, and a strong hash, it's not that big of a deal. Does anyone have any idea how eBay hashes the passwords?

    I'm not worried about it if they were doing something like:
    UPDATE user SET password= ENCRYPT(password, CONCAT('$5$' , uuid(), '$')

    1. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      They XOR your password against 1234567890

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think less of an issue is the potential for people cracking the passwords, more to the point is all the personal information for 128 million ebay subscribers potentially having been stolen.

      "The database, which was compromised between late February and early March, included eBay customers’ name, encrypted password, email address, physical address, phone number and date of birth."

    3. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1

      It's not particularly the strength of the hash that worries me, it's the speed of it. If they're using something like SHA256 - strong, but fast - then I'd be worried.

    4. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      And none of that is remotely a secret. Wow, they stole a page out of a phone book! (mostly, email and DoB are a google away.)

    5. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      My phone number is unlisted, you insensitive clod.

    6. Re:Hash algorithm? Static salt like eBay Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is secret if you use a cellphone and it isn't listed anywhere. Furthermore, my email address is secret in the sense that I don't want it being tied to my name, address, etc. Right now, no one really knows who runs the account.

  11. CNN now has the story by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 2
    1. Re:CNN now has the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems the crackers used Microsoft Surface.

    2. Re:CNN now has the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy with the "how hackers steal passwords" video was the worst explanation ever.

  12. Personal online information by jtollefson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just one more company giving one more reason why corporations should not be allowed to store personal information beyond what is absolutely necessary. Birthday would not necessarily need to be stored anyplace directly accessible, unless it was legally required but could instead be replaced by a flag for "above 13", "above 18", "above 21". If they absolutely needed to have the birthday for representation or audit purposes it could be stored in an offline version that could be brought online as needed.

    In the end, efficiency was prioritized over the need to secure personally identifiable information (PII). eBay should not have stored so much PII in the same database, it should have been stored separately and linked on retrieval.

    Sadly, security requirements being ignored or missed during design is a commonplace occurrence and they don't get fixed until something like this brings them to light.

    1. Re:Personal online information by jtollefson · · Score: 2

      I did, but, I guess I didn't feel that I needed to lay everything out. :) Folks aren't allowed to sign-up unless they're 13 or over, but, all you would need to do is have a weekly, or even a daily process that would synch those online flags with the actual offline birthday.

    2. Re:Personal online information by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      unless it was legally required but could instead be replaced by a flag for "above 13", "above 18", "above 21".

      Tomorrow the law changes and requires a certain other age for certain activities. How do you convert a simple "above 13" flag into the new "above 17"?

      And then, how do you know to change the "above 13" into "above 21" as appropriate unless you know when the birthday is? Do you just wait 8 years and do it automatically?

      And finally, if you're giving anyone who doesn't need it your correct birthday, you're the one at fault, not them for asking.

    3. Re:Personal online information by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      ...but, all you would need to do is have a weekly, or even a daily process that would synch those online flags with the actual offline birthday.

      I think I understand what you mean here, but could I just point out that if you have an automatic process that accesses actual birthday information then that information is online, too? If someone hacks an employee account and gets access to the name/etc database, why wouldn't they just copy the "actual birthday" information, too?

    4. Re:Personal online information by BilI_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      You make the account holder select it themselves, just as they did when they made the account.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  13. Security: A+ + + + + + + + + + by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would hack again!

    1. Re:Security: A+ + + + + + + + + + by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      item not as described. password salt was actually pepper!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Security: A+ + + + + + + + + + by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when the starting bid on their customer database is $0.99...

  14. people at eBay are losers... by DECTerm · · Score: 2

    Seems the people at eBay are completely losers, thanx to slashdot I just had a chat with the support at the UK eBay, they confirmed that I should change my password for my own safety, but NO fucking reply why there is no announcement on the local (ie. UK) site. They just only know well to milk their customers (Paypal) too with their fees.

  15. eBay is sitting pretty. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    The top management of eBay is going, "OK, the hackers got in, stole the credentials, but what can they do with it? What good does it do to them? They got to sell it in eBay, right? It is in their own interest we stay afloat to provide them sheep for fleecing right? So we are likely to survive till I make bonus right? After we get our boni who cares what happens to the company? I should be able to find another company to wreck next year".

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  16. Anonymously Reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email Spam has been coming to my email preferenced through ebay with my username in the subject line for about a week or so. A lot of Costco and Walmart stuff that never used to show up. We will find you fucking hackers wherever you are.

    1. Re:Anonymously Reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have any clues like that, please send the data to eBay so they can use it in investigation.

  17. This information wasn't available, anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used eBay for years, with a few clicks it's easy to find anyone's information (username, address, phone number, etc) - Sure, you can't just outright search for someone's profile with that information on there, but you can still very easily find information just a few clicks deep.

    Next people will be up in arms over the Whois database having their addresses and phone numbers available to EVERYONE on the INTERNET!!!

  18. NSA to blame ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the attackers used a NSA backdoor ?

  19. Password still not stored securely by anyaristow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The personal information screen shows me the length of my password, in asterisks. They wouldn't know how long my password is if they were storing it securely.

    1. Re:Password still not stored securely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They can if they store the length of the password prior to hashing it. Still not the best practice, but perfectly plausible

    2. Re:Password still not stored securely by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Did your password just happen to have 8 characters? My previous was 7 and it showed 8 asterisks, and I just changed it to something much longer than 8 characters and it still shows 8 asterisks.

    3. Re:Password still not stored securely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While applauded for correction, why did the original post get modded 5 insightful initially?

    4. Re:Password still not stored securely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hunter2

    5. Re:Password still not stored securely by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Slashdot mods all have 8 character passwords

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  20. Password on cardboard in your wallet by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's OK to write down your password. Just keep the card in your wallet instead of on your monitor. You probably already keep a piece of plastic with your credit card number on it in the same wallet anyway.

    1. Re:Password on cardboard in your wallet by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      Better yet, write down most of your password and memorize the rest. Just a few extra letters (it can be the same for every site) will defeat the average pickpocket who obtains your wallet. Meanwhile, the written-down part of the password, which should be different for every site, can be long enough to defeat electronic attacks.

    2. Re:Password on cardboard in your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use lastpass :V

  21. Why only partial encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do these companies repeatedly store only *some* of my personal information encrypted? I'm getting really tired of these people leaking my home address, phone number, email address, birthday, etc. That is all information that can be used to impersonate me and gain access to other accounts, etc. At the very least, it leads to piles of annoying SPAM.

    The PCI standards (see https://www dot pcisecuritystandards dot org/ ) require that sensitive information, such as credit card numbers, be stored encrypted. I really wish the feds would just require that *all* personal information be treated as "sensitive" and appropriately encrypted, audited, etc.

    1. Re:Why only partial encryption? by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      Why do these companies repeatedly store only *some* of my personal information encrypted?

      Because cowboy attitude. We just had here the story on the EU law about deleting older links to personal data from search engines. Where most US contributors insisted that this data is "facts" and it would be "free speech" to disseminate it as businesses see fit. Combine this with EULA practices where businesses (many in monopoly position) will not service you unless you agree that they collect your personal data and share it freely with various "partners". When such practice is questioned they always justify it through "it's good for the economy". Case closed. Unless we take the time to question what exactly "economy" is. But we never do.

  22. Where's the outrage from the righteous activists? by PseudoCoder · · Score: 0

    Still waiting to hear about how awful it is for cyber-attackers to go in and steal stuff that will enable further stealing from millions of users; you know, the working types who just want to buy and transact each day and go about their business.

    "eBay's awful, PayPal's awful, blah blah blah. Guy Fawkes masks are cool, Marx and Che are cool, so is to sticking it to the corporations. Ha ha the companies should hire me because I know better than their dumb their security people doing dumb security stuff."

    How many slashdotters worship all the cool haxxorz that keep causing losses in the millions and billions each year? And no standing up for the basic principle of not stealing. Ultimately that's the working man they're stealing from because a) identity theft hits everyone from the top to the bottom of the income scale, and b) the working man's 401k is staked on corporate profits.

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  23. Throw away password by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    As per my usual, my eBay account has all fake information and a throw-away password. eBay often tells me to make it stronger, but it's ironic, because had I of actually used a strong "normal" password (one of my strong ones I can remember), it would now have been possibly compromised.

    I think this might be an argument for using crap usernames/passwords for sites you don't trust (which is most of them), because chances are, they're going to leak your information at some point.

    1. Re:Throw away password by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      As per my usual, my eBay account has all fake information and a throw-away password.

      I don't get it. Why? How do you buy or sell stuff with fake info? Of if you don't buy or sell stuff, why create a login at all? Can't one browse through listings all they want without an account?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Throw away password by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      I had to sell something once, so I needed it. For buying, I just use paypal and anonymous access. I hadn't logged into the account for 2 years.

  24. Correction: Password length NOT shown by anyaristow · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was wrong. They are always showing eight asterisks. It's not the length of your password unless your password is eight characters.

    1. Re:Correction: Password length NOT shown by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the update, diligent and forthright to do so.

    2. Re:Correction: Password length NOT shown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Thank you. Now the entire world knows the length of your password!!

    3. Re:Correction: Password length NOT shown by alexkaskasoli · · Score: 2

      Thanks! I can narrow down my attack on your account to 3.2451855365842673e+32 possibilities :)

    4. Re:Correction: Password length NOT shown by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      My password is 8 asterisks. Are they showing you my password? What gives with these clowns!

  25. Is there a link to the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lost my paypall password years ago.
    Maybe if I get the hash I can crack it myself.

  26. Snowden? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like someone duped an employee into revealing their login/password; they might even have used a keylogger to capture it. Where have we heard that before?

  27. Revert to cash? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    I already use cash if I can't eyeball the person swiping the card or swipe it myself.

    Maybe we should go back to cash and checks.

    I've been in IT since 1999 as a pro and 1982 as a hobbyist, and I give up -- The System cannot be trusted. NSA reading my crap, companies being negligent / careless / indifferent with private / financial data .. script kiddies and organized crims.. enough!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Revert to cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already use cash if I can't eyeball the person swiping the card or swipe it myself.

      Maybe we should go back to cash and checks.

      I've been in IT since 1999 as a pro and 1982 as a hobbyist, and I give up -- The System cannot be trusted. NSA reading my crap, companies being negligent / careless / indifferent with private / financial data .. script kiddies and organized crims.. enough!

      Checks are horribly insecure. With the front of one of your checks, someone can drain your bank account. This is why Donald Knuth stopped sending checks for bugs found in TeX.

    2. Re:Revert to cash? by BurningDiode · · Score: 1

      Cash with a receipt is the way to go if the transaction is in person. But anything else requires some level of trust or monitoring of accounts. Checks give out more information about you and your bank account than your normal debit/credit card transaction. I find credit card transactions a good balance. Its reversible if its fraudulent and gives as little info as possible

    3. Re:Revert to cash? by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Or arrange your accounts with the idea that you will be compromised. So only keep enough cash that you are willing to lose/require for a particular purchase in whatever account you use for online purchasing. Heck I even do that for my offline purchases (with card skimmers floating around the place, IRL purchases aren't safe either).

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
  28. 123456 probably most used password by lemur3 · · Score: 1

    Whenever this happens I will now think of the Adobe password breach ... 130million accounts.

    roughly 10% of those had "123456" as their password..

    you can see the other top 99 herE: http://stricture-group.com/fil... ..probably a good time to reconsider the re-use of passwords.. use a password vault....

  29. Class Action by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

    Who's with me?

    1. Re:Class Action by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Who's with me?

      I'm in! Why not? I can't wait for that settlement when I get 47 cents off my next eBay invoice. Or 0.2% of my seller fees charged from July 1, 1998 to August 27th, 2004 refunded to my account if I have the documentation to prove it.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  30. The law says 7 days by emil · · Score: 2

    Are they following the required procedures in each jurisdiction?

    http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/security-breach-notification-laws.aspx

    These laws seem both plentiful, varied and complex. I hope their coporate legal department wasn't planning on sleep for a few months.

  31. yet to be dropped shoe: paypal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder just how much info an attacker could have obtained?

  32. Security Token? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

    eBay and PayPal used to offer security tokens to provide one-time PINs to be used at login. They were offered as either physical tokens or as smartphone apps. I just tried to look for them on the eBay and PayPal sites, but I no longer see any mention of them. Have they stopped supporting the tokens?

    PayPal now just appears to offer something called PayPal Security Key in which they send OTPs via SMS, and I don't see anything like that on the eBay site.

    1. Re:Security Token? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if there's any way to get a new security token now, but they're still supporting the one I got several years ago.

    2. Re:Security Token? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1
  33. I'm not worried by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get emails from Ebay all the time recommending I change my password. They even provide a handy link in the email for me to click on.

    1. Re:I'm not worried by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      so do I, and every major bank including ones I don't have accounts with! with all kidding aside some of these spoof sites are pretty impressive, until you see what domain they actually point to. Scary thing is many people don't at bottom of window to see what URL (or worse the browser has this option turned off).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  34. Good point by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I kind of had tunnel vision there, didn't I. That comes from 17 yeas of focusing on protecting passwords for a living.

  35. Wait - what?! by ripvlan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hackers gained access to " name, [...], physical address, phone number and date of birth"

    But they "did not [access] other confidential personal information"

    What other personal information is there on the planet? Your name, address and DOB is pretty much everything needed for identify theft.

    Okay - I guess they didn't get Health records. Seriously though - what "other confidential information" does eBay store?

    1. Re:Wait - what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your buying preferences perhaps.

  36. Stealth notification by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    just logged into my ebay acct. and there's NOTHING in the communications there either.

    Yes, I just logged on and don't see anything on their login page. Odd; you'd think that this would be the first place they'd put a note.

    It's also very obscure how to change your e-bay password. You can do it... but it's buried way down in menus inside menus.

    Maybe they're waiting until they can rewrite their login page to put the "change password" menu somewhere that an average user can actually FIND it.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Stealth notification by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      Something this major would have to be routed through legal. This is not a quick nor easy process. Second, I assume they would also need to get it translated into various language, again not quick nor easy.

  37. Aw cripes, not again! by marciot · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the THIRD time this month I've had to change my date of birth due to compromised website.

    1. Re:Aw cripes, not again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the THIRD time this month I've had to change my date of birth due to compromised website.

      So why do you keep giving them correct information? Ebay does not need to know your DOB. Neither does Facebook, or Apple, or PayPal or whatever.

    2. Re:Aw cripes, not again! by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. This is the third time this month I've had to get a finger transplant due to compromised biometrics.

    3. Re:Aw cripes, not again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. It's the third time this month I've had to change my dog's name due to password compromises.

      Do you know how hard it is to get a dog to respond to a new name?

      http://jpegy.com/images/uploads/2012/10/Someone-figured-out-my-password-now-I-have-to-rename-my-dog.jpg

  38. Right, everything changed ;-) by daveewart · · Score: 1

    Password: now changed.
    Date of birth: changed, new birth certificate acquired.
    Home address: moving house tomorrow.

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  39. So I went to change the password by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

    And ebay wants me to type in my full credit card/bank account information to verify my identity. No, this doesn't look like a phishing attempt at all. Even if it's legit, it's bad form.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:So I went to change the password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like a phishing attempt to me. They certainly didn't ask me for any such thing last time I changed my password.

    2. Re:So I went to change the password by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Really? I only had to supply my old password.

  40. 3,963 years per password by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's assume they are using a good salt. With more than 64 bits of entropy, that means the bad guy has to crack one password at a time. That's critically important.

    Ebay currently requires that passwords have uppercase, lower case, and number or punctuation, so lets say a typical password is about 60 bits of entropy*. (That's a rough guess). So we have roughly 1 X 10^18 passwords to try.

    As I recall, crypt() defaults to 110,000 rounds, so we can crypt($5$) about 4,000,000 times per second.

    So how many seconds will it take to try all of the passwords?
    1 X 10^18 / 4 X 10^6 = 2.5 X 10^11 = 250,000,000,000 seconds
    On average, we'll need to try half of the passwords to get the right one, so we'll need 125,000,000,000 seconds.
    125,000,000,000 / 3600 = 34,722,222 hours
    34,722,222 / 24 = 1,446,759
    3963 years

    I'm happy with 3,963 years per password.

    That assumes 60 bits of entropy in the password - a decently good password. With a 50 bit password, it would be three years per password - still not too feasible for a Paypal password. A 40 bit password would fall in about 33 hours, if I did that bit of math right. That's still kind of high, but certainly doable - you just won't get very many people's passwords.

    It seems to me that when using good salt, so the bad guy has to attack one password a time, and a reasonably good password, SHA256 is definitely not too fast to be secure.

    1. Re:3,963 years per password by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1

      Well, I would dispute those calculations a bit, but I accept that good long per-account salting forces each password to be cracked individually. I assume that the salt is compromised along with the password (or they won't be cracked at all).

      Even randomly selected passwords from all alphanumeric characters only gives us about 6 bits of entropy per character. Most passwords are shorter than 10 characters, the average is more like 7. This only gives us 42 bits of entropy per password, assuming complete random selection from that space.

      But - users don't randomly select from that space, and modern password crackers don't simply try all possible letter permutations, although they can successfully do this for passwords which are less than 7 characters. They exploit the patterns and techniques which users use to select passwords, using rules engines, password dictionaries, markov chains and all sorts of clever magic.

      Run this on GPUs using hashcat, which for SHA256 can check about 3 billion hashes a second. A small cluster of 4 of these machines can then easily check over 10 billion hashes a second. You can now rent Amazon EC2 instances with GPUs. In a minute you can check 600 billion hashes, admittedly for a single password at a time.

      Salted hashes are now crackable even for quite reasonable passwords, if the hash algorithm can be run on modern GPUs, and assuming the attacker has the salt as well.

    2. Re:3,963 years per password by alexo · · Score: 1

      They will also reject any password that contains your name or email address (before the @ part).

      For example, if your name is Bob or your email is bob@example.com, then apparently the password asdFAS$@#42Dsd53$*jds22bob,"sK!SsdF$5+x is not considered secure. Idiots.

  41. I wonder if this also affects PayPal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I better change my PayPal password just to be on the safe side. Thank God for KeePass.

  42. I've had it with these motherfucking breaches! by Optic7 · · Score: 2

    I'm getting so tired of these. It seems like every few months now I'm getting affected by one. Last year my bank replaced my debit card three times (Adobe breach, Target breach, and who knows what the third one was)! Consequently, I'm no longer using my debit card as a debit card, but only at ATMs. I use my credit card for any card-based purchases now. But it doesn't stop. You name it: zappos breach, dropbox breach, a breach at an old community college I attended years ago, and probably others that I've forgotten about in the last year or two. Fuck me running.

    By the way, the stories about this breach claim that no financial data was compromised. That's fine, except that the data that was compromised may be used for identity theft: your name, date of birth, and street address. I'm pretty much getting ready to use the option that the credit reporting agencies offer to lock down my credit so that no one can obtain credit in my name without me unlocking it. It's a pain, but I don't think it's a choice anymore at the rate these breaches are going.

    1. Re:I've had it with these motherfucking breaches! by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      I'm getting so tired of these. It seems like every few months now I'm getting affected by one. Last year my bank replaced my debit card three times (Adobe breach, Target breach, and who knows what the third one was)! Consequently, I'm no longer using my debit card as a debit card, but only at ATMs. I use my credit card for any card-based purchases now. But it doesn't stop. You name it: zappos breach, dropbox breach, a breach at an old community college I attended years ago, and probably others that I've forgotten about in the last year or two. Fuck me running.

      By the way, the stories about this breach claim that no financial data was compromised. That's fine, except that the data that was compromised may be used for identity theft: your name, date of birth, and street address. I'm pretty much getting ready to use the option that the credit reporting agencies offer to lock down my credit so that no one can obtain credit in my name without me unlocking it. It's a pain, but I don't think it's a choice anymore at the rate these breaches are going.

      One thing I've done for a while now is use Citicards' Virtual Account Number service for any online credit card purchases. It generates a unique number that can be used one time (sorta - if the purchase has multiple stages like Amazon does for example, the retailer can place several charges) by one retailer. It's a bit of trouble, but I don't have to concern myself that a compromise at one business will cause me to have to replace the card. Plus, if a compromise ever happens, it'll be immediately apparent which retailer is to blame.

    2. Re:I've had it with these motherfucking breaches! by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the idea, and I'll check if my bank offers something similar for my credit card. But I'm going to stick with credit cards from now on. I realize now that there's a reason why banks seem to try to push us to use debit cards every change they get.

      Here's an article describing why:
      http://www.consumerreports.org...

      I say screw them, at least until they pull their heads out of their asses and give us secure cards (chip and pin).

    3. Re:I've had it with these motherfucking breaches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're naive if you think Chip & Pin does anything other than piss-poor security. If (when) a fraudulent transaction is made with one, the banks declare that you're liable for it as their system is 'secure' (hah). It's a false sense of security, and a way to shift liability.

  43. Has anything changed? by nowsharing · · Score: 1

    Should users really rush to change their passwords on an insecure site? I don't quite see the points of a PW change until ebay has changed their security precautions. As the customers, we should demand that THEY change their practices before doing anything. Otherwise we'll be throwing hackers another bone.

    Ebay's silence on this matter is completely unacceptable. Do we really know that credit card info wasn't stolen? They've sealed their lips about all of this so far, because if card numbers were compromised, they would be the demons of the week and permanently have their names tarnished.

  44. Great, now I need credit monitoring by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    It's nice that "no financial information" got compromised, but with my name, address, and date of birth, the crackers won't have any trouble accessing credit in my name. Sigh. Looks like I'm going to have to activate credit monitoring. If eBay has any sense, it'll offer that service for free for everyone whose data was vulnerable.

  45. Legacy Passwords by glennrrr · · Score: 1

    I hadn't changed my eBay password since I created my account, circa 1998, and it was 8 characters long all lower case. Replaced it with something more robust.

  46. Re:Where's the outrage from the righteous activist by praxis · · Score: 1

    It is awful to steal from millions of users. Users have two options: transact business with a business and entrust their data into the business's protection or shun a business. Let us say that your argument is correct, and it is in the best interest of the working man to transact business with a business and entrust his data into the business's protection because that benefits to business and hence the working man's 401k account. Would it not be reasonable for that working man to then be angry at Ebay for not following pretty basic practices to protect this data, such as telling him about it immediately, encrypting his personally-identifiable data and protecting their network.

    I present an alternative view: it is unwise for the working man to tie his worth to the worth of those who do not have his interests in mind. It is wiser for the working man to not spend his money on bolstering the economy by buying unnecessary items from companies that do not have his personal wellbeing in mind. It is better for him to live well within his means and not rely on a 401k.

    There's a lot of stealing going on in the world, and most Slashdotters do not stand up for stealing. They do stand up for basic practices that everyone entrusted with someone else's data should follow if they cared at all for that other person's wellbeing. Ebay does not care for our wellbeing (this should not be news). Every reminder of such will anger some people here.

  47. Stay tuned for the targeted PayPal phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next for the attackers is emails to the accounts phishing for PayPal account info - things like "A charge has been made on your paypal account, click here to cancel". I got one like that today, and the publicity is going to make people hyper sensitive to anything eBay related. This is going to be messy.

  48. 113 bits by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    So the password I was using had 113 bits of entropy. Does anyone know the likelihood this can be cracked?

    Or is it pretty safe given that most people will have easier to break passwords?

    1. Re:113 bits by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Just post your new password on /. and we'll figure this out for you. B-)

  49. SourceForge too! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Accounts' passwords expired and have to be changed. :/

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  50. Would be 100 million as fast as hashcat claims by raymorris · · Score: 1

    On it's front page, oclHashcat says it can run sha256() 11 million (not billion) times per second on a GPU. That's reasonably close to what I get.

    crypt($5$) is 110,000 rounds of sha256(). Therefore, hashcat can run crypt($5$) 100 times per second.

    You thought "easily check over 10 billion hashes a second", hashcat's web page says 100 per second. Doing 110,000 rounds instead of one matters, and of course there's the little confusion between million and billion.

    1. Re:Would be 100 million as fast as hashcat claims by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I got my performance stats from a different web site. But the performance table on oclHashcat's fron page says 11231M c/s for SHA256. That's eleven billion a second, admittedly using 8 GPUs, but in the ballpark of my original post.

      If crypt is iterating SHA256 110,000 times, that sounds fairly good. I've been looking at scrypt, which is explicitly designed to resist hardware based attacks.

  51. Re:Security Questions by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    I can't remember if ebay has security questions, but if it does, that could compromise your other accounts that also have security questions.

  52. Re:Where's the outrage from the righteous activist by PseudoCoder · · Score: 1

    I present an alternative view: it is unwise for the working man to tie his worth to the worth of those who do not have his interests in mind. It is wiser for the working man to not spend his money on bolstering the economy by buying unnecessary items from companies that do not have his personal wellbeing in mind. It is better for him to live well within his means and not rely on a 401k.

    Your alternate view is one I agree with fully. I practice this one myself. Regarding their practices, I also agree putting more responsibility on them for their handling is appropriate, considering all the factors. Point well taken. Thank you.

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  53. Ebay overloaded by zwede · · Score: 1

    Tried to change my ebay password and got this:

    Page not available
    Ebay is asking its users to reset their passwords due to the unauthorized access to our corporate information network. This may result in a delay of service due to the high traffic volume. We ask for your patience and that you return to eBay soon. In the meantime, please be assured that no activity can occur on your account until your password is reset.

  54. So 40X slower than I originally said by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Avoiding the word "billion" because it means different things in different countries ...

    > oclHashcat's fron page says 11231M c/s for SHA256

    Yes, I should get some sleep. Divide that by 110,000 rounds, you get 102,100 hashes ($5$) per second. A bit higher than 100, and a bit lower than 10 billion. For any definition of billion. :)

    Note my original calculation assumed 4 million hashes per second. With the oclHashcat numbers, we're looking at 160,000 years per password, for a reasonably good password.

    If the user then set their password to the very minimum that eBay will allow, that could of course end up badly. Password1234 is going to get cracked no matter how you hash it.

    Hmm, I see there is a competition going on for a new hash function. Robert Morris created crypt(3). His son, Robert T Morris, created the Morris worm. It might be time for Ray Morris to become known beyond the 50,000 sites or so that use our existing security solutions.

  55. Encrypted or Hashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are talking about encryption and everyone assumes they are hashed. Are they hashed somehow or really, as they say encrypted. That is the question.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Did They Ever Fix The Email Change Issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you try to change your ebay contact email, you get a notification sent to you that a request from a particular IP address is trying to change your contact email... only that IP has nothing to do with Ebay, nor with you. It's from all over the world and changes each time. Dunno if it's just a bug or a pervasive MITM attack, or fixed by now. Easy to duplicate though. I sent Ebay all sorts of info about it, and they were utterly hopeless.

  59. EBAY stock was down 8 cents today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously not a big deal.

  60. I want some compensation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can all these companies keep f***ing up and not pay their users compensation. I would suggest $10 per user impacted would work. Watch the security get beefed up. If a bank messes up, you get a payment.

    1. Re:I want some compensation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10? $10??? How about the real cost of mitigation? Like in changing your name, SSN, bank accounts and moving to a different address too?

  61. But what about PayPal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No mention in TFA. That's a non-trivial piece of data.

  62. FUCK MY LIFE by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    I just tried to change my password on paypal, it's the usual where you can't see the password your typing and you have to type it twice.

    Now, normally this wouldn't bother me because I use a random password generator to come up with something like 9rf3-3f0g6#p6ebIn!Hg.

    Except paypal says I can't paste the password in, I have to motherfukking type that long complicated shit in TWICE. FFS.

    So, I didn't change my password, well done Paypal you stupid fucking idiots.

    Thank fuck eBay doesn't do this.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.