Slashdot Mirror


Why Snowden Did Right

Bruce66423 writes: "Ebon Moglen Gives a comprehensive explanation of how the NSA's surveillance operations are a threat to a functioning democracy, and why there is a need for real change. There are interesting parallels to the Roman Empires: 'The power of that Roman empire rested in its leaders' control of communications. ... The emperors invented the posts to move couriers and messages at the fastest possible speed. Using that infrastructure, with respect to everything that involved the administration of power, the emperor made himself the best-informed person in the history of the world. That power eradicated human freedom. "Remember," said Cicero to Marcellus in exile, "wherever you are, you are equally within the power of the conqueror.'

Nowadays, 'Our military listeners have invaded the centre of an evolving net, where conscriptable digital superbrains gather intelligence on the human race for purposes of bagatelle and capitalism. In the US, the telecommunications companies have legal immunity for their complicity, thus easing the way further. The invasion of our net was secret, and we did not know that we should resist. But resistance developed as a fifth column among the listeners themselves. Because of Snowden, we now know that the listeners undertook to do what they repeatedly promised respectable expert opinion they would never do. They always said they would not attempt to break the crypto that secures the global financial system. That was false.'"

22 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. thank you Snowden by watcher-rv4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If somebody did something right in the last decades, politically speaking, was Snowden.

    1. Re:thank you Snowden by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If somebody did something right in the last decades, politically speaking, was Snowden.

      My daughter had to write an essay for her high school literature class about someone she considered to be a hero. Three kids wrote their essay about Edward Snowden. No one else was picked by more than one student. I have hope for the next generation. Maybe they will do better than we are doing.

    2. Re:thank you Snowden by digsbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      This has repeatedly been shown to be impossible. People who continue to argue that he should have gone through legal channels need only read this: http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

      I'm not sure how many more times this question needs to be asked and answered. The NSA, or any other unaccountable power structure, will not self-regulate.

    3. Re:thank you Snowden by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No. You will have the same amount of privacy and national security than without him. But now you have better means to actually estimate it.

      What was suspiciously absent from the debate about Mr. Snowden was the question, how many people before him did the same stunt internally, but didn't came forward and informed the world. The internal security at the NSA seems to have been lousy, and it is quite possible that there have been many more leaks, but they went to the highest bidder and not to investigative journalists.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:thank you Snowden by Urkki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because every contractor has the right to overrule the democratically elected government when they think they are right. What could possibly go wrong with that?

      Being a contractor does not matter, but being a citizen does. It gives not just a right but an obligation to take the measures they think are necessary, when faced with something as treacherous as what Snowden faced. The democratically elected part of the government was largely in the dark about this, making Snowden's actions doubly justified. The decisions needed at a situation like that are hard on many levels. He did pretty good, even in hindsight.

    5. Re:thank you Snowden by digsbo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'd liken this to the difference between the immune system and a cancer.

      There are legitimate activities undertaken by the FBI daily. Such examples as child porn, kidnapping, and other Federal law enforcement duties. I think of these as being more like the immune system.

      There are other activities the FBI engages in like entrapment of mentally deficient individuals into terror "plots" where they convince some nearly retarded guy that he's got a truck full of explosives, and to drive them into a sensitive target. This is more like cancer.

      Now where there are good and bad aspects to what the FBI does, it's tough to understand in what way the NSA or CIA are doing anything that's healthy for the nation. Seems mostly like stuff to justify their own existence (CIA creates enemies by interfering in other countries' government, NSA makes enemies by violating other countries' citizens' privacy, both groups then use blowback to justify their budget/unconstitutional actions).

    6. Re:thank you Snowden by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would kids mistaking a traitor for a hero give you hope? You didn't fixate on Snowdens revelation of domestic spying, and totally overlook his treachery regarding international spying, did you?

      Nope. But given that he wisely didn't dare take the time to sort everything out before handing the data to the Guardian and fleeing, I agree with Snowden that the latter was an acceptable cost for blowing the whistle on the former. The outing of the international spying operations did little real damage; it didn't provide much information on methods, didn't expose any human assets, and despite the de rigeur howls of outrage, everyone knew it was going on anyway. At most there was a little surprise as foreign agencies discovered that the NSA was even better than previously thought.

      On the other hand, the revelation that the NSA was blatantly violating the legal restrictions on its operations (albeit with some weaselly definitions attempting to work around it) and -- even more important -- that the NSA had abandoned one half of its dual mission in favor of the other half, was hugely important to get out.

      Ever since I worked with the NSA a few years ago I've thought of them as the good guys, because when I worked with them they were clearly and seriously trying to strengthen the security of the corner of the US financial system I was working on. I knew they tried to break security as well, but was certain that they'd take steps to close serious holes they found which threatened important government and non-government security. The rationale was that since their job is both to spy on everyone else's signals and to secure ours, they could only safely leave holes in place if they were confident that only they could exploit them.

      But thanks to Snowden we now know they not only didn't help to fix the holes they found, and didn't care if the holes were something that others might exploit, they actively tried to create new ones, to subvert new designs and implementations. They've been working to weaken our entire security infrastructure -- actively working against one half of their mission -- in order to make their jobs on the other half easier.

      We really, really needed to know that. Frankly, it's information of such vital importance to REAL national security, meaning securing the freedom of Americans rather than the narrow goals of government agencies, that it would have been worth a lot more damage. Lives, even.

      Yes, Snowden is a hero. Not an unblemished hero, but on balance a true American hero.

      I should mention that I still don't consider the NSA wholly rotten. Actually, my colleagues work closely with an NSA employee, the guy who designed and still works on SELinux. He's smart, dedicated and very serious about improving security. There are lots more like him, probably the majority. But the organization is rotten and needs a serious housecleaning to refocus on both of its missions. Thanks to Snowden we know that.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. One more blowout by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  3. But that's not all Snowden did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If all Snowden had done was blow the whistle on domestic surveillance programs, I'd agree entirely.

    But doing a massive document dump that included things the NSA is *supposed* to do - spy on non-US countries - puts Snowden in another category. What that category winds up being is going to be decided by history. But it won't be that of a simple whistleblower doing nothing but good.

    Because the only people who claim that have "harming the US" as a goal. (At least have the balls to admit that, please.)

    1. Re:But that's not all Snowden did... by mellon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You presume that U.S. citizens are the only ones whose rights matter. Don't feel bad—many of us U.S. citizens think the same way. But you will find if you talk to citizens of other countries, like Germany and Canada and France, that they also care about these issues, and care that the NSA, GCHQ and others have spied on them. And, more importantly, the techniques that the NSA has used to pwn the net are so damaging that even when they are used for legitimate foreign policy reasons, the harm they do to our domestic interests is massive. And the bugs they planted in Cisco router firmware are even worse: they have motivated people to use Chinese tech instead of American tech, and in the process likely created an opportunity for the Chinese government to collect intelligence in our stead. Is that better than nobody being able to collect the intelligence?

    2. Re:But that's not all Snowden did... by c4320n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Preposterous. 'Just following orders' (or, 'Just following our directive', as it were) is no excuse. Every human being has an inalienable set of rights, and surveillance violates these rights; culpability for that violation exists regardless of the NSA's ostensibly-foreign 'jurisdiction'.

    3. Re:But that's not all Snowden did... by DrJimbo · · Score: 5, Informative

      But doing a massive document dump that included things the NSA is *supposed* to do [...]

      This was a lie when it was said about Chelsea Manning and it is a lie when it is said about Edward Snowden. Neither one of them did a "massive document dump" although they both had the opportunity. Instead, they did the responsible thing and disclosed what they found to news organizations to let the news organizations decide what was safe to publish and what wasn't.

      If the only way you can support your world-view is with outright lies, perhaps you need to reconsider your world-view. Of course, those who most need to reconsider almost never do.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  4. Believe Glenn Greenwald's book got it perfect . . by sgt_doom · · Score: 5, Informative

    No Place To Hide

    by Glenn Greenwald

    The full force and impact of this book on NSA's full spectrum domestic and international surveillance cannot be stressed enough; what we have heard and read in various international news articles is gathered here at one source, to be read to fully grasp the enormity of it all!

    When those of us who served in the military, and worked for various organizations for the NSA (Naval Security Group, or NSG, Army Security Agency, or the ASA, USAF Security Service), the agency was strictly forbidden from domestic surveillance --- for that way lies ultimate power!

    During Reagan's administration, in 1988, the NSA was transferred from civilian status to the domain of the Department of Defense, under control of the Pentagon.

    Such action initiated what Greenwald so aptly describes as its present incarnation of Orwellian dimensions.

    Although Glenn cogently describes its financial intelligence spying, only those who have been diligently following the financial investigative journalism of Matt Taibbi, Pam Martens and Nomi Prins will fully appreciate the significance of this.

    When NSA's full spectrum intelligence is disseminated to its clients --- the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Justice, etc. --- it is being likewise dispersed to Wall Street (DOT = Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, DOA = Big Agra, or ADM, Cargill, Monsanto, etc., and DOJ = Wall Street's white-shoe firms, etc.).

    This is a slight peek behind the curtain of the unholy financial-intelligence-complex which sits atop the pyramid of control.

    Remember that Edward Snowden was a contractor with Booz Allen Hamilton, and has proven to the world his unimaginable and extraordinary access to the most senstive of NSA programs --- and who owns Booz Allen?

    One of the top private equity/leveraged buyout firms (private banks), the Carlyle Group, with the likes of George H.W. Bush as a past advisor, and with the original seed money coming from the Mellon family.

    Thusly we must ask just how much access to global financial intelligence do these private banks routinely enjoy, along with their publicly owned cousins, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs?

    When NSA intercepts shipments of routers, switches and other network devices to insert backdoor software and hardware to reroute data communications back to them --- it isn't about national security --- just financial intelligence --- had anyone of those traitors ever been concerned with real national security they would have sounded the alarm about the offshoring of jobs, technology and investment to China and elsewhere!

    When the Boeing subsidiary, Narus (or other similar firms), aids totalitarian countries to capture pro-democracy activists for torture and death, so too does the NSA help in preemptive arrests of American activists and community organizers, as well as members of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

    As one National Intelligence Officer is quoted in the book as stating, "...this is about vast profit..."

    [Please see the bottom of p. 224 and top of p. 225 to understand why no one should give a rat's ass at the recent firing of New York Times executive editor, Jill Abramson.]

    This is a fantastic book not to be missed!

    Additional sources and pertinent sites:

    http://electrospaces.blogspot....

    https://www.aclu.org/sites/def...

    http://www.mindmeister.com/326...

    http://www.wikileaks-forum.com...

  5. Re:Almost... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not democracy if capitalism has its hooks in every aspect of government.

  6. Not rocket science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you trust coercive authority, then snowden did wrong. If you do not trust coercive authority, then snowden did right.

    Unfortunately, the vast majority of human beings (regardless of where they live in the world) DO trust coercive authority, and this of course makes life a hell of a lot easier for the elite the top of the power pyramid.

  7. Soviet Russian(not a joke) by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you think back 40-50, one of the primary criticism of Soviet Russia was that no one in that country did any real work. In industry you sat around all day playing chess, and the governement most spent it's time surveilling itself and everyone else. While this was an exaggeration, the point should be well taken. The purpose of a governement is to govern, and if too many resources are spent spying, if the stability is so strained that constant monitoring of citizens is required, then that nation-state is not going to survive very long. It is not only the expense, it is the waste of talent, the existence of meaningless jobs. This later is really death to a country. If young people know they need no real education because they can just chill in the military or hang out and drink vodka while spying on other people, why would they bother to gain real skills?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Soviet Russian(not a joke) by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you'll find that the NSA is relatively efficient at what it does in terms of its mission statement. That's the more chilling analogy here. 40 to 50 years ago it took massive amounts of "feet on the street" to gather intelligence along with lots of time to analyze the information. Now with wholesale wiretapping of all forms of communication there's not much that our government can't learn about nearly every citizen in the country. By nearly we have to think of kids who aren't on the Internet or have a cell phone yet. If you start to tie together the communications surveillance with the amount of surveillance that goes on from commercial entities and local law enforcement a profile on the behaviors and destinations of every American is now at hand. Your license plates on your car are tracked, your credit card/banking transactions tracked. Your travel is now tracked both by "chipped" passports and airline itineraries. Even your transit pass is tracking you. We may have backed into our Orwellian surveillance world in the name of easy shopping or "security" but that certainly doesn't mean that we have to allow it to continue. That's the failure of our democracy right now, we're failing to push our leadership to dismantle this system and to push for legislation that would outlaw these wholesale collection processes in the first place.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  8. Cowards by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The sad truth is the majority of Americans are fundamentally cowards. That, combined with the human tendency to grossly over estimate the risks from rare events with severe consequences creates this problem.

    Unlike a war which happens over there terrorist acts can happen anywhere. If they can happen anywhere, they can happen here, to me! Gasp!

    Look at the hysteria that occurred when the anthrax mailings were going on. People were reporting "white powder" everywhere and breathlessly telling each other "that could've been me, I could have DIED".

    No, not really. Unless you were a postal worker, you had a bigger chance of being kicked to death by a wild mule than you did of encountering anthrax in a package.

    The sad truth is people play their potential role up in their mind because they think their lives are boring and uneventful. A terrorist attack may be horrible, but it is exciting, too. People do the same thing with celebrities. "OMG! I ate dinner in the same restaurant as Justin Bieber! He was there the night before!"

    Add all of that together and you get a lot of people who will gladly give up lots of freedom for a little (perceived) security.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Cowards by NotSanguine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The sad truth is the majority of Americans, at least the stereotype I apply to them, are fundamentally cowards. That, combined with the human tendency to grossly over estimate the risks from rare events with severe consequences creates this problem.

      There. FTFY.

      Americans aren't any different from other humans. There are smart ones, dumb ones, good ones and bad ones. Over the past century, geography and good luck (much more so than good planning), gave the American middle class a historic run. Now that's changing again, and Americans are struggling to keep what they have. Most feel they don't have time to focus on government shenanigans, which is a shame, because those who own the government are taking away the security and liberty Americans used to have.

      This makes some Americans paranoid, others complacent, and still others cling more tightly to the idea of American exceptionalism. All of this seems to push folks to act against their own self-interest. Well, except for those who think that the world is theirs to exploit and that if anyone is harmed by their plundering, it's their own damn fault for not getting there first. I call it "survival of the sociopath-iest" and it turns my stomach.

      tl;dr. Americans aren't any more or less cowardly or better or worse than anyone else. Stop painting people with a broad brush. It's counterproductive and leaves your bigotry showing. We're all Homo Sapiens. Full stop.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  9. but what is a functioning democracy? by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because america, although projected as one, is far from a functional democracy. We've engaged in systematic disenfranchisement and enslavery of an entire race of people during slavery and well into the 20th century within the confines our our policy of mass incarceration. Women didnt achieve equal voting rights until the early 20th century. We wiped an entire indigenous race of humans out of existence during colonization. Voter identification is enforced in 30 states and will prevent free and open election for anyone without a picture ID. Gerrymandering, closed primary elections, and the 2000 florida voter scandal are all conclusive proof we do not even remotely represent a functional democracy and have not for quite some time. Former criminals, after completing their sentence, are barred from the right to vote in many states and may only seek restoration of their voting rights with the pardon of a governor and a steep fee. Many states still maintain a debtors prison system by which those who cannot pay court costs are summarily enrolled in detention facilities. A Third party has not existed in any respectible context in the United States for more than 100 years, and the electoral college system exists to ensure this reality remains unchallenged. There are virtually no repercussions for employers who resist or refuse an employees request for time off from work to vote. Japanese americans faced internment and were not permitted to vote during world war two, let alone contact family members outside of their camp. Jews were barred in america holding state office for quite some time, and atheists to this day in many states are still restricted from holding political office. New York has a stop-and-frisk policy where they do not need probable cause to stop anyone at will. Our supreme court recently ruled that the systemic isolation, relocation, and arrest of protestors during the presidency of George W Bush was entirely legal. As evidenced by the occupy campaign we readily beat, torture, and maim protestors even going to far as to hose passive protestors with pepperspray for simply existing. Our borders have the free right to interrogate, stop, and detain anyone (american or not) without any formal probable cause. Those declared terrorists may be detained indefinitely and shipped to a secret torture camp in Cuba. We have banned the communist party from ever taking part in an american election or operating as political party.

    so while I applaud the author for pointing this very recent discovery out, its critical to remember we are as much a functional democracy as the USSR was a functional communism.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  10. Re:The Roman Empire? by riverat1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're going to put Obama in that category then I have to add George W Bush to the list and most of Congress who also went along with violations of the Constitution too.

  11. Lie to the boss by AndyCanfield · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The NSA is part of the U.S. Federal Government. The boss of that government is the People of the United States of America. It's in the constitution; read it. The NSA will get their asses nailed to the wall because they lied to the boss. If I'm your boss, and you lie to me, you're fired.

    Edward Snowden is my hero; he can sleep on my floor any time.