Slashdot Mirror


German Scientists Successfully Test Brain-Controlled Flight Simulator

New submitter stephendavion (2872091) writes "Scientists from the Institute for Flight System Dynamics at Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany have demonstrated the feasibility of flying a brain-controlled aircraft. Led by professor Florian Holzapfel, the team is researching ways that brain-controlled flight works in the EU-funded project 'Brainflight'. TUM project head Tim Fricke said a long-term vision of the project is to make flying accessible to more people." So far, the tests are only simulator based, but promising.

8 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, but... by necro81 · · Score: 4, Funny

    But strangely enough, it only works if you think in Russian.

    (Movie references [1], [2], [3])

  2. Re:LOL ... by chub_mackerel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it was a movie. Clint Eastwood could tell you that the problem with this is that in order to control the plane you must think in German.

  3. Re:LOL ... by cruff · · Score: 2

    ...think in German.

    FTFY: think in Russian

  4. Not Quite a Resounding Success by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 2
    From TFA:

    The Germana researchers conducted flight simulator tests on seven subjects with varying levels of flight experience, including one person without any practical cockpit experience. "One of the subjects was able to follow eight out of ten target headings with a deviation of only 10," Fricke added. Several of the pilots who participated in the tests managed the landing approach under poor visibility, while one test pilot even landed within only few metres of the centerline.

    So out of 7 subjects, 6 with flight experience, 1 was able to follow course headings with an error of 10 degrees. That's pathetic. It's the difference between Baltimore and Washington D.C. (or worse).

    Then one was able to land within a "few meters" of the centerline... and that is touted as success? So that means most of the others couldn't hit the runway.

    GPS controls would have done better. So basically success to these guys is "subject turns head left + plane turns some direction left = success".

    It's going to be a long time before I board a 737 with this crap on the pilot's head.

    --
    I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
    1. Re:Not Quite a Resounding Success by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So out of 7 subjects, 6 with flight experience, 1 was able to follow course headings with an error of 10 degrees. That's pathetic. It's the difference between Baltimore and Washington D.C. (or worse).

      Then one was able to land within a "few meters" of the centerline... and that is touted as success? So that means most of the others couldn't hit the runway.

      I think the point is that it worked at all. As in, it's new, in its infancy, but very promising technology.

      If you're so clever, show us your system which does this. Oh, wait, you don't have one, do you?

      It's going to be a long time before I board a 737 with this crap on the pilot's head.

      Obviously. Nobody is claiming this is ready for live planes.

      What they're saying is they've made the first initial steps with this technology. And initial results in a flight simulator are starting to look like they might be able to make it work.

      Why have people on Slashdot started to miss the point entirely?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. cheaper airline travel? by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Funny

    This should make commercial air travel much cheaper and safer as airlines begin to do away with the single-point of failure that costly human pilots represent, implementing instead a crowd-based solution that empowers all passengers to contribute equally to guiding the plane to wherever they decide will be the flight's destination.

  6. Wait, what? by chinton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean up until now pilots have been flying without using their brain?!?

  7. Re:Why not just self-driving? by Baloroth · · Score: 2

    What is brain controlled?

    It's replacing the physical flight controls with directly brain-controlled flight controls. As to why: a large part of learning to fly (not the biggest part, certainly, but a significant piece) is learning how to use the fairly complicated controls. If you can simplify or even remove that interface, it makes the process of flying easier to learn.

    Since this is Slashdot, someone is undoubtedly going to say that that learning difficulty is a good thing, since it sets a higher bar for pilots. There may be a bit of truth to that, but it's an artificial boundary that doesn't actually pertain to flying ability. It's like having to learn to use a Dvorak layout before you let anyone code: learning Dvorak probably won't make you a better coder, it'll simply make learning to code a more difficult process. Likewise, the complex controls that planes have doesn't make pilots better at flying, it simply makes learning to fly more difficult. So, while complicated controls might keep out lazy pilots, it won't keep out bad pilots (that's what the licensing requirements are for).

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton