Slashdot Mirror


Fuel 3-D Claims to be a High-Res, Point and Shoot 3-D Scanner (Video)

The Fuel 3-D website has a blurb that says, "The world’s first handheld point-and-shoot, full color 3D scanner. Our planned list price is $1500 but by placing your advanced order now you pay only $1,250. Fire up your creativity!" We've thought about getting a 3-D scanner ever since we first messed with a 3-D printer, but we've thought more about something in the sub-$300 price range than in $1000+ territory. But that's just us. There is no doubt a healthy market for 3-D scanners to use in commercial applications where $1250 (or even $1500) is hardly worth noticing. Ah, well. Maybe we need to look at the The DAVID website which describes their device as an "Incredibly Low-Cost 3D Scanner for Everyone!" Their 3-D starter kit is only $529 from a randomly-selected U.S. reseller, which isn't too bad compared to the alternatives. But waiting for prices in this market niche to come down is another possibility, and it's one a whole lot of individuals -- including us -- and smaller companies will probably choose. (Alternate Video Link)

5 of 25 comments (clear)

  1. Can't have researched competitors much by smart_ass · · Score: 4, Informative

    we are not aware of any of these handheld systems that collect color data in addition to 3D geometry.

    http://www.creaform3d.com/en/t...

    http://www.artec3d.com/hardwar...

    http://www.vorum.com/english/p...

    I am sure there are others.
    Having used all three of the above linked devices, the key is in the software. The hardware is but a small piece of the puzzle.

    --
    Ouch ... did I just say that.
    1. Re:Can't have researched competitors much by Alef · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, calling their accuracy, by which they mean noise level on a perfectly flat surface, of 0,3 mm on a 35 cm (diagonal) field of view "extremely high resolution" is quite a stretch. High compared to other cheap scanners, possibly, but at least an order of magnitude worse than industrial scanners of similar format.

      I think it is an interesting concept to combine photometric measurements with geometric stereo in a single handheld unit, trying to get the best of both worlds, so to speak. But it certainly feels like they are overselling it.

    2. Re:Can't have researched competitors much by Alef · · Score: 2

      After having read some on their website, I get the sense that the primary novelty of Fuel3D is not the technology, but who they are marketing it towards. There are plenty of scanners, like the ones you mention, that have equal or better performance characteristics, but they pretty much always seem to be marketed towards either medical applications or manufacturing industries. Fuel3D, on the other hand, have the slogan "Fire up your creativity", visit Maker Faire, and so on. I imagine they hope to break into an emerging market segment before the other guys catch up.

  2. Re:$529? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Informative

    Buy it straight from DAVID and it comes with the software

    $529USD is actually a pretty good deal for the kit, considering that the software alone retails for around $360.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. What does the back look like? by mspohr · · Score: 2

    OK. I know nothing about 3D scanners but the subject of TFA and the others mentioned here all seem to be just stereo image capture. These might be useful for something but certainly not for duplicating the object in a 3D printer.
    To me, real 3D captures an object from all sides... a 360 degree sphere. These 3D cameras just capture one side view and try to calculate depth of that side from stereopsis.
    So... beyond making slides for my View-Master, what good it this?
    http://www.fisher-price.com/en...

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?