Slashdot Mirror
Chicago Robber Caught By Facial Recognition Sentenced To 22 Years
mpicpp (3454017) writes with this excerpt from Ars: "The first man to be arrested in Chicago based on facial recognition analysis was sentenced last week to 22 years in prison for armed robbery. ... In February 2013, Pierre Martin robbed a man at gunpoint while on a Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) train. After taking the man's phone, Martin jumped off the train. However, his image was captured by CTA surveillance cameras and was then compared to the Chicago Police Department's database of 4.5 million criminal booking images. Martin, who already had priors, had a mugshot in the database. He was later positively identified by witnesses. At trial, Martin also admitted to committing a similar robbery also on the Pink Line in January 2013—his face was captured during both robberies."
Shoulda just hacked the Chicago camera system with his phone.
This is nothing more than the type of fingerprint matching that's been going on for many decades. It just puts a name to a person after the fact. Now on the other hand, if he was actively recognized via facial recognition as he was out and about in public and then apprehended, well that would be a different story.
Better known as 318230.
Chicago Robber Identified By Facial Recognition Sentenced To 22 Years
Caught would imply that he was walking down the street and facial recognition directed authorities to him. That did not happen.
No Dude, poor life choises put you behind bars, the best years of your life down the tubes for a smartphone. This is a perfect example of how stupid is a action verb, not a state of being.
Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
Sounds to me like this was used as an investigative lead that helped them find other evidence, rather than as the principal evidence presented in court. This really isn't different than a police officer viewing the recording to see the offender's face, then going through books of mugshots to find the face, then investigating those people that the officer thinks might be the offender. This is simply the computer taking the image that the police officer identified and searching those "books" for close matches, then the police looking at the MO of the crime as compared to the MO of the person previously arrested, and investigating ones that have the most commonality first.
In this case they identified a suspect, the suspect apparently had offended in this same way before, and the suspect was tried and convicted. This doesn't seem to violate any new privacy considerations- the recordings being collected themselves are nothing new, and the mugshot database isn't either. Simply making the comparison itself doesn't add any new fuel to the fire of personal liberty complaints or of violation of privacy.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Just saying.
All this will do is put stupid people in jail, while high-stealing bank execs walk the streets free.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Maybe he deserved this, sounds like it.
But it doesn't justify the mass surveillance being put in all over our public spaces. It can't even be justified on the cost, but far worse is the erosion of your freedom to go about your business without being tracked and monitored permanently. It might catch the odd transgressor, but that is not an acceptable enough reason to piss away all our privacy.
Oh but you have nothing to hide, so what? Well, it was Joseph Goebbels who first made that pithy remark about having nothing to fear, and look where that ended up - many perfectly innocent people had everything to fear.
The only reasonable response to mass CCTV is for everyone to wear a balaclava. Once the system is rendered useless, they might reconsider spending taxpayer's money on it. And it sends a strong message that we simply don't want to be tracked, even if we are not criminals.
Crime is no longer a career choice.
Armed robbery of people on a train haven't been a profitable profession for at least 150 years :) :)
And I'm basing that fact that it ever as profitable on movies
Crime has long been the employment of quite a few members of society but now they will be caught.
s/employment/desperate measure/
By the way, criminals being caught is not a new thing... close to 1 percent of the prison service eligible US population is behind bars.
Wearing a mask is illegal in many states unless for medical reasons or weather.
Your own source seems to disagree with you. According to it, about half of the states blacklist specific, prohibited activities, but otherwise allow masks for anything else, while the other half whitelist a broad set of permitted activities that hit most of the common cases, but otherwise disallow masks.
Among those that blacklist activities, the lists are pretty much all the same: no wearing masks to conceal your identity while engaging in crime (i.e. it's one more charge they can add on top), no wearing masks to intimidate or harass people entitled to equal protection under the law (i.e. an anti-KKK clause that keeps them from wearing their hoods in public), and don't obstruct police officers. Among those that whitelist activities, they almost all carve out permitted exceptions for holidays, theatrical productions, Mardi gras, and the like, in addition to masks worn for work, health, weather, or religious reasons.
If you wanted to do something like have everyone wear Guy Fawkes masks at a protest or demonstration, the only place you probably wouldn't be allowed to do it would be Washington D.C., since they specifically prohibit wearing masks at a demonstration (which seems like a First Amendment issue to me, but the Bill of Rights hasn't gotten in the way of D.C. enacting all sorts of draconian laws :-/).
That isn't how lineups are done in real life. Real police work bears no resemblance whatsoever to the routine felonies committed by character of cop shows.
Sometimes TSA catches people that forget to leave their guns at home but never have they caught terrorists.
Who forgets where their firearm is? I have a concealed carry license. Multiple ones in fact, the combination is good in 30-35 States. I can tell you at any moment exactly where all of my firearms are and what condition (loaded, unloaded, last time they were oiled, etc.) they're in. I have precious little sympathy for someone that "forgets" where their firearm is. The very least that should happen to them is they lose their concealed carry licenses, because they're clearly too fucking stupid to carry a deadly weapon in the public space. Revoke their drivers licenses too, while we're at it, because I'll bet you $10,000 they're the same idiots who text and drive.
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
Facial recognition is known to produce false positives. Identification of suspects by witnesses is well known to be notoriously unreliable and easily influenced by the interrogator. All I can hope is that this method will not be used to convict without corroborating evidence.
Everything in the world is a double-edged sword. Another example is DNA evidence.
For over a century, fingerprints have been the gold standard by which suspects were positively identified. Today, the reliability and uniqueness of an individual's fingerprints has been called into question. The one saving grace when a positive match can be found is that it is very difficult to falsify fingerprints found on a weapon or at the scene of a crime.
Ah, but DNA is another matter altogether. We are being taught that individuals matched via DNA evidence leaves very little doubt, is it 1 in 7 Million, that the DNA found on the scene is that of the perpetrator. But what if the DNA is planted on the scene to frame an innocent patsy? Leaving a hair or blood sample is very easy to do. Couple that with the government and police compiling DNA databases of the citizenry and an entire new danger emerges.
Every time there is a political protest or, the Occupy Wall Street movement is a good example -- what was ubiquitous at all those sites? Cameras recording facial metrics of those involved. Now I suspect the US government has a massive database of photographs processed to extract the necessary metrics to identify other photographs of the same person. False positives could create mayhem in a system where too many are already falsely convicted of crimes.
No sir, I don't like it.