Slashdot Mirror


First Phone Out of Microsoft-Nokia -- and It's an Android

An anonymous reader writes BBC reports that the first phone resulting from the Microsoft-Nokia merger has been announced: the Nokia X2. And foiling everybody's ability to guess what OS it would run on, the answer is Android. But this being Microsoft, do expect some embrace-and-extend — the user interface is similar to the Windows phone. And it is being offered as a way to hook users into its cloud-based services, several of which come pre-installed as apps. Is this the first Linux product being offered by Microsoft? Can we upgrade Microsoft's social rating from CCC to CCC+?

26 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Use the best tool for the job.

    1. Re:So what? by clarkn0va · · Score: 2

      Use the best tool for the job.

      What are the chances, based on past performance, that the best tool for the job is a phone from Microsoft? On a platform where they're complete virgins?

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    2. Re:So what? by clarkn0va · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think I can fault MS/Nokia for going with the winner, but I might question the user that seeks his Android fix from this company. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    3. Re:So what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Android already have ~80% of the market, this move seems to destroy one of the only competitors left ... empirically, that kind of monopoly has historically never been a good thing in the software industry.

      Being able to grab the source and play with it, including doing whatever you wish without license fees kind of takes the sting out.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:So what? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Due to a fundamentally much better design architecture, Linux and to some degree Android either don't or can't suffer with many of the problems Windows has in the first place. Those that do happen also get fixed much quicker due to a much more active developer base.

      You know back in the day this was sort of true. Throw up a server on Linux and it just worked, do the same on Windows and it worked for a little while until it didn't. It was not that code quality or general architecture was drastically different it was simply unix fork()s worker processes in separate memory spaces which disappear when finished... On the flipside windows lacking fork() and associated culture relied heavily on thread pools and or async hence effects of same programming flaws tended to accumulate to global effect vs being cleared automatically upon forked process exit...but enough of the past.

      Today windows phone architecturally is quite good with security advantages over Android in form of choosers to facilitate access to global data and resources.

      More specifically I can't consider Android secure when apps are readily available to root your phone and crack boot loaders by exploiting vulnerabilities that persist for years. Even if patches exist upstream vendors are too lazy, clueless or otherwise wanting of device replacement revenue to push them out to their customers.

      Meanwhile frustratingly no root exploits are publically known to exist for WP8 nokia.

      Microsoft has made plenty of stupid decisions yet they are hardly alone.. if you ask me all the major smartphone OS vendors are wholly unworthy of any praise. They all universally and intentionally place users under unnecessary risk for benefit of themselves, app vendors and carriers.

      I would most likely own a Microsoft phone today if the platform was more like normal windows (pre 8), windows mobile or unfucked android where users actually have control over their devices and software environment which were not constantly engaged in copying everything to vendor servers... for the love of everything holy it is not even possible to maintain a local contact database in WP8.

      As it is now I refuse to support morally bankrupt visions of computing where privacy is continuously frivolously violated and all execution centrally curated. WP and iPhone both operate under walled gardens. Android is at least for the most part open source where the many people who give a shit are able to work to provide viable solutions to counter crap from Google (Of Ap Ops was a mistake fame) and app vendors.

    5. Re:So what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      So don't grab those parts. Idiot.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:So what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Yes, and maybe you should ask Amazon about that.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:So what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Strike three. Now put on your standard issue Apple duncecap and go sit in the corner.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are an idiot. All Android devices can access and use apps from the Amazon store.

      It's funny how you go around shilling for Apple and condemning Android when it's extremely clear that you haven't even used an Android device to be able to make any judgements. You are exactly the unthinking, prejudiced type of customer Apple enjoys raping.

    9. Re: So what? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Zune? Does that count?

      Most of the time, but on leap years there's an entire day when it can't count or do anything else.

  2. It's a trap! by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Buying an android phone from Microsoft? Isn't that a little like buying a firearm from the Brady Campaign?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  3. Seems like a 180 from their previous views by timrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can remember just a couple of months ago, when Microsoft hosted a tournament for Killer Instinct on the Xbox One. There was a bit of an uproar from the competitors and from the various streaming websites covering the event because Microsoft banned non-Windows phones at the competition venue (and, of course, gave out Windows phones to all of the competitors so they could have product placement on the streaming sites). As far as I know, that ban was never lifted and the tournament went on that way.

    The idea that MS would then turn around and release an Android phone after pushing their Windows phones that hard seems like a complete turnaround.

    1. Re:Seems like a 180 from their previous views by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems more likely that Microsoft is so large that parts of the company are on different wavelengths and act inconsistently with one and other. Also, no one brings a phone from conception to market in a few months. This was probably something in the pipeline from before Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia. Microsoft could have axed it (and under Ballmer they probably would have) but I think they've realized that doing things like that for purely ideological reasons is poor business sense and that while they might have been able to get away with it in the past, the times have changed. Given that they recently made Windows Phone free for manufacturers (at least certain ones anyway) it's not like they're potentially losing out on revenue either.

    2. Re:Seems like a 180 from their previous views by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How bad their embedded OS is? When was the last time you used a windows phone, back in the Windows Mobile 2003 days? Windows phone is actually a very nice OS. The only real problem with it is traction, or lack thereof. If it actually had enough market penetration to attract developers to make the kind of apps to build marketshare (yeah, vicious circle) then it would be a great phone OS. I've used all 3 major mobile platforms. If I could have the kind of apps I wanted in the MS app store, I'd be on windows phone right now,

      There may be some truth to that. I carried a Windows Mobile 6 device for awhile (company issued phone) and the experience was so bad (the phone won't ring because the audio device "has encountered an error and will now close"? Really??) that I vowed never to touch another Microsoft-embedded device if I could possible avoid it.

      So even in the (unlikely, sorry) event that Windows Phone 8 is super fantabulous, I just couldn't make myself take a chance on it. Fool me once etc etc.

      (Speaking as a very happy Windows 7 user on the desktop. Best product Microsoft ever made, in my opinion.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  4. Re:Social Rating? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Is this something from Marxist dictionary, comrades?

    Nearly, but try the next volume to the left on your shelf, the Marketing dictionary.

  5. Re:Microsoft has been selling Linux for years by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wouldn't say MS is a "major" kernel contributor. They've submitted a number of patches so that their Hyper-V VM so that Linux servers can run Windows in VM. But even with contributions they ranked in 2012 as #17. I don't see them actually contributing anything more than that.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  6. Is it because Windows is to slow on the low end by TheSunborn · · Score: 2

    Is it because Windows is to slow on the low end hardware that they need to offer an Android phone?

    The phone don't have access to Play store, so it can't be due to the many Android Apps they are doing it.
     

    1. Re:Is it because Windows is to slow on the low end by AMDinator · · Score: 2

      Windows Phone is developed against low-end hardware to ensure that it runs well on it. I've played with a Lumia 520 and found it to be more than fast enough.

      The 520 sells new for less than $70 off contract. It's definitely "low end".

  7. Uh, Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use the best tool for the job.

    Their standard strategy is actually to create something that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the best tool for the job.

    I fully expect that Microsoft's contribution to the Android ecosystem will end up like Ebola's contribution to human society.

    Hopefully the carnage will remain confined to few localities and not spread significantly.

  8. various by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can we upgrade Microsoft's social rating from CCC to CCC+?

    For the benefit of those, such as myself, who did not get the reference, CCC is a low bond credit rating.

    Also, a couple of things to keep in mind here about the history of MS corporate strategy. First, MS has a record of adopting (e. g. Kerberos) or imposing (e.g. OpenXML) open standards for the purpose of corrupting or abusing those standards. A record of unscrupulous behavior breeds distrust and it would be reasonable to suspect that MS could have something similar on mind for the Android platform. Good summary of the Kerberos episode here:

    In November 1998 an internal memo leaked out of Microsoft which clearly stated that Open Source software not only performs and scales much better than Microsoft Products (it discussed especially the quality and availability of Linux), but also proposed that Microsoft attack these superior products by "de-commoditizing protocols". In other words, when faced with a superior competitor, Microsoft's preferred approach is to corrupt global standards and to introduce proprietary protocols that bind the user to the Microsoft environment.

    Don't believe me; see for yourself - read the Halloween documents, made available by Eric S. Raymond. Incidentally, Microsoft has acknowledged the authenticity of these documents and actually responded to them. It's interesting reading. Very.

    A good example of this policy in action (apart from the HTML and Java deviations described above) is Microsoft's attempt to appropriate the Kerberos protocol. Kerberos is an authentication protocol developed by MIT, distributed as Open Source software. Microsoft added an "innovative improvement" to Kerberos, by misusing a reserved field to specify whether or not an NT machine was allowed to authenticate another Kerberos system, rendering this corrupted version of Kerberos incompatible with Open Source versions in the process. (The misuse of a reserved field, or any field for that matter, is of course a gross violation of protocol standards.) Then Microsoft went on to state that they had "created" an "improved version of Kerberos", called the result their own intellectual property, and threatened to sue anyone who would dare to put it in their software, including Kerberos' inventor MIT. Only the global uproar that followed caused Microsoft to reconsider this nonsense.

    Secondly, and more innocuously, someone at MS might have wised up and realized that profits from their Android patent licensing would be better than losses from another round of failed MS OS phone investment.

  9. They're a business ... by MacTO · · Score: 2

    and their goal is to make money. Given the lack of popularity of Microsoft's mobile platform, it makes far more sense to ship Android devices with their products layered on top than it does to ship a fully Microsoft phone that will likely have limited uptake.

  10. Re:Microsoft has been selling Linux for years by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the most recent contributions, MS doesn't even show up. So MS only contributed enough to Linux to make sure that their product would work. I still don't consider that a major contribution.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. Not Linux, XENIX !!!! by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This phone isn't running true Android, it's a port of Android, but using Xenix as the base OS.

    For those of you on Slashdot who are not old farts like myself, google "Xenix" to find out what it is. It's part of Microsoft's "Embrace and Extend" policy to use something they own to create a whole new version of an existing popular phone/tablet OS....

    And if anyone believe what I'm saying, even for a second, you need to find a BBS for the less naive....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Not Linux, XENIX !!!! by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      And instead of Java apps they use GW Basic...

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. Re:Microsoft has been selling Linux for years by bmajik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft has a long and interesting Linux/FOSS history.

    I remember in the late 90s, Microsoft actually released a Front Page Server Extensions module for Apache on Linux, so people using FP could publish sites to Linux servers.

    During the early 2000s, MS shipped a bunch of GPL'd stuff via the Interix/SFU product.

    Currently, System Center (enterprise management tool) can also monitor and manage Linux machines along side windows (and Mac) machines.

    As noted elsewhere, Microsoft has made Linux a 1st class scenario for Hyper-V on-premise and Azure hosted uses.

    Microsoft has opened some its internal projects to the external community, with acceptable licenses, and Microsoft has also contributed to existing FOSS projects where it has made sense. Internally, "should we use existing FOSS" or "should we open source this?" are questions that are coming up now where in the past, they never did, and asking them would get you some funny looks.

    In the future, you're going to see Microsoft doing a better job of meeting customers in mixed/heterogenous settings. We've got a new CEO that has provided this guidance to the entire company. The market changes have certainly become too large to ignore, but the bottom line is that we're adapting.

    On the business side, getting some of a customer's business is better than getting none of their business.

    As always, we partner with everybody and we compete against everybody. For example, I sit in a building where most of the developers here work on Microsoft's own ERP products, yet I worked on features that let Visual Studio talk to SAP.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  13. Re:creaky old farts may remember... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 2

    I don't feel creaky. I don't want to go on the cart.

    --
    We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.