Slashdot Mirror


Hospitals Begin Data-Mining Patients

schwit1 (797399) sends word of a new and exciting use for all of the data various entities are collecting about you. From the article: You may soon get a call from your doctor if you've let your gym membership lapse, made a habit of ordering out for pizza or begin shopping at plus-sized stores. That's because some hospitals are starting to use detailed consumer data to create profiles on current and potential patients to identify those most likely to get sick, so the hospitals can intervene before they do. Acxiom Corp. (ACXM) and LexisNexis are two of the largest data brokers who collect such information on individuals. They say their data are supposed to be used only for marketing, not for medical purposes or to be included in medical records. While both sell to health insurers, they said it's to help those companies offer better services to members.

6 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't give warm fuzzies by robstout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm alright with my doctor having this information, in theory, but I really don't trust the insurance companies with this. "So, I see that you like taco bell. We're raising your rates."

    1. Re:Doesn't give warm fuzzies by timrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What frightens me is the idea that they could get the wrong information and give that to my doctor or insurance company. For instance, a couple of weeks ago, my car broke down. While it was in the shop, I was getting a ride to work with a co-worker. They stopped at Dunkin' Donuts every morning and got a coffee and a donut, and I would usually pay for it (along with their gas) in exchange for giving me a ride. This means my purchase history would show me buying a coffee and a donut every morning for around five days, even though I didn't actually consume either of them.

      With a system like this in place, I'm sure my insurance company would see that and go "He's buying donuts, raise the premiums!" even though the donut I'm not consuming doesn't really effect me in any way.

    2. Re:Doesn't give warm fuzzies by plopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Couple that with "eventually consistent" databases and you have a recipe for disaster.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Doesn't give warm fuzzies by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One step further; You're with a friend and stop at a convenience store, he asks you to get a pack of smokes. Your insurance states you're a non-smoker. They use this data to refuse a claim in the future.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  2. Donut want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks a lot autocorrect. Now my insurance premiums are going up.

  3. Re:Time to Legislate Data Mining by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can't allow for consent at all, if you do, every contract will simply require your consent in order for service to be rendered.

    The only way you stop data mining is to make it illegal, no exceptions. Its really no different than outlawing slavery. You can't allow someone to sign away their privacy or bodies to slavery otherwise they'll be duped, tricked or forced into a situation where they have to sign away those rights even if they don't want to.

    Want a bank loan? All banks will require you to allow them to mine your data or no loan, so you don't actually have a choice if you want a loan. But it'll just be extended to everything. Cell phone companies already do it. Power companies will start, and they'll add that you have to allow ANY and ALL of their affiliates to mine you as well ... and then everyone will become an affiliate of the power company.

    Nope, the only solution is to 100% outlaw data mining, which just isn't going to happen because the general public is basically too ignorant of the issue to care.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager