Slashdot Mirror


MP Says 'Failed' Piracy Warnings Should Escalate To Fines & Jail

An anonymous reader writes with news that, not long after UK ISPs agreed to send piracy notices (Voluntary Copyright Alerts Program), thoughts have already turned toward adding criminal penalties. From the article: Prime Minister David Cameron's IP advisor believes that the carrot needs to be backed up by a stick. In a report published yesterday largely detailing the "Follow the Money" approach to dealing with pirate sites, Mike Weatherley MP says now is the time to think about VCAP’s potential failure. "The Voluntary Copyright Alert Programme (VCAP) is welcomed and will be a good step forward once it is hopefully in operation in 2015, although it is primarily an education tool," Weatherley says. ... "Warnings and fines are obvious first steps, with Internet access blocking and custodial sentencing for persistent and damaging infringers not to be ruled out in my opinion." These suggestions aren't new, but this is the second time in a matter of months that the Prime Minister's closest advisor on IP matters has spoken publicly about the possibility of putting persistent file-sharers in jail.

10 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. One rule for the plebes another for the politician by RichMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When politicians running for election start getting in real trouble for stealing songs and images to use in their promotional material then they can start to think about applying this to the little people.

  2. False Warnings? by DERoss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about a fine and prison for making a false complaint or warning about a copyright violation?

    1. Re:False Warnings? by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they could find a way to imprison a corpoation, I'd immigrate to the UK tomorrow!

      That's easy if you think about it: imprison the board of directors whenever there is sufficient malfeasance to warrant such a punishment. They hold shared responsibility for the company's actions (and benefits thereof), so let them share the consequences.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  3. Totally clueless by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, that guy illegally downloaded a movie that's worth 20$ on DVD.

    Let's put him in jail, costing the government thousands of dollars per year.

    1. Re:Totally clueless by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm in security. And once security costs more than the asset you're trying to protect, it's time to stop protecting the asset. If your insurance costs more than the asset it insures, wouldn't you cancel it immediately?

      And the cost for protecting copyright has outdone the damage done by infringement a long, long time ago.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. We keep getting closer to a dystopia by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prosecutor,"Yah, you're going to jail for downloading some crappy movie."

    You,"But I never downloaded that movie."

    Prosecutor,"Lets hear your defense."

    You,"I run a free wifi spot for people who want to check the net when they're out and about."

    Prosecutor,"You should have never said that fellow. You're responsible for what other people do on your router. So lets see what other criminal activities they did before we sentence you to just a couple years of jail."

    There's an alternative dialogue that involves a guy who clicks on links he finds on Twitter and Facebook and doesn't realize he watched copyrighted material.

  5. Aww, I read that wrong by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a moment it sounded like asshats sending out frivolous takedown notices via carpet bombing would end up in jail.

    Should've known that adding sanity to the mix would be asking too much.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Even better idea: by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's have Parliament put a law into place that warns him whenever he incorporates someone else's ideas and philosophies in his speeches, and after the third time, put him in jail.

    After all, can't have him "pirating" other peoples' intellectual property, now can we?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Even better idea: by kbrannen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about we follow the money for him to see if he's getting "contributions" to say this. Perhaps that's why he's using other's ideas.

    2. Re:Even better idea: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about we follow the money for him to see if he's getting "contributions" to say this. Perhaps that's why he's using other's ideas.

      Remember, it's not bribery, it's a licensing fee.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .