Slashdot Mirror


Germany Scores First: Ends Verizon Contract Over NSA Concerns

schwit1 (797399) writes with word that, after revelations that Verizon assisted the NSA in its massive surveillance program, Germany is cutting ties with Verizon as their infrastructure provider. From the article: The Interior Ministry says it will let its current contract for Internet services with the New York-based company expire in 2015. The announcement comes after reports this week that Verizon and British company Colt provide Internet services to the German parliament and other official entities. ... Ministry spokesman Tobias Plate said Thursday that Germany wants to ensure it has full control over highly sensitive government communications networks.

206 comments

  1. Now it's time for New York to nut up! by killfixx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    New York and New Jersey.

    Verizon has been fucking them for years...hard!

    Never thought I'd feel bad for people from Jersey...

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    1. Re:Now it's time for New York to nut up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You god damn bennies can fuck right off.

    2. Re:Now it's time for New York to nut up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York and New Jersey.

      Verizon has been fucking them for years...hard!

      Never thought I'd feel bad for people from Jersey...

      Keep your corruption straight already. Fucking over citizens/customers financially is a completely different kind of reaming than Federal pound-me-in-the-ass spying. This should be obvious.

    3. Re:Now it's time for New York to nut up! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      From all sane people the world over: Go fuck yourself.

    4. Re:Now it's time for New York to nut up! by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Sane people all over the world eh? That's about 10 people tops so they are definitely a minority. If you are upset about the international intelligence operations please keep in mind that spying on foreign competitors and adversaries is a time honored tradition going back to the time of the Pharaohs. It's a time honored rule that countries have no friends they only have interests. And thankfully US interests in other countries are finally taking a backseat to it's own domestic interests. The narrow minded individuals complaining about US foreign intelligence operations should try pulling their heads out of their asses for a few minutes and put any arguments they have in context and that context includes acknowledging that the US does not operate in a vacuum and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights are not international in scope and while some of the domestic ones have taken a beating they are still in place and are being practiced everyday of the week. If you think international espionage should be banned from existence then go get Russia, China, and pretty much every other country on the planet to eliminate all their activities and then you can berate the US if they don't jump on the happy train. Until that magical day arrives you will just need to persevere and stoically face the mighty winds of injustice and unfairness blowing around the world. There are support groups that can help you through times such as these so remember you are not alone!

  2. Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody wants anything communications-related from the U.S.A. anymore.

    1. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, do a traceroute to slashdot or GTFO.

    2. Re:Are you getting it yet? by gatkinso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What kind of fools would trust their internal government communications to a foreign company in the first place?

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dude, do a traceroute to slashdot or GTFO.

      Well I live in Canada, the only time my ISP(teksavvy) routes to the US now is if I'm requesting a US based address. Not even traffic going to europe or asia is routed through the US.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones who get money from that company.

    5. Re:Are you getting it yet? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      One can only assume that they have a similar model of corruption as that used by the US political system when determining large contract suppliers.

    6. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not saying everyone should only get in house communications equipment.
      But the government should really consider it.
      The Nazis didn't outsource the creation of enigma to the Americans for a good reason.

    7. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I was shocked to read that. I could see some small, poor country just not having the resources to run a decent network and outsourcing it to a big private company. But Germany? Come on.

    8. Re:Are you getting it yet? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Nazis didn't outsource the creation of enigma to the Americans for a good reason.

      Because Americans are bad at math?

    9. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's not saying everyone should only get in house communications equipment.
      But the government should really consider it.
      The Nazis didn't outsource the creation of enigma to the Americans for a good reason.

      Naw, but they did source the equipment they used to select people for a trip to the concentration camps from IBM.

    10. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not saying everyone should only get in house communications equipment.
      But the government should really consider it.
      The Nazis didn't outsource the creation of enigma to the Americans for a good reason.

      Even the USA uses communications equipment "Proudly made in the USA" from components "Proudly made in China".

    11. Re:Are you getting it yet? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germany probably thought that the US were their allies . . .

      . . . fools, indeed! The US doesn't have any allies any more; just enemies. Or, at least they treat everyone as enemies.

      Hell, even the citizens of the US are treated as enemies by their own government . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    12. Re:Are you getting it yet? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Well, if you've already trusted your national defence, university education, ideological belief system, and popular cultural to the homeland of said foreign company, entrusting your national telecoms infrastructure is a relatively small step.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    13. Re:Are you getting it yet? by MONSTER_RANCHER · · Score: 0

      Unfortunate backlash, and when it comes down to it V has no say in it at all.

    14. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, any "fools" who believed in the internet, globalization, trade and little things like the WTO.

      Sure, you look like a genius now, post-Snowdon. Before that you either believed something different, or you were a paranoid freak, or you were an NSA insider, who never, EVER talked about this stuff in public. Most importantly you weren't the person who was the decision maker to contract with Verizon. Those people are often driven by cost first and everything else, including security, somewhere down the list.

      And if you think that contracting to a domestic company, say Deutsche Telecom, well the vast majority of those multinationals have extensive international operations and are merely headquartered somewhere. Yeah they might have started out exclusively German but those days are long over. So "domestic outsourcing" isn't exactly a panacea.

    15. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Sique · · Score: 2

      The government network contract was up for bidding, and Verizon won. It's as easy as that. And now, the German government found out that Verizon didn't disclose some very important information in the contract negotiations.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    16. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, you should probably traceroute a few more things before making that claim. Teksavvy buys a lot of bandwidth from the US: http://fixedorbit.com/AS/5/AS5645.htm
      Many routes to europe or asia will take US carriers unfortunately.

    17. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just because none of the routers on the traceroute is in the US, doesn't mean the routing doesn't go THROUGH the US.
      http://cablemap.info/

    18. Re:Are you getting it yet? by goodmanj · · Score: 0

      "US doesn't have any allies any more; just enemies"

      That's not true! We have lots of allies. "Ally" means "someone we give $billions of military aid to despite the fact that they hate us and murder their own citizens", right?

    19. Re: Are you getting it yet? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Or you, you know, saw the film Enemy of the State 16 years ago and knew even then it wasn't far off the mark.

    20. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Naw, but they did source the equipment they used to select people for a trip to the concentration camps from IBM.

      AKA typewriters.

    21. Re:Are you getting it yet? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      No... it means that the people running the equipment produced by AMD, Apple, Cisco, Dell, Google, HP, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Sun are from the same country as you.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    22. Re:Are you getting it yet? by MrVictor · · Score: 1

      Greedy, globalist capitalists?

    23. Re: Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And when the rest of the planet cuts all ties to American companies ( thereby impacting their profits ) due to the mistrust the NSA has sown, the gloves will come off and FINALLY something might get done about it

      After all, we all know our Congress critters votes typically go to the companies who pad their election campaign the most. The almighty dollar tends to trump everything.

      That you have to impact corporate profits to make it happen shows how sad things truly are. :/

    24. Re:Are you getting it yet? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FWIW I'm *still* a paranoid freak. I don't believe that ANY centralization of power under the control of humans can be trusted. People are corruptible, and worse, some among them are psychotically driven to seek positions of power. At some point any position of power will fall under the control of one of them, and his (these characters are extremely predominately male) first act will be to extend his current power, and his second will be to increase his immunity to repercussions for his illegal, or at least immoral, actions.

      Please note that this doesn't mean I think there is any reasonable way to eliminate such concentrations of power. What it means is that I think it should be made as difficult as possible to reach such a position by political maneuvering and scheming. To this end sometimes I suggest that the holder of such a position should be selected by lottery among those technically qualified. This will produce an inefficient government, as those selected would be less adept at diplomatic negotiations and compromise. OTOH, look at the current congress, and contemplate whether it could do worse. I am bothered by isolated positions of power such as the POTUS, but my real feeling is that they should be devolved into purely symbolic offices, and the real power should vest in some small committee, selected, as suggested above, by lottery....and not from any small pool of candidates.

      OTOH, I can see the value of voting, if not of plurality wins voting. So I am also moderately supportive of Instant Runoff Voting or Condorcet Voting. They would clearly be an improvement over the current system, though they would increase the problem of information overload at election time.

      As for Germany...I suspect that their motives are basically economic, but this time it's causing them to make the correct decision. They should not trust a foreign country with their governmental communications.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    25. Re:Are you getting it yet? by mirix · · Score: 1

      "tabulating machines". they did very simple computations. punched card based.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    26. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Bartles · · Score: 2

      No, actually some American schools are bad at teaching math. We still have plenty of math geniuses who were home schooled or managed to escape the public system.

    27. Re:Are you getting it yet? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      huh? Germany ends contract with US company like Russia wants to make their own chips instead of buying from US. You mean like uh you know as like um the stuff NSA did is ruining US business in other countries? Golly, that's an astonishing concept.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    28. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the white population of the US has European ancestry, so there's that...

    29. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good at providing friendly fire though.

      Not sure why they call it 'friendly' fire. Definitely doesn't feel friendly if you're on the receiving end.

    30. Re: Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is nothing wrong with what the NSA does. Remember national secuity trumps all.

    31. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, now, dear Citizen Enemy, please remain calm, stay in line and you will get your turn to post a comment on the internet as soon as one of our Censor Officers is free.

    32. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, the Department for Work and Pensions (administers most social security benefits)... recently moved to virtualise all its desktops... and they all run in data centres in Colorado.

      Thanks. Not only do British tax payers get ripped off by fucking huge US IT suppliers (used car salesmen and cowboys)... but the US government gets to hoover up the vast quanties of information the DWP holds on UK citizens.

    33. Re: Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they did. The Enigma was invented by a Dutch. It was advertised as a business tool prior to WW2 and available to everyone. It was then seized with the beginning of the war and modified based on the civilian machine.

    34. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That did not help much in the case of Verizon.... The german Verizon was forced by US goverment.

    35. Re:Are you getting it yet? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      1. Sexist for saying men are evil. 2. Racist for criticizing Obama. So which are you, right or left? You can't be both.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    36. Re:Are you getting it yet? by johanw · · Score: 1

      Yes, we exported our religious zealots and criminals to the US. Clear example of GIGO.

    37. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of fools would trust their internal government communications to a foreign company in the first place?

      You're kidding, right? This whole business of trusting people you have no business trusting is the foundation of modern IT, according to fancy management magazines. See: the whole "cloud computing" management fad where you can

      - Run your mission critical things on equipment the configuration and location of which are unknown to you
      - Trust your mission critical proprietary data to companies known to be doing business with the NSA (or your competitors)
      - Pay monthly or hourly or whatever for stuff such that after 3 months you could have bought whatever it is six times over

      All so we can enable middle managers with credit cards to make massively important technology decisions without actually having to consult with anybody who knows what they're talking about because we all know that IT is a big waste of time, kind of like subjecting managers' ideas to actual critical review is. Of course, when this house of cards falls the tech people who were uninvolved in the first place will be the ones under the gun to fix it or else.

    38. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't allies. Those are just targets of US marketing campaigns.

    39. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good point. If Germany really wanted security they would develop their own Internet and not route anything at all, ever, to any outside network.

    40. Re:Are you getting it yet? by BForrester · · Score: 1

      Correct, and though you can pretend you don't know what they will be used for, if you sell military vehicles, punch-card tabulators, or cucumbers to the Nazis, you're still doing business with the Nazis.

    41. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    42. Re:Are you getting it yet? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      Yeh, like Beuw Bergdaul who was home schooled and never learned how to spell.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    43. Re: Are you getting it yet? by Sciath · · Score: 1

      It might trump Trump, but not all.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    44. Re:Are you getting it yet? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      WTF are you, AC spewing out of your hole?

      The Nazis didn't outsource the creation of Enigma to the Americans. They brought it from the Poles (who had already broken it and given the keys to the British). Or something like that.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    45. Re:Are you getting it yet? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      you say that as if it were OTS equipment in the 1930's. This was customized at Hitler's request by IBM -- https://www.jewishvirtuallibra...

    46. Re: Are you getting it yet? by leenks · · Score: 1

      No, he was German - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.... Or were you thinking of this guy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

  3. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to show Verizon that its customers don't like their data NSLd out.

  4. Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA has ways around all the trite attempts to keep your privacy. Nothing will change unless we have a massive change in the powers-that-be.... and even then I only give it about a 5% chance.
     
    But hey, it doesn't really matter... The USA got to the World Cup!!!! Woohoo!!!!

    1. Re:Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, the rest of the world can't do much. It's pretty much up to you guys in the US to fix it.

      So make with the fixing already.

    2. Re:Doesn't really matter by Sciath · · Score: 1

      No balls in America. The land of the free is no longer applicable and the home of the brave is a joke.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
  5. "Nut up" doesn't mean what you think it means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a friendly alert, the phrase "nut up" does not mean what I think that you think that it means.

    It's slang for punching or otherwise hitting a man so hard in the scrotum that it's as if his testes (that is, his "nuts") permanently end up located over his penis (that is, they were previously "down" relative to the penis, but now they are "up").

    The phrase you're thinking of is "balls up". That term means to toughen up when facing an adversary. "Nut up" does sound similar, but it clearly has a very different meaning.

    1. Re:"Nut up" doesn't mean what you think it means. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on where you are from, where I hail from nut up and ball(s) up are synonymous.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:"Nut up" doesn't mean what you think it means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Balls up' means something totally different here in England. Here it's when a man forces one of his testicles into a fizzy drink bottle and walks around with the bottle hanging off of his genitals. Football and rugby players do it in their dressing rooms before and after games as a show of manliness. I don't really understand how it's manly but somehow it is to them.

      I think that the term 'man up' is what the GGP was looking for. It means to act like a man and fight for your rights.

    3. Re:"Nut up" doesn't mean what you think it means. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Go ask the IRA about their "nutting squad" . . . or . . . maybe it's a better idea not to . . .

      My first thought was, "Whose nut, youse guys?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:"Nut up" doesn't mean what you think it means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie. Will you do "tits up" next?

  6. Yes. by mojo-raisin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Snowden is truly a hero.

    This rocks.

    1. Re:Yes. by easyTree · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he's a traitor to his country's attempts to act dishonorably without widespread knowledge. Shame on him.

    2. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To whoever down modded the above comment, Whoooooooooosh! He was being sarcastic.

  7. Biting the hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... after revelations that Verizon assisted the NSA ...

    That would be biting the consumer that feeds you. American companies spend much time telling politicians what to think: Why didn't lobbyists make this an issue? I've posted the "nations of tomorrow" monologue (Network, 1976) on SlashDot a few times. But fascism needs traditional government because traditional government has the guns and jails. Which means that corporations which obviously have no fear of jails, can be facing an economic and possibly a literal gun barrel.

  8. How good are Verizon's Lobbyists? by jpschaaf · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Verizon's lobbying budget is big enough to bring about any changes... maybe AT&T will help out on this one to keep the same from happening to them in other countries?

    1. Re:How good are Verizon's Lobbyists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but Comcast is second as a company spending money on lobbyist, right behind a large defence contractor.

    2. Re:How good are Verizon's Lobbyists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not very.
      In other countries, lobbying is called bribing, which is illegal.

  9. Jersey deserves it. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    ...never forgiven them for blighting us with that abortion they called a "reality show".

    As for TFA, I'm kind of surprised that Germany's Interior Ministry hadn't been with Deutsche Telekom/T-Mobile all this time.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  10. How many of these will it take? by kolbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For their corporate lobbyists to actually get some movement on Capital Hill and attempt to undo this.

    1. Re:How many of these will it take? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I seriously don't think that's ever going to be on the cards. The question is how many of these does it take before someone allocates enough spin-budget to make this seem as though it's no longer a problem.

      "These are not the privacy-invading droids you are looking for..."

    2. Re:How many of these will it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Undo this? How can anyone ever trust anything coming out the US again? This can not be undone. Ever. The US is done.

    3. Re:How many of these will it take? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The move to white boxes and to a countries own domestic code mix has begun.
      The educational move away from junk US encryption and their tame academics standards has begun.
      The gov move away from junk US encryption and their tame standards setting bureaucrats has begun.
      The divestment from named US brands has begun - brands that might be connected to vast US pension funds that factored in ongoing vast international sales.
      A slight change in the way some US software brands are seen by the consumers is already be whispered about.
      What can the US gov or its brands do? The encryption is shared with 5+ other nations, their staff, ex staff, former staff have insights into the complex expensive US products.
      Nations are slowly understanding what they have been using for years and what junk telco standards and weak encryption means to their own national interests.
      The magic of a soothing word about the wonders of the US private sector, a deep generational respect for fully enforced US legal standards by a US political leader or local US embassy staff just sounds like a sales pitch.
      US products have to be considered in any and all bidding - your nation signed a treaty is not a good place to be demanding regional sales from.
      Our spies work well together, US brands given them global reach is not a good place to be demanding regional sales from.
      Expect to see new calls for domestic investment, jobs for skilled loyal local staff and their firms first and only.
      The real question is what any nations own domestic security services will do to in the face of the massive ongoing sale of their nations digital communications to 5+ other nations. Will a next generation of political leaders be so foolish as to give away their nations entire banking sector, trade negotiations, tech jobs, gov funded scientific output, gov databases and private sector data for free to 5+ other nations via tame foreign telcos products?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:How many of these will it take? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Everyone has a short memory. In a decade nobody will even think about this, and even next year it will be "O, yeah. That's true."

      There will continue to be some people who are concerned, but they were already concerned. Now they just have a bit of evidence to point to, if they can get anyone to listen.

      My suspicion is that this is really economic, and the contract will be awarded to some German contractor who is "good friends" with the right people.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:How many of these will it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This applies to literally every single country under the sun. Even if the hardware your ISP uses is made in the same country and assembled and setup by government employees, there can be moles. You just have to design your protocols and algorithms to assume the worst and be pleasantly surprised when nothing bad happens.

      The US is not done; Closed-source hardware and software is. For every Heartbleed, there are literally hundreds of MS-CHAP's. Oh, and not even just a few of the Microsoft vulnerabilities where caused by what looked like suspiciously naive implementations. MS-CHAP uses 'triple DES' but not in the way you'd expect. They apply DES to 3 separate bitstreams. Yes, you can effectively crack streams composed of every third byte using normal DES-breaking tools. In hindsight thanks to Snowden, there's no way that was an accident or misunderstanding. Seems they have a policy of barely increasing security in incremental improvements. Rather that is time-tiered marketing (forces you to buy each upgrade that they can easily release) or cooperation is anyone's guess.

  11. Verizon to stop buttfucking us in 2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think you can put a positive spin on that?

  12. How is Verizon involved? by MobyDisk · · Score: 0

    I'm confused.

    At first I thought this was retaliation for the wiretapping of Angela Merkel. But DER SPIEGEL says that the wiretap was setup by CIA and NSA employees from the roof of the US embassy, and had nothing to do with Verizon.

    So are they saying that because Verizon let the US Government spy on Americans in America, they won't let Verizon operate in Germany? That seems odd to me. Verizon in Germany should be operated by German employees and is subject to German law. What Verizon did in the US seems unrelated.

    Personally, I welcome them sanctioning multinational companies for bad behavior. But it is surprising.

    1. Re:How is Verizon involved? by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they shared nothing but the name, that would be one thing, but they actually share the same management as far as I know.

      A $2 whore is still a $2 whore even if she moves to another country.

    2. Re:How is Verizon involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A $2 whore is still a $2 whore even if she moves to another country.

      No, then she's a 26 Peso whore.

  13. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The way to evade beta, for now, is to use the URL http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 before you open any other Slashdot page. It's a cookies thing.

    This public service announcement was brought to you by Beta Sucks (tm).

  14. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by easyTree · · Score: 1

    lol. keep up the reasoned, well-balanced discussion ppl. :D

  15. Is it any different with anybody else? by mbkennel · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's an illusion that the USA is unique in this. It isn't, it's just that there aren't any other whistleblowers.

    If you contract with Deutsche Telecom, you'll be subjected to German intelligence interception certainly.

    Realistically---you'll be subjected to German, British, Chinese, French, Russian, American and Israeli intelligence interception to some degree or another.

    1. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The USA is unique in the resources it can devote, and therefore the scale at which it can operate. Which is to say, it is unique.

    2. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      So let them listen. That's what encryption is for.

    3. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      And if they already have a dozen ways to break encryption?

      What then?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by ed.han · · Score: 1

      Or, how about not requiring encryption in the first place? All introducing a countermeasure does is flag you as a possible person of interest. Far better to nip it in the bud where possible.

    5. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by rahvin112 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Lol, that's so laughable it's not even funny. I'd be willing to bet there are at least two other countries with more capabilities. The Russians and Chinese. Hell I bet even the Israelis are better because their country is so heavily into hi-tech.

    6. Re: Is it any different with anybody else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you 13? I think you are 13.

    7. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... at least two other countries with more capabilities."

      You, sir, are an idiot. Or shill. Or at least laughable and funny.

    8. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Then the obvious solution is to make sure everyone uses encryption for even the most trivial things. Enable it by default.

    9. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the NSA does, and many other countries too - but even for them, it's non-trivial. They may be able to subvert encryption on targeted suspects by compromising the endpoints or using false certificates, but they can't monitor entire populations that way.

    10. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is encrypted. It just looks like plain text, but it has a totally different ulterior meaning...

    11. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let them listen. That's what encryption is for.

      Encryption is pointless if they've got access to the OS. Windows, OSX and Linux all have code from the US. Why do do you think all major OS' are so aggressive at quietly indexing all your files? Pointless for the owner/user (searches are rare and the cost of indexing is far greater than the benefit) but very useful for people looking for something incriminating.

    12. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      How delusional are you?

      They already are.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not only can. Also wants to.

      Giving people cheap education or health? Fuck it, lets buy some more military and spying stuff.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:Is it any different with anybody else? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Only because so much is either sent in cleartext or stored in centralized and monitorable locations (eg, facebook).

      If all traffic of any importance were encrypted, and only the recipient had the key, the NSA would be unable to monitor everything without detection. They could use endpoint hacks or active MITM on targetted individuals, but doing so en mass would be quickly noticed.

  16. Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The announcement comes after reports this week that Verizon and British company Colt provide Internet services to the German parliament and other official entities.

    Germany should've learned their lesson, when a telegram sent to their Ambassador in Mexico was intercepted by the British — and shared with the US-government.

    Had we not obtained that piece of intelligence, the history of the world could've been quite different...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2

      The announcement comes after reports this week that Verizon and British company Colt provide Internet services to the German parliament and other official entities.

      Germany should've learned their lesson, when a telegram sent to their Ambassador in Mexico was intercepted by the British — and shared with the US-government.

      Had we not obtained that piece of intelligence, the history of the world could've been quite different...

      Yeah and if MI6 had grown a spine and called bullshit on the CIA case for WMD's in Iraq maybe that country would not now be on the cusp of becoming an Islamist Caliphate and 179 British soldiers would not have died what is increasingly looking like pointless deaths. At least the Germans had the good sense to see that the CIA 'evidence' for Iraqi WMDs was a steaming pile of horse manure and the strategic foresight to realize that intervention in Iraq would highly probably become the kind of FUBAR it currently is. Could it be that Germany (and France for that matter) learned some lessons from WWI, WWII and the cold war proxy conflicts that Britain might be well advised to take to heart?

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by Dasher42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah and if MI6 had grown a spine and called bullshit on the CIA case for WMD's in Iraq maybe that country would not now be on the cusp of becoming an Islamist Caliphate and 179 British soldiers would not have died what is increasingly looking like pointless deaths. At least the Germans had the good sense to see that the CIA 'evidence' for Iraqi WMDs was a steaming pile of horse manure and the strategic foresight to realize that intervention in Iraq would highly probably become the kind of FUBAR it currently is. Could it be that Germany (and France for that matter) learned some lessons from WWI, WWII and the cold war proxy conflicts that Britain might be well advised to take to heart?

      Ummm - they did. In the time between Colin Powell's UN address and the State of the Union address by President Bush, I was able to read links on foreign media where MI6 was warning the CIA and the CIA was passing the warning upward. That's "the facts fixed around the policy" for you: only a tiny minority of the USA's population knew as Bush spoke that he was deliberately using hoaxed information as a pretext for an unjustified war.

      Similarly, "full" transcripts of Hans Blix's testimony to the UN about the findings of weapons inspectors in Iraq were carried on CNN and the BBC - but the BBC's was the one actually full. The rest of the world got to see the entire thing; most of the US public had omitted from its media all the most convincing evidence that WMDs in Iraq were a fiction, and no cause for war.

      Don't let someone cover their ass at Langley or in DC. The falsification of evidence started from the top.

    3. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Not really. German subs had already started unrestricted attacks on US shipping. The Zimmerman telegram was not necessary to get the US into WWI.

    4. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      The map on that page is quite interesting, the red line shows how far north Mexico used to reach.
      If those borders still stood The USA wouldn't have much of an illegal immigrant problem but Mexico sure would.

       

    5. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even here, anyone paying attention could tell it was bullshit. If you have to setup your own intelligence outfit at the Pentagon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O... to get the "intelligence" you want you're doing it wrong. Hell, there were several instances where Cheney spat out complete and utter bullshit.
      "these tubes can ONLY be used for centrifuges" for example, was called on it by nuclear scientists and just kept repeating it.

    6. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 1

      German subs had already started unrestricted attacks on US shipping. The Zimmerman telegram was not necessary to get the US into WWI.

      The American public opinion remained split — plenty of people thought, it was the victims' own fault, that they chose to, despite Germany's fair warnings, to travel to UK or ship goods over there.

      The telegram — and other, less famous, bits of intelligence obtained the same way — provided very important insights to the British and our own governments.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 0

      If those borders still stood The USA wouldn't have much of an illegal immigrant problem but Mexico sure would.

      Amazing naivete — unless you are joking... Illegal immigrant problems come to countries with relatively high standard of living — you don't have to be part of the much-despised Golden Billion, dirt-poor Thailand, for example, has this problem because their neighboring Myanmar (Burma) is even poorer.

      Whether those borders still stood or not, I doubt rather strongly, we wouldn't have been substantially richer than Mexico anyway.

      But, as things are currently progressing, we may lose those lands anyway — if they get saturated with Latinos the way Crimea is saturated with Russians (result of Stalin's ethnic cleansing of 1944), they may one day vote to leave the US and join Mexico. Whatever their true feelings might be, polite Mexican special forces (with our own border guards and military under orders not to shoot) will ensure, the referendum's tally is "correct".

      The rest of the world will be as indiffirent as it is today to Russia's war on Ukraine. Thanks to Obama's today's help Mexico will finally have finally accomplished, what Santa Anna and Pancho Villa failed to do centuries ago.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    8. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 1

      Yeah and if MI6 had grown a spine and called bullshit on the CIA case for WMD's in Iraq

      Except:

      1. Everybody agreed, Iraq had WMDs — not just the war-mongering Bushitler and his blood-thirsty neocons, but the wise respectable statesmen and women of the previous Administration
      2. They were all correct — Saddam Hussein really did have WMDs, although not as much as we feared or as Iraqi generals hoped for
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 1

      Don't let someone cover their ass at Langley or in DC. The falsification of evidence started from the top.

      http://www.wired.com/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The telegram was contributory, but the submarine attacks would have drawn the US into WWI by themselves.

      https://history.state.gov/mile...

    11. Re:Zimmerman telegram? by mi · · Score: 1

      Not at all clear. Just as many have blamed America itself for the 9/11, plenty of people thought, those, who died from the German submarines, had only themselves to blame. Public opinion was rather split — the large Irish population, for example, was heavily anti-British. It is not obvious, we would've sent actual troops to Europe — or as many, had it not been for the intercept... We didn't have much of a standing army back then — the call-up consisted of President asking the State militias to, please, contribute the troops.

      Some of Robert Heinlein prose (Lazarus Long going back in time to meet his grandfather and parents), while nominally science-fiction, describes that period in fine detail.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  17. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't understand. It could be impossible for him to disable it. The footer link and the nobeta=1 QS parameter sometimes just don't work at all for me, I guess because Slashdot Beta is just that fucking broken. But other times they do work just fine. It's a crapshoot, really. Even legends like Bjarne Stroustrup or Sir Tim Berners-Lee could get stymied by the same bug, and they'd have no choice but to make similar complaints, too. The real fix is just to totally get rid of the dung heap that's called the Slashdot Beta. That'll fix the problem completely, and properly.

  18. Wall Street says not a big deal by ayesnymous · · Score: 2

    VZ stock hardly changed today.

    1. Re:Wall Street says not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VZ stock hardly changed today.

      Maybe they are expecting that Germany would be liberated and instilled with democracy (including VZ run monopoly) by late 2015.

  19. For the love of God, don't put most of your point by easyTree · · Score: 5, Funny

    in the title.

  20. World Cup by JustinKSU · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a second I thought Slashdot was starting to get into sports reporting.

  21. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by sumdumass · · Score: 2

    I wonder how many people are disabling the footer with no script or something? And I would guess that the do not track stuff built into browsers as a work around for websites ignoring the do not track marker might be the problem with the nobeta=1 QS parameter.

    Of course those are guesses but if you haven't looked into it, perhaps it might lead you somewhere productive. I disabled cookies altogether a while back and found most all of my web pages loaded differently and on some, I had to log in every time I clicked a link or it forgot I was already logged in. Now I just clear my browser cookies every so often and when opening new sites.

  22. Mineshafts! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Mr. President! We must not allow...a mineshaft gap!

    That's basically what this whole "We'll control it all ourselves. Mineminemineminemine!" idiocy is.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  23. De-americanization has officially began by boorack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will be somewhat off-topic but still (somewhat) related.

    De-americanization has officially began when Russia signed gas deal with China bypassing dollar. This process started long ago but with this deal it's now official. Things seem to speed up since then. Germany Verizon thing is just another domino piece falling. Regardless of what Americans think of it, I see it as a good thing. Aside from taking (most of the) world of american hegemony, ending of US imperial project can benefit Americans themselves - granted that their (incompetent and incredibly corrupt) government manages to transition from imperial power to ordinary (but better managed) country in orderly way (that is, without inciting WW3).

    Message to fellow Americans: you're still one of the most progressive folks in the world (yet NOT the most ones), it's just your fucked up government that sucks, causes mayhem (Ukraine being the last manifestation of this) and blocks your potential. It's time to abandon your imperial/global hegemony policies - you can prosper pretty damn well in a multipolar world (much better than most of the rest). It all depends on you. BUT there are few things to do. You need to bring your fucked-up out-of-control government back in control, forget about american exceptionalism and learn to live in (competitive) multipolar world (ie. do not solve all problem using military or inciting civil wars).

    1. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American here, don't care what you think.

    2. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sincerely,

      V. Putin

    3. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, no more entangling alliances. Europe was a peaceful Utopia and Russia and her neighbors got along perfectly before the US stuck its nose in and messed everything up.

      As a bonus we get to cut back our 22% of the UN budget and 25% of NATO budget to a level appropriate for just another country in a multipolar world.

    4. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riddle me this: When "american hegemony" ends, who will step up to the plate?

      Russia? Ukraine would ally with Iran to re-obtain nuclear arms if that happened.
      China? South East Asia is terrified of them to the point that Japan is trying (successfully) to re-build its military.
      The U.N.? The 'international community' considers the U.N. to be nothing more than a U.S. puppet.

      No one? Historically, whenever there wasn't a dominant 'superpower', near constant regional conflicts would be waged.

    5. Re:De-americanization has officially began by thrich81 · · Score: 2

      As much as I would like for the US to withdraw to its borders and let the other democracies defend their own borders in a big, bad world -- the last time we had a multipolar world we got World Wars I and II out of it. A big reason we got WW II is that the US did withdraw to its own borders after WW I and the multipolar world outside proceeded to screw it up on three continents at once.

    6. Re:De-americanization has officially began by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The world has already had near constant regional conflicts via Covert United States foreign regime change actions
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Most nations may not want to be at some "plate" allowed crumbs by a 'superpower' if they elect a good party or live under a tame dictator.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are right in the fact that the idea of some country upholding justice through military power is quite appealing.
      The problem is, and what Americans often don't want to admit because it requires some long hard honest introspection, is that the veneer of America being the great good guy is wearing thin outside of the USA.
      The crap the NSA is currently doing, for example, has been tried many times before in many other countries. It has never ended well - always by those in power using it as a tool to remain in power. It's a warning sign.
      When the world hears about renditions and black sites, drone strikes, they see this bad behavior and recognize it for what it is - after all, many have suffered under regimes that do worse. It makes us worried.
      When you consider that people working in the defense industry producing bombs and ordinances can only stay in business by selling more bombs and ordinances, and the only way to create a demand for the new is to use the old, you realize there are people in Washington who profit from war. There are also politicians who benefit from there being a crisis. Would you have let them create the TSA is there wasn't a crisis? There are bad people who benefit from conflicts.
      If the United States wants to remain the world's policeman, that can only continue while the reputation of the United States is beyond question. The trust required for this position cannot be gotten by bribes or coercion either. The troublesome part is the cogs inside a political machine that has turned rotten are often the very last people in the world to recognize it. Those cogs know they are good people, working for the right reasons, and assume their mission is just. The results throughout history are often disastrous: concentration camps, gulags, internment camps, political oppression, etc.

      So, America, if you want to continue being the world police, then get your act together and stop acting like the tinpot dictators you claim to be against. Otherwise, the rest of the world will have to step up, grow up, and learn to police themselves. And as you have seen, there are growing pains to giving children modern weaponry.

    8. Re:De-americanization has officially began by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > De-americanization has officially began when Russia signed gas deal with China bypassing dollar.

      Relatively local trade of that sort has often avoided conversion into a third currency. Nothing new.

      The idea that Russia or Chinese currency would make significant inroads against the dollar is preposterous. The ruble is so untrusted that commerce within Russia often is done in dollars as Russia is the largest holder of US banknotes in the world.. China - well let me know when their currency flows are not restricted, and they adopt some sort of internationally accepted accounting standard.

      As far as American involvement in other countries, you guys in Europe seemed mighty happy back on this date in 1963 when Kennedy came to Berlin to express his solidarity.

      As far as the Ukraine goes that's strictly a EU thing. Russia is getting bent out of shape because the Ukraine wants to start the process of joining the EU. However since the Russia basically keeps Europe from starving with natural gas that is converted into fertilizer, the EU is in no position to say boo to Russia so it's up to the US to try to exert pressure on them. Nothing new, the US has been propping up Europe for the last 60 years.

      Personally I'd like to see the US withdraw from Europe (and NATO). It would help us immeasurably from a financial point of view to not pay for the EU's defense any more and in addition I'd get a laugh watching you starve in the dark when Russia shut off your gas and oil.

    9. Re:De-americanization has officially began by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Regional conflicts are a whole lot less nasty than the world wars that were going on before the US became a superpower.

    10. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has more dollars than it knows what to do with. Gas trades in dollar... Humm...

      Cause you know, the Russians (who have been giving us rockets for dollars) suddenly prefer Chinese currency that is in continuous inflation to keep exports cheap.

      I think the Russians divesting their consumers and creating a more efficient supply chain will only reduce the price and increase it's stability.

    11. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats ALL the regional conflicts via covert U.S. action?

      Break out the champagne and call it a Golden Age! Thats NOTHING compared to when the sun never set on the British Empire and shipped opium to drug the Chinese population for DECADES. Or when the Sick Man of Europe ruled over the Middle East and installed brutal local dictators to maintain control over the empire for CENTURIES. Or when no one ruled the world because the U.S. acted like a whiny brat and locked himself in his room after WWI...

    12. Re:De-americanization has officially began by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Regional conflicts are a whole lot less nasty than the world wars that were going on before nuclear weapons created MAD seems more accurate, the US seems to have created more conflicts since WWII then any other country with many of those conflicts being a long way away from the US borders and the only thing that America seems to respect is nukes.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not going to happen - too much of an 'us versus them' mentality where everything is treated as an attack or personal affront. I believe this is partly caused by lack of education and not being seen as 'weak' - with a unhealthy dose of bravado pervading the culture. Everything must be 'won' - everything's a game.

      Also, I grow tired of hearing "but it's the government, not the people" line. Americans could be out protesting, getting actively involved and making a difference, but many don't. Which is the other reason why it won't happen - apathy. After all of the recent revelations, if it that hasn't woken them up by now - I fear nothing will.

      As it stands, I actively encourage routing around the US until such a day comes when they are a more responsible, respectful world citizen.

    14. Re:De-americanization has officially began by durin · · Score: 1

      You're making too much damn sense to be on slashdot. Are you a troll?

      --
      Why, yes! I AM new here.
    15. Re:De-americanization has officially began by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The veneer of the US being the great good guy is also wearing thin inside the US. Jingoists aren't really saying we're good, they're saying "We're the home team". In that sense they've got a point, but there's no reason to expect that anyone outside the US would feel that way.

      P.S.: The US has so far been more altruistic and honorable than previous countries have that fell into the same role. This has been declining over time, as should be expected. Human institutions that centralize power become corrupt. So far we aren't as bad as Britain was during their reign, and Britain was better than their predecessor. For that matter the Romans were better than the Greeks. (Well, sort of. The Greeks didn't really last long enough to really become corrupt.) And the Greeks were better than the Assyrians. But if we continue to be so dominant, expect us to become worse and worse. Eventually we'll reach the point where no dominant power would be an improvement. I don't think we're there yet, on a time-averaged basis. Others, experiencing the sharp end of the knife, might reasonably have other opinions.

      The real lesson is that people can't be trusted with unchecked power. Nationality and religion are irrelevant. A way can always be found to abuse it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:De-americanization has officially began by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      You where talking of the past UN decades AC....

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    17. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You do realise that the NSDAP was partly bankrolled with Wall street money right? (also from a lot of other countries btw).

      And the one of the reasons Japan went to war was the oil embargo imposed by the US.

      Absolutely not saying the US is responsible for what happened after, but please don't try to make it out that the US was in complete isolationist innocence and that these world events unfolded without any US interaction.

    18. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Arker · · Score: 1

      "As far as the Ukraine goes that's strictly a EU thing."

      Ahem.

      Google Victoria Nuland.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    19. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Arker · · Score: 0

      Nonsense.

      The main reasons we got WWII was our intervention in WWI, forcing a profoundly unbalanced and unfair peace. See
      http://www.historyonthenet.com/WW1/versailles.htm

      This in turn practically guaranteed WWII, in one form or another.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    20. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention to get off your lawn.

    21. Re:De-americanization has officially began by HiThere · · Score: 2

      People have been out protesting, but the press is centrally owned by those who don't want to encourage such behavior. So they don't cover it. It's not like the 1970's, when each city had its own independent newspaper, and many had independent TV stations. Mind you, if you search for protests you can find them documented. They aren't really suppressed, and they are covered in various small areas. But nobody does, so the protests die away...or transform into posts on You-tube.

      Additionally, as the population ages the proportion of people who will protest injustice without counting the costs declines. That is an activity mainly engaged in by people in their early 20s. People who are just becoming aware of the political structure of the world, and haven't yet become hardened to it. And who will protest without counting the cost.

      Additionally (yet more) there needs to be an acceptable alternative. If all the alternatives seem worse, then it's hard to protest even a clear injustice.

      Additionally, the system is designed to channel protests into harmless channels. If you engage in the standard political process, you are marginalized unless you have LOTS of financial backing. If you go into a minor party, you are just about guaranteed to not be electable. This is a result of the plurality wins voting system. If there are 15 parties, then only the two largest have a reasonable chance of electing someone. If there are 3 parties, the same applies. With 4 parties you could theoretically get elected with 25.0001% of the vote, because that would be the plurality. So the rational choice is to always pick whichever of the two biggest parties is the least repulsive...and that what most people do. This may be why so many people just don't bother to vote. It's seen as a waste of effort.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Russia is a much more rational and diplomatically capable partner than USA now. USA acts like an histerical bitch since years. Obama made Bush seem like a decent president...

    23. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're proving his/her point. But you don't get that, do you?

    24. Re:De-americanization has officially began by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Abject nonsense. If you saw what the victors of WWI did to the Germans you'd be surprised it took them as long as it did to get royally upset and cling to anyone who claimed to be able to fix it. It was utterly disgusting. The sheer amount of violence and suffering inflicted upon the normal German people was horrific. Starvation, violence, oppression, freezing cold in winter, you name it. You've been blinded by nationalism - don't believe the hype.

    25. Re:De-americanization has officially began by dave420 · · Score: 1

      If the US was really the world police, it would step in when things needed sorting, not when things could be sorted in a way that is good for the US. If you really want to think of the US as world police, then they are a corrupt and murderous police force. Tell the world again why they should be thankful? Try not to end it with "it would be a shame if anything happened to your nice country..."

    26. Re:De-americanization has officially began by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Quite right. the problem is what is the correct way in a place like the Ukraine. People are telling america to get involved and to protect the ukraine, but that leads directly to them saying we didn't do it right.

      America shouldn't be the sole super power, I wouldn't mind having a United Europe with equal military strength so that America doesn't have to shoulder the burden alone. Take Libya it took American fighters and awacs to clear out the surface to air defenses so that Europe could send in air cover. As Europe didn't have the firepower to do it alone, yet the USA needed just one Carrier.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    27. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. The trouble in Ukraine is a result of the US-led push to get Ukraine into NATO, which was guaranteed to piss the Russians off. The fact that the Poles think this is a wonderful idea does not mean the entire EU does.

      And by the way, it makes little sense to talk of "the EU" concerning anything except economic policy, as the EU does not have a common foreign policy, even if some EU members wish this where the case.

      Other than that, I actually agree with you that Europe should wean itself off its dependence on the U.S. - the cold war is over, we don't have to choose the shinier of two turds.

    28. Re:De-americanization has officially began by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The ruble is so untrusted that commerce within Russia often is done in dollars as Russia is the largest holder of US banknotes in the world.

      It's not the nineties anymore.

      China - well let me know when their currency flows are not restricted, and they adopt some sort of internationally accepted accounting standard.

      I am letting you know thus.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    29. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a world with the U.N. but no U.S. support? Oh that's right, it was the period between the 1920-1930s when the League of Nations, the predecessor to the U.N., existed without the support of the U.S. I seem to recall some major war in the 1940s, but that was the U.S.'s fault right?

    30. Re:De-americanization has officially began by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      "It's just your fucked up government that sucks "

      You have your facts wrong. Our government closely represents the will of the people.

    31. Re:De-americanization has officially began by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The only reason US developed nuclear weapons was to put an end to wars that it didn't start and didn't want to be involved in.

      Maybe Germany should think back to how lucky it was that the US didn't complete the Manhattan project before the end of WWII in Europe. Yes, the US probably would have nuked German cities if the war was still going on. Britain also wanted to nuke Germany in retaliation for Germany's blitz of London etc. - the first time mass bombings of civilian cities had been carried out.

      While nuclear weapons are a terrible thing, let's not forget who REALLY started mass bombings of civilian targets. Some of the conventional strikes on cities in Europe killed far more people than either Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

    32. Re:De-americanization has officially began by Sciath · · Score: 1

      What's bad about regional conflict? So long as it stays regional. Let people kill each other if they support warmongering schisms or governments. It assists in keeping the worlds population in check. Just think of what the world population would be today without WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. We'd probably be looking at a global population of at least 10 billion today (counting intervening epidemics, natural disasters, etc.) if it weren't for war. Until the day Earth's populations are united in a Star Trekian utopia of science and rational decision making, there will be wars. So why try to interfere with the inevitable? Atomic holocaust? Not really as likely as all the war mongrels would like everyone to believe. Even jihadists, are intelligent enough to realize that if they really want to establish an Islamic caliphate somewhere, there has to be a planet to do that on. And considering the Islamists aren't that great at developing interplanetary or even proposing interstellar drives, I seriously doubt they'd be will to destroy the planet in a hydrogen holocaust. They're power seekers just like the U.S. war mongers. Even they understand there has to be someone to rule over.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
    33. Re:De-americanization has officially began by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure America and others would have developed nuclear weapons no matter what as they were an invention whose time had come, just like America developed aircraft carriers during peace time and also was a major contender in the naval arms race between the wars until a treaty limited the numbers of capital ships.
      Nothing you say challenges the idea that after WWII, especially after the Soviets also had nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them, large scale wars such as the world wars became impractical due to "Mutual Assured Destruction".

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  24. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless it is porn

  25. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by uniquename72 · · Score: 2

    You don't understand. It could be impossible for him to disable it.

    It's easily disabled. There was a time when only techies read /.; now techies are the exception rather than the rule.

    Sad times.

  26. Better yet ban the company from the whole country by mrspoonsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it can be shown that the company is working against the countries interests (company treason?), such as in this case, ban them from all sales in that country. That really would get the attention deserved.

  27. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 2

    Damn straight.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
  28. Time for everyone to follow suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the only thing these bullies in america understand, profits so lets stop feeding the monster the one thing it desires

  29. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Informative

    the low tech solution? login. I only see slashdot classic. the conversation view is better, it is easier to follow long threads. The best part? Slashdot classic allows you to login once and keeps you logged in. Mobile and Beta slashdot log me out of the system after every post, If I can login at all.

    One would think Slashdot would have tested user logins without someone like 1password or apple keychain providing login every time.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  30. We the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please correct me if i'm wrong.

    This story has close to none coverage in Germany.

    It's been dug up by a blogger (1) and reblogged by netzpolitik.org (2), who then started to ask questions.

    There are some articles gathering up by now, but the big media seems to shush things.
    The leading tv-stations (ARD & ZDF) that are publicly funded have no real content regarding this story.
    This being said: ZDF does list a story in which the government looks as if it has addressed this problem entirely by itself. Some reuters-bot-written junk. (3)

    But this was not the case, the government clearly had no intention to reveal it's ties to Verizon. If it wasn't for the blogger, they wouldn't have had to.
    Now they're trying to downplay the story and to make the provided services look like a fallback routine or - even better - like an unused source.

    The Fed. Ministry of Interior posted yesterday that it had contacted Verizon in 2010,
    telling them they would slowly withdraw from the contract, since the Verizon services were being replaced gradually by a new infrastructure for the Government. (4) ...they forgot to tell us when this would happen, but now it seems like they are ready for the big transition m(

    After the internet died last summer, this is a bad joke.

    Anyhow:
    also yesterday the big coalition has managed to finalize their decision regarding a hearing of E. Snowden.
    They hold a majority within the exclusivly formed task force regarding the NSA affair.
    They have decided mutually that a hearing can not take place on German soil - given the 'fact' that an extradition treaty with the US is in effect. (5)

    1: Daniel Luecking http://medienkonsument.de/
    2: https://netzpolitik.org/2014/arbeitserleichterung-fuer-die-nsa-deutscher-bundestag-bezieht-internet-von-us-anbieter-verizon/
    3: http://www.heute.de/bund-baut-kommunikationsnetz-neu-ohne-us-partner-verizon-33792814.html
    4: https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Kurzmeldungen/DE/2014/06/bund-wechselt-netzbetreiber.html
    5: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/nsa-affaere-grosse-koalition-verhindert-befragung-von-snowden-a-977742.html

  31. Fat ass by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    umptions that the other way is better are silly.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by DocHoncho · · Score: 2

    It only ever happens to me on mobile, so no no-script there. What happens is you can see the link to use classic, and then it disappears behind some other div. To top it off, the stupid fucking website is "responsive," so it squishes itself down into a useless wad of mobile-site and fuck you if you'd rather it stayed a normal full page. So far as I know there's no way to disable CSS Media Queries without browser plugins so the design weenies have finally managed to get us good and stuck in their sweaty ass-crack of "modern web design."

    --
    Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
  33. You post ac: Here is how to stop that... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Add these lines to your hosts file, first (& do NOT take a cookie, perhaps disabling javascript too - I don't use them period unless I absolutely HAVE to on most sites, by setting a GLOBAL policy in Opera by default that way, & only creating "exception sites" as needed (db access stuff, see below)).

    ALL very easy to do in Opera 12.17 64-bit, as it's the MOST flexible browser under the sun STILL!

    Anyhow/anyways:

    216.34.181.45 slashdot.org
    216.34.181.45 beta.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.46 images.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 it.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 developers.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 yro.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 mobile.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 news.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 ask.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 tech.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 apple.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 books.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 games.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 hardware.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 interviews.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 linux.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 science.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 idle.slashdot.org

    ---

    * Note the BOLDED line above? It's key!

    It forces you to go to "classic" /. that way by doing that (see the one above, same IP address), overriding the redirect, easy as apple-pie!

    (To quote Tony Stark/Iron Man, regarding his Arc Reactor? "It works"...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You *may* also wish to force the other "normal/classic" sites that way beneath too, e.g.:

    216.34.181.48 it.slashdot.org
    216.34.181.48 beta.it.slashdot.org

    & ANY others you may frequent - I note I don't have to, & always get "classic" pages... works for me, should for you too (however, for the "registered 'lusers'" here, they MAY have to play with their cookies they take, & stall javascript too... I never use it on ANYTHING but ecommerce database access related sites (else they won't work usually, fully))... apk

    1. Re:You post ac: Here is how to stop that... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beta should be renamed "shyta".

  34. What about themselves? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Is it the same Germany whose BND secret service collaborated with NSA to spy on internet backbone links?

    1. Re:What about themselves? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to help the US to spy on someone else, it's another thing to allow the US to spy on them. No surprise. No ethics, either, but that's no surprise.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:What about themselves? by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

      How strange it is, that once the politicians find themselves on the receiving end of all the surveillance tactics they enthusiastically support for regular citizens, they are up in arms and immediately start issuing bans and prohibitions! "We are shocked -- SHOCKED -- that these consequences of widespread mass surveillance would one day prove to have undesired side-effects! Who could have predicted this outcome???"

    3. Re:What about themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, the agreement between Germany and the U.S. likely never included spying on the German government. Of course, trusting the U.S. to actually honor any agreements reached is hopelessly naive, but that is par for the course for German foreign policy.

  35. Better start prepping by Theovon · · Score: 1

    So, first other countries start dropping the dollar as the international reserve currency. Now they’re going to stop buying our products and services. Our economy is going to hell in a handbasket.

    1. Re:Better start prepping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our economy is going to hell in a handbasket.

      Which is what happens when you act like thugs for decades and lie not only to the world but to your own people about it. The vast majority of Americans still to this day don't know the stuff that the US does in their name, largely to protect/advance the interests of multinational corporations.

    2. Re:Better start prepping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was planned that way many decades ago. That's what this is all about.

  36. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I feel your pain there. I use dolphin which I think is a Safari clone or based on the same engine or something like that. Anyways, I had to set it to pretend to be a desktop browser to get Slashdot to appear correctly. I don't know if it was beta or what, I didn't stick around long enough to pay attention before switching it out. But there are stupid pages where ads don't size properly and crap like that so I guess if I happen to get the same beta issues on mine, I might have to stop browsing slashdot from it. 90% of my time here is from the phone.

  37. economic might more powerful than spying by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    problem with the short sighted spying and lets spend crazy money on the military misses that economic might is certainly more important. You cannot pay for stupid expensive spying and military programs or twist the arms of other countries if you are not economically strong. Not only is the spying program Constitutionally wrong it is weakening the US in real and lasting ways.

  38. For the love of God, don't put most o... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of what in the title?

  39. Are these guys really that stupid? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    First, what kind of numbnut country outsources their state communications services? Come on man.

    Then who are they going to get as a replacement? Some other company that has no doubt already been suborned by a secret agency?

    1. Re:Are these guys really that stupid? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      I dont think West Germany was given much option. With the quality and quantity of KGB, GRU, East German and other spies in play all aspects of West German telco networks would have been vital to the NSA and GCHQ.
      Later the tame German staff who grew up with/advanced into the post 1960's telco upgrades just kept selecting staff that where happy to serve under/with the GCHQ and NSA.
      German domestic and foreign intelligence just kept telling every elected gov that its was very secret and very vital.
      A few decades later Germany still wonders why its international prowess is so low, trade is difficult and trade deals seems to fail.
      Why its science is last to market or other vital sectors of its economy seem so slow.
      Kind of easy when 5+ other nations are noting everything of importance Germany communicates in real time and acting while Germany is still discussing.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Are these guys really that stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, what kind of numbnut country outsources their state communications services?

      Germany. The country that honestly believes the Americans are our friends.

  40. Russians like money by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Russians have gas/oil and need money.
    EU has the money and wants gas/oil.
    They exchange them.
    Putin has the power to upset everybody a great deal, to the point where he might not survive such a disruption. EU doesn't have the power to upset it's people by pushing Putin into such a situation- they still have democracy... Either way, they are not going to change their economic situation for long.

  41. Encryption by Cordus+Mortain · · Score: 1

    Have I missed something here? Are the German authorities really sending sensitive information over the internet unencrypted? It's just not that hard to set up VPNs

    1. Re:Encryption by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The German weak networks selected by trusted German gov crypto staff allow the USA/UK and friends in but keep other nations out :)
      The German gov staff hope this will allow Germany to be trusted by the US and UK and get more export grade US mil equipment.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  42. Good! by Tool+Man · · Score: 1

    This sort of thing is starting to hurt, right in the pocket book where it counts. That is exactly the right response to companies stabbing their consumers in the back.

  43. Secret agreement after WW2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Germany is still grounded due to WWI and WWII. It would not surprise me if there were secret agreements in place that allowed the victors to monitor government communications for a long time.

  44. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by Carewolf · · Score: 2

    It's easily disabled

    No it isn't. From mobile it is no longer possible to disable, it just redirects nobeta links to beta, and there is no login to beta, so no way of logging in and enforcing your settings. Yeah it is THAT broken.

  45. A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The regime in Washington has trampled the interests of the rest of the world continuously, since the end of WW2. It is time for European countries to cast off this crazed regime, and its utterly corrupt leadership. We should do this by fully isolating them. Everywhere that the United States interferes - without exception - has been destabilised, or subjected to war. As a European citizen, I want no part in the imperialist conflicts of this rotten turd of a country. 'Democracy', american style, is nothing more than having the right to buy your representatives, if you are rich. Whenever I go to the United States, it is clearly fascist through and through - from entry at the fascist style border control, where a dumb crazed militaristic robot subjects you to an interrogation, to the shameful excuse for media, America has become the ultimate dystopian nightmare. Why bother with border control at all - who would want to live there?

  46. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by sa1lnr · · Score: 1
  47. Re:Even more "low tech" (low as you can go)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. I really don't have anything against it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just that I'm far more used to the 'classic' version is all - plus, I wanted to see how much MORE I could do with hosts (ontop of them adding more speed, security, reliability, & anonymity than any other single browser solution)... they're nigh 'ubiquitous' for MANY purposes - this, is just yet another, in overriding redirects (or perhaps better put, redirecting site redirects, as is the case here).

    * At first, I thought I'd like "beta" (seemed to remind me of older UBB style/O'Reilly code based boards I spent years (1997-2004) on in other sites' tech forums) - however, I've been coming here since 2005 almost exclusively, & gotten VERY used to 'classic'... so, there ya are! Just proves how versatile hosts are, yet again.

    APK

    P.S.=> For even MORE of all the neat things hosts can do for you on the grounds noted above? Shameless Plug:

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:

    http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    Courtesy of "yours truly", absolutely gratis...

    ... apk

  49. "For now"? This will always work... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as 'classic /.' exists -> http://politics.slashdot.org/c...

    * The folks @ DICE are pulling a "microsoft" (oh, no!!!) & Windows 8 GUI shell interface changes - wasn't the best move for MS, & from the sounds of it here and many other times in posts on forums? Not a good move here for this site either really... folks don't want the beta, largely - they're like myself: VERY used to "classic".

    (E.G./I.E. -> For instance - I wouldn't want the steering wheel, gas, breaks, & stickshift + clutch in my car changed to crane or forklift style controls after all... analogy there, somewhat weak, but it fits!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You've got every RIGHT to filter out things coming into your home via your webbrowser, & to see what YOU want to see... that technique, using hosts, always works!

    ... apk

  50. Re:Better yet ban the company from the whole count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shut it down. Corporate execution.

  51. Economic destruction by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    The NSA has not only undermined our trust in the government (well... that's assuming there was any to begin with), but it's also wreaking huge devastation on our economy. How many US-based companies have lost huge amounts of foreign business due to these revelations?

    It's NOT Snowden's fault for revealing these actions. It's the US Government's fault for having their fingers in every conceivable cookie jar in the world, and forcing US-based companies to assist them with it (willingly, unwillingly, and even unknowingly).

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:Economic destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why Snowden should be given a presidential pardon whilst James Clapper and Keith Alexander should both be in a federal slammer somewhere to rot.

      By forcing him to travel to Russia, the US are inadvertently helping their cold war enemies.

    2. Re:Economic destruction by Sciath · · Score: 1

      Goes to show how easy it is to twist the wires of justice into a shockingly abhorrent vehicle of torture. The good id the bad, the bad is the good. 1984 Truespeak. And the average citizen is too stupid to even realize it. Or if they do, they just dont care anymore. Which has the same end result.

      --
      "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
  52. Re:If characters were from Jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many cast members were from Jersey?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Shore_%28TV_series%29

    2 were from NJ, 6 from NY and one from rhode island... so .. don't be dumping so eagerly on NJ

  53. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    I log in. I still get the beta pages (about 2 out of 5 articles) even though I've specified classic view. You can see in the comments how I'm dealing with it. There are alternatives.

    --
    That is all.
  54. You love NJ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never thought I'd feel bad for people from Jersey...

    Because you normally feel extremely good for them?

  55. Re:wtf forced on beta again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  56. Are you getting it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, to be honest, the real solution is to encrypt. There are ASIC solutions that if massively deployed would make this much more practical (economy of scale effects). It stinks that we can't have fast(er) Internet access because we have to now encrypt everything and deal with the overhead that causes. If we heavily encrypted all international tunnels- err cables (LOL, thinking of I2P), then they would just find a way to get to the encryption key or compromise the routers. But that's no reason to give up - making it harder would at least be worth it. Not to mention that it's like the software upgrade treadmill and the technology is always changing, anyways.

    The days of trusting the network are sadly long gone. You should be designing infrastructure where you don't trust yourself (or your successor/s) to not abuse it. The internet that evolved from ARPA's project (most people call this successor 'The Internet' or 'The WWW') had an implicit assumption of trust of the providers since packets were sent over telecom equipment that was behind closed doors, on US land often owned by the parties involved? Or maybe it was a habit from the days when most of the hardware was owned by the military or educational institutes and isolation between nodes was an effective countermeasure. Only a few physically secured links would be needed for connections between geographically-isolated local networks, in theory. There are ways to detect if cables have been messed with, especially if they're physically underground or on a high-tension line. Of course the art has advanced so now we have to worry even on land and a lot of the old techniques to detect meddling can be bypassed.

  57. Assume network still compromised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I certainly can't fault anyone for ceasing to do business with an entity that they believe is working against their interests, I think it would be incredibly naive to believe this will improve security.

    Network applications ought to already be assuming the network is compromised. If dumping a known-compromised network makes you feel safer, that indicates you're still doing something wrong.

    Whatever Germany replaces Verizon with: just ass/u/me that infrastructure is also compromised by a foreign government too, ok? And the same goes for all of us.

    All of us, including Americans. Our networks are compromised, and we should proceed as though this can't ever be prevented, and instead, treat it as something we need to be able to work with. If we want to also try to prevent it too (i.e. through the courts or Congress, firing egregiously-behaving contractors, etc.) fine, but we need to be able to win, even given the premise of a totally untrustworthy network. And we can.