Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Hackers Infiltrate Firms Using Malware-Laden Handheld Scanners

wiredmikey (1824622) writes China-based threat actors are using sophisticated malware installed on handheld scanners to target shipping and logistics organizations from all over the world. According to security firm TrapX, the attack begins at a Chinese company that provides hardware and software for handheld scanners used by shipping and logistics firms worldwide to inventory the items they're handling. The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

Experts determined that the threat group targets servers storing corporate financial data, customer data and other sensitive information. A second payload downloaded by the malware then establishes a sophisticated C&C on the company's finance servers, enabling the attackers to exfiltrate the information they're after. The malware used by the Zombie Zero attackers is highly sophisticated and polymorphic, the researchers said. In one attack they observed, 16 of the 48 scanners used by the victim were infected, and the malware managed to penetrate the targeted organization's defenses and gain access to servers on the corporate network. Interestingly, the C&C is located at the Lanxiang Vocational School, an educational institution said to be involved in the Operation Aurora attacks against Google, and which is physically located only one block away from the scanner manufacturer, TrapX said.

93 comments

  1. Problem traced by invictusvoyd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

    1. Re:Problem traced by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the code size these things tend to have, you could embed an office package into it and nobody would notice. I wonder what happened to the habit of making embedded systems simple and transparent...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason I found this story funny (and also creepy), that just makes it hilarious (and much less creepy).

    3. Re:Problem traced by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      All I can say is "duh." Btw China is just playing catchup, just like with space exploration, and now with snooping, as every time I see Intel Inside, or AMD, guess what? It's rigged, the same way, snooping or modifying your data, and not much you can do about it. The only chip you can trust is the one you make. And the US military is dependent on all this Mitutoyo and Doosan chip based things. I'll take a mechanical dial instrument over an LCD one lately, and also a Seiko self winding mechnanical watch with jeweled friction bearings, like http://www.ebay.com/itm/SEIKO-... , if it weren't so damn expensive compared to a quartz/battery watch. A standalone quartz based watch is still more secure than relying on your cellphone for time, for things such as the alarm going off and not being late from work, as I've caught my cell phone's alarm feature not working when it was crucial, and it was set to go off but it didn't.

    4. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assuming the holy mantra physical access = security gone; Even if they had the latest and greatest Windows 8.2 SP4 for Embedded or living on the edge with Arch Linux they would still have been compromised.

      The attacker can take as long as he likes to figure out a way to compromise the OS, if on a time crunch simply send out a a batch of good devices while you figure out how to shaft the next batch

    5. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I visit Slashdot... for the insight!

    6. Re:Problem traced by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder what happened to the habit of making embedded systems simple and transparent...

      I remember some 20 years ago a friend of mine was telling me that sooner or later, your microwave would have a whole operating system on it, even though it only performed simple tasks. It was already cheaper even then to use a MCU over discrete logic for many devices which were not staggeringly complex. It's about development time. As long as we fail to demand quality, we will continue to get what is convenient to produce in quantity. Pity about quality.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Problem traced by plover · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "scanner" portion of these devices is typically an embedded system that drives a hardware sensor, and speaks USB out the back side. You could probably open one up, solder a cable to the right points on the scanner board, and you'd have exactly the simple and transparent scanner you requested.

      But because the business wants a truckload (no pun intended) of functionality out of these scanners, they need it to have more capabilities. First, it needs to be on the network, or it won't give them any benefit. Next, it needs to be multi-tasking so it can display alerts, etc. Its primary task may be to inventory the stuff coming off a truck, its other tasks may include assigning work items to line employees, displaying alerts on the supervisors' screens, punching the timeclock for breaks, and possibly even employee email. To a lot of businesses, a browser based interface lets them run whatever kind of functions they want, without the expense of continually pushing a bunch of apps out to a bunch of random machines. So taking all that together, embedded XP is one (bloated) way of meeting all that.

      So while the scanner itself is simple, it's the rest of the hardware in the device that was infested with XP and other malware.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

      The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

      Fixed that for you. Where is the outrage when the Chinese exploit their industries for hacking? Guess that's not a way to get that quick +5 insightful these days.

    9. Re:Problem traced by Megol · · Score: 1

      No. You are just paranoid.

    10. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse - they see the US as non-Chinese. That's a lot like saying "non-human". Why should you pay any attention to the rights of those 'things' that aren't your family, aren't even Chinese?

    11. Re:Problem traced by saleenS281 · · Score: 2

      It would be just as, if not easier to put a backdoor in a proprietary embedded system. Unless the companies in question both demand and inspect the entire source code for their scanners, it doesn't matter WHAT is running on them.

    12. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually:

      The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

      It doesn't matter what OS is in use if the manufacturer is the one installing the malware.

      The lesson here isn't that XP is insecure - it's that you shouldn't buy Chinese goods.

    13. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words, what they really want is a scanner hardware bit that clips onto a droid or iphone. Unless they're scanning bar- or QR-codes, in which case the phone can already do that on its own...

      We've long since reached the point that for handheld specialty devices, it's far more sensible to take advantage of an existing, highly extensible and highly capable brain - the smartphone or tablet - and clip on any needed speciality hardware. See: Square (turns your phone into a card reader), cash register systems, etc. One of the fairly few exceptions is high-end cameras, since you basically need a smartphone-class system just to handle a 20MP sensor in the way users expect, but even so there's apps that let a remote computer control it.

    14. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What phone do you have, so I know never to buy it?

      The only times my phone has ever failed to fire its wake-up alarm are when I forgot to plug it in and it died. Which is no more its fault or different than if I failed to wind a mechanical watch. (Meanwhile, my $40 Timex Indiglo has a full year on its battery and several more to go...)

    15. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These boards tend to also double as signature pads, GPS naviagation, route planning, tracking, and purchase systems for delivery drivers. Go ahead and pay attention the next time you get a package from UPS or FedEx.

    16. Re:Problem traced by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      FedEx used to do these things in Forth. Given how featureful Forth software can be even in tiny amounts, I just still don't see a reason for embedded XP. But then again, what do I know, I'm a brain-damaged Wirthian/Mooreian.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:Problem traced by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I fully understand how an MCU saves time over using discrete logic. That is a trivial issue. But I sort of fail to see how dealing with complex software on top of complex hardware beats using simple (not trivial!) software on top of simple hardware, perhaps with the exception of this being The Only Way for a lot of solution vendors ("What, you don't want to program in C++ with our 3GB environment? But that's how we do things!").

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:Problem traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Chinese culture is based on stealing rather than inventing.

      WTF I didn't realize the NSA is staffed by a bunch of Chinese-Americans?
      Shit these Asiatics have already deeply infected our infrastructures.

    19. Re:Problem traced by sillybilly · · Score: 0

      How about the other way around. I'm not even sure the story is real, and the Chinese aren't just framed by someone infiltrated designing these scanners for them, and they diligently and mindlessly make it, like they make so many other things, and they end up looking like idiots. I got called paranoid above, well, hey, you have no friggin idea how paranoid I can get. In fact Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" says everything you see in reality may be fake. And Rene Descartes came up with one truth that he was certain about, and did not doubt that it might be fake, by just closing his eyes, and thinking hard, and that's "Cogito ergo sum", or "I think therefore I am," which is awesome, but he got stuck there, he couldn't really go much further. Even all of math (that you can supposedly do without opening your eyes or using your senses, just pure closed eyed thought) can be fake, as you can flip any axiom it's based on, and there you go, it's a different math with a different set of rules, but no better or worse than the one based on original axioms. So don't believe everything you read, take everything you read with a grain of salt, and if you wanna fly off on a paranoid tangent, there are various degrees of paranoia and distrust, including total everything in the world is fake and you're just in suspended animation in Alien's spaceship, dreaming everything, and she's just using you to think for her, reading your mind, because the human brain is pretty good at stuff, while she's also growing offsprings in your chest. As external eggs, and in that eggs that don't require an energy packet in them, are much faster and fecund ways to reproduce than the mammalian female taking weeks(bunnies) to months(humans) to pop 1(human) to 20(pigs) offsprings at a time. For instance a good queen bee without a mammalian womb might lay 3000 external eggs individually, into individual hex cells, per day.

  2. China-based threat actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    China-based threat actors are using sophisticated malware installed on handheld scanners to target shipping and logistics organizations from all over the world [...] The Chinese manufacturer installs the malware on the Windows XP operating systems embedded in the devices.

    Okay... first, is a "China-based threat actor" anything like a Chinese hacker? Or are we talking about thespians who specialize in instilling apprehension and dread, while standing on top of dinnerware? Because these are two different things.

    Also... Windows XP?!? There's the problem right there. Why in the name of Bob does someone have Windows EMBEDDED in a scanner? You need a GUI to make something go "BEEP"?!? Seriously? Next you'll say that your vacuum cleaner has Windows XP embedded. Hey, look, here's a Windows XP embedded PENCIL! This new eraser I just bought... Windows 8! Yeah!

    1. Re:China-based threat actors by toejam13 · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are probably using Windows XP Embedded (XPe), which is a customizable version of the OS. Customers can strip the OS down to only the components they need, significantly reducing the footprint of the OS.

      XPe benefits from being able to use standard XP hardware drivers. Sometimes a driver simply isn't available for Linux, QNX, VxWorks or other embedded OSes. That's one reason that OS/2 based ATMs are disappearing - not because of security, but because drivers for newer card readers don't exist.

      Lastly, you'd be surprised at what a modern scanner looks like. It doesn't just read barcodes and go beep. My workplace uses scanners for inventory tracking, and they come with a full GUI where we can associate new parts with a chassis, report drives being shredded, and just about anything you can think of inventory related.

    2. Re:China-based threat actors by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      "Or are we talking about thespians who specialize in instilling apprehension and dread, while standing on top of dinnerware?"

      Well if they call everyone "Daaahhling!" and have endless anecdotes about how they were at the RSC with Daaahhling Larry doing a particularly evil modern day interpretation of Richard III involving hackers then that may well be the case.

    3. Re:China-based threat actors by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Okay... first, is a "China-based threat actor" anything like a Chinese hacker?

      Newspeak.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    4. Re:China-based threat actors by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      But still vulnerable to a ton and a half of vulnerabilities. Sure you can cut your exposure down (like no IE) but that still doesn't mean that the OS can't be attacked in other ways. You also hit the nail on the head, obsolescence and driver support. A lot of companies want to get away from XP but that means upgrading other systems and in some cases processes because there aren't one for one analogs available. That's the bigger problem, when a company gets hemmed in by the tech they may have selected decades ago. I had to work with one customer a year ago to get rid of a couple of SCO boxes that had been running since the late 80s running inventory control. It wasn't just the OS that was the issue, it was also the inventory software that they'd been using for decades. Changing that wasn't as simple as an OS upgrade.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    5. Re:China-based threat actors by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2

      Sometimes a driver simply isn't available for Linux, QNX, VxWorks or other embedded OSes.

      That is actually the best argument to avoid such hardware. Rely on hardware that is open standards based, then you can reduce dependency on proprietary drivers

      The reason they have to stay with XPe is because there probably aren't any drivers for Vista/Win7/Win8/Win8.1 So much for the benefit of reusing XP drivers

    6. Re:China-based threat actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay... first, is a "China-based threat actor" anything like a Chinese hacker?

      Newspeak.

      Not at all. This is the Chinese Government, and everyone knows it. However, they don't have absolute proof. So, instead, the release only states those facts that are proven: That this attack is coming from person and/or organization in China.

    7. Re:China-based threat actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if they call everyone "Daaahhling!" and have endless anecdotes about how they were at the RSC with Daaahhling Larry doing a particularly evil modern day interpretation of Richard III involving hackers then that may well be the case.

      You've met President Jinping?

    8. Re:China-based threat actors by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a driver simply isn't available for Linux, QNX, VxWorks or other embedded OSes.

      That is actually the best argument to avoid such hardware. Rely on hardware that is open standards based, then you can reduce dependency on proprietary drivers

      The reason they have to stay with XPe is because there probably aren't any drivers for Vista/Win7/Win8/Win8.1 So much for the benefit of reusing XP drivers

      On the other hand, I'm sure whatever is needed could be ported to NetBSD - which can probably also run on these things, as it runs on just about everything else, including toasters. Just sayin' that there's more to wide-spread hardware portability than just XPe.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we already knew that they were doing it. Now we also know how are they doing it.
    More importantly now we know where we must point our missiles to, to knock them out.
    In all, good work.

    1. Re:OK by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      No, not "good work". And we're not going to fire any missiles at China.

      The article essentially told us absolutely nothing useful.

      I don't give a crap where the command and control for the malware is.

      I need to know who the manufacturer is, what brands that manufacturer produces, and what specific products we're talking about.

      And that's exactly what the rest of you need to know as well, because at least some of us need to know what scanners we need to find and toss in a bin. And we need to know what to look for on the backend systems that have apparently been affected so we can clean them and lock them down.

      Lanxiang Vocational School (no idea if that's the right one, or, after looking at the map, if there are any scanner manufacturers in the area) is not someplace I've ever heard of before, and I don't see any obvious factories on that map.

      Horrible FUD article.

    2. Re:OK by Kiralan · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on the 'nothing useful' point. The linked pdf in the post was nothing more than 'Look at this serious threat' on the first page, and how wonderful the virus detection company's product was on the rest.

      --
      V for Vendetta: People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
  4. Backtrack the financials... by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check for uncanny puts and calls on the market before earnings reports come out that can be traced to related parties...

    1. Re:Backtrack the financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puts and calls - that is about the only thing I can think of that would make this kind of data at all useful.

    2. Re:Backtrack the financials... by satuon · · Score: 1

      I'd say "So they know those financials. So what?" It's not like they got the nuclear arsenal codes.

    3. Re:Backtrack the financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure they do, it's 0000000

      Everyone knows this.

    4. Re:Backtrack the financials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, I thought it was 8 zeros, am I wrong?

    5. Re:Backtrack the financials... by module0000 · · Score: 1

      You can buy your own devices with enough cash, which you get from massively profitable trades based on (stolen) insider information.

      I don't think a nuclear arsenal is what they are after though..more likely they just want to take the money and run.

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    6. Re:Backtrack the financials... by saleenS281 · · Score: 0

      The US will never lose a military battle. Russia is attacking our infrastructure, China our economy. If you think this isn't a big deal, you're not getting the big picture.

  5. The Moral? by linearz69 · · Score: 1

    Don't buy stuff from China. It built with the bones of children AND it contains malware.

    1. Re: The Moral? by cormandy · · Score: 1

      Sadly all of the handheld scanner factories in the US have since shut down.

    2. Re: The Moral? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sounds like to me a prime opportunity to re-open one, and tout "american or canadian made" with "staff from inside the country" along with "rigorous QC."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering pollution is so high that children would actually contain many of those toxic materials used in electronics, that isn't so far fetched.

    4. Re: The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We don't know how to make chips in the US?
      I think Intel and IBM would disagree.

    5. Re: The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IBM? AMD? Intel? Samsung? Apple? They all make chips, and none of them are making them in China.

      China is a major IP problem, and that IP problem is self-imposed by their culture. Korea and Japan also share some of this culture (Samsung vs Apple), but they're not making compromised hardware because that would absolutely kill them when their customers no longer trust their products.

      Nobody has any reason to trust Chinese hardware or drivers, often the parts are counterfeit, and so are the drivers. I can name a few things off the top of my head:
      X100P cards (MDM3200) are counterfeited and sold for use with Asterisk PBX software
      Various Cisco (1700 thru 3560 series) and Nortel hardware that ended up in ISP's and government systems

      Plenty of MemorySticks/SDcards/CompactFlash devices are counterfeit, along with many external hard drives.

      As for your paranoid ramble. Concrete+rebar will not last, brick doesn't last. Only roman concrete lasts, and you don't want moldy rotten construction hanging around any longer than it has to. Most of the stuff that is still standing (think Golden Gate bridge) is only still standing because of maintenance, eventually these things hit a point where the maintenance exceeds the cost of building a new one.

      Like it seems stupid, but the only kind of building that would last forever and be completely indestructable would be one made of carbon nanofabric, diamond or sapphire. Completely rot-proof, strong as hell, but don't go making a 110 story skyscraper from it, just because it's strong, doesn't mean it has the ductile qualities to stand up to earthquakes and wind, it would have to absorb that, and the welding would rapidly be eroded from that.

      There was a TV show (I think it was "life after people") I watched that should all humans disappear in a blink of an eye, everything would start falling apart within 48 hours:
      a) Power plants would stop operating (coal, oil and gas), causing a chain of outages that take out the power grid and SCRAM'ing the nuclear stations, leaving only geothermal, hydroelectric, wind and solar still operating but not sending the power anywhere. Most wooden structures equipped with natural gas would catch fire.
      b) within 2 years, glass buildings would be shattered as the material used to hold them in shrinks and falls out
      c) Within 20 years many brickwork buildings, roads and bridges would be destroyed from encroaching plants
      d) Within 50 years, concrete+rebar, skeletons of remaining buildings would cause them to collapse

      Go look at existing decay images from Chernobyl, Salton Sea, and Code (California) to see how fast certain environments encroach.

    6. Re: The Moral? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like to me a prime opportunity to re-open one, and tout "american or canadian made" with "staff from inside the country" along with "rigorous QC."

      Of course! Because we all know no American agency would place backdoors or malware in a product, right?

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    7. Re: The Moral? by Kasar · · Score: 1

      We have SEH and some others growing silicon in the US, though the profits go to the parent company.
      US manufacturing seems to interest Asian companies more than any US ones, they exited the US in the 80s/90s and invested heavily overseas. Even Foxconn of suicidal worker fame has been talking about opening US facilities.

      --
      vi? Who's that?
    8. Re: The Moral? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Well Intel still makes microprocessors and Microchip still makes microcontrollers in the US.

      If you want ARM ST makes micros in Europe which is an ally, oh wait ... scratch the last one.

    9. Re: The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, there is no such agency.

    10. Re: The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you would need a country that values privacy and is willing to tell the big powers to fuck off and die when asked to "cooperate with security".

    11. Re: The Moral? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is no place for your paranoid racist rant. Take it to Stormfront.

    12. Re:The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the moral issues of theft, it's interesting to study how they obtain access.
      Some information should always be guarded and not placed on computers because there will always be a way to get the data.
      For very important data to remain secure I still use the old way, paper, ink and one very dated old PC not connected to internet and attached printer for word processing.
      Pages get sealed in plastic then placed in a fire proof box.
      There are places that are beyond hacker reach, just takes some time and effort.

       

    13. Re: The Moral? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they are all manufacured in China, but a local company, Intermec, makes and sells scanners. They may be Chinese sourced parts though.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    14. Re: The Moral? by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      Only one that sure loves to protect "national security". Of course, there's also some part about a secret court and mass-surveillance, but hey, at least your, well, kind of safe! Right?

    15. Re: The Moral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

    16. Re: The Moral? by sillybilly · · Score: 0

      No other place on Earth has had a steady congregation of nerds since the 90's, like Slashdot. Those in power who don't like the truth spoken out loud, especially when it goes against their very expensive private media campaign of trying to set a trend and brainwash everyone into something, they will want to demolish slashdot. So the first step in that is divide and conquer, send one off the Stormfront, another one to Soylentnews (what a crappy name that is, almost as bad as a herbivore head with GNU is not Unix.)

    17. Re: The Moral? by romons · · Score: 1

      Go look at existing decay images from Chernobyl, Salton Sea, and Code (California) to see how fast certain environments encroach.

      I've heard of bitrot, but Code, California? Some google employee enclave? And you say it is deteriorating?

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
  6. Awaiting the Chinese governments response by phayes · · Score: 1

    In 3 months when absolutely nothing has been done to identify or punish the people responsable for this:
    Look! NSA Spy on you! Snowden nice guy, spend time in Hong kong running from US Government. This, little problem, everyone forget soon!

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    1. Re:Awaiting the Chinese governments response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead the RED Chinese gummint agonizes over the "security" of Windows 8 and iPhones - maybe the security they have a harder time cracking to hijack?

    2. Re:Awaiting the Chinese governments response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead the RED Chinese gummint agonizes over the "security" of iPhones - maybe the security they have a harder time cracking to hijack?

      Fixed that for ya.

  7. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This was most likely done way before Windows XP was EOL, so blaming it on that isn't right. The big problem is that embedded software usually is closed source, hardly ever edited and almost never gets updated unless there are obvious bugs that limit functionality of the device.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not use linux on such things? With everything being custom proprietary stuff, there is no need for "ms office compatibility" or such. So put in a free operating system, increasing the margins as there is now no payment to microsoft. (Or no expensive manouvres to cover up blatant piracy) nd the device boot up faster too . . .

    2. Re:Not really by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Well, Linux versions do go EOL as well, and if it's being embedded in the device it isn't really going to matter what OS it's being embedded in.

      That said, embedding Windoze is pretty dumb for no other reason than it's an absolutely craptacular excuse for an operating system.

  8. Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it will work.

  9. Hope it doesn't get in the way of US spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the processor backdoors and stuff.

  10. Open source. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    Really we are just seeing a failure in widely used proprietary software.

    Obscure proprietary software is less of a problem because hackers are less likely to attack it.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  11. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that these "hacks" always seem to originate in China, not at the NSA.

  12. Look out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Red Peril again! Batten down the hatches.

  13. Have you forgotten? by conscarcdr · · Score: 1

    That China has always been our best friend. It was Frederick of Pinchfield who masterminded Operation Aurora and all the handheld scanner attacks.

  14. EFI BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have found similar attacks in commercial off the shelf motherboards out of China with infected EFI BIOS.

    1. Re:EFI BIOS by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Seriously, if you've got evidence of this, post it. Name names.

      Making vague "infected EFI" comments is utterly unhelpful.

  15. it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by stokessd · · Score: 2

    If the summary is at all accurate, the manufacture built both the hardware and the software. So blaming the OS is silly. This is a case where any OS could be used, even a custom one, and they would add the spying functionality as they were building it. The real issue is buying hardware systems from unethical folks, no OS hardening in the world will help you when the manufacture controls it.

    If China doesn't improve their stand on ethics, they will be relegated to building bath toys and partial systems where their leaks and theft aren't super critical. If they hope to join the rest of the developed world, they need to get their shit together.

    1. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      The problem is we have no place to be telling china to improve their hacking ethics these days.

    2. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If China doesn't improve their stand on ethics, they will be relegated to building bath toys and partial systems where their leaks and theft aren't super critical. If they hope to join the rest of the developed world, they need to get their shit together.

      Are you serious?

    3. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      If they hope to join the rest of the developed world, they need to get their shit together.

      so, you suggest, USA ain't developed?

      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/04/22/001239/intentional-backdoor-in-consumer-routers-found

    4. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by catgirlui · · Score: 1

      i'm Chinese but I don/t think ethic is a big thing And in fact we are not so poor - - we are not like the Korean guys

    5. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been paying attention. China has become a less attractive place to take business because their shoddy business practices are becoming known in the west and wages have been going up there anyhow. This way of providing supply oriented services is deeply ingrained in their corporate culture and has been going on long before everything sold in the US was made there, even other chinese don't trust each other in business over simple transactions unless there is a long running personal relationship.. the whole supply chain is fucked over there. I believe they will come around just as other countries have on the same issue but it will take some time because it's just how shit is over there.

    6. Re:it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if they can sell it at a low enough price point.

  16. "Customers can strip the OS down ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently not

  17. embedded systems get less OS updates so any by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    embedded systems get less OS updates / fail behind on patching so any os can be at risk.

    Also does that Linux system hook into exchange / AD? Your DB? Ect?

  18. Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did not know that scanners can run Windows. I thought they ran some proprietary operating system that is harder to hack into. Maybe the software that I am thinking of existed in the early 1990s Microsoft developed scanning software for Windows XP. thanks for sharing.

  19. it's not really an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ethics are only a problem for people that are well fed and comfortable. Just saying.

    Would you steal bread from the wealthy decadent neighbor if your family was starving? Would it be more ethical to let your children starve?

    Contrived example, I know. But as wealth inequality gets worse, so too do these issues. If your standard of living is 2 orders of magnitude better, I'm pretty sure the people living in poverty will all heave a great sigh of pity at this injustice to your stock portfolio.

    Seriously? Bath toys? Underestimating China might just be the last thing the American Empire ever does.

    1. Re:it's not really an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're talking about is a thing but I think you're ignorant of the motivations and situations that make chinese do these things, they're not the actions of the desperate poor and destitute. Your poorest chinese is pretty fucking poor by US standards but he has nothing to do with handheld scanner in the USA. Not nigeria or congo

  20. Hypocrisy by HughJazz · · Score: 1

    American government officials: It's wrong for the Chinese government to engage in mass surveillance Chinese government officials It's wrong for the American government to engage in mass surveillance. Principled people with actual ethics: It's wrong for *any* government to engage in mass surveillance.

  21. Chinese hackers by canned · · Score: 1

    funny how all those "Chinese hackers" who are so dumb that don't even know how to use a simple proxy to hide their IP addresses coincidentally began appearing at about the same time the US government decided China and Russia will be the new enemy. And now that China has stopped buying US treasure bonds I bet we will be hearing about new "Chinese hackers" every single day. coincidentally, NATO wants to do a conventional warfare against hackers, too. Whatta coincidence indeedy

    1. Re:Chinese hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really are this dumb. They hack straight from their HQ all the time.

    2. Re:Chinese hackers by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      They probably want the U.S. to "notice" them or something, but it probably wouldn't be that easy for the U.S. to send a strongly worded cease-and-desist message that actually would make China stop their activities, at least not very soon, especially when the U.S. just lost a considerable portion of its own credibility a while ago. If the U.S. ceased exploiting our own systems, then they may just be able to pound China from a higher standpoint.

  22. All's fair in love and war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the US corporate world has made China rich, they will now be their bitch.

  23. jargon by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    What the hell is a "threat actor"?

    Why use jargon when "criminal" is a perfectly good word? And if this is a specific type of criminal, say a terrorist or a thief or the intelligence apparatus of a foreign country, then there are very descriptive and precise words for those as well. If it's corporate espionage, then "crook" works well, too.

    Why do people who use technology feel the need to create neologisms for the most mundane things? Just the other day, I saw someone from a news web site refer to an "article" as an "explainer cardstack". I'm not shitting you. I immediately took that news source out of my RSS feed because if they're that dedicated to lexical obfuscation, I don't trust anything they write.

    English motherfucker. Do you speak it?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  24. it isn't XP, it's an ethics problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL ethics? Typical American arrogance.

    Nobody outside America gives a shit what you Americans think, your generations are like the Germans in the Nazi era, so naive, arrogant and delusional, you don't even know which side is up, ever since you idiots were born you've been told lies such as Santa and "American Exceptionalism", while in fact there is no Santa, and your "country" have been under controlled by Europeans families since its foundin (Protip: Israel own you), the house of cards are now falling apart, you guys just don't know it yet, but the rest of the world is well aware of what's happening, and they're rushing to jump off the USD ship.

    You idiots talk a lot about values, but everything you idiots claimed you stand for ended up being nothing but a big fat lie, your country was founded on mass murder of the natives, after that you mastered slavery, you then got lucky on WW1 and WW2 because you guys were so far away from the rest of the world, then as soon as the war was over, you guys stole all the best German scientists (all your stealth planes and the Apollo project were lead by those scientists), ditched the Brits and enjoy the head start while the rest of the world was recovering, after that you started toppling governments all over the world, dropping chemical weapons everywhere (look up, Vietnam, agent orange), and now you're spying on everyone, even your "friends".

    These are all common knowledge outside America, so keep dreaming dick heads, it doesn't even matter if you guys don't choose to wake up, because the party is already over, the future generations will look at you the same way as we see the Nazis.

  25. Re: Windows 8 eraser by peacefool · · Score: 1

    A bad choice, obviously: it's not compatible with a WinXP pencil!