Slashdot Mirror
How To Fix The Shortage of K-5 Scholastic Chess Facilitators
theodp writes The good news, writes Michael Thomas, is that wired kids are learning chess at an unprecedented rate. Young children learning chess from tablets can quickly become more knowledgeable than their parents. But the bad news, laments Thomas, is there is so much demand for scholastic chess that there are not enough experienced chess facilitators to go around. Could technology like RFID-tagged chess pieces or services like ChessStream.com be employed to referee second-grader chess matches, Thomas wonders, or are more well-meaning-but-not-necessarily-expert human facilitators — a la T-ball coaches — the answer?
A "shortage"! Quick, import more H1B's!
Table-ized A.I.
perhaps they will also play chess on tablets.
What will we as a society do with an unprecedented crisis such as this looming? With all of the other myriad crises plaguing our nation, this is what keeps me up at night.
Every minute playing chess would be better spent learning about algorithms, computer programming, or biology.
The last thing any parent or teacher should do is encourage playing chess at any serious level. It's like encouraging people to compute logarithms or trigonometric functions longhand on paper; there's some initial benefit in learning some abstract ideas, but then it's just mechanics. And the same is true for chess, and computers have established this in a dramatic way, by showing that simple but fast and deep searches with very simple heuristics can beat any human who has ever lived. A $0.50 pocket calculator can bet any human at the sine function game!
The argument made in that article that chess is somehow good for the goals of "STEM" makes me laugh out loud, but simultaneously weep that the idea was proposed with apparent sincerity...
Fact 1: Most 16 year olds I know these days can't spell.
Fact 2: An adult has 2x the brainpower as a child, especially with decision making, because of frontal lobe rearrangements that happen during teen years
So it's really quite stupid to teach K-5 kids chess instead of reading, writing, and spelling.
The issue is with schools cutting extra-curriculum activities, because the teachers want to get paid, and the schools can't afford it. Fix that somehow, and you'll probably get all the coaches you need, not just for chess club, but for sports and the arts.
Buck Feta. You know what to do.
I've had two kids now in youth chess and this article smacks of the "wrong direction" I think the youth chess movement is headed.
The trends I saw included:
#1) More PAID chess instructors. Er...for what? The best instruction...and players...are already online, with fully developed laddering, ranking, tutorials, etc.
#2) More REMOTE tournaments. What is this...hockey now? This is a huge barrier to families (e.g., smart immigrants, kids with divorced parents) who can't afford to truck the two hours in each direction - and overnight (i.e., requiring a hotel) meets are on the horizon.
#3) Life AFTER chess is discouraged. In my "gifted" experience, you learned chess in first or second grade, and could take down just about anyone in middle school, but then you moved on from games into programming, higher math, or something else with a lot of other people who outgrew chess as a daily or even weekly activity. However, "outgrowing chess" is no longer OK with this crowd...instead you're expected to keep playing until you ladder up or burn out - yikes.
Is this a tech-for-no-reason article?
The article gives a long example where players need to figure out things like checkmate. That's the most trivial of problems, which players need to figure out just to complete the game. Plus, average children at the K-5 (outside of tournaments) have a house rule where capturing the enemy king is a checkmate, which is the same effect.
If you're at a tournament for that, then you really need to play a few chess matches yourself - even if it's against BattleChess, Chessmaster, or plenty of other free computer programs that can have their difficulty significantly reduced.
The best approach would be to mentor teenage facilitators.
Come on. The article is a joke. " A chess facilitator brain implant would be wired between perception and cognition. You would just look at the board and know if it is checkmate." Did the original poster not realize this?
Do we really need to promote chess playing to a group of imaginative, energetic children who have just barely grasped the concept of role-taking, and are only barely ready to understand - much less compete in - competitive or team sports? Did they do something to earn this sort of punishment? Are these sort of felons?
Don't get me wrong; I was in a "Chess and Tactical Games Club" when I was in Highschool. We played warhammer 40k with minatures, star trek combat on a hex map that looked like a starscape, and recreated WW2 naval battles in the gym with wood blocks, marked ropes and protractors, played Risk and Axis & Allies. We even played a few economic simulator games.
However, I can't remember playing a single game of chess. This is largely because playing a game where a turn took an hour and a half was more fun than playing chess, and that's coming from a highschool geek back when the term meant something.
My guess is that there's only a perceived shortage of k-5 scholastic chess facilitators, rather, if the number is higher than 1, we probably have more than we ought.
As a taxpayer, I support chess on tablets.
1) No chess pieces to lose.
2) Program can ensure chess rules are always followed
3) school chess tournaments can be conducted via telephone/internet, avoiding unnecessary transportation. Seriously, there is a long tradition of chess by mail, or phone, and these are kids in public schools.
4) all of which mean, less expensive adult labor is needed to make things work.
American Kids Falling Behind in Chess!
More Chinese Kids Play Chess Than American Kids!
America Behind In Chess.
Chess Helps Kids Excel
THEN you will see every helicopter parent demanding facilitators be hired by schools.
I learned the basics of playing chess in the fifth grade when the guidance counselor picked a club for me since I had zero interest in joining any of the school clubs. I didn't master the game until I got Sargon II for the Commodore 64. After playing a game everyday for two years straight, I was able to defeat the computer on the highest difficulty setting most of the time.
like women's underrepresentation in technology?
"[Chess] is certainly a pleasing and ingenious amusement, but it seems to have one defect, which is that it is possible to have too much knowledge of it, so that whoever would excel in the game must give a great deal of time to it, as I believe, and as much study as if he would learn some noble science or perform well anything of importance; and yet in the end, for all his pains, he only knows how to play a game. Thus, I think a very unusual thing happens in this, namely that mediocrity is more to be praised than excellence."
-- Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, 1528, Book II para. 31, Singleton translation
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
... its more then sufficient for the referring of chess matches between children.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
I am a full-time chess coach for K-5 kids. I have over 200 students that I see every week. At first I though this article was going to address the very real demand for more skilled coaches in K-5 schools. Instead, the article is trying to push a software/hardware solution that would make it "easier" to adjudicate games and tournaments. This solution is addressing a problem that doesn't actually exist.
Here is the problem they present as an example: an 'argument' between two students about whether a position is checkmate. The presented solution: a variety of software/hardware that will make it easier to 'referee' the position. This is ridiculous. When two students are having an argument, figuring out whether there is checkmate on the board is usually the easiest problem to solve. Getting the students to calm down and be good sports is the hard part.
In addition, there is no shortage of adjudication at tournaments. One or two coaches can easily handle the problems of 300+ students in a tournament. We don't need legions of people equipped with apps to go watch children's games. To make the article even more irrelevant, most tournaments across the world are run with a "non-interference" rule. This means that the tournament staff cannot actually comment on whether a position is checkmate. It is up to the students to come to a decision on their own, agree and report. The coaches with let them report an incorrect result if that is what they agree on. It is part of the game. So the coach doesn't actually need to know whether the position is really checkmate.
The only time an actual ruling needs to be passed is if the students can't come to an agreement. This is very rare and will usually only happen 1 in 2000 games or so. We don't need to RDIF tag all of our 16000+ tournament pieces just so that 1 in 2000 games someone who knows nothing about chess can make an accurate ruling. We'll just bring over an expert in those cases.
A quick aside to those questioning the benefits of K-5 chess, it is hugely beneficial to students. Sure, it would be great if they spent the time they did on chess on other things, like algorithms or biology. However, most students don't get super worked up about algorithms. They aren't going to willingly spend 15 hours a week on algorithms. They will happily spend that time on chess however, and chess is teaching them a lot of the same skills. Critical thinking, carefulness, perseverance, recovering from mistakes, cause and effect, and on, and on.
The most important skill that students learn is how much effort you have to put into something in order to really become an expert. Nothing else a child does in their K-12 years really teaches them that in order to be an expert, you need to spend years and years working on it. Chess is very good at driving this point home.
Anyone saying things like "every minute playing chess would be better spent learning about algorithms, computer programming, or biology." has clearly never sat a kindergartener down and try to teach them algorithms. Every day. For a year. Teach them chess. They will grasp it. They will want to learn. It is fun. They will gain skills that you wouldn't be able to impart in other ways.
But you don't need to take my word on it. The benefits of chess have been have been well studied. Scholastic chess is one of the few things that has been proven to consistently increase academic performance, collage success and future income.
Also a shortage of facilitators at juniors grades in Candy Crush Saga, and that's not even touching the tip of the iceberg, Angry Birds Space coaches are at a chronically low level!
Bejeweled is in crisis, people!
Most inspired and insightful post I've read on Slashdot all year.
Thank you for teaching children.
$5 / month hosted VPS on linux = awesome!
Anyone looking for chess resourses could do worse, than visiting my website. http://dollyknot.com/chess.html/
It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
I've been a TD for scholastic chess tournaments. For the most part, the kids are no different than adults, except slightly more respectful on average. In 95% of the games with semi-experienced kids, no TD is really even needed. The only time I got taxed was with the kids who had never been at a tournament before. In that case, it was not about figuring out whether a position was checkmate or not, but dealing with kids who knew each other deciding to offer advice to each other, or similar violations of the game.
The article was stupid to a level that is just hard to believe.
--MyLongNickName
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I've never seen so much filler "news" in any previous year in the slow Memorial Day to Labor Day summer months.
All I can say is there damn well better be gender equity in grade school chess, as these testosterone fueled second grade boys oppress and damage the psyches of the girls, leading to a critical lack of both STEM and Chess Playing females.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
> Every minute playing chess would be better spent ...
learning go, obviously.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Use Human Growth Hormone to make them taller?
Obama has a Russian chess tutor named Putin.
Don't think they are playing on tablets and they may just be betting the entire world!
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
I used to enjoy chess, then I started getting involved with formal chess and found out I had to start studying other people's games to get better.
I could not think of a more boring subject; and I was reading math textbooks in my spare time, (4th-5th grade).
I could be one how does one do so?
Wake me when the online chess sites all break. Everybody that I know that's good at chess learned and play online. Chess is one of those games that if you can't figure out strategy on your own after learning the pieces and moves, you're not going to do well at chess. Plus, getting good at chess requires a lot of matches and so a lot of time. If you're not into it, even as a smart person, you're not going to waste the time, especially if you're better at something else maybe just as geeky.
HAHA, hoisted by your own petard.
ProTip: Don't grab a random quote from wikipedia. ..." the mean is more commendable then the excellence."
I have a copy of it right here, and he says(Sir Friderick) :
Meaning one should learn it, but to be the best he views it is the waste of time of the local courtiers. It based on observation of the Sapinish courtiers.
Later he goes on and talking about game besides chess(chestes) are there just for the common person to marvel at.
You really should try to understand what the fuck you are quoting from,, you look like an idiot.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Yes, deity forbid that those children find fun in a competitive intellectual venture. The horror!
Really, they should all be sitting down to Starcraft tournaments with doritos and mountain dew readily nearby.
Actually, even better, ban both of those, and redirect any funding the useful things like the local sports/football club.
This is really good news thanks for share !
Get great apps on your phone Battle Alert Hack
Because a chess set costs only a few dollars, requires only two people, is accessible to men and women, to young and old, is enjoyable at many skill levels, can be carried on a hike or vacation or on the ISS ... Need I go on? /., this comment is foolish.
Even by the generous standards of
http://robotunicornattack.us
Upon loading up the game and probably startling Google Chrome itself with the absurdness of what I was playing, the word disappointment temporarily fell out of my vocabulary because after even 30 seconds of playing my head was filled with rainbows, amazement, and awe at how simultaneously simple and entertaining the experience was. Aside from the frightening array of colours that would distress even the hardiest of retinas, everything about this game is unbelievably simple and easy to grasp. Taking the fact that you are a mechanical unicorn as given, you are thrown into a bubblegum world of fantasy and sparkle which, upon witnessing it with your own eyes, will make you understand what those Skittles talk about when they bang on about "tasting the rainbow". As a robot unicorn, your job is to simply run endlessly across terrain, jumping intermittently when the ground beneath you ends and landing on the next platform. The jumps become increasingly difficult as you progress, with terrain and giant star-shaped obstacles getting in your way.