Slashdot Mirror
Manuel Noriega Sues Activision Over Call of Duty
mrspoonsi sends this BBC report:
Manuel Noriega, the former dictator of Panama, is suing Call of Duty's video games publisher. The ex-military ruler is seeking lost profits and damages after a character based on him featured in Activision's 2012 title Black Ops II. The 80-year-old is currently serving a jail sentence in Panama for crimes committed during his time in power, including the murder of critics. One lawyer said this was the latest in a growing trend of such lawsuits. "In the U.S., individuals have what's called the right to publicity, which gives them control over how their person is depicted in commerce including video games," explained Jas Purewal, an interactive entertainment lawyer. "There's also been a very well-known action by a whole series of college athletes against Electronic Arts, and the American band No Doubt took action against Activision over this issue among other cases. "It all focuses upon the American legal ability for an individual to be only depicted with their permission, which in practice means payment of a fee. "But Noriega isn't a US citizen or even a resident. This means that his legal claim becomes questionable, because it's unclear on what legal basis he can actually bring a case against Activision."
Send him truckloads of unsold "Panama" single cassettes.
Manuel Noriega can't even have some nobody VP at Activision eliminated anymore. Back in the 80s he could have had trained assassins at their doorstep within a week.
I read the internet for the articles.
>As much as everyone has reason to hate Manuel Noriega
Yep
> I want to see him win this, including punitive damages. Activision is that bad of a company.
That's a poor reason to want someone to win a lawsuit. If he wins it should be because his suit has merit.
Doesn't that same law apply here?
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
If he was suing EA I'd donate to his legal fund
Activision i don't hate so i hope he loses for no reason other than its a silly claim how is he losing money? lol prison laundry is not paying him the full wage he deserves?
Could you imagine if Hitler was still alive? he'd make a killing on law suits!
He's in prison under Panamanian law. Sure, we helped put him there (and profited from his crimes before that became unfashionable and he became less willing to be controlled) but he's in prison for violating Panamanian law and was put there by the Panamanian judiciary.
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
I find it very strange if I wouldn't have the same standing to sue anyone abusing my likeness in a US court for violation of US law in US jurisdiction as anyone else. For example, if you slander me in a US newspaper why shouldn't I have standing to sue you? If those laws didn't apply to literally everyone, any foreigner would be totally without the protection of the law in every country but their own and there's plenty crimes that can be conducted remotely.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
COD present a pretty accurate portrayal of that monster. So not libel or slander.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Odd, since the US has said that US laws do apply to Noriega, even when the person and crime are not on US soil.
"National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
It would be amusing if the suit is thrown out under the Son of Sam law... (He wouldn't be a celebrity if not for his crimes).
This has come up before in similar cases and the celebrity loses unless their image is used in a way that misleads consumers by implying endorsement of the product.
For a video game example, see James "Jim" Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc. Also, Tiger Woods' agent sued regard a painting featuring the golfer, and lost, in ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing. Alyssa Milano's mom, Lin Milano, contacted us about her daughter's "right of publicity" 20 years ago and we found we could tell her to take a hike.
Absent defamation, the celebrity's name and image is protected in a way very similar to a trademark. (In common law jurisdictions, almost _exactly_ like a trademark). You can't sell "Britney Spears" brand headphones without permission, because that would imply that the singer endorses the product, misleading consumers. You CAN sell a comic book titled "Britney Spears is a stupid slut" because nobody will think Ms. Spears endorsed that.
Of course there can be other causes of action if someone does something else bad and also happens to be using a celebrity's image as well, but it usually comes down to implied endorsement. Laws do vary from one state to another.
That's why he's not suing under libel or slander, but under the publicity clause.
He doesn't want it removed, or reparations for damage to his reputation, He just wants to be paid for the too accurate representation of him. If EA had just mad it some random jungle military guy, they'd have been fine.
"Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
actually imho that seems like the most reasonable outcome
agreed
Merit? Now since when has that mattered in lawsuits?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Oops. Was actually going for "don't really have to worry about [it]"
Have you seen Weird Al's Word Crimes? It's hilarious.
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
So, you think EA should switch the character to depict George Bush?
Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!