Slashdot Mirror


Activist Group Sues US Border Agency Over New, Vast Intelligence System

An anonymous reader writes with news about one of the latest unanswered FOIA requests made to the Department of Homeland Security and the associated lawsuit the department's silence has brought. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has sued the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in an attempt to compel the government agency to hand over documents relating to a relatively new comprehensive intelligence database of people and cargo crossing the US border. EPIC's lawsuit, which was filed last Friday, seeks a trove of documents concerning the 'Analytical Framework for Intelligence' (AFI) as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. EPIC's April 2014 FOIA request went unanswered after the 20 days that the law requires, and the group waited an additional 49 days before filing suit. The AFI, which was formally announced in June 2012 by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), consists of "a single platform for research, analysis, and visualization of large amounts of data from disparate sources and maintaining the final analysis or products in a single, searchable location for later use as well as appropriate dissemination."

6 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Ingsoc by Bodhammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." George Orwell - "1984"

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  2. Re:No Decent Solution by NotSanguine · · Score: 3, Funny

    A strong nation ID card would help such that even casual employment was not possible without prior approval by local police would go a long way towards stopping illegals from having the desire to get here. Yet businesses love lowering the wage pool by flooding illegal immigrants into the nation. I wonder just how much the price of groceries would jump if illegal farm labor was shut down. And the absolute bottom line is that reproduction as well as immigration degrades the quality of life for all of us. We need strict population size control.

    You're absolutely right. Those people don't deserve to live here, thinking they can come to this country and have their descendants live here too! And all those wetback children using our diapers are a disgrace! We Americans have been here since the beginning of the American continent, formed as the super-continent Pangaea broke up starting about 175 million years ago. Immigrants must be stopped. They never gave us anything but trouble. But why stop with just keeping out the immigrants and limiting procreation (that's worked out really well in China, no?)? Let's get Swiftian on their asses! MMMM babies!

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  3. Re:No Decent Solution by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Nations must have borders or the nation ceases to exist.

    I question that basic assumption: All that does is divide people into an "us vs them" mentality.

    Why must there even BE _artificial_ human inventions such as borders?

    The earth doesn't have borders, only men do.

    I want a world where:

    * People can freely live and work they may without another man giving them permission
    * Personal Rights and Freedoms are respected and placed at a higher value then artificial government granted privileges,
    * Governments to acknowledge that they are created BY the people to SERVE the people, not the other way around where people are brainwashed into believing they need artificial government granted privileges.
    * Governments are Accountable for their actions
    * Governments are Open about their actions

    If people, and government which are an extension of people, would spend less time living in FEAR and profiting off making machines to kill other men we wouldn't even need borders.

    Eventually a unified world government is more efficient but since that scares the hell out of a lot of people that will never happen until we remove money (corruption) from politics.

  4. Re:Why oppose this? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Informative

    The US tried that for a very short time under Nixon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... A massive movement of staff to secure the border was in place and worked very well.
    The flow of drugs, drug money laundering in US banks and illegal labor was at risk. Over time the US returned to a policy that can be seen today.
    A free flow of people, goods and the need for expensive financial instruments ensures wonderful regional profit.
    The UK was a great example too with its visa "expires" database. The UK forgot how/why to count visa in and visa out (was International Passenger Survey).
    The main reason seems to be a super cheap flow of workers and the UK will try and bring back "exit checks" in a year or so :)
    As for US policy - cheap workers with no on site wage or health laws was always the big win to keep wide open boarders for decades.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. Re:No Decent Solution by NotSanguine · · Score: 3, Funny

    In 2013 almost a million people immigrated to the US legally.

    I know. Recognizing sarcasm isn't your strong suit, eh?

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  6. Here's what's wrong (again... still) by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These laws are toothless. "Must answer within 20 days"... or what? With no one held immediately culpable, the law is precisely meaningless.

    Heard of anyone going to jail for this?

    Heard of anyone paying a fine for this?

    Even heard of anyone losing their job for this?

    Compare: If you don't do something the government desires you to do, there will be consequences.

    This is just like the constitution: "Highest law in the land" -- violate it -- as SCOTUS and congress have done over and over -- and the consequences? Nothing.

    Just so you taxpayers know your place. The laws aren't for the government. Those are just laws "for show." The real laws are just for you. Because, you know, they care about you.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.