Slashdot Mirror


NASA Names Building For Neil Armstrong

An anonymous reader writes A building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where Apollo astronauts once trained, was named in honor of astronaut Neil Armstrong. Armstrong, who died in 2012, was remembered at a ceremony as not only an astronaut, but also as an aerospace engineer, test pilot, and university professor. NASA renamed the Operations and Checkout building, also known as the O&C, which is on the National Register of Historic Places. It has been the last stop for astronauts before their flights since 1965. It was also used to test and process Apollo spacecraft. Currently, it's where the Orion spacecraft is being assembled to send astronauts to an asteroid and later to Mars.

52 comments

  1. "to Mars" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> to enable human flight to the vicinities of the Moon and Mars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_%28spacecraft%29)

    I hope someone realizes that there's an order of magnitude in there somewhere.

    1. Re:"to Mars" by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      You'd better call NASA and let them know!

    2. Re:"to Mars" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      My point is that making it to Mars implies "ability to make it to the moon." Writing "the Moon and Mars" is like saying that my truck can pull "a string of beer cans and my 26-foot boat".

    3. Re:"to Mars" by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      So...its still factual, just look at it as its being designed to go to mars, the moon is on the way, therefore it can also go to the moon. Its written for the masses, to them it just sounds better but its not any less true even if you dont care for the wording

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:"to Mars" by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      not really factual, we've not begun to address the issues serious Mars trip entails.

    5. Re:"to Mars" by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      So , I guess that NASA isn't training astronauts anymore ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  2. Why not something important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a Battleship or Airport?

    1. Re:Why not something important? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Informative

      A good many things have been named after him already, including over a dozen schools, an asteroid, a moon crater, and a new engineering hall at Purdue (his alma mater.)

      http://www.universetoday.com/5...

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Why not something important? by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Are you kidding?

      What on earth (intended) could be more suitable?

      He was at the forefront of operations during his active career as an astronaut, and now he has checked out.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re: Why not something important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A battleship, or an airport, like I said.

      Even pointless states and worthless presidents get those. And not some rural airport. A big one with jumbo jets.

    4. Re:Why not something important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding?

      What on earth (intended) could be more suitable?

      A jazz museum. A giant trumpet. A... wait... that's not right...

  3. Poor Buzz by Alien7 · · Score: 1

    He's not going to get a building named after him ever...

    1. Re:Poor Buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Poor Buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buzz Lightyear already had several movies made about him! The Toy Story series started in the 90s! Slashdotters sure have gotten slow/ignorant lately. I blame beta.

    3. Re:Poor Buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he does not care as long as he is still walking the face of the earth.

    4. Re:Poor Buzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the same. Buzz has been living in Armstrong's shadow ever since that day.

      The building could have been named after all three astronauts from that first Apollo landing. Neil, Buzz and whats-his-name

    5. Re:Poor Buzz by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Pauly Shore.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  4. Re:Surprising by oodaloop · · Score: 2

    What a joke this nation has become

    Indeed. Students aren't even taught basic critical thinking skills to be able to identify crackpot conspiracy theories. I hope you're joking. But in case you're not, please explain why the Soviet Union (and over 30 other countires) congratulated us after tracking us to the moon and back. Were they participating in a conspiracy to make themselves look bad?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  5. Re:Surprising by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

    Soviet Union congratulated US for obviating own staged moon landing and exposure of inferior cinematic technology.

  6. Corporate sponsors ? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Couldn't NASA find a generous corporate sponsor to shell out some $$$ to have their name on the side of a building or rocket ?
    Stupid companies pay for namespace on sports facilities why not take advantage of the side of the gantry.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Corporate sponsors ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea!

      What the world needs most is more fucking advertising.

    2. Re:Corporate sponsors ? by riker1384 · · Score: 1

      Vehicle Assembly Building brought to you by Carl's Jr.

    3. Re:Corporate sponsors ? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      If it would get some more cash for NASA to do real science independent of the nitwits we call Congress I'd put up with it...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  7. As someone that works at KSC by trout007 · · Score: 1

    The real name of the building is M7-0355. This is most likely just going to involve a little sign in the lobby.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:As someone that works at KSC by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      The real name of the building is M7-0355. This is most likely just going to involve a little sign in the lobby.

      We've a 'Jean Batten Airport' down here in NZ. People still call it Auckland Airport.

      (Who was Jean Batten? She invented the leather strap used on ships to secure loads: hence "batten down the hatches". Not sure why they named an airrport after her)

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:As someone that works at KSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jean Batten, aviator. Battens are much older than she.

  8. What, NASA doesn't sell there building naming righ by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    What, NASA doesn't sell there building naming rights to the highest bidder?? that might be a few million towards a moon landing or another robot to mars.......or a CEO bonus....

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  9. NASA names building after astronaut by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    Slow news day?

  10. Interesting only if the building were on the moon by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    It wasn't even a new building, they just changed the name of an existing one.

  11. Re:What, NASA doesn't sell there building naming r by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't NASA ignore the celebrity bullshit and name buildings after the people they did the real work of getting man into space and onto the moon, the Scientists and Engineers. NASA you want more scientists and engineers, than stop bloody giving them a back seat to the monkey in the cockpit, grrr ;).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  12. "for"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neil is dead, I don't think he wants you to name anything for him. You can, however, name something after him...

  13. renamed to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Renamed it to what? I'm having a hard time trying to find the new name of the building.

    1. Re:renamed to what? by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

      NA-0355?
      Armstrong Building?
      Neil Building?
      Armstrong Operations & Checkout?
      Neil Operations & Checkout?
      Operations & Armstrong Checkout?
      Operations & Neil Checkout?

      Who knows? It doesn't say anywhere.

      And yes - I did RTFA.

      No disrespect, but for crying out loud - if you report on something, do it properly.

    2. Re:renamed to what? by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1
  14. Armstrong was a cool dude by trawg · · Score: 2

    His biography First Man is a great read. Armstrong seemed like a classic "Right Stuff" guy; I'm sure the book paints him in a positive light but after reading it I couldn't think of anyone else I would want to be the first person to set foot on the moon in the name of humanity.

    I think a better tribute from NASA would be to get us back to the moon. Maybe they could name the first permanent settlement there after him?

  15. Re:What, NASA doesn't sell there building naming r by thrich81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What part of "not only an astronaut, but also as an AEROSPACE ENGINEER, TEST PILOT, and UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR" did you not read in the summary? Nobody worked harder than the early astronauts to get man into space and they were all engineers or scientists. A test pilot is in reality a flying engineer.

  16. No shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The three Orion spacecraft are going to be called: God country and apple pie.

  17. A trend? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Foxconn named one of their factory buildings "Giant Leap" after some employees decided to skip the elevator.

  18. Remembered? Nobody asked him by RubberDogBone · · Score: 2

    Remembered for being a hero, an astronaut, a pioneer, but not, apparently, for the deeply humble and private man he was later in life.

    Armstrong would NEVER have wanted a building named for him, never in a million years. He'd be absolutely furious. NASA knows this and this whole thing is a big fat stick in his eye for wanting his privacy. They never forgave him for that. This is their revenge: his name on a big, ostentatious building. The only thing worse than this would be naming something Armstrong Base.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  19. It's "named AFTER" not "for" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you Americans have such difficulty with prepositions?

    The building was named AFTER Neil Armstrong.

  20. Well shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did not know Neil was dead :(

    Yes... I live under a rock.

  21. Re:Surprising by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    More importantly, the size and scale of the conspiracy would have to be massive. Tens of thousands of people worked on the program would have to be fooled. How many hundreds of thousands of people would have to work to keep ten thousand people fooled or not divulging? Neil deGrasse Tyson said it best in that only 3 people knew about Bill Clinton's sex scandal yet it got out. Also it would have cost the US government more money to create a hoax than it would to actually go to the moon. And they would have done such a piss poor job at it anyway.

    Also they tend to fixate on a few things that seem to be the smoking gun; however, when looked in detail are not as definitive as they seem. For example photos from NASA show that shadows are not parallel. According to conspiracies, this must have been because more than one light source was present, ergo, it was staged. This however does not take into account that the surface of the moon is not flat. Mythbusters verified this.

    Another one is the crosses (+) in the photos appear sometimes behind the subject instead of in front. This can only be because the crosses were added later to photos and not originally taken with the "moon" camera. Anyone with sufficient expertise photography knows that can be caused by overexposure. Overexposure was necessary for some photos in order to get a decent image. And the list goes on.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  22. Re:Remembered? Nobody asked him by Dronak · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for whether Armstrong would like seeing something named after him or not. However, I can say that the "Armstrong Base" exists, just not by that specific name. NASA officially renamed their Dryden Flight Research Center to the Armstrong Flight Research Center on March 1, 2014. See http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dr... for some info. The test range there will still be named after Dryden though.

  23. Re:When politicians need to hide incompetence... by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    NASA already renamed the Dryden Flight Research Facility (NASA's part of Edwards in California) after Armstrong

    not sure why this was marked down (unless all of us tired of hearing same complaints). I remember the hoopla about renaming DFRC and politicians on the house floor giving glowing speeches of Armstrong, and then later that day they cut the NASA budget $600 million.

    It seems to me Neil would want that NASA facility to remain under Hugh's name. Armstrong flew the X-15 but it was Dryden who was instrumental in creating the X-15 program.
    Who Was Hugh Dryden and Why Should We Care? (page 163)
    http://history.nasa.gov/sp4112...

    I heard verbally from someone they renamed Lewis Research Center after Glenn to discourage politicians from closing down the center.

    Rumor has it they want to rename Ames Research Center after Sally Ride. Of course Sally is a fine person and but consider Joe Ames was the first NACA administrator and later he kept the NACA alive when Herbert Hoover tried to eliminate it and transfer its duties to industry. And here's another from a NASA history page (I kept this but lost the url):

    "Ames accepted a nomination by Air Minister Hermann Goring to the Deutsche Akademie der Luftfartforschung. Ames then considered it an honor, many Americans did, and was surprised to learn about the massive Nazi investment in aeronautical infrastructure, then six times larger than the NACA. Ames urged the funding for a second laboratory and expansion of the NACA facilities to prepare for war. " It was these facilities and infrastructure that helped allies win WWII, helped US aerospace industries, laid down the foundations for NASA able to make Neil the first man to step the moon.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  24. "It has been the last stop for astronauts..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should read

    "It has been the last, small, step for astronauts before their flights..."