Slashdot Mirror


Experiment Shows People Exposed To East German Socialism Cheat More

An anonymous reader writes The Economist reports, "'UNDER capitalism', ran the old Soviet-era joke, 'man exploits man. Under communism it is just the opposite.' In fact new research suggests that the Soviet system inspired not just sarcasm but cheating too: in East Germany, at least, communism appears to have inculcated moral laxity. Lars Hornuf of the University of Munich and Dan Ariely, Ximena García-Rada and Heather Mann of Duke University ran an experiment last year to test Germans' willingness to lie for personal gain. Some 250 Berliners were randomly selected to take part in a game where they could win up to €6 ($8). ... The authors found that, on average, those who had East German roots cheated twice as much as those who had grown up in West Germany under capitalism. They also looked at how much time people had spent in East Germany before the fall of the Berlin Wall. The longer the participants had been exposed to socialism, the greater the likelihood that they would claim improbable numbers ... when it comes to ethics, a capitalist upbringing appears to trump a socialist one."

8 of 619 comments (clear)

  1. Money by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much money did the people in each group have, on average, during their youth?

    Otherwise they might be just testing whether richer people give a lesser value to a small amount of money than poorer people.

    I'm pretty sure the average 20yo european would cheat less to get 8$ than the average south american and more than the average japanese.

  2. Breaking news by egladil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People raised in a country were the government spies on its citizens, encourages selling people out, and kidnaps dissenters are more likely to lie for personal gain.

    My guess is this is more an effect caused by Stasi, and not the communism/capitalism divide.

    1. Re:Breaking news by StillAnonymous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is actually one of the most important points and can't be stated enough.

      Look at what's happening in the West now. Bankers run amok, ripping off trillions and causing widespread economic damage. Instead of being punished for their crimes (which aren't even acknowledged by those in power), they are allowed to continue. Inflation, taxation, offshoring, dubious immigration policies, and (in the USA particularly) a corrupted healthcare system resulting in enormous costs has ruined the middle class. The poor are just as fucked as ever and the only government response to that is to build more prisons for the crimes that are the result of poverty.

      How do the people react? Take a look around. More and more people are resorting to get-rich-quick schemes and outright scams. Frivolous litigation in attempt to score a big windfall so they'll never have to work again.

      Nobody wants to put in a hard day's work any more because they're realized that it's a sucker's game. Like a parent, government must lead by example. And the example they are setting is a dire one.

  3. Seriously? by tgv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Researcher ask two groups, that they know to be different beforehand, a question, and then are surprised to get different answers? Really? If it had gone the other way around, they would have had simply reversed the explanation. And this study has so many potential confounds, like poverty, or even geological distribution, that it's hard to describe the level of ignorance of researchers that contribute this effect in their abstract to "exposure to socialism". Last week there was something about children from religious groups vs. children from non-religious groups, and the message that gets picked up is: religious children are more superstitious, and this week it is: socialism makes people dishonest, etc., while in reality no such conclusion can be drawn. Seriously? F* this kind of research.

  4. Re:let me correct that for you. by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there was no socialism in east-germany. there was none in east-europe. that was fascism with a tiny bit of communism-appearence thrown in. socialism is found in scandinavia, belgium, netherlands, france, and the former western-germany.

    Most Western European countries are mixed economies, mostly capitalist, with some socialism, and a welfare state.

    East Germany and the Soviet Union really bought into the idea of Socialism: the state owned everything. Private property was outlawed. You could go to jail for making a profit.

    The East Germans were so committed to the idea that the state owned everything that they believed they had a right to build an enormous wall to keep the governments property (people) from escaping to the West.

  5. It's democracy, stupid. by abbamouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sigh. We've known for a long time that in autocratic regimes of any type, levels of interpersonal trust are lowered. After all, your neighbor might be an informer, and the state itself is a liar and propagandist. Similarly, low levels of social trust correlate with all sorts of antisocial behavior, from cheating and intolerance to distrust of democracy itself. So all this experiment really proves is something we already know: living a long time under an oppressive regime generates distrust which legitimizes cheating and so forth. Capitalism and "socialism" have little to do with it.

    --
    Make cheese not war 8:)
  6. Re:let me correct that for you. by stjobe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Communism is State Socialism. It should be wrong to say that it is the only socialism out there, but it is definitely socialism.

    Soviet communism was (corrupted) state capitalism disguised as state socialism.

    Russia was truly communist for a few years after the Russian revolution, until the Bolsheviks took over and turned everything on its head and forever corrupted the word "communism". Now, instead of thinking "oh, communal ownership of the means of production so all may be equal", most people think "oh, corrupted state owns everything and represses its people so that a select few can have it unimaginably better than others" - which is so far from (any of) the communistic ideals that it's almost impossible to go any further.

    Soviet communism was communistic in name only.

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  7. Re:let me correct that for you. by flyneye · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From experience; I would be willing to bet that ANYONE living with scarcity threatening day to day living is willing to cheat, lie, con, finagle and it can get so bad that you steal, mug, burgle,injure and could possibly kill, dependent on circumstances.
    No real research in this story, just a reminder of mans state.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!