Slashdot Mirror


For Now, UK Online Pirates Will Get 4 Warnings -- And That's It

New submitter Tmackiller writes with an excerpt from VG247.com: The British government has decriminalised online video game, music and movie piracy, scrapping fuller punishment plans after branding them unworkable. Starting in 2015, persistent file-sharers will be sent four warning letters explaining their actions are illegal, but if the notes are ignored no further action will be taken. The scheme, named the Voluntary Copyright Alert Programme (VCAP), is the result of years of talks between ISPs, British politicians and the movie and music industries. The UK's biggest providers – BT, TalkTalk, Virgin and Sky – have all signed up to VCAP, and smaller ISPs are expected to follow suit. VCAP replaces planned anti-piracy measures that included cutting users' internet connections and creating a database of file-sharers. Geoff Taylor, chief executive of music trade body the BPI, said VCAP was about "persuading the persuadable, such as parents who do not know what is going on with their net connection." He added: "VCAP is not about denying access to the internet. It's about changing attitudes and raising awareness so people can make the right choice." Officials will still work to close and stem funding to file-sharing sites, but the news appears to mean that the British authorities have abandoned legal enforcement of online media piracy. Figures recently published by Ofcom said that nearly a quarter of all UK downloads were of pirated content." Tmackiller wants to know "Will this result in more private lawsuits against file sharers by the companies involved?"

11 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Illigal or not? by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article starts off saying that they have been decriminalised, but then the government is still calling them illegal and apparently more people might be sued over this "decriminalised" behaviour. So what exactly is the stare of the legality of pirating in Britain?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Illigal or not? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It means it's still illegal, but the government has no interest in enforcing that law. It's going back to just a civil matter, between the copyright holders and the copyright infringers.

    2. Re:Illigal or not? by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's never been criminal.

      Are you a lawyer in the UK? The Crown Prosecution Service say that deliberate infringement may be criminal.

      The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 also lists criminal penalties such as those copied below. It might be worth getting competent legal advice given jail time is a pretty significant punishment.

      (2A)A person who infringes copyright in a work by communicating the work to the public—
          (a)in the course of a business, or
          (b)otherwise than in the course of a business to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright,
      commits an offence if he knows or has reason to believe that, by doing so, he is infringing copyright in that work.

      (4A)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (2A) is liable—
          (a)on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or a fine not exceeding £50,000, or both;
          (b)on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or both.

  2. Re:"Will this result in more private lawsuits...?" by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed.
    No more blackmail settlements, no more blanket anonymous lawsuits, no more copyright trolls.
    Somebody needs to stop those freetard publishers running amok with other people's hard work.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  3. Re:4 warnings per? by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Funny

    They send you a letter with 4 warnings inside.

  4. Re:So the idea is that.... by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because they can turn around in a few years when this is normalised behaviour and say "Hey, isn't it ridiculous that we know who all these inveterate pirates are, but we aren't doing anything? Maybe we should pass a simple law that fines them a few hundred quid, that's not much of a problem, is it?"

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  5. Warnings are discoverable ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... in litigation.

    In court, a person could not use the, "Gee ... I didn't know," defense.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Warnings are discoverable ... by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes the 4 letters show a history of infringement and the isp's can show bandwidth use too. Its the legal cover for the hard part of traditional cases for free via a stored database of letters sent.
      Some nice political cover and colour of law. They only want to educate you with warnings.
      Its the lawyers that take the final step to seek an identity. The gov and providers can walk away from any long term logging questions. Months of stored logs are just for the 4 letter compliance.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. Re:"Will this result in more private lawsuits...?" by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The history of antipiracy lawsuits, especially in the US, would seem to suggest that they do bugger all to reduce piracy, at an enormous cost to the IP owner and the taxpayer. When the patient's dying on the table and your best witchdoctor isn't helping, maybe it's time to switch to a better kind of medicine.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  7. Changing attitudes, i.e. brainwashing by Baki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope and think that the brainwashing of the younger "freeloading" generation will fail.
    It is truely disgusting to see the attempts to brainwash the people to protect vested economic interests.
    The collateral damage to prevent sharing of bitstreams is just too high.
    We cannot prevent this, neither with laws nor with brainwashing. Sharing is just too easy and natural.

    We'll have to adapt our economic model to the new reality instead, the "new normal".

  8. Re:"Will this result in more private lawsuits...?" by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The correct answer is, both.