Slashdot Mirror


MIT Combines Carbon Foam and Graphite Flakes For Efficient Solar Steam Generati

rtoz (2530056) writes Researchers at MIT have developed a new spongelike material structure which can use 85% of incoming solar energy for converting water into steam. This spongelike structure has a layer of graphite flakes and an underlying carbon foam. This structure has many small pores. It can float on the water, and it will act as an insulator for preventing heat from escaping to the underlying liquid. As sunlight hits the structure, it creates a hotspot in the graphite layer, generating a pressure gradient that draws water up through the carbon foam. As water seeps into the graphite layer, the heat concentrated in the graphite turns the water into steam. This structure works much like a sponge. It is a significant improvement over recent approaches to solar-powered steam generation. And, this setup loses very little heat in the process, and can produce steam at relatively low solar intensity. If scaled up, this setup will not require complex, costly systems to highly concentrate sunlight.

12 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Sponge-like? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    SpongeBob Square Solarpanel?

  2. De-salination? by Squidlips · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could it be used for de-salination

    1. Re:De-salination? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Faster CPUs, better solar panels, radiation shielding and drinkable water for all the world.

      Graphite. Is there anything it can't do?

    2. Re:De-salination? by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, now *there's* an idea. I suspect you'd have issues using saltwater though - when the water is boiled the salt would be left behind within the foam. In a closed-loop system that might not be an issue as the distilled water would be reintroduced to the reservoir preventing excessive concentration of salts, but otherwise you'd almost certainly end up with salt crystals completely coating the foam, Which would either render it immediately ineffective or eventually build up to such a level that it dies as a solid block of salt with an embedded carbon lattice.

      Of course desalination isn't cheap, so it might be cost-effective to replace the foam regularly. You might even be able to rinse the crystals away with filtered seawater in order to reuse the foam.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:De-salination? by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Faster CPUs, better solar panels, radiation shielding and drinkable water for all the world.

      Graphite. Is there anything it can't do?

      Frankly, silicone still has a purpose that graphite doesn't fulfil.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:De-salination? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You wouldn't boil the saltwater in foam, genius. Use properly prepared and recycled water as a heat transfer fluid and use that heat to distill seawater in tanks built for that process.

  3. The next generation of MIT? by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hadn't previously heard of this MIT' before. I hope we see good things from them.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:The next generation of MIT? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's MIT Prime, a.k.a. MIT: The Next Generation.

  4. Re:Finally by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Informative

    “There is still a lot of research that can be done on implementing this in larger systems.”

    Translated;

    “There is still a lot of research that MUST be done TO IMPLEMENT this in larger systems.”

  5. details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They found they were able to convert 85 percent of solar energy into steam at a solar intensity 10 times that of a typical sunny day.

  6. costly concentration by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > if scaled up, this setup will not require complex, costly systems to highly concentrate sunlight.

    So, mirrors are costly now - does that imply that this carbon foam stuff is cheaper to produce than a sheet of polished stainless steel? If so that *is* promising.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  7. No concentrators. Really? by necro81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The summary states "if scaled up, this setup will not require complex, costly systems to highly concentrate sunlight". But the video itself says that all of their testing was done with light at 10x normal solar intensity. In other words - you still need concentrated sunlight, you won't be able to set this beaker out in the bright sunshine and expect it to start boiling. The authors contrast it with solar power towers that concentrate sunlight to 100x or 1000x, but it still sounds like you'd need concentration of some sort.