Slashdot Mirror


FCC Reminds ISPs That They Can Be Fined For Lacking Transparency

An anonymous reader writes The FCC issued a notice on Wednesday reminding ISPs that, according to the still-intact transparency rule of the 2010 Open Internet Order, they are required to be transparent about their services. "The FCC's transparency rule requires that consumers get the information they need to make informed choices about the broadband services they purchase." Applicable scenarios include "poorly worded service offers or inaccurate counts of data against a data cap...[as well as] blocking or slowing certain types of traffic without explaining that to the customer." The transparency rule gives the FCC the power to fine ISPs for non-compliance.

9 of 38 comments (clear)

  1. Transpaerncy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lots of talk about from that from this Administration , that but it's all very opaque from the President on down.

  2. About time by rainfay · · Score: 3, Funny

    About time, now will the actually follow through with it.

    --
    -- Let Random be Random
    1. Re: About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about a simple rule that says "The customer gets whatever deal is stated in the largest font as understood by a five year old." That would eliminate almost all marketing BS.

    2. Re:About time by Andrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In 2013... ...Verizon had 120.5 billion in revenue, 32 billion in operating income. ...Comcast had 64.7 billion in revenue, 16.6 billion in operating Income. ...AT&T had had 128.8 billion in revenue, 30.5 billion in operating income.

      What does this tell me? That unless the fine is a percentage of their profit (which to my knowledge doesn't happen in the US), internet providers probably aren't too worried about it. In fact, if lack of transparency nets them more profit than they lose by paying the fine, it's only good business to continue breaking the rule.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    3. Re:About time by Andrio · · Score: 2

      Damn, my formatting broke. Sorry about that!

      Hey Slashdot, how about a useful feature in Beta? Like a 5 minute window to edit your post!

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  3. Why haven't they fined practically every ISP? by timrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this order still stands, why hasn't the FCC fined practically every ISP under this rule? Plenty of ISPs were (and some still are) throttling YouTube, and I don't think I saw a single notice from the ISPs themselves about it. I would think that YouTube counts as a "certain type of traffic" for the purposes of this rule.

    1. Re:Why haven't they fined practically every ISP? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2

      If this order still stands, why hasn't the FCC fined practically every ISP under this rule?

      It seems they've got quite a lot of bark, but not enough bite. Unless it comes to boobs on TV.

  4. Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's refreshing to see that the FCC can and does behave like a regulatory agency. Despite all the "discussion" over Net Neutrality and all the maneuvers that appear to fly in the face of what consumers and end users want, this is a move that makes sense. Forgive my overt cynicism, but I can't ignore the fact that the individuals heading the FCC in recent years have all been former CEOs of the telcos they have been trying to *cough* regulate. There have been apt analogies by John Oliver that leaving these folks to runn the FCC is akin to "leaving the dingo to watch the baby."

    In a logical market, the consumer's wants and needs are supposed to be what drives the market. If a customer wants a smartphone, it should be a device provided at the point of sale with a cellualr service. Customers do not want the bloatware that the telcos push on them. From a network security standpoint, there is nothing more frustrating than apps that just appear on the device without customer interaction. Telcos have become too greedy for thier own good and it is simply a matter of time before the trend in business of "self-regulation" will fail to work. Arguably, and across multiple industries, it already has.

    1. Re:Gasp! by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Keep in mind, this represents the FCC _talking_ like a regulator, not _acting_ like one.