Slashdot Mirror


Will Your Next Car Be Covered In Morphing Dimples?

cartechboy writes Golfing and cars, not much in common there. But that's about to change thanks to a new technology from a research lab at MIT called Smorphs. The idea is simple: put a set of dynamic dimples on the exterior of a car to improve its surface aerodynamics and make it slipperier, and therefore faster. Pedro Reis is the mechanical engineering and research spearheading this project. A while ago Mythbusters proved the validity of the dimpled car form in a much more low-tech way. The concept uses a hollow core surrounded by a thick, deformable layer, and a smoother outer skin. When vacuum is applied, the outer layers suck in to form the dimples. The technology is only in its very earliest stages, but we could see this applied to future vehicles in an effort to make them faster and more fuel efficient.

11 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. The Future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My wife's car just had $10k worth of hail damage repaired via insurance. You're telling me that on her future vehicle we will be expected to pay extra for the "animated hail dimples" option?

  2. 11% fuel efficiency improvement by Max_W · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is a lot. Why car industry does not make cars like this?

    1. Re:11% fuel efficiency improvement by Pentium100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because it looks ugly. Also, the laws in my country limit the maximum speed to 130km/h, so I don't care that denting the car will make it faster - I can break the law already if I want (my not very aerodynamic car made in 1982 with 80kW gasoline engine running on LPG can go at around 165km/h (and going 35km/h over the limit would result in a huge fine)), I do not really need a faster car). Also, saving 11% money on fuel but having to buy a new car would not pay off unless you drive a lot.

    2. Re:11% fuel efficiency improvement by ravenscar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know I'm feeding the trolls, but I'll venture that English is not Max_W's first language. Don't be an asshole. Or, if that's too hard, just be an asshole by yourself. No need to trumpet it online.

    3. Re:11% fuel efficiency improvement by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Informative
      Bull. It does not look ugly. It looks strange to you only because you have never seen it before. Let them start making it and all the young kids will say how cool it looks. (Look at what the silly things like in music!)

      As for your argument about 11%, you are a very ignorant. It is not about replacing your car, but about making the NEXT car you buy 11% more fuel efficient.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    4. Re:11% fuel efficiency improvement by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tractor trailers would seemingly benefit the most.

      Given the trucking industry's current interest in aerodynamic additions that are not necessarily aesthetic,

      I would say that's your target market.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  3. Re:Your next supercar. by rsborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your next supercar will be ugly as hitting your father with a sweaty sock, but really efficient because, as we all know, people buy supercars for their efficiency.

    Let's turn it around - *some* or "a lot* of people who buy super cars (especially of the electric variety) buy cars for their efficiency (speed/mileage).

    Notes:
    a) not all or nothing - a big enough niche where you dominate (and erect defenses from encroachment) will provide a solid business model and sustainable profits.
    b) speed requires efficiency, unless you plan on putting rocket fuel into your afterburner.
    c) I always thought dimples were sexy on a girl, why not a car?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  4. Re:Why not permanent? by queazocotal · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm unsure - but suspect that if they were there permanently - with the profile done right, stamped out of the steel - they may improve stiffness, and reduce weight.
    Stamping such a pattern would be 'interesting', and prone to lots of wear in the dies though.
    For composite, in principle, it could almost be free.

  5. Re:Why not permanent? by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TFA: "If a golf ball were to fly fast enough, it would be better off with a smooth skin."

    The dimples make things better at low speeds, and worse at high speeds.

    --
    So.. it has come to this
  6. Re:Cars are fast enough already by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What really needs to be focused on is a method to stop them dead in their tracks whenever they are in striking distance of slower moving objects such as pedestrians and bicyclists.

    That's dumb. Pedestrians and bicyclists don't have the same requirements as automobiles, we should focus on keeping them separated. It's not as though they need to share the same space, except where no thought has been given to them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. This seems unnecessarily complicated. by Primate+Pete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just press dimples into the plastic/fibreglas/metal panels of the car? No expensive technology needed, and "good enough" dimples can just be made part of the parts molds/presses.

    On a second topic, I would be investigating this if I owned a racing team because anything that decreases the fuel consumption of my car improves overall race performance. Skipping a single refueling stop is a big deal. Since the teams are already making custom cars, the cost of adding dimples should be negligible compared to the overall cost of the vehicle. Not quite something for nothing, but close.