Slashdot Mirror


Was America's Top Rocketeer a Communist Spy? The FBI Thought So

New submitter IMissAlexChilton (3748631) writes Frank Malina masterfully led the World War II effort to build U.S. rockets for jet-assisted takeoff and guided missiles. As described in IEEE Spectrum, Malina's motley crew of engineers and enthusiasts (including occultist Jack Parsons) founded the Jet Propulsion Lab and made critical breakthroughs in solid fuels, hypergolics, and high-altitude sounding rockets, laying the groundwork for NASA's future successes. And yet, under suspicion by the Feds at the war's end, Malina gave up his research career, and his team's efforts sank into obscurity. Taking his place: the former Nazi Wernher von Braun. Read "Frank Malina: America's Forgotten Rocketeer". Includes cool vintage footage of early JPL rocket tests.

52 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Nazi he was not.

    Go read up on the history of Germany's rocket scientists. The majority were a buncha eggheads who thought it was cool they'd found someone willing to fund them, right up until they found themselves with guns pointed at their heads and explanations of what would happen to them or their families if they didn't succeed.

    While it's s sad Frank Malina lost out on continued innovation in the JPL, put the blame where it belongs: The Feds and the Congresscritters who were so caught up in their witch hunts that they drove away the very brilliance that might've helped us not only take the space race to another level, but perhaps also avoid the stagnation imbued during the late saturn v and shuttle era.

    Imagine if Skylab had stayed in orbit and been used as the basis of an ISS 20 years earlier.

    The possibilities were endless. But as usual jackbooted thugs and politicos ruined them for their own careers.

    1. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The majority were a buncha eggheads who thought it was cool they'd found someone willing to fund them,

      And willingly worked 12,000 "undesirables" to death.

      put the blame where it belongs

      Square on Frank Malina's shoulders for wanting to do something else.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It inspired Fear, and a weapon of terror against civilian targets was the real requirement.

    3. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their greatest weapon is terror. Terror and efficiency. Okay, their two greatest weapons were terror and efficiency. And organization Okay, their three greatest weapons were terror, efficiencey and organizatoin.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    4. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The V2 ... was not a success during the war

      That is an understatement. The V2 had no significant military effect, but consumed enormous resources to develop, manufacture, and deploy. Freeman Dyson once described the V2 program as "almost as good as if Hitler had adopted a policy of unilateral disarmament."

    5. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by JDAustin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course you need to remember that the US government was infiltrated with communist spies and sympathizers. You only need to look at Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Harry Hopkins and the Rosenbergs.

    6. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by pupsocket · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article:

      "The actual manufacturing was done by prisoners from the concentration camp Mittelbau-Dora. As the historian Michael J. Neufeld has documented, von Braun went so far as to handpick detainees with technical qualifications for this work. (The prisoners were worked literally to death. In all, about 12,000 died producing von Braun’s rockets; for comparison, the rockets themselves would kill an estimated 9,000 people, many of them civilians.)"

    7. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      o/~ "Once the rockets go up, who cares where they come down?
      That's not my department", says Werner von Braun o/~

    8. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by readin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you need to remember that the US government was infiltrated with communist spies and sympathizers. You only need to look at Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Harry Hopkins and the Rosenbergs.

      Good luck getting Communism Deniers to admit this. I would be happy if we can get them to admit that Russian Communism was just as evil as Nazism.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    9. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Nyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course you need to remember that the US government was infiltrated with communist spies and sympathizers. You only need to look at Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Harry Hopkins and the Rosenbergs.

      You know, it's sort of like terrorists today. We might have a few here (and we do, Boston marathon bombing) but see, most of us are NOT terrorist, but the way out government acts, there is terrorists under every bed. Not unlike how they acted in the "communist" scare days.

      The problem? Our government, the USA doesn't care if it fucks over all it's law abiding citizens trying to stamp out a few "undesirables". They didn't care back then, they don't give a fuck today. That is the problem. They create these monsters why how they act, then want to punish us for it?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    10. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      That simplifies is slightly.

      The V2 was about as expensive as a top-end fighter jet (thought the only jets were top end then). So every V2 meant one less fighter in the air, except it didn't. The problem they had was a massive lack of oil for fuel which means the fighters couldn't fly. The V2s were powered by alcohol, and no one had planes able to run off the stuff then.

      Also, if the Reich's nuclear bomb ambitions had worked out, the V2 would have provided an unstoppable delivery mechanism.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is people like you keep mixing up Communism - an economic system - with the Soviet political system. It's about the same as claiming that capitalism is a government like the United States. The Soviet political system was corrupt as any seat of power will be.

    12. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We weren't there. Was he picking them like Schindlers List? Trying to save his engineering colleagues? Or was he hating on Jews? I dunno, the mans dead and history books are notoriously inaccurate with details like this. I'll let God judge him... if there is no afterlife then this arguments an exercise in futility.

    13. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Well no, sometimes the monsters are actually real.

      But those who fight them should still take care not to become monsters themselves. It's hard to not see a frightening similarity between Hitler's attempt to take his country with him in the last days of the Fourth Reich, and the US's - and the USSR's - policy of taking the world with them - MAD - in the Cold War. How much of it was the superpower's own inherent evil, and how much was absorbed from Nazi Germany during the war?

      That's one of the nastier aspects of cultural evolution: fighting an opponent exerts pressure on you to fall on his level. Nazis terror bombed London, so the Brits firebombed Dresden. An aspect of Nazism managed to seep into the British Empire precisely because they were mortal enemies, just like an aspect of it seeped into the United States, and later an aspect of Soviet-style communism - the omnipresent surveillance systems that are apparently impossible to dislodge.

      I'm not sure if such contamination can be prevented, and that rises some serious questions about whether using warfare to deal with rogue nations is not unlike trying to stop Ebola by wrestling the victims to the ground.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You left out the third option. Was he just trying to stay alive and ignoring the conditions around him. It is very easy for humans to do that.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      You also have to remember that the US claims to be a Constitutional Republic which of course means that if the people and the several States (3/4s) decide to pass a Constitutional Amendment making the country communist, well that's part of freedom and democracy.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Megol · · Score: 2

      Bullshit. He could have, in his important position, pressured for better conditions for the workers. He didn't. He didn't even express disgust privately. He oversaw the program and controlled details including selection of workers. He knew of the bad conditions the workers endured. He in no way tried to improve them. He just didn't care.

      And that is how one is a good Nazi. He should have hung* just as the other war criminals.

      (* I'm actually against death sentences but his crimes was worse than some that was hanged)

    17. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      The truth is probably a lot more complex, and honestly, much more human.

      My guess is that he really wanted to make a spaceship, he got funding, got in over his head by showing dual use for his rockets, and then was pretty much co-opted into the war program.

      He certainly was subject to arrest, and was arrested at one point. Only his particular position allowed him to avoid it becoming permanent. It is difficult to believe that after that, he was not actively trying to keep himself useful to the regime so that he wouldn't be arrested again.

      Was he an Oskar Schindler? Almost certainly not. I'm guessing he simply saw the people assigned to him as what was needed to get the job done and that complaining about their fate would do nothing more than allow him to join them. I imagine he simply kept going and probably used his dream of building a spaceship to put a silver lining on the situation.

      However, was he a committed Nazi? Also quite unlikely. If he could be accused of actual abuses, those were likely a mix of his overwhelming belief in the value of what he was doing and fear of what failure would expose him to. It is unclear what the mix was, but it is unlikely he was ideologically motivated. Instead, he was a technocrat, and like many technocrats, humane concerns can often fall by the wayside, a mindset that would certainly be enhanced by his need to survive.

      In Wernher von Braun: Crusader for Space, numerous statements by von Braun show he was aware of the conditions but felt completely unable to change them. A friend quotes von Braun speaking of a visit to Mittelwerk:

      It is hellish. My spontaneous reaction was to talk to one of the SS guards, only to be told with unmistakable harshness that I should mind my own business, or find myself in the same striped fatigues!... I realized that any attempt of reasoning on humane grounds would be utterly futile.[34]

      When asked if von Braun could have protested against the brutal treatment of the slave laborers, von Braun team member Konrad Dannenberg told The Huntsville Times, "If he had done it, in my opinion, he would have been shot on the spot."[35]

      The unsuspecting von Braun was detained on March 14 (or March 15),[40] 1944 and was taken to a Gestapo cell in Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland),[9]:38–40 where he was held for two weeks without knowing the charges against him.

      Others claim von Braun engaged in brutal treatment or approved of it. Guy Morand, a French resistance fighter who was a prisoner in Dora, testified in 1995 that after an apparent sabotage attempt that von Braun ordered a prisoner to be flogged,[36] while Robert Cazabonne, another French prisoner claimed von Braun stood by as prisoners were hanged by chains suspended by cranes.[37] However, these accounts may have been a case of mistaken identity.[38]

      The quotes show that he was certainly not invulnerable, and his actions are in line with the survival of a technocrat. This doesn't make him a hero, but there may be extenuating circumstances. We almost certainly would not have condemned him if he was some simple farm overseer expected to make use of slave labor to make a quota, but von Braun gets a lot of criticism in proportion to his future prominence in the US Space Program.

    18. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      Of course the V-2 would've been more useful if the Nazis didn't have to rely on their spy network for targeting data - at a time when the German spy netwok in the UK had been completely subverted. Properly aimed V-2s would have caused a lot more damage.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    19. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by pupsocket · · Score: 2

      The kindest thing you can say about him was that he had tunnel vision. He was an ambitious man who did not find murderous slavery to be sufficient reason to just take orders. No one can be forced to lead as uniquely as von Braun or forced to fight so hard for control of a project.

      Was his behavior understandable? Yes, if you believe he was blinded by obsession. Was it justified? Not by a moon shot.

    20. Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... by pupsocket · · Score: 2

      An excellent characterization.

      As I understand it, he was arrested for complaining that the war was not going well, which everyone knew but people in high places were forbidden to mention. His problem wasn't that the Nazis were Nazis, but that they were the losing.

      As a technocrat under extenuating circumstances, he illustrates the worst moral worthlessness to which a technocrat can fall, and so should not be esteemed. He should never have been celebrated as an American hero.

  2. Lessons for today's world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder how many innocent people today have had themselves and their careers ruined by the NSA/GCHQ/TLA and how as a result we have all suffered by not benefiting from their work.

    1. Re:Lessons for today's world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep replace paranoia over communism with paranoia over terrorism and we have the NEW USA.

    2. Re:Lessons for today's world by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder how many innocent people today have had themselves and their careers ruined by the NSA/GCHQ/TLA and how as a result we have all suffered by not benefiting from their work.

      In an environment where you can be punished for your beliefs, is intelligence really the evil?

      It's not the information that's to blame, it's what people do with it, and the worse people are, the less they'll need.
      Think of the worst people throughout history, and imagine them making less informed decisions.

      McCarthyism, Salem witch trials, Inquisitions

      See, the problem wasn't solid information regarding who's a communist, who's a witch, or who's Muslim, the problem was the people punishing you if they thought you smelled like one.

    3. Re:Lessons for today's world by readin · · Score: 2

      I wonder how many innocent people today have had themselves and their careers ruined by the NSA/GCHQ/TLA and how as a result we have all suffered by not benefiting from their work.

      I wonder how many innocent people had themselves and their careers ruined by Communists. I seen numbers over 100 million just for people murdered by Communists. The number of careers ruined is many times that - both by simple matter of Communism not working and by deliberate attempts to deprive people of education (see the Cultural Revolution and talk to my physics professor who spent his college years on a farm rather than learning physics and researching). .

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    4. Re:Lessons for today's world by readin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are aware that the implementation of communism is a breach of fundamental human rights?

      Any one party system is a breach of fundamental rights. I don't remember "property" in the "Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" quote. Are you arguing that you have the right to property?

      The philosopher they were channeling had said life, liberty, body and property. Also the forerunner to the Declaration of Independence was the Virginia Declaration of rights which said "That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety."

      Later of course property was included as fundamental in the Fifth Amendment which said "No person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" and again in the Fourteenth Amendment which says "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

      Property is so fundamental that it was one of the earliest rights recognized. The Magna Carta says, "No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land."

      So yes, we all do have the right to property. It is fundamental.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    5. Re:Lessons for today's world by readin · · Score: 2

      Yep replace paranoia over communism with paranoia over terrorism and we have the NEW USA.

      To get to paranoia over communism you have to replace paranoia over nazism.

      You think it wrong to call the concern about Nazism "paranoia"? It is similarly wrong to call the concern about Communism "paranoia". Communists killed a whole lot of people. They were equally involved in the invasion of Poland that started WWII in Europe. They killed millions in Ukraine through forced starvation. Name something the Nazis did and you can find the equivalent in Communism (except for developing nice cars like the Volkswagen; the Communists didn't do anything like that.).

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    6. Re:Lessons for today's world by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doing what you want and telling others they can't do what they want because you claim the land under them, or the clothes on their back doesn't sound like "liberty" either.

    7. Re:Lessons for today's world by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have a right to *your* posessions, but not a fundamental right to own any possessions. Once you have them, they are yours, but that's different than saying you have the right to the.

      Just because I have the right to procrate, doesn't mean I will have children provided to me (by the government or private enterprise), should I demand them. Property is the same. You don't have a right to "have" property, but once you have it, it is yours.

  3. another GNU link by clovis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this is the intended artice:
    http://spectrum.ieee.org/aeros...

    1. Re:another GNU link by clovis · · Score: 2

      I also found these written by Dr Malina in 1967 regarding search for during and after WWII

      http://www.olats.org/pionniers...
      http://www.olats.org/pionniers...
      http://www.olats.org/pionniers...

  4. von Braun didn't take his place by thrich81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    von Braun didn't take anyone's place -- he created his own place in Huntsville. The work on rockets on the West Coast and other places in the US continued with little affect by von Braun. For example the Navy's Vanguard project which was supposed to launch the USA's first satellite was a parallel effort to the Army's efforts at Hunstville. And the Air Force developed the Atlas and Titan missiles in other parallel efforts. It just happened that when NASA needed big rockets for Apollo, the Saturn series developed by von Braun's team were the most suitable. Notably, precursors to Apollo, the manned orbital Mercury and Gemini missions, were launched on those Air Force derived boosters. The sentence in the summary is BS. And by all accounts, von Braun was agnostic towards the Nazis, neither a supporter nor a resister, disinterested in politics, but navigating the system he found himself by the time it was too late to get out -- yeah, I know it is more complicated than that, but I don't have a thesis to write here.

  5. He isn't the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You should look up who is China's "Father of Rockets".
    Hint: just like Malina, except he was ethnic Chinese and decided to go to Communist China instead of giving up his career.

    Suspecting your top talent of being a spy, what a great way to kickstart advancement programs for your enemies!

    1. Re:He isn't the only one by twosat · · Score: 2

      Him too? I had heard of Qian Xuesen (known in the USA as Hsue-Shen Tsien) who also was one of the founders of JPL and ended up founding China's space program as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q... https://news.ycombinator.com/i...

    2. Re:He isn't the only one by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure China's "father of rockets" lived sometime during the Song Dynasty.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  6. However the FBI by dbIII · · Score: 2

    However remember the FBI was too incompetent back then to remember to bring handcuffs to the arrest of "public enemy number one". A necktie had to do the job.
    And then they fell for the scam of the "lie detector" - or did they really fall for it or was Hoover just accepting yet another kickback before spending Government money?
    What you see today is nothing like it was back then.

  7. Re:See also Hsue-shen Tsien by IMissAlexChilton · · Score: 2

    Iris Chang's Thread of the Silkworm has an excellent account of Tsien.

  8. Re:Van Braun built weapons for Nazis by jafac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's actually a long story behind this, and Von Braun was actually arrested because Hitler suspected he was a traitor. Von Braun was a visionary who just loved rockets and wanted to land on the moon and colonize space. The Nazis were a funding means-to-an-end for his rocketry studies. After the Nazis tried to arrest him and his team, he escaped with some equipment and top scientists to defect to the allies.

    So no, it's not at all accurate to speculate that Von Braun was a Nazi or into that whole ideology.

    He used his expertise to con the Nazis into paying for his very expensive hobby.
    Then he came to the USA, and played the same con on Congress to fund his continued work here. Congress thought they were getting ICBMs to wave at the Russians. Von Braun was getting a moon landing, and who gives a shit about politics.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  9. Re:Van Braun built weapons for Nazis by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "So no, it's not at all accurate to speculate that Von Braun was a Nazi or into that whole ideology."

    No, he was just a guy who used up the lives of prisoners to meet his ends. He may not have been an ideologue, but he was a sociopath.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  10. Re: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    It has been common for the government to have public executions without trial when an american citizen is known to say "bad things"

    Saddam Hussein did a little more than just saying "bad things"

    I wasn't aware that he was an american citizen.

    Plus we didn't off him when he was murdering Kurds and other "undesirables", or when he started a revanchist war against Iran that resulted in several hundred thousand, possibly a million, casualties. He only got in the doghouse for seizing Kuwait, threatening the carefully engineered balance-of-powerlessness established in the middle east by the the allies after WWI.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. interesting, somehow I didn't even know this by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Malina is pretty well known in some corners of CS for his work on kinetic sculpture and generative art, and for founding the International Society for the Arts, Sciences and Technology, along with its associated journal Leonardo . But I didn't know he did rockets earlier in his career.

  12. Useless toxic puffer fish for President by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the witches McCarthy were far more dangerous and worthy of being hunted

    Ah yes, like that dangerous playwright who was offered a way out if his wife, Marilyn Monroe, agreed to be photographed with McCarthy for political promotional material. That was one part of the witch hunt, in that case more accurately called a shakedown.

    It was an utterly worthless grab at power by an immoral, corrupt and ultimately cowardly man who wanted to skew the political playing field in his direction when opposed by a large number of far more worthy candidates for President from both parties. It's just as well that he bit off more than he could chew by getting a lot of special favors for one of his friends in the military and then attempting to prove that General Marshall (of the Marshall plan and a lot of other things, such as running a big chunk of WWII) was a communist. His stupid stunt meant to send him into the White House was exposed for what it was - a power grab by a man who had achieved very little in his life attempting to drag down others who had and make himself look bigger.

    So do you think he had a list of spies like he said he did? Why didn't he hand them over then? Wouldn't it be a bit like treason to have a list of foreign spies and not hand it over to law enforcement?

  13. Re:Van Braun built weapons for Nazis by radtea · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then he came to the USA, and played the same con on Congress to fund his continued work here.

    So in your view von Braun was an amoral, self-agrandizing liar who was willing to actively engage in the selection of slave labour working in death camps to build rockets that killed thousands of strangers just so he could play with cool toys? Because that's what you're describing.

    I say "self-agrandizing" because everything that von Braun wanted to do would have been done without him, without the 12000 dead slave labourers, without the 9000 dead British civilians.

    I've had some pretty extreme scientific and technical ambitions in my time, but have somehow been able to realize many of them without killing people, and have given up the rest because: killing people. So I'm willing to pass judgment on von Braun in this respect: if he faced a choice between following his dreams and not killing people I'd have to say the latter is the far better choice.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  14. Re:Sick of Denialists by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yup. Most Americans have no idea what communism really is/was. Basically, it was a power grab by a large number of apparachik (officious) people, who enjoyed micromanagement of everyone around them about everything. Nosy Parkers on steroids. In most western countries today, we have many communist institutions now: Old age pension, disability pension, health care, limited working hours, minimum wages... However, we also have the bad things associated with communism: Overflowing prisons, secret/not so secret military prisons (Guantanamo, Guam), places of torture (CIA camps in Poland), spying on everybody innocent or not (NSA, CIA), border fences with guards who shoot to kill (Arizona, California border with Mexico)...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  15. Re:Nazis over Scientology by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where did it say he was a scientologist? They didn't even exist back them. You made that up to pump up your argument.

    Jack Parsons was friends with L. Ron Hubbard for a time, and this friendship allegedly failed because Hubbard took off with a great deal of Parsons' money. Again allegedly, Scientology was founded with that money. Malina and Parsons are two major figures in rocketry who did various occult rituals with both Alastair Crowley and L. Ron Hubbard and basically the historical links between those last two are mostly links through the rocket researchers more than direct contacts.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  16. Re:Van Braun built weapons for Nazis by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    f he faced a choice between following his dreams and not killing people I'd have to say the latter is the far better choice.

    It's very easy to say that when faced with threats against yourself or your family. We'd all like to believe that we'd do the right thing in the face of overwhelming adversity, but frankly you have no way of knowing what you'd do until it happens.

    It is however easy to judge from behind the safety of a keyboard.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  17. Where do you get this garbage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You clearly have not read the appropriate NASA documents.

    Skylab was in very good condition and NASA wanted to use it in conjunction with the shuttle, which was scheduled to be operational before Skylab fell into the atmosphere. The Shuttle was to be used to re-boost it, but two things happened: [1] solar activity was higher than expected (which affects the upper-most part of the atmosphere and increased the atmospheric drag on Skylab) and [2] the shuttle ended-up being too far behind schedule. NASA, realizing that shuttles would not be ready in time, studied launching an unmanned "tug" to dock with and re-boost Skylab so it would still be there on orbit and operational by the time shuttles were ready, but congress in the late 70's was as stupid as today - Congress did not fund this cheap solution, so we ended-up dumping $100 Billion and ten years of construction time into building ISS to get a similar orbital capability (Skylab had 320 cubic meters pressurized volume, that's more than the US part of the ISS). The shuttle could have then flown additions to Skylab (which had a docking adapter for multiple visiting vehicles). An enhanced Skylab would have had no Russian "entanglements", and had its own lifesupport and navigation capabilities.

    Skylab was FAR from "worn out" and the damage from the launch was quite managable. The astronauts who closed it out left it ready for re-manning. When Skylab re-entered the atmosphere it did so under remote control from the ground, with its systems fully functioning until they were destroyed by the reentry. READ THE DAMNED REPORTS, which consist of hundreds of paged of excellent details, before misinforming people.

    1. Re:Where do you get this garbage? by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      You clearly have not read the appropriate NASA documents.

      Actually, yes, I have.
       

      Skylab was in very good condition and NASA wanted to use it in conjunction with the shuttle

      NASA was (is) an organization of thousands of people - and cannot "want" anything. A small group of people, who had no funding, wanted to use Skylab in conjunction with the Shuttle, but that was just one of the dozens (hundreds?) of pie-in-the-sky ideas various groups within NASA generate on an annual basis. Very few space fanboys realize this and presume every single dammed one of those gotta-publish-something-to-keep-my-job studies and "plans" (was) is something "NASA wanted to do" no matter how ludicrous the idea was. Actually, the more ludicrous the idea the more the space fanboys love it, because it's just more ammo for their ignorant whinging about NASA's "failures". Ignorant because on top of not grasping the pie-in-the-sky nature of many of those "plans", they fail to realize that NASA is not an independent organism - but rather is a branch of the Executive Department and only does what the Executive approves and Congress fails.
       

      Congress did not fund this cheap solution, so we ended-up dumping $100 Billion and ten years of construction time into building ISS to get a similar orbital capability (Skylab had 320 cubic meters pressurized volume, that's more than the US part of the ISS).

      What's interesting here is you claim Skylab would provide similar capability - but then rather than comparing capability, you compare volume. Thus, probably inadvertently due to gross ignorance, you reveal the shallowness of your knowledge. In reality, Skylab didn't have a fraction of *any* of the capabilities of the ISS. It doesn't produce as much power, could only support a much smaller crew, and wasn't equipped with but a fraction of the scientific equipment, etc... (Even though Skylab and the ISS have a similar volume, the ISS has almost six times the mass. There's a reason for that.) Nor, given the small diameter of it's hatches, could it have been reasonably refitted to provide significant extended capability. Raw volume is impressive, but it's no more useful than an empty house. It's useful stuff that make a house or a space station useful, and Skylab was grossly lacking in that department.
       

      The shuttle could have then flown additions to Skylab (which had a docking adapter for multiple visiting vehicles).

      Yes, Skylab had a docking adapter for visiting vehicles. No, they weren't useful for adding additional modules. On top of lacking the structural strength, they had no provision for routing power, life support, data, etc. (Not without running cables through the already narrow docking tunnel - not that there was anywhere to hook them to on the Skylab end anyhow.)
       

      When Skylab re-entered the atmosphere it did so under remote control from the ground, with its systems fully functioning until they were destroyed by the reentry.

      No, they weren't "fully functioning". The third crew had to use a lashed up servicing system to replenish the freon loops in the air lock module (which were leaking). The also had to perform a spacewalk to install a back up set of rate gyros since the original set were failing. (Etc... etc...) Skylab was worn out, and it's equipment was beginning to fail even while the manned occupancy program was in progress.

      A lot of people believe that Skylab was some lunar landing level program, and that in the same vein "tossing it aside" represented the loss of some grand capability. Nothing could be further from the truth. Skylab was a shoestring budget program subsisting on Apollo's leftovers and discards. (To the point where they had to take a hatch off an unused Gemini to provide an EVA hatch - they had no money to develop or build one of their own.) It had a minimal lifespan and modest scientific capability with no capacity for significant resupply, replenishment, refitting or extension.

  18. Better a Nazi than a Commi by rainer_d · · Score: 4, Informative
    That was really the line of thinking in large parts of the US-government for a while.
    Best expressed by no one else than Harry S Truman, who, when a member of the congress complained about the huge amounts of former Nazis in the new intelligence agency the US was building up in post-war Germany (nowadays known as BND), simply replied: "I don't care if this Gehlen guy [first head of the agency, a former Nazi-general] is fucking goats - as long as he's helping us, we'll use him".

    During the 2nd world-war, if you played your cards well in Germany, you could achieve a lot. Some people early on realized this and built a career on it that often continued after the war. If you had the support of "the system", you had almost unlimited resources at your disposal.
    Von Braun used these resources because he had a vision, a dream - and he was crazy and ruthless enough to sacrifice anything to make his dream come true.
    Like the above mentioned Gehlen, he was also bold enough to change sides when the right time had come - knowing that the work he had done and the ideas in his head were more interesting to the Allies than the rest of what had happened during the war.

    People from the UK (where V2 rockets hit mostly) are usually furious when you mention the name - they'd have probably wanted to put him up for trial in Nuremberg and seen him hanging - but his work, his men and he himself were already too important by the time the court was setup - and the cold-war had already started.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  19. Communist == Spy in America? by jandersen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it not possible to be a Communist - even in America - without automatically being a spy or traitor? In most of the world 'communist' means 'somebody whose political views align with Communism'; well, more or less. If it is possible to be Christian, Jew, Muslim, ... and still be a patriotic American, is it not possible to be a Communist, patriotic American? Or course it is.

    'Communism' is, put simply, the idea that means of production should not be owned by any individual, but should belong to the community. Not the state - the community, whatever that means. Equating the state with the community is a highly artificial idea. Please note that communism in this sense does not mean that people can't have property, it just means that the means of production are owned by everybody - like in a cooperative, really. Or a family - and if anything is being touted as American these days, it is 'family values'; so communism is at the core of what it means to be American.

  20. Re:Van Braun built weapons for Nazis by ultranova · · Score: 2

    There's actually a long story behind this, and Von Braun was actually arrested because Hitler suspected he was a traitor. Von Braun was a visionary who just loved rockets and wanted to land on the moon and colonize space. The Nazis were a funding means-to-an-end for his rocketry studies. After the Nazis tried to arrest him and his team, he escaped with some equipment and top scientists to defect to the allies.

    So no, it's not at all accurate to speculate that Von Braun was a Nazi or into that whole ideology.

    Heinrich Himmler betrayed Hitler near the end of the war. Would it therefore be inaccurate to speculate that Himmler was a Nazi, or at least had sympathy for the ideology?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  21. And by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    And an almost fanatical devotion to physics.

    --
    No brain, no pain.