Slashdot Mirror


Barry Shein Founded the First Dialup ISP (Video)

Back in the dawn of prehistory, only universities, government agencies, and a few big corporations could get on the Internet. The rest of us either had computers connected to nothing (except maybe an electric outlet), Compuserve, Prodigy, AOL or another service or possibly to an online bulletin board service (BBS). And then, one day in 1989, Barry Shein hooked a server and some modems to an Internet node he managed for a corporate/academic wholesale Internet provider -- and started selling dialup accounts for $20 per month to individuals, small companies, and just about anyone else who came along. Barry called his ISP The World, which is still out there with a retro home page ("Page last modified April 27, 2006"), still selling shell accounts. We may run a second interview with Barry next week, so please stay tuned. (Alternate Video Link)

116 comments

  1. First? by shameless · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want to say "First", but I also want to say that I knew Barry back when he started this whole thing. Congrats on your staying power!

    1. Re:First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BITNET

      1984 ?

    2. Re:First? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2

      BITNET

      1984 ?

      BITNET routed IP packets onto the Internet in 1984?

      (Remember, unless you Provide a Service that routes packets onto the Internet, you're not an ISP. You may be a UUCP service provider, you may be a BITNET service provider, you may be a BBS service provider, and that all may be very important, but you're not an Internet service provider, as per the "ISP" in the title of this article, unless you let your customers send IP datagrams onto the Internet; relaying mail onto the Internet, while an extremely useful service, is not sufficient to qualify you as an ISP.)

    3. Re:First? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      If /. allowed caps you'd see a BIFF@BIT.NET post here.

      So you won't.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  2. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think AOL was the first to do this...

    1. Re:Uh... by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, AOL didn't offer actual internet access until pretty late in the game.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Uh... by brwellstx · · Score: 1

      The September that never ended. I think Green Day wrote a song about it.

    3. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to "Wake Me Up When September Ends"?

    4. Re:Uh... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      As someone who moved away from BBS's to the Internet before there was such a thing as a "web site", I feel qualified to say that, No, AOL was not the first.

      Back then there was no Firefox. We used gopher.
      There was no Google. We used archie.
      Even Mosaic wasn't around yet.
      There was no "click here to download". We used ftp from the command line. And there goddamn sure as fuck weren't any Viagra ads.

      You could freely post your email address online for the whole world to see, with no worries of getting on a spam list. It was a beautiful time.

      Not only was AOL not the first, I feel comfortable and confident in saying that, by far, the darkest day the Internet has ever seen was the day that AOL unleashed its hordes.

    5. Re:Uh... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      IIRC, AOL didn't offer actual internet access until pretty late in the game.

      VERY late in the game.

      And when it finally happened, that's the day that the Internet transformed from something great into the ghetto of spam, scams, and ads that it is today.

      And, yes... GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!

    6. Re:Uh... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Somewhere circa 1997(?) -- It was a dark day for the internet: people too stupid to be on the internet were now pooping all over it.

    7. Re:Uh... by The+Phantom+Mensch · · Score: 1

      I remember reading the Mac System 7 announcements on the Mac listserve (Appletalk?, something like that) about a year before it was released, and then downloading it from ftp.apple.com for free when it was released. In floppy disk image files. Reportedly ftp.apple.com was hosted by a Mac SE/30 running A/UX.

    8. Re:Uh... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, AOL didn't offer actual internet access until pretty late in the game.

      Today's date is Tue Sep 7644 07:32:08 PDT 1993

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:Uh... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's just your aged bias. It was a ghetto of spam, scan and ads before AOL hooked into the internet.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Uh... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      And when it finally happened, that's the day that the Internet transformed from something great into the ghetto of spam, scams, and ads that it is today.

      Another great invention for the masses ruined by the masses.

    11. Re:Uh... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Is this working?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    12. Re:Uh... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      alt.binaries.pictures.midget.blonde That is all.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    13. Re:Uh... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Although certainly not the first ISP, I think Delphi was one of the first commercial online services to offer internet access (maybe late 1992, definitely by 93). Delphi was totally text based, but if I recall, it only cost $20/month for 20 hours while AOL, though snazzier, was something like $3/hr. The one good thing about AOL discs in the very early 90s, was coming bundled with a version of GeoWorks that ran on DOS.

      Anyway, I finally got actual internet through a dial-up ISP in late 1994, then DSL in 1999. And now, I toy with the idea of cutting the cord completely from time to time, as I get too tired to cuss at the punks on my lawn.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    14. Re:Uh... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      The best thing about AOL was that for several years, I never had to buy floppy disks. I could count on a reliable stream of free ones showing up in my mail box on a regular basis. Sometimes 2 or 3 in a day.

      I was quite perturbed when they switched to sending their shit out on CD.....

  3. Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash video, seriously? Slashdot continues its slide into irrelevance...

    1. Re:Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android 2.2 bitches!!!

  4. Bad video quality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It looks like he is still using dialup.

  5. UUNET in 1987? by hondo77 · · Score: 2

    The company I worked for was dialing into UUNET back in 1987/88. Why aren't they considered the first?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:UUNET in 1987? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Was the company you worked for reselling dialup to anyone who paid them?

    2. Re:UUNET in 1987? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      No but we were paying UUNET.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:UUNET in 1987? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I think the key world here is "dial-up". Was UUNET offering modems you could dial into over public telephone network at that time?

    4. Re:UUNET in 1987? by jsm300 · · Score: 1

      UUNET was not providing internet connections at that time. They started out as a UUCP service provider, primarily providing email and Usenet feeds via uucp. So sometimes people will say they are the first ISP, just like people will claim Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL were all ISP's back then. But The World was the first true ISP providing access to the Internet, which probably wasn't all that exciting for the general public at that point.

    5. Re:UUNET in 1987? by paiute · · Score: 1

      the Internet, which probably wasn't all that exciting for the general public at that point.

      Are you kidding? Don't you remember the excitement of going to Yahoo and seeing what new sites had come online the day before? The list had a dozen some days.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    6. Re:UUNET in 1987? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly UUNET didn't offer IP based access until the early 90s. Prior to that it was just limited access to emails and some file transfer.

    7. Re:UUNET in 1987? by plcurechax · · Score: 1

      The company I worked for was dialing into UUNET back in 1987/88. Why aren't they considered the first

      Because UUnet didn't offer dial-up TCP/IP connectivity (or Inter-networking) back in the 1980's, they offered dial-up UUCP (unix-to-unix-copy) services for Usenet (NetNews) and email (with ! (bang) addresses).

      They offered backbone IP access in 1990 via its AlterNet service based on the Wikipedia article you linked.

      plcurechax@slashdot.org!sf.net!...!uunet

    8. Re:UUNET in 1987? by jsm300 · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about websites? Because I can't imagine people were all that excited about new telnet, ftp or gopher sites. If you're talking websites then your timeline is a little off. The World became the first ISP in 1989. Tim Berners-Lee created the first website in December 1990, but didn't really advertise the fact (and make a web browser available) until August of 1991.

    9. Re:UUNET in 1987? by paiute · · Score: 1

      Yes - in the mid-to-late 1990s Yahoo had a list every day of the websites that had come online the day before. In the beginning the lists were short.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  6. Re:Uh...try again by Maxwell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think again. AOL, prodigy, compuserve were all proprietary, isolated systems. They did not provide internet access. It wasn't until 89/90 that there email services could even talk to each other (via the internet).

    Source: old enough to have listed compuserve "forums" and AOL "keywords" on my business cards...

  7. Old school by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

    This was pretty sweet back in the day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... (Not to be confused with Telnet)

  8. I hate Google+ Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of these Google+ interviews are nearly unwatchable due to the really poor audio/video quality... Ugh.

  9. My first internet connection by psxotaku · · Score: 1

    Just had a good laugh with my wife. We got our first dialup account with The World back in the early 90's. Wrote my first scripts because of that account (and the usenet).

  10. Delphi... WELL... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    damn those were heady days. Substantive discussions. Thoughtful comments. My how things have degraded in just about any forum you care to pick.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Delphi... WELL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u r just jealos of the uinternet now moran

  11. Re:Uh...try again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget about FidoNet :)

  12. rewriting history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the problem with the internet, the rewriting of history. Mindlink in Burnaby bc had full telnet, fido, archy etc well before 1989.

    1. Re:rewriting history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they didn't. You're misremembering. They just had relay services until the 90's.

  13. Page last modified April 27, 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Top of page: "New Pricing And Services Effective September 1, 2010"

    So, yeah, wouldn't trust the "Page last modified" date.

  14. Ticket to the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barry and "The World" a.k.a Software Tool and Die and Trumpet Winsock were my tickets to the internet world (pardon the pun) back in the day. I had a whole private network running off a dial-up connection! Sometimes I miss those days. Thanks, Barry.

  15. Why isn't by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Dialing into a BBS, bouncing into a schools system and then access the net not considered the first dialup isp?
    Something I did in '83.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Why isn't by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it's because the BBS operator didn't sell that as a reliable service. You knew those machines were there. You knew you could route through the BBS to those machines. You had passwords for those machines.

      If your BBS's sysop had known a teacher or something, gotten a password, and then re-sold that service... TROUBLE.

      FWIW, I was a bit taken aback by TFA because I was under the impression that there was no commercial dial-up Internet until some kind of law was passed in the early 90s, and that AOL and/or CompuServe had something to do with lobbying for it.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Why isn't by rs79 · · Score: 1

      No.

      Anybody could connect to the uucp network, it was ad-hoc and came with unix all out of bell labs and written by private industry.

      The TCP/IP network otoh, was paid for by USG research dollars which the USG thinks gives them statutory authority over it, hence the dns and ip regime in place now which is effectively government control, not the private industry control that exists over the network itself.

      At the time the NSF regulated IP transit with the AUP; Steve Wolff, who Barry mentioned, was in charge of this and felt the network would grow more quickly if the NSF wasn't "in the loop" and withdrew the AUP thus handing over the network to private control.

      I asked Wolff years later why he didn't liberate the DNS as well as the network, it remained under the auspices of the NSF which got us to where we are not. He said in retrospect he should have; he didn't think it was important back then but if he knew then what he knows now he would have done it.

      You have to keep in mine too there was nothing ON the TCP/IP network. Both UUCP and TCP/IP had email (although the ip side lagged badly, mail was really invented at Bell, IP made very crude versions of this ad took forever to do it) but News had come out of UUCP and there wasn't much else on the network. You really only needed IP if you needed to telnet or ftp and in 90 not many people were being paid to do this. So dial up uucp sites were not uncommon even then - every city had them, and from there you could real mail and news. That's all the network was back then.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:Why isn't by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Had DNS been let out to the wolves, the internet we know now would not exist. It would be a segmented series of corporate owned conflicting networks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Why isn't by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I'm guessing it's because the BBS operator didn't sell that as a reliable service"
      Actually, he did.

      "If your BBS's sysop had known a teacher or something, gotten a password, and then re-sold that service... TROUBLE."
      Trouble, on the internet? say it ain't so!

      The 90's was about business being able to use the internet more then ir was about the common citizen accessing it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Why isn't by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Dialing into a BBS, bouncing into a schools system and then access the net not considered the first dialup isp?

      Because you're not getting IP packets sent to or by your machine's IP protocol stack over that dialup connection.

    6. Re:Why isn't by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Both UUCP and TCP/IP had email (although the ip side lagged badly, mail was really invented at Bell,

      No, it wasn't.

      IP made very crude versions of this ad took forever to do it)

      Inter-host email came out the same year that UNIX first existed, and wasn't invented at Bell Labs. It ran over NCP, because TCP/IP didn't even exist yet.

      SMTP, which ran over TCP and NCP, was first specified in 1982, slightly after TCP was first specified.

  16. Is my memory failing or ... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Before I got a Sysop account at Compuserve, I paid $9.95 if memory serves.
    All the companies were there to download updates from, you could download libraries, utilities, examples, FAQs and Howtos, talk with the programmers, whine to the quality assurance people, you could buy books, jeans and coffee an some other stuff, play multiplayer games (all text) send email to the world, read usenet newsgroups, get email newsletters (tweets with no limit, for the young whippersnappers amongst you) and later also use the web.

    Why would people pay the double for what exactly?
    Do I have to RTFA for that? :-)

    1. Re:Is my memory failing or ... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Before I got a Sysop account at Compuserve, I paid $9.95 if memory serves. All the companies were there to download updates from, you could download libraries, utilities, examples, FAQs and Howtos, talk with the programmers, whine to the quality assurance people, you could buy books, jeans and coffee an some other stuff, play multiplayer games (all text) send email to the world, read usenet newsgroups, get email newsletters (tweets with no limit, for the young whippersnappers amongst you) and later also use the web.

      Why would people pay the double for what exactly?

      The ability to connect to an arbitrary Internet-based service with a client program that connects using TCP?

      Perhaps what you describe was adequate for the vast majority of users, but somebody who wanted direct access to the Internet, including, for example, the ability to (perhaps slooooowly) FTP to an available Internet FTP site would welcome it.

    2. Re:Is my memory failing or ... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps what you describe was adequate for the vast majority of users, but somebody who wanted direct access to the Internet, including, for example, the ability to (perhaps slooooowly) FTP to an available Internet FTP site would welcome it."

      CIS had an FTP client as well.

    3. Re:Is my memory failing or ... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      That's nice. It's still compu$serve.

      If you knew what you were doing you didn't pay for net, that's the advantage to store and forward uucp over always-on IP.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:Is my memory failing or ... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You paid $9.95 AN HOUR, didn't you? They said $20/month.

  17. Im'a let you finish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Al Gore invented the first dialup folks.

  18. Great Emulation by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    It even took 30 seconds for the TheWorld.com web page to load, just like a real dialup line!

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    1. Re:Great Emulation by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Comcast makes everything seem like the 80's

  19. This guys ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is out of whack.
    GO read his site.
    "Yes, keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out of your head.
    (although I've heard it since from other sources and attributed to Ann Landers, Carl Sagan and others I'm pretty sure this one was original when I said it and others have attributed the quote to me. "

    It was Walter Kotschnig, who Carl was quoting in DHW. That Statement with lightly different verbiage goes back 150 years, and probably older.

    TECO is basically perl? Please. Perl doesn't stand for anything, and TECO is closer to freaking COBOL then perl.

    As a reminder you're not the only one that's been working with computers for 40+ years.
    Narcissistic ass.

    1. Re:This guys ego by rs79 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Internet is the unusual personalities of the people that built and use.*

      Barry literally wrote the book on tcp/ip, and as he says, the net was small back then and we all knew each other.

      who the fuck are you?

      *This is probably true of Slashdot, too.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:This guys ego by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Barry literally wrote the book on tcp/ip"

      Applemen, not Shein. Since the conversation is ABOUT a guy named Barry, you should clarify when talking about a different Barry.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:This guys ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem with Slashdot is arrogant, know-it-all dinosaurs like you, who are unfortunately about the only participants left on this decrepit website. Article "discussion" is mostly just one long ego fest for jackasses like you to make a show at how elite you were back in the day. Well maybe back in the stone age you were somebody important and connected(and that is doubtful), but it's now 2014, billions of people use the Internet, and you're just another obnoxious jackass running his mouth on a completely irrelevant website. You're not really that important dude(and probably never were), no matter how much name dropping you do. And no, an obnoxious jackass is not an "unusual personality."

      Many of you nerds really need a serious ego deflation.

  20. Certainly not the first by Shrubber · · Score: 1

    I don't know who really can make that claim but Intelecom Data Systems in Rhode Island was offering dialup Internet access to the public in 1987, including SLIP (and later PPP.)

    1. Re:Certainly not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. On a VAX stolen from Brown & Sharpe.

    2. Re:Certainly not the first by bmo · · Score: 2

      >Yup. On a VAX stolen from Brown & Sharpe.

      I saw that Microvax in Andy's basement. "Hey Andy, where'd ya get the Vax?" "We don't talk about that."

      "...Ok..." >proceed to turn up Pink Floyd's DSOTM.

      After he returned it, he got an ancient 780 and I believe 2 (or 3?) washing machine sized disks.

      slightly related tangent -

      Ferguson Perforating got rid of their Microvax II one day and I found out that it went to the landfill, because the guy they gave it to couldn't operate the damn thing "and it was old." I was catatonic with disappointment. "DO YOU THROW AWAY A MICROMETER BECAUSE IT'S NOT ELECTRONIC?!" I yelled.

      It was 1993/4. Still the heyday of the BBS networks. I could have created a beast of a multiline setup bigger than Andy's. *grumble grumble*

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Certainly not the first by bmo · · Score: 1

      I don't think he had Internet access in 1987. That came a bit later, I believe. Certainly not on the Microvax. Andy didn't charge for access to the machine when it was a BBS which probably saved his butt.

      Lots of time spent in Vax Multi-User Moria and VMS Phone.

      I believe Daver was 12 or something when he wrote the full-screen editor for the BBS.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Certainly not the first by rs79 · · Score: 1

      All of the internet ran on stolen equipment and stolen phone lines back then. You made it work by whatever means possible.

      Jesus Christ, Sun and Cisco were both formed on the commission of a federal crime - they stole the machines from Stanford.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  21. Re:Uh...try again by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    Except fidonet nodes could talk to each other. I ran a node for only mail relay in Southern Ontario from 92-96(from the time I was in middle school to the time I was nearly finished high school), because a bunch of BBS's in the area were choking the only provider at the time for mail requests. By the time late '96 had come around most people had moved to ISP's and BBS's around here were dying. Oh BRE, FRE, and LORD how I do miss you at times.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  22. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by sootman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Add $5.00/month for unlimited* dial-up.
     
    * Unlimited does not mean 24 by 7 connectivity. It means unmetered, interactive usage. Sessions inactive for more than 20 minutes are subject to disconnection. Attempts to defeat inactivity detection may result in additional charges or termination of service.

    IF IT'S FUCKING LIMITED, DON'T FUCKING CALL IT UNLIMITED!

    How hard is it to just say "Add $5.00/month for unmetered, interactive usage" without an asterisk and a bunch of bullshit between "Add $5" and the description of what you actually get for your five bucks?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, then they can replace the asterisk note with a FAQ that answers "What is unmetered, interactive usage?". It's either 6 of one, or half a dozen of the other.

    2. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      You weren't there. Clearly.

      You're used to dialing with ISDN or DSL and have it connect?

      That's adorable.

      Know what you got 90% of the time when you dialed up with a modem back then? A busy signal.

      That's cause for every modem that existed, 5 guys wanted to use it. This went on until cable and dsl, late 90s or so.

      So it was considered rude to dial up, then go away and leave it connected when you weren't using it and people were waiting.

      Free ISP's (there were many, Barry was just the first pay-for one) would jut disconnect you and fuck you that's why. And most didn't charge so they could do this. But if you were paying, yupi might not expect that o had to be aware of the rules, like don't spam and don't tie up the modem pool.

      You don't like it? Open your own isp and you can do what you like and waste your very expensive phone lines on people that forgot to hang up when they went out.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's cute that you get angry, but everyone know what it meant because you know what limited meant? metered.
      You have no clue of the context of the time, so stifle your outrage, newb.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I find it cute when children come out and decide to speak on the issues of man. They are of course wrong, but we should encourage them so they can learn.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    5. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Like you I have no qualms with the "unlimited" description. Back then, when you wanted to use any network service, you dialed in, probably on your only phone line, which before voicemail service (or as an expensive extra charge), meant people got a busy signal if trying to call you. When you were done online, you'd disconnect to free up the phone line for yourself as well as the ISP's modem for other users' use.

      What was cool about an "unlimited" plan, of course, was that you didn't have to worry about racking up hourly charges -- $3hr back in the early 1990s was close to the minimum wage at the time, so for a poor college student, that could be quite substantial and acted as a heavy limiter of use.

      Even today, we hear "unlimited broadband" but if someone wanted to be pedantic, even at the record 50+ tbs rate, there is a limit to how much data can be sent or received in a month. I think people still get that -- kind of like how "all you can eat" doesn't mean you can eat a whole cow -- somethings just aren't possible.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:I'm sure he's a nice guy, but... by sootman · · Score: 1

      I first went online with a brand-new, crazy-fast 14.4 that I had to set the DIP switches on in 1995. So I wasn't there in 1989, but I'm not a total noob, either. Busy signals 90% of the time? Not in 1995. You're exaggerating just a shade, perhaps. Maybe once every couple days I couldn't connect, but I usually got through on the second call, and pretty much always by the third. I didn't get cable until 2000 or so.

      I have no problem with how he runs his business -- phone lines, idle time, etc., yeah, I get that -- but it's 2014 and even though "literally" now means "figuratively", the word "unlimited" still means "unlimited". My only complaint with him is that he shouldn't say "unlimited" if there are, in fact, limits. That's all. There's a perfectly good word available for him to use: "unmetered" -- and I know he knows that word because he buries it under the asterisk. It is quite simply dishonest, whether it's AT&T or Comcast selling UNLIMITED* broadband or a little mom-and-pop shop like this.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  23. Definitely not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know who was first but I was on Wetware Diversions, a dial-up ISP in San Francisco connected to the Internet in as early as 1987 and it was up before then. I paid a certain amount of money (I don't remember the amount) to dial in to their servers with my Supra 2400bps modem via telnet I recall, and I read Usenet there.

    DNS wasn't even in use at the time I recall as e-mail addresses still needed to use bangs ("!") for routing, which made it difficult for me to send e-mail because I didn't know the names of various routers so I could route my e-mail through them to reach its destination. (I'm not exactly sure of the technical side of things; please forgive me.) In other words, we didn't use @schoolname.edu to send e-mail. We had to do something like routerone!routertwo!routerfive!schoolname etc. to address our e-mails. You can see examples of this in the link below.

    I did a quick search for "Wetware Diversions" and came up with this long list of ISPs going back as far as 1988:

    http://www.phrack.org/issues/29/4.html

    (Posting as AC because I don't have a /. account yet.)

    1. Re:Definitely not the first by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      I don't know who was first but I was on Wetware Diversions, a dial-up ISP in San Francisco connected to the Internet in as early as 1987 and it was up before then ...

      DNS wasn't even in use at the time

      RFC 882 and RFC 883 were published as early as 1983, so I really doubt that DNS wasn't at use at all in 1987.

      I recall as e-mail addresses still needed to use bangs ("!") for routing

      That's a UUCP convention, not used on the real Internet. Perhaps the service that you used required bang paths and didn't use DNS, but DNS was most definitely in use by people connected to the Internet (as opposed to people connected to a dialup service that gatewayed email onto the Internet).

      I did a quick search for "Wetware Diversions" and came up with this long list of ISPs going back as far as 1988:

      http://www.phrack.org/issues/29/4.html

      That says

      07/89 415-753-5265^ wet San Francisco CA 3/12/24 24
      386 SYS V.3. Wetware Diversions. $15 registration, $0.01/minute.
      Public Access UNIX System: uucp, PicoSpan bbs, full Usenet News,
      multiple lines, shell access. Newusers get initial credit!
      contact:{ucsfcca|claris|hoptoad}!wet!cc (Christopher Cilley)

      I see nothing about "Internet" there. I see "uucp", "bbs", "Usenet", and "shell access", all of which can be provided as dialup services, and none of which necessarily imply that they support something such as SLIP or PPP over dialup lines and route packets between the host on the other end of the dialup line and the Internet, that being what being an Internet Service Provider indicates that you do.

      UUCP (including UUCP mail and USENET), BBS access, and dialup shell access were certainly very useful services at the time, but they aren't sufficient to make you an ISP.

      If you're going to quibble that Barry wasn't the first dialup ISP - not the first provider of dialup UUCP or the first provider of dialup BBS access or the first provider of dialup shell services - then talk about earlier ISPs, not earlier providers of dialup UUCP or dialup BBS access or dialup shell services.

    2. Re:Definitely not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you very much for your explanation and clarification! Makes sense. Like I said "I'm not exactly sure of the technical side of things; please forgive me." :-) I should have been less certain of my claim.

    3. Re:Definitely not the first by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "but they aren't sufficient to make you an ISP."

      Of course they were. What does the I in ISP mean? "Internet".

      If what you offer can interoperate with the network, you're an ISP. What do you think the ip network looked like before the web? Hint: nobody really used Gopher (other than .ca whois) and 99% of all activity was mail and news. Which came from uucp and was ported to IP. But until the web came along there was simply no reason for a pain in the ass SLIP or PPP connection cause you could do anything important with a uucp connection.

      ftp wasn't the only way to move files around. And as a user of the network you couldn't tell if those other people were on uucp or the ip network, it was all transparent to you - Interoperability.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:Definitely not the first by The+Phantom+Mensch · · Score: 1

      I had internet access at work starting in 1986 but since it was work related I stuck to fairly sensible net usage. My first home ISP was through a small startup in rural northern NJ, starting in 1992 or so The local phone service at that time under NJ Bell was pretty terrible. Local calls only serviced half the county, and not even the county seat where AOL and Compuserve's dial-up phone banks were established, so AOL use was a toll call. Recognizing this, two guys set up a dial-up phone bank in an area that serviced this little gap in dial-up access and ran with it for about 5 years. This was a full fledged ISP right from the start with IP addresses, ftp access, mail servers, Usenet, etc. And for the first year or two tech support meant talking to the sysadmin himself. Planet.net was the name of it and as far as I can tell the domain name is up for grabs.

    5. Re:Definitely not the first by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      I used Gopher.

      Fuck. How I would love a Gopher like interface to most of the content on the web now. Blazing through using arrow keys. It was fast and got me info.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    6. Re:Definitely not the first by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      "but they aren't sufficient to make you an ISP."

      Of course they were. What does the I in ISP mean? "Internet".

      If what you offer can interoperate with the network, you're an ISP.

      If you can route packets from clients to the Internet, you're an ISP.

      If you can only route mail messages and Usenet mail postings to the Internet, with your clients using UUCP to send them and receive them, and perhaps provide the ability to download and upload files using UUCP and maybe other uux-based services, you're a UUCP service provider, not an ISP.

  24. My contribution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ok, this guy in my post here is not Barry Shein. Posting anonymously just in case someone can figure out who it is...

    Anyway I was a sysadmin on some Unix and VMS machines at one work site. At one point I hooked into Usenet via another department within the company, but was always a bit nervous about it as this was a large defense contractor that was paranoid about any outside network connections. I only wanted the technical newsgroups and some access to external email but I did allow a few choice non-tech sites through (local for-sale stuff and the like).

    One of the users would ask me, jokingly, if I would add alt.sex.bondage. I would refuse of course, laughing. I had limited disk space and limited dialup bandwidth, and very low seniority. I'd say I would do it if I got a memo from the president of the company, which I knew would never happen. But every month or so John Doe would ask again, could he get alt.sex.bondage. I'd give the same excuses and roll my eyes. After awhile I was not sure if he was just keeping a long running joke going or if he wasn't really joking after all. But I left the company after awhile.

    A few years later one of my friends mentioned that John Doe started his own company. It was one of the larger ISPs around at the time for people who wanted dialup access to their school or company's mainframes, access to Usenet, a shell account, and so forth. This was in 1988 or 1989, with actual dialup. Later when the web started taking off they provided early access and get very large. So this really was a big pioneer of "the internet" you might say.

    So in hindsight one of the things I've been wondering ever since, is whether or not my refusal to supply alt.sex.bondage was a key motivator to kicking off the internet revolution. Me and Al Gore, we should be buddies.

    1. Re:My contribution... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "(local for-sale stuff and the like)"

      ie., porn.

      This fueled a lot of the early net. I knew an deign engineer that wanted the engineering groups. They wouldn't spring for a uunet feed from DC to Irvine so buddy got smart and gve his boss a floppy of porn from home. He said you get one of these every week if I get a full feed, Capish? He got a full feed and friday afternoons had to download and pay the porn tax. You did what you to, that connection in Irvine was at the time strategically important to the growth of the network. Now we had LA, San diego and orange county online.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  25. Re:more like 1987 by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Yeah, not the first. There were multiple public ISPs in Portland in 1989. PDxs, agora, Teleport...

    One is still around, nearly 30 years later - Raindrop Laboratories http://www.rdrop.com/ still has its "vintage" mid '90s web page, too. (It has been around since 1985.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  26. Not the first, just the most egotistical. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Portland had "agora" in 1985. PDxs and Teleport joined in 1987.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:Not the first, just the most egotistical. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Portland had "agora" in 1985. PDxs and Teleport joined in 1987.

      With all three of them routing packets between a host on the other end of a dialup SLIP connection (not PPP, the first RFCs for that came out in 1989) and the Internet? If not, they weren't ISPs, they were providers of other dialup services.

    2. Re:Not the first, just the most egotistical. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Why? The IP network was tiny back then and the uucp network was enormous ans had all the apps. There were no people passing packet back then because nobody wanted to - they didn't need to. You could get everything the network had to offer via uucp.

      Except telnet. But there was nowhere to telnet to. Back then if you needed to telnet you had a line in your house. What else would your boss say "ok, we need you to telnet it. I hear a third ISP opened in the US, so use that."

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:Not the first, just the most egotistical. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      So the first manufacturer of cars was a stable guy in North Africa. Because there were no roads and not many other cars so you could get everywhere by horse. Right?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:Not the first, just the most egotistical. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Why? The IP network was tiny back then and the uucp network was enormous ans had all the apps. There were no people passing packet back then because nobody wanted to - they didn't need to. You could get everything the network had to offer via uucp.

      OK, so there wasn't much of a market for ISPs back then, and most organizations offering dialup services weren't ISPs, they provided UUCP access or UNIX shell access or a BBS or....

      So, if neither agora nor PDxs nor Teleport offered your machine the ability to directly transmit IP packets to and receive IP packets from hosts on the Internet, they may have offered very useful services, but they weren't ISPs, and thus do not count as evidence that The World wasn't the first dialup ISP.

      If you want to prove that The World wasn't the first dialup ISP - not "the first dialup service provider", Barry's smart enough not to claim that The World was that - you're going to have to find an organization providing dialup direct Internet access before they did.

    5. Re:Not the first, just the most egotistical. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      agora was. I know because I had it. I know because a friend and I convinced Alan Batie (the owner/operator) to install a SLIP daemon in 1987.

      Many years later, I worked at Intel, and looked up Alan. I had to introduce myself to the man that, to me, "gave me the Internet." He remembered me. (Or my user name, anyway.) I was more flattered by that at the time than if a sports star or president had told me they remembered me.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  27. Freenets? by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

    I was dialing up to Freenets back in 1988, paying for 'privileged' access (though they were non-profit) and was using email, archie, gopher, IRC, etc... Wouldn't this be considered an ISP?

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
    1. Re:Freenets? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      I was dialing up to Freenets back in 1988, paying for 'privileged' access (though they were non-profit) and was using email, archie, gopher, IRC, etc... Wouldn't this be considered an ISP?

      Only if you could send IP packets directly onto the Internet and receive IP packets directly from the Internet, which would seem to imply that they were Freenets in a sense other than this sense of Freenet ("Freenet is a self-contained network, while Tor allows accessing the web anonymously, as well as using "hidden services" (anonymous web servers). Freenet is not a proxy: You cannot connect to services like Google or Facebook using Freenet." And, no, "Google and Facebook didn't exist at the time" is not a counterargument; replace them with whatever Internet services existed at the time, and if the resulting "You cannot connect to service such as ... using Freenet." remains true, it wasn't an ISP.).

    2. Re:Freenets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, before my time, but Freenet has/had another meaning besides freenetproject.org (perhaps inspired their name though?)

    3. Re:Freenets? by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      As I stated, I used Archie, Gopher and IRC.. and as I just remembered EW-Too chat prgrams and MUDs/MUSHes/Etc... and was connecting to them directly from a shell account.... so by your definition that falls under ISP.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    4. Re:Freenets? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No.
      UUCP was the 'internet' until TCP/IP became more popular. The first personal computers used UUCP to connect to the internet.
      By internet, I mean the hardware and lines. TCP/IP is not the internet. It's an internet protocol. A way to tonnect to communicate vie 'the internet'.

      Here, let me help you out:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Freenets? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      No. UUCP was the 'internet' until TCP/IP became more popular. The first personal computers used UUCP to connect to the internet. By internet, I mean the hardware and lines. TCP/IP is not the internet. It's an internet protocol. A way to tonnect to communicate vie 'the internet'.

      The Internet, with a capital "I", as in "Internet Service Provider", uses the Internet protocol suite (IP, UDP, TCP, etc.), not UUCP, although UUCP can run over TCP. I don't care what you mean by "internet", with a lower-case "i"; as we're talking about who was the first Internet-with-a-capital-I service provider, what you mean by "internet" is completely irrelevant.

      Here, let me help you out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

      Here, let me help you out. You may recognize a name that appears several times on that page; why giving me the URL of a page that I have edited several times doesn't "help me out", if by that you mean "informing me of something I didn't know". I'm quite familiar with UUCP, having used it in the 1980's and early 1990's, and having managed it at some of the companies at which I worked.

    6. Re:Freenets? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      As I stated, I used Archie, Gopher and IRC.. and as I just remembered EW-Too chat prgrams and MUDs/MUSHes/Etc... and was connecting to them directly from a shell account.... so by your definition that falls under ISP.

      OK, I guess I didn't make it clear enough.

      If you can send IP packets over your dialup connection and have them routed onto the Internet, and have IP packets from the Internet routed to your machine over the dialup connection, you're dialed into an ISP.

      If you have to dial up a host and log in to getty over that dialup connection, then you're dialed up to a UNIX shell service provider, not an ISP, even if the UNIX host you've logged into happens to be connected to the Internet.

      If a UUCP program on your machine has to dial up a host and log into a UUCP account over that dialup connection, then you're dialed up to a UUCP service provider, not an ISP, even if the host you're connecting to via UUCP can route emails to the Internet.

      So unless you were using Archie and Gopher and IRC clients running on your machine at home, with those clients sending IP packets out over a SLIP connection and receiving IP packets from that SLIP connection, you were not dialing into an ISP.

    7. Re:Freenets? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Yes, before my time, but Freenet has/had another meaning besides freenetproject.org

      I.e., there were Freenets other than the one based on Ian Clarke's design?

      (perhaps inspired their name though?)

      Yes, I think the domain name "freenetproject.org" was chosen by the Freenet developers because they wanted a domain name containing "freenet".

      (I.e., "freenetproject.org" appears to be the domain name for the Freenet Project; it's not just a bunch of people who liked Freenet and decided to have a domain name with "freenet" in it.)

  28. Re:Uh...try again by bonehead · · Score: 2

    Don't forget about FidoNet :)

    FidoNet was something different.

    I'm not saying it's irrelevant to the conversation. Not by any means. It holds a very important place in history. But it was it's own, separate thing. It wasn't the Internet, and it wasn't the commercial online services.

    In a way, it was the first "common man's" global network. Sure, the Internet existed, and ARPAnet before that, but for many years they were only available to the privileged few.

    Fido Net was a way for a regular guy to use his computer to communicate with people outside of his home town.

    Seems like nothing today. Back then it was a HUGE deal.

  29. Water invented in 1974, the cup in 1989? by jeff-nelson3388 · · Score: 1

    I had raw IP dialup in 1989 in Tucson, Arizona. It's so long ago, that I don't recall the name of the company, but they were not new in 1989. And, there were other options.

    --
    @_jeff_nelson +jeffnelsonjeffnelson
    1. Re:Water invented in 1974, the cup in 1989? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had dial up internet in 1987. TLG. The Little Garden. we first used terminals to access uucp and mail, then we got gopher,
      and finally www in 1992, with Cello. Absolute crap, and we had a great party the night that NCSA/Mosic was released.

    2. Re:Water invented in 1974, the cup in 1989? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      I had dial up internet in 1987. TLG. The Little Garden.

      Presumably a different TLG from this one, as that one dates back to 1992.

  30. Re:more like 1987 by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2

    Yeah, not the first. There were multiple public ISPs in Portland in 1989. PDxs, agora, Teleport...

    One is still around, nearly 30 years later - Raindrop Laboratories http://www.rdrop.com/ still has its "vintage" mid '90s web page, too. (It has been around since 1985.)

    If you follow the "Alan Batie" link from RainDrop's home page, and then follow his "agora" link from "I work at Peak Internet, a local ISP in Corvallis, Oregon. I also run a small ISP in Portland, Oregon, called RainDrop Laboratories. It started in 1985 as a public access system called Agora, while I was working at Intel.", it speaks of agora's RainNet Internet access starting in 1990 - "Now that our subject had SVR4, with TCP/IP and all, and there being several other hacker sorts around town who'd been eyeing the Internet with envy for sometime, it was time to see if something could be done locally. RAINet was thus born in the fall of 1990, and its first connection was a 2400 bps SLIP link between agora and parsely (another local public access system, owned by Tod Oace at the time)."

    (Remember, unless you actually Provide a Service that lets you send IP packets onto the Internet, you're not an Internet Service Provider. Dialup BBSes don't count, UUCP doesn't count, only SLIP/PPP/bridged Ethernet/PPPoEoAoDSL/PPPoAoDSL/DOCSIS/etc. so that you can splat out one of these things - or one of these things - onto the Internet counts.)

  31. Good old Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in '89 I was a member of the Boston Computer Society's Commodore Users Group. I remember when The World started up and I signed up for an account. It was a thrill to log in on my Commodore 128 with a 2400 baud modem and telnet, ftp, or gopher around the world. Remember Fidonet and when ISPs gave you a free subscription to newsgroups? I'm sorry to say that the thrill is gone since the Internet became a corporate environment.

  32. Web hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible anyone is naive enough to still be paying Barry $50/month for their 50MB storage / 2GB of transfer web hosting?

    1. Re:Web hosting by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Who else are then supposed to pay now that Karl Denninger packed it in?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  33. Re:more like 1987 by rs79 · · Score: 1

    Lots of guys did - Karl Denninger in Chicago and Greg Laskin LA. But they were UUCP not IP connections.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  34. Re:Uh...try again by rs79 · · Score: 1

    " It holds a very important place in history"

    Only in fido-land. It was a pox to the rest of the net.

    Q:How do you know when the Fido boys tried to gateway again?
    A: there are 300 posts in alt.aquaria. 280 of them are the same.

    Every. Friggin. Time.

    And no I don't know why your tank is green.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  35. "hello, world" by rich_salz · · Score: 1

    I remember their daily message (msgs) had "Hello, world -- dmr" for the longest time. Also that Barry had very long discussions with NSFNet folks (Steven Wolffe?) about AUP, as the first commercial ISP.

    1. Re:"hello, world" by rich_salz · · Score: 1

      Someone sent me a copy:

          From uunet!research.att.com!dmr Tue Oct 17 03:35:50 1989
          Return-Path:
          Received: from uunet.UUCP by world.std.com (4.0/SMI-4.0)
                          id AA27107; Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:35:50 EDT
          From: uunet!research.att.com!dmr
          Received: from inet.att.com by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with SMTP
                          id AA15993; Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:21:50 -0400
          Message-Id:
          Date: Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:15:37 EDT
          To: msgs@world.std.com
          Subject: printf

                          "Hello, world.std.com!\n"

                                          Dennis Ritchie

  36. Heh heh... well played by jpellino · · Score: 1

    (as I was going to say of course /. is immune from such pettiness...)

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  37. The WELL Was First - in 1985. Shein Is A Fraud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on first-hand information, and belief, The Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link - The WELL, a product of Whole Earth Access - was first to offer dialup Internet accounts to paying customers.

    I specifically remember having an account on The Well, back in 1985. You needed a credit card to sign up, but John Draper ('Captain Crunch') told me that there was a back door - just enter all zeroes, and they would send you a bill. I tried it. It worked. I created an account - tyger@well.com - and that was my first paid UNIX account, on a VAX 11/750, I think ... in 1985, if I recall correctly.

    Barry seems to have trouble dealing with the fact that he was not first.

    He can't stop claiming otherwise.

    His entire reputation depends upon promoting an alternate version of events.

    Kind of like his claim that he wrote xman(1).

    Well, yes, SOMEBODY wrote xman(1).

    But where's all the other software that Barry wrote, later?

    Some of us suspect that Barry had a little help with his graduating project.

    If you want to read more about Barry Shein's antics, please see this website describing an unlawful termination lawsuit against Oracle, in which Barry Shein played a prominent part:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040408124353/http://www.orafraud.org/Oracle/terminator.html

    I'm not saying that Barry Shein is pathological, but it's a question that should be asked.

    1. Re:The WELL Was First - in 1985. Shein Is A Fraud. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Based on first-hand information, and belief, The Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link - The WELL, a product of Whole Earth Access - was first to offer dialup Internet accounts to paying customers.

      Dialup accounts where you'd run SLIP over the dialup line, and IP packets you sent over the line got routed to arbitrary Internet hosts, and those hosts could route packets back to your machine which would receive them over the SLIP line?

      If not, that's not a dialup Internet account. It might be a dialup shell account, or a dialup UUCP account, but it's not a dialup shell account. Barry's not saying he was the first to offer dialup shell accounts or dialup UUCP accounts, he's saying he was the first to offer dialup Internet accounts, letting your home machine directly connect to the Internet.

  38. BBS use and the internet by JimSt · · Score: 1

    I signed up for a World account in the first days of his operation, and still maintain my account there. It remains my main email account of last resort, even though I have two email domains now. The interviewer and Barry perhaps didn't know about the dialup BBSing that went on before there was a commodity internet available. As a note, I dialed up to his system in Boston for about 2 or 3 bucks an hour, so it wasn't cheap, but it didn't break the bank either. (From Irvine, Ca.). Later a company here in Irvine, network intensive started to offer a dialin locally and the cost went to a flat 10 or 20 bucks a month to get a PPP dialin connection, which could be left up on a phone line, sort of like todays connection. In fact it was about 1/3 the speed of DSL if anyone cares. Back to the main topic, the BBS craze was hot from the late 70s to 89 and was as big as anything around. You would get large grouped networks of BBSs and you could dial into a local one, and they would all sync with each other in various ways. I see the Tomcat package now, and recall one package that was huge back then. There were also Mustang BBS's. Many small fortunes were made into nothing with the craze as some companies (I think Mustang was one of them) went to revenue, and you would pay thousands to get a system to run on a big bank of PC hardware and inbound modems. This all went into the tank overnight when World and then several other companies came on the scene. As to what did you do? He didn't mention Gopher and FTP. The main use of dialups later on was to trade software, some legal, some not so much. The Internet was a trove of such stuff and a utility much like Google, called Gopher was out there. It didn't offer anything but indexing and file name searching, but was far better than the BBS scene where there were indexes of various quality available, and you would have to call and register to get things on distant BBSs. The email was interesting, but newcommers like me from the land of BBS didn't have a lot of use for it, though as various people started to use Usenet and that grew you could make friends and use it more. As he mentioned if you were laid off, you had contacts you lost, and that world didn't intersect much with the BBS directly.