Slashdot Mirror
The Man Responsible For Pop-Up Ads On Building a Better Web
An anonymous reader writes Above all, Ethan Zuckerman wants you to know that he is sorry. In the mid-1990s, Zuckerman was working as a designer and programmer for Tripod.com when he wrote the code for the first pop-up ad. He says: "At the end of the day, the business model that got us funded was advertising. The model that got us acquired was analyzing users’ personal homepages so we could better target ads to them. Along the way, we ended up creating one of the most hated tools in the advertiser’s toolkit: the pop-up ad. It was a way to associate an ad with a user’s page without putting it directly on the page, which advertisers worried would imply an association between their brand and the page’s content. Specifically, we came up with it when a major car company freaked out that they’d bought a banner ad on a page that celebrated anal sex. I wrote the code to launch the window and run an ad in it. I’m sorry. Our intentions were good."
As soon as the tools were added for a web page to open a new web-page, I'm sure pop-ups were "invented" simultaneously across numerous ad agencies.
A very expensive patent that was litigated aggressively...
VLC Remote for iPhone and Android
[quote] Our intentions were good. [/quote]
FVO "good" meaning "to make money". Not unsurprising in the Capitalist America, but still a bit too easy.
Not that I care much, if not him someone else would've thought this one up. Pop-overs, pop-unders, pop-ins, insertions, insertions by your own ISP, unbidden playing of something VERY LOUD, possibly with video attached, what-have-you. There's something about advertising that invariably brings out the most obnoxious in the advertiser. Or even outright evil, like advertising toolbars and other malware.
It's what commerce does, it what it must do if it's effectively a religion to you.
I am reminded of a User Friendly comic.
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030712
... which led to the pop-under, etc. On the bright side, this led to higher adoption rates for browsers that supported ad-blockers, noscript, etc. So if it weren't for this guy, Firefox would probably never have gained the traction it did, and the vast majority of people would be stuck on IE.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
the intention was to show advertising to people. Steal their bandwidth and hide real content without getting approval. The intentions of advertising on the web were never good, they were evil. And all that because some companies want to line their pockets.
No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
--Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
NEVER has good intentions. EVER
Your apology will never be enough to excuse what you wrought
Why sweat it? This was the obvious next step in advertising. If he hadn't of done it, someone else would have done it a few days/weeks/months later.
We finally have it confirmed that pop-up ads are the result of anal sex. Makes sense to me.
"If I hadn't followed orders, someone else would have."
I come from a wealthy family which has done some fairly atrocious things serving horrible people, and got very rich in the process. That line has been used by them over and over.
You know what? If the best people refuse to do something - especially if they shout loudly about what they were asked to do - then it gets done badly, or not at all.
i appreciate the apology. i imagine steve buscemi crossing his name off a list with a crayon and then smearing lipstick all over his face.
... it's blocked by a pop-up.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
But I have to admit that if my intentions were ever good, I wasn't actually marketing anymore. I'm glad that he's apologetic, but let's not push the junk mail and pretend users wanted it.
But I have to admit that if my intentions were ever good, I wasn't actually marketing anymore. I'm glad that he's apologetic, but he was in marketing. You don't swing a pitchfork in Hell and pretend you don't work there.
>>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
This technology sounds totally cool. I'd like to see them use it to make pop-up ads on the shitty Slashdot Beta site. They could make pop-up ads to counter the user's extreme boredom as this user waits for the shitty Beta site's page and all its shitty JavaScript and CSS crap to initially load. Then they make pop-up ads on to record the exact back-button click when the person notices that it's the shitty Beta site rather than the Classic site, and the person's anger starts to grow. The pop-up ads would progressively cause the user's anger to turn into madness, and then finally utter and complete disappointment and despair once the shitty Beta site has finally loaded. The pop-up ads could also cause the formation and flow of the very first of many teardrops to cascade down this poor victim's cheeks as the user struggles in vain to read the stories' small text with poor contrast. The total anguish could be examined in excruciating detail, so the awful nature of the Slashdot Beta site could be truly comprehended.
a major car company freaked out that they’d bought a banner ad on a page that celebrated anal sex. I wrote the code to launch the window and run an ad in it. I’m sorry
That was so gay!
Agreed. Advertiser's intentions are never good. Their intention is to manipulate people at a subconscious emotional level in order to get their money. "Good" is when you donate to charity, not when you manipulate people.
Ya, and the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
And then he went on to write Facebook. I'm not sure I like this guy.
There are no such things as good intentions, at least not for users.
Marketing is about manipulating and about out-shouting the competition. This is not at all restricted to the internet. The obvious progression on the internet was stationary ads, animated ads, ads that pop up over content, ads that were indistinguishable from content, ads that bypassed adblockers, ads that started playing sound, ads that start playing videos, and now ads that pop up in the middle of videos.
We saw the same thing with TVs, ads in the ad breaks, louder ads in the ad breaks, longer ad breaks, ads popping up at the bottom of the screen during content, ads featured in content (not all actors like drinking Coke).
Oh and on billboards which were painted on the side of buildings, then free standing, then free standing with lots of lighting shining on them, and now a back lit video billboard which is blindingly bright at night.
Sorry buddy but you never had "good intentions".
You're factually right, of course, except for the religion part. Indeed, it's worse than religion, because you can always free yourself of religion, while on the other side and for the time being, capitalism is the one currently available world operating system, wherein the only thing keeping everything going (including the world itself) is profit – until the world finds another, better operating system.
At the end of the day -- you are still a worm Zuckerman
Sofia Koutsouveli Sofia Lucifairy lucifairy7@gmail.com
... is paved with good intentions.
I think you took a wrong turn somewhere and ended up on http. If you want to pay cash to have discussions, you want to be on nntp newsgroups.
Here on the web, ads pay for the sites, such as this one, so you don't have to pay cash.
The mere fact that they had purchased the ad on that particular page shows their intentions weren't good at all but strictly profit motivated. A "good" response would have been to remove the ad, not create a pop-up. On the other hand, the car company should have fired them.
Well maybe I did't want that car ad on my tripod page either, did they consider that?
No it simply means that he is aiming for a position at Apple.
First we hang you and your kind.
Then we'll work something out.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Look at the bright side of online ads. If you don't like something and want it changed, instead of uselessly complaining to the site owner, you can complain where it really hurts - the advertisers. Works in the real world all the time. Popups suck, no question about it, but a banner or sidebar, if it's paying for the site, I'm not going to complain. Noisy video ads, on the other hand ... can't close the tab fast enough.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Bill Hicks said all there is to say to people like that guy.
Not that I care much, if not him someone else would've thought this one up. Pop-overs, pop-unders, pop-ins, insertions, insertions by your own ISP, unbidden playing of something VERY LOUD, possibly with video attached, what-have-you. There's something about advertising that invariably brings out the most obnoxious in the advertiser. Or even outright evil, like advertising toolbars and other malware.
Don't worry, the free market will fix it!
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
And is it the preferred brand of, well, drivers or passengers?
Have gnu, will travel.
**of course**
that's the narrative for most tech companies that we see in the media being depicted as "successful"
that's the model and everyone knows it...this guy was a fool if he didn't see it (but i accept his apology!)
seriously, /. the above quotation explains quite a bit of conflict in tech today...it's about **incentives**
with the above business model, the incentives all go in the wrong direction: towards 'big brothering' a person as an internet profit model
we must end this notion forever!
Thank you Dave Raggett
What's wrong with Battlefield Earth? That movie is freaking hilarious. I am rather angry that they removed one of my favorite scenes from the DVD -- the one where they are debating if humans can fly and they drop a guy off a cliff to find out.
You knew that at Slashdot.org, you'd find "news for nerds". You intentionally loaded Slashdot to get what is on Slashdot (news, discussion).
You knew that at Slashdot.org, you'd find ads. You intentionally loaded Slashdot to get what is on Slashdot (ads).
So yes, you did ask for the ads, just as much as you asked for the discussion - you intentionally requested a page that has those things.
If you want a discussion without ads, nntp or IRC is for you. You are welcome to pay Dejanews directly rather than paying Slashdot indirectly.
If you choose to come here, to a site with ads, knowing that the service provided to you is provided by ad revenue, don't bitch about receiving exactly what Slashdot offers - news and discussion financed by ads. If you don't want what Slashdot offers, don't come to Slashdot. Simple.
Yeah, seems a bit of a spurious claim. You could argue the developers who added the ability to open new windows to the browsers are more responsible (and put a lot more work it).
And what's the back-patting "I'm such a leet hacker" bit all about:
"Not only did I deploy what was probably the first popup, I wrote the javascript and the server-side Perl to launch it," Zuckerman told me in a follow-up. "I'm old."
It wouldn't of been much claim to fame if he hadn't written the javascript would it? "Yes, I FTP'd the first popup ad code to a web server (but someone else wrote it)"... He wrote a few lines of javascript with a "window.open" call. It's not exactly rocket science. And what's server side Perl got to do with 'inventing' the popup advert? The server side code has nothing to do with creating the popup, it could just as easily be a static html file.
Is paved with good intentions.
My program for hosts file construction adds security, speed, reliability, + anonymity & does more, more efficiently by FAR vs. addons + fixes DNS' security issues:
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:
http://start64.com/index.php?o...
(Details of benefits in link)
Summary:
---
A.) Hosts do more than:
1.) AdBlock ("souled-out" 2 Google/Crippled by default)
2.) Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse"
3.) Request Policy -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
B.) Hosts add reliability vs. downed/redirected dns (& overcome redirects on sites, /. beta as an example).
C.) Hosts secure vs. malicious domains too -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... w/ less added "moving parts" complexity/room 4 breakdown,
D.) Hosts files yield more:
1.) Speed (adblock & hardcodes fav sites - faster than remote dns)
2.) Security (vs. malicious domains serving malcontent + block spam/phish & trackers)
3.) Reliability (vs. downed or Kaminsky redirect vulnerable dns, 99% = unpatched vs. it & worst @ isp level + weak vs Fastflux + dynamic dns botnets)
4.) Anonymity (vs. dns request logs + dnsbl's).
---
* Hosts do more w/ less (1 file) @ faster levels (ring 0) vs redundant inefficient addons (slowing slower ring 3 browsers) via filtering 4 the IP stack (coded in C, loads w/ os, & 1st net resolver queried w\ 45++ yrs.of optimization).
* Addons = more complex + slow browsers in message passing (use a few concurrently & see) & are nullified by native browser methods - It's how Clarityray is destroying Adblock.
* Addons slowup slower usermode browsers layering on more - & bloat RAM consumption too + hugely excessive cpu use (4++gb extra in FireFox https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth...)
Work w/ a native kernelmode part - hosts files (An integrated part of the ip stack)
APK
P.S.=> "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend"
...apk
My program for hosts file construction adds security, speed, reliability, + anonymity & does more, more efficiently by FAR vs. addons + fixes DNS' security issues:
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ 32/64-bit:
http://start64.com/index.php?o...
(Details of benefits in link)
Summary:
---
A.) Hosts do more than:
1.) AdBlock ("souled-out" 2 Google/Crippled by default)
2.) Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse"
3.) Request Policy -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
B.) Hosts add reliability vs. downed/redirected dns (& overcome redirects on sites, /. beta as an example).
C.) Hosts secure vs. malicious domains too -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... w/ less added "moving parts" complexity/room 4 breakdown,
D.) Hosts files yield more:
1.) Speed (adblock & hardcodes fav sites - faster than remote dns)
2.) Security (vs. malicious domains serving malcontent + block spam/phish & trackers)
3.) Reliability (vs. downed or Kaminsky redirect vulnerable dns, 99% = unpatched vs. it & worst @ isp level + weak vs Fastflux + dynamic dns botnets)
4.) Anonymity (vs. dns request logs + dnsbl's).
---
* Hosts do more w/ less (1 file) @ faster levels (ring 0) vs redundant inefficient addons (slowing slower ring 3 browsers) via filtering 4 the IP stack (coded in C, loads w/ os, & 1st net resolver queried w\ 45++ yrs.of optimization).
* Addons = more complex + slow browsers in message passing (use a few concurrently & see) & are nullified by native browser methods - It's how Clarityray is destroying Adblock.
* Addons slowup slower usermode browsers layering on more - & bloat RAM consumption too + hugely excessive cpu use (4++gb extra in FireFox https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth...)
Work w/ a native kernelmode part - hosts files (An integrated part of the ip stack)
APK
P.S.=> "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend"
...apk
holy crap, TIL that User Friendly is still around.
Bless ye my son. After your confession, write 10 quicksort algorithms and ye will be absolved of thy sins.
I fail to see why that was the solution they came up with. There's no difference between ads on the page and ads in a popup.
If YOUR page loaded it then YOUR ad provider was sketchy as hell and YOU were guilty for blindly hooking up with them.
Wanting it to be as safe, reliable & efficient as possible would be the goal to achieve sockpuppetmaster, TomHudson = Barbara, Not Barbie (back with yet more sockpuppets I see & the same poor "illogic-logic" you always spouted).
APK
P.S.=> Of course, as per MY usual? YOU are MORE THAN WELCOME to validly technically disprove the points extolled here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... regarding how hosts files give you more added speed, security, reliability, & even anonymity online (which you can't validly, of course... & THAT? Makes ME, laugh... really laugh, @ the trolling technically weak "likes of you" & ALWAYS did!)
... apk
So you're saying one shouldn't surf safer, more reliably, & faster (if possible, & it is with my program)?
Please - Do society a favor:
DO NOT RUN FOR POLITICS!
(Since NO society needs yet another "ah, close enough for gov't work" waster of taxpayer monies since you do NOT believe in doing the MOST with what you've got to work with).
* Additionally, as per your trolling usual (since you saw fit to even *try* to "startup" with me again & failed badly)? You can't validly disprove my points on hosts adding speed, security, reliability, & more -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly - it's unbelievable you'd make yet ANOTHER "sockpuppet" account ontop of your other 2 (or more probably) in TomHudson & Barbara, not Barbie, also - you really ARE a piece of work "cyclops" - the fact you've said what you did seriously makes me wonder if your brain was damaged worse than it was before any 'treatments' you got for your malady (which your attitude & karma in LIFE earned you it + other misfortunes a troll like you merits - you came in here giving me guff proving that much)... apk
How many /. registered 'luser' acc't.s do you have again? At least 3??
Please - lol, go away "cyclops"... you're a joke!
You're also completely dumb if you think NOT doing the BEST WITH WHAT YOU HAVE is a "smart thing to do" as far as speed & efficiency (let alone tossing better security, & reliability out the door with it)...
Man - No wonder YOU want to run for politics: You "fit the bill" of someone with no more than the intellect of a carrot that "jumps" when the 'master with the dollars' speaks & asks "how high, masta?" vs. DOING THE RIGHT THING instead!
After all - You'd tell us it's ok to NOT surf safer, faster, & more reliably just like you'd waste tax payer dollars as some political schmuck (no doubt about it based on your "illogic-logic" you've just spouted yet again... lol!).
APK
P.S.=> Lastly - I love making you "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!", as always, from disproving my points on hosts adding more security, speed, reliability & more, MORE EFFICIENTLY than any single browser addon (as well as fixing DNS redirect security issues too - multiple bonus), here -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... since you ALWAYS do (you're not proficient enough technically to do so, & YOU KNOW IT, I know it, + by now? So does anyone else reading...)
... apk
You state it damages a brain as it has yours obviously, along with you projecting you're fat http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so quit doing yourself in BarbaraHudson=TomHudson=Barbara, not Barbie you multiple account using stalking troll (or didn't you startup with apk here too)? Yes, you did. Man, you're too stupid to live.
"I tore apart your stupid hosts file crapola." - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Why'd you run from disproving my points that give users added speed, security, & reliability here this week where YOU started up your usual b.s. with me -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... ?
---
"and one way to monetize your hosts file is to put a few bogus entries in that go to bogus "monetizing" sites" - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
I don't "monetize it": It yields more speed, security, reliability & more, for FREE - a good thing to do. I have the ability to do so & it's better than ANY single competitor by far doing more with less.
(ALL I let users add is their favorite sites (for speed, & reliability) + to import known bad sites or adbanners (for safety & speed) blocking entries from 12 reputable sources in the security community - & users control it, not I!)
---
"Who has independently vetted it?" - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
The BEST in the security antimalware & antispyware business currently, http://www.av-test.org/en/news... who also host my program for hosts is who -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
They recommend it as "best of breed" @ the TOP of that last link's page (MalwareBytes' hpHosts page).
APK
P.S.=>
"After all, you post anonymously" - by BarbaraHudson (3785311) on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @10:46AM (#47703255) Homepage
Better than having multiple sockpuppet accounts like you for upmodding yourself & downmodding those you can't get the best of:
http://slashdot.org/~Barbara%2...
http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson...
Which YOU have used to spread falsehoods like where you attempt to harm my professional programming career by libeling me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + trying to create a concerted effort to stalk me by anonymous posts http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
... apk
Can adblock do the following things (that custom hosts files can):
1.) Secure you vs. known malicious sites/servers
2.) Secure you vs. downed DNS servers aiding reliability
3.) Secure you vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns servers
4.) Protect you vs. fastflux using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
5.) Protect you vs. dynamic dns using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
6.) Protect you vs. domain generation algorithm using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
7.) Speed you up for websurfing not only by adblocking but also hardcoding favorite sites
8.) Get you past a dnsbl you may not agree with
9.) Keep you off dns request logs
10.) Do all of those things and block ads (better than adblock) more efficiently in cpu cycles and memory usage
11.) Work on ANY webbound application (think stand-alone email programs, for example).
12.) Give you direct, easily notepad/texteditor controlled data for all of the above
13.) Block out trackers
14.) Block spam mails sources
15.) Block phishing mails sources
"?"
* Simple YES or NO answers will do for repliers to this - that's all.
APK
P.S.=> Of course, ANSWER ="NO" to each enumerated item above as far as "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" (crippled by default & 'souled-out' defeating it's very base purpose) is concerned -> http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... so *IF* you feel like doing things LESS efficiently as well -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... ontop of doing less than hosts do (by far) with more complexity + from a slower mode of operations (usermode with more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode, also starting up w/ the IP stack itself, before REDUNDANT inefficient addons even BEGIN to operate, & as the 1st resolver queried by the OS as well)?
That's illogical but up to you - I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make them drink!
... apk
Can adblock do the following things (that custom hosts files can):
1.) Secure you vs. known malicious sites/servers
2.) Secure you vs. downed DNS servers aiding reliability
3.) Secure you vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns servers
4.) Protect you vs. fastflux using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
5.) Protect you vs. dynamic dns using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
6.) Protect you vs. domain generation algorithm using botnet attacks and stop their communications back to their C&C servers
7.) Speed you up for websurfing not only by adblocking but also hardcoding favorite sites
8.) Get you past a dnsbl you may not agree with
9.) Keep you off dns request logs
10.) Do all of those things and block ads (better than adblock) more efficiently in cpu cycles and memory usage
11.) Work on ANY webbound application (think stand-alone email programs, for example).
12.) Give you direct, easily notepad/texteditor controlled data for all of the above
13.) Block out trackers
14.) Block spam mails sources
15.) Block phishing mails sources
"?"
* Simple YES or NO answers will do for repliers to this - that's all.
APK
P.S.=> Of course, ANSWER ="NO" to each enumerated item above as far as "Almost ALL Ads Blocked" (crippled by default & 'souled-out' defeating it's very base purpose) is concerned -> http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... so *IF* you feel like doing things LESS efficiently as well -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... ontop of doing less than hosts do (by far) with more complexity + from a slower mode of operations (usermode with more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode, also starting up w/ the IP stack itself, before REDUNDANT inefficient addons even BEGIN to operate, & as the 1st resolver queried by the OS as well)?
That's illogical but up to you - I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make them drink!
... apk
Regarding AdBlock/W. Palant: He wrote me by email, 1st mind you, stating "hosts are a shitty solution" to which I replied:
"Show us adblock can do more for added speed, security, reliability, & anonymity than hosts can, + that adblock does it more efficiently than hosts"
Which on my latter 'point-in-challenge' on efficiency he was proven in research by others to be MASSIVELY inefficient -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... & he can't show adblock does more (especially crippled by default + 'souled-out' to GOOGLE).
Additionally - I sent Wladimir Palant that challenge in response to his statement from 2 different email addresses I use!
Result:
Still no answer from him in regard to my challenge put to him to this very day MONTHS later (that tell you anything? It did me - he knows his addon is far inferior to hosts & certainly less efficient by far also) - Wladimir Palant RAN like a scared rabbit...
ClarityRay is also DESTROYING AdBlock - via native browser methods to DUMP what addons you use (however - it can't DO THAT to hosts files).
I only tell it how it is on hosts' superiority vs. AdBlock & any browser addon (or combo of them, from 1 FILE you already natively possess no less - vs. "bolting on" more redundant & inefficient complexity + room for failure/breakdown) - Funniest part is, Wladimir Palant (& his running) does as well!
APK
P.S.=> Hosts = a superior solution that even fixes DNS redirect security issues (vs. browser addons & their inefficiencies + messagepassing overheads as well as myriad lack of abilities hosts have from 1 file that's part of the IP stack itself - faster, more efficient, & less redundant as well, since TCP/IP has 45++ yrs. of refinement & optimization in it, & runs in a higher CPU serviced ring of privelege & operations in kernelmode vs. slower usermode layering over browsers slowing them more, & hosts = 1st resolver queried by the OS itself also - MULTIPLE bonuses)... apk
Regarding AdBlock/W. Palant: He wrote me by email, 1st mind you, stating "hosts are a shitty solution" to which I replied:
"Show us adblock can do more for added speed, security, reliability, & anonymity than hosts can, + that adblock does it more efficiently than hosts"
Which on my latter 'point-in-challenge' on efficiency he was proven in research by others to be MASSIVELY inefficient -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... & he can't show adblock does more (especially crippled by default + 'souled-out' to GOOGLE).
Additionally - I sent Wladimir Palant that challenge in response to his statement from 2 different email addresses I use!
Result:
Still no answer from him in regard to my challenge put to him to this very day MONTHS later (that tell you anything? It did me - he knows his addon is far inferior to hosts & certainly less efficient by far also) - Wladimir Palant RAN like a scared rabbit...
ClarityRay is also DESTROYING AdBlock - via native browser methods to DUMP what addons you use (however - it can't DO THAT to hosts files).
I only tell it how it is on hosts' superiority vs. AdBlock & any browser addon (or combo of them, from 1 FILE you already natively possess no less - vs. "bolting on" more redundant & inefficient complexity + room for failure/breakdown) - Funniest part is, Wladimir Palant (& his running) does as well!
APK
P.S.=> Hosts = a superior solution that even fixes DNS redirect security issues (vs. browser addons & their inefficiencies + messagepassing overheads as well as myriad lack of abilities hosts have from 1 file that's part of the IP stack itself - faster, more efficient, & less redundant as well, since TCP/IP has 45++ yrs. of refinement & optimization in it, & runs in a higher CPU serviced ring of privelege & operations in kernelmode vs. slower usermode layering over browsers slowing them more, & hosts = 1st resolver queried by the OS itself also - MULTIPLE bonuses)... apk