Slashdot Mirror


Financial Services Group WCS Sues Online Forum Over Negative Post

First time accepted submitter kavzee writes The popular Australian online discussion forum, Whirlpool, is being sued by a financial services group for refusing to remove a negative review about its services. A similar story occurred a number of years ago when another company by the name of 2Clix attempted to sue Whirlpool for the same reasons but later withdrew their case. "A financial services business licenced through National Australia Bank is suing an online forum for refusing to remove an allegedly fake and negative post about its services, claiming it has damaged its reputation with would-be clients. It is the latest legal action launched against an online forum or review website for publishing negative comments, following several high profile cases in Australia and overseas. Financial advice group WCS Group has initiated action against Whirlpool in the Supreme Court of Victoria, seeking unspecified damages and costs, despite the fact the forum generates no revenue."

4 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Re:As a chrono-American, I can remember... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Informative

    America is closer to a penal colony these days.

    From the internetz: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

    The incarceration rate in the United States of America is the highest in the world. As of October 2013, the incarceration rate was 716 per 100,000 of the national population.[2] While the United States represents about 5 percent of the world's population, it houses around 25 percent of the world's prisoners.[3][4] Imprisonment of America's 2.3 million prisoners, costing $24,000 per inmate per year, and $5.1 billion in new prison construction, consumes $60.3 billion in budget expenditures.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  2. The comment. by Macfox · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is the comment they're referring too apparently. http://forums.whirlpool.net.au... Could have all been dealt with, had they participated in the forum to correct any misunderstanding. Too late for that now.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
  3. Re:Financial Services by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because if I use a firm who charges 0.05% and gives me a 3% return, that's better than a firm that charges 1% and gives me a 10% return.

    Funds that charge higher fees DO NOT give better returns.

    Higher Fees Don't Mean Higher Returns, Study Finds
    24% of Active Mutual Fund Managers Outperform the Market
    In every single time period and data point tested, low-cost funds beat high-cost funds
    Morningstar Study Says High Fees Are Bad for Investment Performance

    Anybody that thinks that high fees are buying high performance is delusional.

  4. Re: The question comes down to can they prove fake by NotSanguine · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...The defendant always as the advantage in US criminal law.

    That's hilarious! I wish I had mod points this is definitely a +5 Funny!

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr