Slashdot Mirror


Adam Carolla Settles With Podcasting Patent Troll

Personal Audio has been trying to assert patents they claim cover podcasting for some time now; in March Adam Carolla was sued and decided to fight back. Via the EFF comes news that he has settled with Personal Audio, and the outcome is likely beneficial to those still fighting the trolls. From the article: Although the settlement is confidential, we can guess the terms. This is because Personal Audio sent out a press release last month saying it was willing to walk away from its suit with Carolla. So we can assume that Carolla did not pay Personal Audio a penny. We can also assume that, in exchange, Carolla has given up the opportunity to challenge the patent and the chance to get his attorney’s fees. ... EFF’s own challenge to Personal Audio’s patent is on a separate track and will continue ... with a ruling likely by April 2015. ... We hope that Personal Audio’s public statements on this issue mean that it has truly abandoned threatening and suing podcasters. Though a press release might not be legally binding, the company will have a hard time justifying any further litigation (or threats of litigation) against podcasters. Any future targets can point to this statement. Carolla deserves recognition for getting this result.

63 comments

  1. WOOHOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good

  2. Lodsys has been very quiet of late by seoras · · Score: 2

    Lodsys, of "in-app purchases" infamy, have been very quiet of late.
    Is the tide finally turning in the favour of innovation and common sense?

    1. Re: Lodsys has been very quiet of late by frikken+lazerz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's still little to no innovation because innovative simply doesn't sell. The big companies are afraid to take risks, and individuals with big ideas have to deal with so much red tape and bureaucracy that most of them don't even try. Unless by innovative you mean dumbing down the user interface even more to appeal to the least common denominator. If so, then there's craploads of innovation.

    2. Re:Lodsys has been very quiet of late by maroberts · · Score: 2

      I am still missing my Groklaw fix which used to assiduously track and report on such cases with detailed insight.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    3. Re:Lodsys has been very quiet of late by Stumbles · · Score: 2

      So do I. The analysis done at Groklaw in my opinion was more than top notch and a joy to read. I was saddened when PJ announced its closing.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    4. Re: Lodsys has been very quiet of late by JWW · · Score: 2

      Whenever patent trolls get talked about, it always comes down to how much impact this is having on small businesses and entrepreneurs.

      I think the patent trolls naturally tell us that this is "no big deal".

      However, I can't shake the feeling that utterly abysmal rate of new small businesses being started these days is directly related to these fucking evil trolls.

      I think any estimation of how much economic activity is being stifled by these trolls is quite possibly orders of magnitude off.

    5. Re: Lodsys has been very quiet of late by seoras · · Score: 1

      > Unless by innovative you mean dumbing down the user interface even more to appeal to the least common denominator. If so, then there's craploads of innovation.

      Oh you mean like Tim Berners-Lee did when he simplified human interaction with shared data on the fledgling internet which had, until then, been useable only by CS academics and a few industrial techs?

      Give me craps loads more my friend...

  3. why bother doing anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you just get sued, or arrested, or banned, or beaten up, or killed

    ain't merica great

    1. Re: why bother doing anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Even all the knowledge, expertise and intelligence in the world... without opportunity, it means nothing.

      And opportunity is sadly a pipe-dream in 21st century 'murica.

    2. Re: why bother doing anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people say knowledge is power! Those people are liars.

    3. Re: why bother doing anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Luckily nobody patented whining and hand wringing over the internet, otherwise Slashdot will get sued.

    4. Re: why bother doing anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or just don't know!

  4. Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should have pushed for court and had a judge rule then it would have murdered the whole thing and sent a clear message to all the other patent trolls.

    Now the trolls have the ability to come back later, picking a poor podcaster that can not fight back.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Webcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to call it a webcast, i.e. episodic publication of audio files on the Internet.

    Podcast is just Apples branding of the webcast for its iPod, and it came later.

    This patent troll claimed *podcasts* infringed on its patent, as they came later , but webcasts came long before their patent and were a normal thing when they patented it.

    All in all, the real mess here is a patent that should never have been issued by a patent office that permits everyone to patent everything and leaves it to the courts to resolve if there was an invention there later. The patent office should be held liable for issuing bad patents to non inventors.

    1. Re:Webcast by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better to call it a webcast, i.e. episodic publication of audio files on the Internet.

      Podcast is just Apples branding of the webcast for its iPod, and it came later.

      This patent troll claimed *podcasts* infringed on its patent, as they came later ,

      This is all completely wrong. First, Personal Audio is not technically "troll" - it didn't buy patents to troll, it actually developed the (somewhat obvious) technologies. Paul Logan is a real inventor that has brought real products to market.

      Second, there is no patent for "podcasting" at all. The Personal Audio patents are about distribution and organizing of episodic content. Yes, they had a real product that did that, until Apple incorporated the same techniques into iTunes.

      Paul Logan's Slashdot interview might be a little instructive for those that have only heard Adam Corolla's inflammatory fundraising scheme.

      Logan: Well, I could answer this question by arguing that I did try to build a product. That I spent $1.6 million of my own money trying to realize our vision of a custom listening experience that ended up, at the end of the day, being implemented in the form of a cassette tape product, and not the digital player system we envisioned and patented.

      When I left MicroTouch to start Personal Audio in 1996, we employed 500 people making touch screens in Massachusetts. Without those patents, we would never have gotten the company off the ground.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:Webcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Paul.

      You suck.

    3. Re:Webcast by jfengel · · Score: 2

      It sounds to me as if he's pulling a switch in the middle of his argument. He didn't spend $1.6 million on the "episodic content" part. He spent the money on the playing device, which may have been noble and good, but he got his lunch eaten. (Not even by Apple. If it was a "cassette tape product", then it wasn't wireless and had less space than a Nomad.)

      I'm sorry his product failed, but it seems like a reach to claim priority on the obvious parts of it. And I have even less sympathy when he's dragging in unrelated expenses to try to justify it.

    4. Re:Webcast by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1

      I would mod you up against the storm of patent-hating middle-aged techies here if I had points. Unfortunately any post suggesting patents are good will get modded into oblivion.

      The real issue is the plight of the middle income person trying to fight the corporation. Even if the patent is totally off base, we just can't afford it.

  6. Patent trolls provide a valuable service by engun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The big corps would now have us believe that a special breed of troll called a "patent troll" is the only problem with the system, and they, like every entrepreneur, are merely victims. This is all just the same manipulative BS. The patent troll exists only because the patent system is broken. Fix the problem at its root and patent trolls will be irrelevant.

    1. Re:Patent trolls provide a valuable service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    2. Re:Patent trolls provide a valuable service by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The patent troll exists only because the patent system exists... You can't fix what is "broken" by design. It's time for complete utter abolition. And copyright too! Pure corruption, all of it...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Patent trolls provide a valuable service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your hard work is taken away without compensation.

  7. Podcasting is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the once good shows are gone, now the podsphere is nothing but crap. Bad music riddled with ads, and celebrities fellating each other in shitty interview shows. I miss the classic podcasts, like Diggnation, Penn Jillette Radio, and Infected by Martin Sargent. Those were actually funny shows, not that fake interview crap that is pervasive now.

    While I'm on the subject, I also miss when people would podcast video. It was awesome to download a video and then watch it later. My computer and iPod were like DVRs. The whole video podcast genre has died thanks to Youtube. What is the point of having open standards like RSS+MP4 when everyone would rather lock off their content by putting it on these proprietary video sites.

    The Internet sucks these days. It's all too commercial.

    1. Re:Podcasting is Dead by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      There are still some gems out there. You should check out Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak's No Agenda Show.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:Podcasting is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Morning, Lone Wolf.

  8. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by jeti · · Score: 4, Informative

    He should, but he couldn't. Apparently he had already spent more than the $500.000 he had crowdfunded to fight the troll. Not everyone can afford justice.

  9. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    So you ask for more, I donated $100 to his cause and would have thrown in another $100, Also get other big hitter podcasters to spread the word. Adam is big, but not Leo Laporte and TWIT big. He could have reached out and really churned the media on this.

    Honestly these patent trolls need to be met with a legal nuclear bomb. You dont end on a peace agreement, you turn their world into a nuclear wasteland.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  10. To each his own by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    The notion that podcasting is dead is quite humorous. Brings to mind the "email is dead" articles.

    My favorite Bill Burr webcasts are when it is just him. Yes, he jams in two big bunches of ads, but a few clicks is all it takes to skip them.

    I think the point is that things change. TV channels change (usually getting worse). Podcasts change, usually by adding disruptive ads. The solution is always the same -- branch out, trying something new.

    My podcast, has no ads & no guests, runs about 75 minutes. I work on adding potential content all week. Editing takes three times as long because why should my listener suffer my hums and haws.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:To each his own by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      You sound a little like Bob Ross, the guy who used to do the painting show on public television.
      But what is that you're doing with the names? Is that numerology? Seriously?

    2. Re:To each his own by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure if your "seriously?" was a question, or a critique. Anyway, "no" to the second question.

      --
      I come here for the love
    3. Re:To each his own by Silvrmane · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Bill's podcast is funny. What kills me is that he botches up reading the ads so badly that they also become very entertaining. I remember one time he just stopped reading an ad halfway through and blasted the advertiser for selling a really terrible product. I think it was some kind of 'healthy' snacks or something. Needless to say, he lost that advertiser that day. Please nobody tell Bill that he could just record one 'good' take of an ad and just edit it in every week.

    4. Re:To each his own by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I skip prerecorded ads (e.g. beginning, end of Carolla's podcast.. sometimes in the middle). I listen to live reads, for those kinds of mistakes or just riffing..

  11. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by usuallylost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would have been great for him to invalidate their patent. I can however see where the economics of it might not work. Especially considering that the trial was occurring in a venue considered friendly to trolls. It sounds like he, and his legal team, made a calculation and figured that they were going to spend a lot more money with no certainty that the court would do the right thing. Also with no certainty that they would be able to recover any of their non-trivial legal fees. I can see where he would decide it was time to cut his losses. The silver lining here is that if he spent over $500,000 odds are they ended up spending something similar. So this whole endeavor has likely been a big money loser for them.

  12. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure about those statistics? Right now on iTunes, the Adam Carolla show is #25 on the top podcasts list. TWIT is #70, and The Tech Guy is #94. On the top episode list, there are 4 episodes of Adam Carolla-related shows (three ACS with one at #2, one Adam and Dr. Drew Show) listed above the first instance of TWIT, which is #84. In the top 100, there are 5 ACS episodes, one Adam and Dr. Drew, and just 2 TWIT. No Leo solo on there.

  13. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by unrtst · · Score: 1

    The silver lining here is that if he spent over $500,000 odds are they ended up spending something similar.

    It's quite difficult to consider spending half a million dollars on legal fees only to walk away without justice being served as being a silver lining. This is one more reason people should support the EFF - they see their cases through to the end whenever possible (AFAICT). The best outcome in this case for the lawyers involved is exactly what happened - loads of fees and no actual case; what motivation do they (in general) have to see patent trolls go away?

  14. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adam has been asking for more money every day for months...every episode of every show on the Carolla Digital network has had at least two, maybe three requests for donations cut in to the broadcast for several months now. They set up separate fundraising through Amazon clickthroughs just for the troll fight. Despite all of that the donations have seemed to flatten out around $500k.

    Why didn't you throw in that extra $100?

  15. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem I see in the north-american justice system is that you have to pay (and pay a lot) to defend yourself, as absurd and ridiculous that are the accusations against you. That way the bandit lawyers always win, because winning or losing the cause they will always make you lose a lot of money.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  16. Re:Adam? Adam? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whinger not wuss.

  17. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All podcasts on Carolla Digital had a message from him in the beginning, asking for donations to "crush" the patent troll.

    And the guy has way more than 500.000 at his disposal.

  18. Not "Podcasting" by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

    Personal Audio has been trying to assert patents they claim cover podcasting

    This is completely false. The patents don't cover podcasting per se, rather they cover methods for displaying and indexing podcast directories for distribution, the way they are organized in, for instance, the iTunes store. You can podcast all you want, distribute your podcasts and do everything else with them without Personal Audio making a claim, unless you put them into an iTunes store-like directory.

    Not saying that it's a whole lot better, but this patent is easily avoidable, and the description is just disinformation.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Not "Podcasting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The patent is also invalid and should never have been granted. The only way to get rid of it is to challenge the validity in court. A settlement means he's not going to do that and the patent stands. It doesn't matter that it's easily avoidable, it's not something that should have been patented in the first place.

  19. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by usuallylost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason I say it is a silver lining is that the money Adam Carolla lost is mostly crowd funded money. So a lot of people lost $20 each. The trolls didn't bankrupt him, it appears that they didn't succeed in forcing him to pay and they very likely lost ~$500,000 out of pocket. So for the trolls this is a net loss. Depriving them of funds, generating publicity for the cause and having them fail at their goals are all good things. Not as good as winning an outright victory but better than losing to them.

    Lawyers as a general rule are loath to see anything that generates legal activity go away. No matter how abusive of the system it is. Just look at how much money lawyers spend defeating any measure that might be construed as tort reform. Still at the end of the day when a lawyer is being paid, assuming the lawyer isn't a crook, they generally act in their client's interests or at least within the confines of the client's instructions. From the point of view of the individual lawyers involved the very best thing that could happen is this case drags on for years and they get to bill a lot more hours. A case like this is a gravy train for lawyers and now it is ending.

  20. So much for fighting by geekoid · · Score: 1

    eh, Corolla?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:So much for fighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the best you can do is a draw. It's not up to him whether or not the plaintiff drops the case.

  21. Crowdfunding the rich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he might have pushed a little harder to get his attorney fees back if it had been his money, not mine, spent fighting this patent. This is the sort of thing (also, Oculus, etc.) that will end up killing crowdfunding. Widely disseminated public risk, closely held private gains.

  22. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's because we don't need tort reform, our system is pretty good. The vast majority of reasons people use for tort reform were made up by the insurance companies.

    You clearly don't know any lawyers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So at what point did iTunes become Nielson?

  24. At what royalty? by tepples · · Score: 2

    I looked on the company's website, and it appears to list no royalty schedule, unlike MPEG LA and MP3Licensing (Fraunhofer/Technicolor).

    1. Re:At what royalty? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I looked on the company's website, and it appears to list no royalty schedule, unlike MPEG LA and MP3Licensing (Fraunhofer/Technicolor).

      Well those guys are involved in "standard" organizations, so their patents have to have a schedule so they qualify as RAND patents.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  25. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Adam Corolla has a whole podcast network, and that is bigger then TWIT and Leo.

    The problem with Patent troll is that anyone who has a claim is now called a troll.

    When you create a nuclear wasteland, it's everyone's world suffers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because we don't need tort reform, our system is pretty good. The vast majority of reasons people use for tort reform were made up by the insurance companies.

    Thank you for pointing out that poor example; while plenty of trial lawyer groups fight tort reform (which is actually bad for consumers), they also fight the trend towards corporate adjudication, damage caps, etc., which are also all bad for people (but good for corporations). Seems like the grandparent just has a chip on his shoulder about attorneys.

  27. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately he has absolutely nothing to gain from proceeding further with litigation. He fought the good fight and didn't cave in to their demands. He got them to back off and created the framework for others to suceed as well.

    He is a businessman, not a saint.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  28. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by CauseBy · · Score: 1

    In, what, like 2006 or something. It's been a while now.

  29. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    He should have pushed for court

    How much did you contribute to his crowdfunding campaign to help cover the million-dollar cost of going to court?

  30. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by wed128 · · Score: 1

    They are not Nielson, but they are a significant (if not perfectly distributed) sample of podcast listeners, and one of very few centralized sources of data on the subject.

  31. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Adam has been asking for more money every day for months...every episode of every show on the Carolla Digital network

    Ah, there's the problem. Many of his biggest supporters in this effort have no interest in his shows at all.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  32. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >He should have ... had a judge ... murdered ... and sent a clear message to all the other patent trolls.

    You're now on a watchlist.

  33. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

    With the litigant (Personal Audio) having chosen to file in the Texas court system that historically favors the patent holders, Carolla's legal team probably advised him to take the deal, walk away without payment, secure future immunity and call it a victory.

    It is unlikely that Personal Audio will file against other podcasters - even large ones, like Maron, Rogan, Nerdist, Ira Glass, LaPorte, et. al because the litigant discovered during filing that podcasters aren't making huge buckets of money. The largest, most successful podcasters - Carolla, Leo LaPorte, etc. are only clearing a few million dollars a year from advertising, merch and affiliate links - which may sound like a lot to you sitting at your computer, but to a large corporation is a rounding error. Which is why most of the trolls file against large companies. Like Apple, who would have salaried in-house counsel fight for a few weeks, until it was determined they could possibly lose, in which case they would quietly pay the troll $10 million to STFU and go away quietly.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  34. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Well, he "settled". I can't provide a direct quote, though it sure seemed like he said previously he'd never settle.

    I'm glad at least that there isn't a permanent gag order, and Adam will give the details in not too long a time.

    BTW, I am not saying I'm necessarily 100% on his side. There was either a Planet Money or Freakanomics podcast episode about Personal Audio, and, after listening to that, I do think they had something very close to "a podcast with cassettes".. As much as people disclaim patents of "do X __ON THE INTERNET___", this seems to me to be at least a more reasonable case of a patent "crossing media". IANAL , so that's why I say "seems". Though even Adam has said on his podcast that he's not against patents, he's mostly railed against the system itself.

  35. Re:Dammit! Adam you rolled over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because it is perfectly reasonable to have to spend half a million frickin' dollars to protect yourself from a completely frivolous and vexatious lawsuit.

    Obviously, you are correct that no reform is needed. Who couldn't afford such a pittance?