ACM Blames the PC For Driving Women Away From Computer Science
theodp (442580) writes "Over at the Communications of the ACM, a new article — Computing's Narrow Focus May Hinder Women's Participation — suggests that Bill Gates and Steve Jobs should shoulder some of the blame for the dearth of women at Google, Facebook, Apple, Twitter and other tech companies. From the article: "Valerie Barr, chair of ACM's Council on Women in Computing (ACM-W), believes the retreat [of women from CS programs] was caused partly by the growth of personal computers. 'The students who graduated in 1984 were the last group to start college before there was personal computing. So if you were interested in bioinformatics, or computational economics, or quantitative anthropology, you really needed to be part of the computer science world. After personal computers, that wasn't true any more.'" So, does TIME's 1982 Machine of the Year deserve the bad rap? By the way, the ACM's Annual Report discusses its participation in an alliance which has helped convince Congress that there ought to be a federal law making CS a "core subject" for girls and boys: "Under the guidance of the Education Policy Committee, ACM continued its efforts to reshape the U.S. education system to see real computer science exist and count as a core graduation credit in U.S. high schools. Working with the CSTA, the National Center for Women and Information Technology, NSF, Microsoft, and Google, ACM helped launch a new public/private partnership under the leadership of Code.org to strengthen high school level computing courses, improve teacher training, engage states in bringing computer science into their core curriculum guidelines, and encourage more explicit federal recognition of computer science as a key discipline in STEM discussions.""
So women stopped studying computer science because they didn't have to anymore? That certainly sounds like a crime against humanity.
simply not accept that men and women are different, and like different things? this is getting really creepy how obsessed some people are these days with other peoples lives.
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
Yknow, like Susan "HedgeMage" Sons? She certainly had some choice words about this entire tempest in a teacup.
Also it's worth pointing out that computer science degrees are something like 10% of all degrees conferred in the US, and women utterly *dominate* every single aspect of education from K12 through college, even earning nearly 2/3rds of all bachelors degrees. I would think the fact men are barely over 1/3rd of college graduates in the first place is a bit of a bigger problem than what major women choose.
A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
Same. My lack of self confidence is what caused me to spent all my time with my c-64 instead of people.
NOTHING YOU DO IS GOING TO CHANGE THAT SHORT OF GENETIC ENGINEERING.
Stop trying to turn it into a fucking social issue, its a god damn evolution issue. WE ARE NOT ALL THE SAME.
We are not all the same, but it is a fucking social issue. From my experience math is a pretty girly thing. That is until the parents step in or teachers. Mostly parents though. School teachers with this mentality are mostly retired by now (here). A friend of mine is still an outcast in her family, because she not only liked math, but she also studied computer sciences which was ok for her brother, but not for her. In the eyes of her family that screwed her chances for a good classical marriage. Or girls that get hoarded into the puppet house and Lego friends corner in the Lego store when they have Lego technics sets in their hand.
You can really imprint a lot in the early years. Like math is hard. This is stuff for males and this is only for female. It might not end 50/50, but you sure can raise social barriers so that stuff wont be tried.
Btw. most men don't want to spent all day dicking with computers either.