Slashdot Mirror


Radioactive Wild Boars Still Roaming the Forests of Germany

An anonymous reader writes 28 years after the Chernobyl accident, tests have found that more than one in three Saxony boars give off such high levels of radiation that they are unfit for consumption. In 2009 almost €425,000 ($555,000) was paid out to hunters in compensation for wild boar meat that was too contaminated to be sold. "It doesn't cover the loss from game sales, but at least it covers the cost of disposal," says Steffen Richter, the head of the Saxon State Hunters Association.

11 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Interesting line from TFA: by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Informative
    Chernobyl was a long time ago.

    It was only about one half-life (Cs-137) ago.

    Also, Cs-137 gets washed to lower soil layers very slowly (a few millimeters per year).

  2. Re:Reall problem: German radiation phobia by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't the trichinosis already be irradiated anyway? Just think of the radiation as a 'very-slow-roasting' system. The meat is practically falling off the bone before the animal is even dead.

    .
    For the humor-impaired, this is a joke.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  3. Silver lining by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since a lot of hog hunts are done at night, the slight glow should make the boars a lot easier to see

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  4. Re:Reall problem: German radiation phobia by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hmm...

    Assuming all of the radioactivity is due to Cs-137, that 600 Bq/kg limit translates to 0.0000003 micrograms of Cs-137 in any given kg of wild pork.

    Okay, I can buy the argument that that "safe" limit errs on the side of caution a bit much....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Re:Reall problem: German radiation phobia by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    hmm...

    Assuming all of the radioactivity is due to Cs-137, that 600 Bq/kg limit translates to 0.0000003 micrograms of Cs-137 in any given kg of wild pork.

    Okay, I can buy the argument that that "safe" limit errs on the side of caution a bit much....

    The real problem from a meltdown isn't really the radiation. While that's scary and all... the real problem is what else is released and what the shorter half life elements decay into. Most of what the control rods are made out of are horrific heavy metals, and during the Chernobyl incident the Russians panicked and dumped large amounts of liquid lead and cement laced with lead into the basement of the reactor. The lead boiled off and then rained back down all over the region. If I lived in the area, I'd be more concerned about that lead than I would be about the radiation.

  6. Re:Interesting line from TFA: by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mushrooms can be used to bioconcentrate metals. Some species prefer cesium:
    http://www.herbmuseum.ca/conte...

  7. Re:Interesting line from TFA: by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems odd that the pigs are too irradiated to eat but seem to thrive and breed just fine.

    Most people these days prefer to live a good deal longer than their earliest possible breeding time.

  8. Found it by aepervius · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) germany apparently forbid anything above 700 bq/Kg , whereas otehr country do it at 3000 Bq/Kg.

    2) Average contamination in 2009 was 7000 Bq/Kg in the highiest contaminated area.

    I wish the article could have told that.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  9. Re:Reall problem: German radiation phobia by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ann Coulter. Not even up to politician level of smug idiocy, she's a Fox News talking head/moron.

    Ann Coulter is a political Kim Kardashian. She thrives on drawing attention to herself by acting like an idiot. But her statement is a tiny kernel of truth wrapped up in a big ball of stupidity. Slightly higher levels of background radiation may actually be good for you. There is some evidence, in both animals and humans, that slightly higher levels of external (not ingested) radiation, over extended time, can reduced cancer rates and improve health. One hypothesis is that the radiation "exercises" the cellular repair mechanism, and keeps if functioning well.

  10. Re:For a country so good at engineering... by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also I'm sure that idiot Merkel decided to close all their nuclear power stations because she thought they'd get nice cheap gas from russia. Hmm, wonder how thats working out for her now...

    At the peak, German nuclear generation was 133 TWh in 2011. Since then, German renewables generation has grown from 47 TWh/year to 178 TWh/year, Germany can now meet demand without any nuclear and without additional gas imports.

    I'm sorry the facts broke your narrative.

    Why do I get this funny feeling that the "178 TWh/year" figure is from the rated capacity factors and not the actual production?

  11. Re:Interesting line from TFA: by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    North Italy, Austria and then south Germany where the first regions hit by the Chernobyl explosion.

    Don't quote me on that, but I'm decently sure that Chernobyl (and Pripyat) were the first regions hit by the Chernobyl explosion...