Slashdot Mirror


Finland's Nuclear Plant Start Delayed Again

mdsolar writes with news about further delays to Finland's Olkiluoto 3 nuclear reactor. "Areva-Siemens, the consortium building Finland's biggest nuclear reactor, said on Monday the start date of the much delayed project will be pushed back to late 2018 — almost a decade later than originally planned. Areva-Siemens blamed disagreements with its client Teollisuuden Voima (TVO) over the plant's automation system, the latest blow for a project that has been hit by repeated delays, soaring costs and disputes. "The delays are because the planning of the plant has taken needlessly long," Jouni Silvennoinen, TVO's project head, told Reuters on Monday. "We haven't examined the supplier's detailed schedules yet, but our preliminary view is that we could do better (than 2018)."

4 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll never be finnished.

  2. Re:Indeed... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unless it is a fast breeder or similar that can "burn" plutonium, by the time they get around to getting the fuel, there won't be much uranium left on sale, or suppliers willing to sell it.

    There is a glut of uranium on the market, with prices for yellowcake falling by more than 50% since Fukushima.

  3. But the good news is by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not just software projects that that can't be completed in a timely, cost-effective manner.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  4. Re:Indeed... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes. A glut of unranium putting uranium producers out of business, closing mines, etc. The glut today may well lead to a shortage a few years out from now.

    No, because as soon as prices recover, the mines will reopen. There is enough uranium stockpiled to cover the transition. If prices ever go back to where they were in 2010, it will be cost effective to extract uranium from seawater, where the supply is almost limitless. At current consumption rates, we will not run out of relatively cheap uranium for thousands of years. There are plenty of reasonable arguments against nuclear energy, but "we are running out of fuel" is not one of them.