Slashdot Mirror


SpaceX Challenges Blue Origin Patents Over Sea-Landing Rocket Tech

speedplane writes: Last week, Elon Musk's SpaceX fired two challenges (PDFs) at Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin over U.S. Patent 8,678,321, entitled "Sea landing of space launch vehicles and associated systems and methods." The patent appears to cover a method of landing a rocket on a floating platform at sea. In their papers, SpaceX says that "by 2009, the earliest possibly priority date listed on the face of the patent, the basic concepts of 'rocket science' were well known and widely understood. The "rocket science" claimed in the '321 patent was, at best, 'old hat[.]'" Blue Origin has approximately three months to file a preliminary response to the challenge. You can review the litigation documents here and here. (Disclosure: I run the website hosting several of the above documents.)

1 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Would it really be worse without patents? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Patents are still useful for small businesses because it provides protection against someone else coming along and patenting your product after the fact.

    Not really. They grant patents which conflict with existing patents all the time, and you still need to be able to take a suit to court to prove that the subsequent patent should not have been granted, which means you still need millions of dollars in your legal fund.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"