Slashdot Mirror


Google Serves Old Search Page To Old Browsers

Rambo Tribble writes: In an apparent move to push those using older browsers to update, Google is reported to be serving outdated search pages to said browsers. The older pages lack features available on the newer versions, and this policy compounds with the limits announced in 2011 on Gmail support for older web clients. As a Google engineer put it, "We're continually making improvements to Search, so we can only provide limited support for some outdated browsers." The BBC offers a fairly comprehensive analysis.

8 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Yes by fisted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes! Where? I want it!

    1. Re:Yes by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is why I am still on 12.17. Works well and does get security updates occasionally. For the very few pages that do not work, I can always use FF.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Yes by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Informative
      I tried it (by setting the user-agent of my firefox to "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040914 Firefox/0.10"), and I'm delighted. Image search works again and it feels faster too.

      I didn't notice the problem you're mentioning about link visited being broken. I searched twice for myself, the first time I clicked on one of my links. After the second search, that link was correctly colored purple, as it should. However, I did notice a small delay before it turned from blue to purple.

      And there are no tracking cookies or similar inserted into the links, just the plain links. Overall a good experience :-)

      I didn't check though whether the results were maybe outdated (newer pages not listed...), that would be nasty...

  2. A solution to a problem by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, I can get good old Google back by spoofing IE6?

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:A solution to a problem by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've got it about 60% serviceable.

      That sounds about right. I tried netvibes for a few months after iGoogle went away and finally just gave up and use Awesome New Tab in Chrome. Unfortunately, you can't make Awesome New Tab the home page. You can make it come up automatically when you start Chrome, but not when you click the little house.

      I've stopped missing iGoogle like I used to, but I'm still kind of pissed.

      Seriously, it was a dick move that iGoogle went away. The problem with the igHomes and the netvibes is that they can't integrate all the google services as well as google. On the bright side, with all my futzing with iGoogle replacements and unsuccessfully trying to recreate iGoogle, I've come to understand more clearly how much of Google services' functionality comes from them invading my privacy. So now I use Epic browser and startpage.com and actively seek to thwart google wherever I can, at least in regard to my participation in its "business model". Sometimes, I use Tor browser just to be a dick to people who want to upskirt my private life. Not that there's anything interesting in my private life, but apparently, there's something there good enough that Google was willing to give me all sorts of free shit just to get a peek at my undies. Fuck them.

      I came to understand that when somebody gives you something nice for free, and they're not related to you in some direct personal way, you should be suspicious as hell and look for the catch before putting out your hand. Of course, many of you have long understood this, but I had to get hit over the head with it because I'm a little slow.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. "Please don't throw me in the briar patch!" by J'raxis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is supposed to motivate me to upgrade? Right now, on the rare occasion I use Google,* I have JavaScript completely disabled to make Google (search, image search, and news) actually work the way I want it to in my browser. If they're going to help with this by serving me their older---read "cleaner, simpler, faster"---search page, I say, thanks, Google!

    * Google alternative. They use the Google index but don't track their users.

  4. Slashdot Beta by gargleblast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The last remaining problem I had with beta.slashdot was its turning up in google results. I solved that with Firefox redirector and this rule:

    Include pattern ... *-beta.slashdot.org*
    Redirect to ....... $1.slashdot.org$2
    Pattern type ...... Wildcard

  5. Affected Browsers (non scientific) by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 4, Informative

    By changing the User Agent string on my brower I found that the following are affected by this:
    IE9
    FF6.0
    Chrome 4
    Safari 5
    And all versions of Opera before they used the blink engine.

    Possibly more when I have the time.

    The timeline on when these came out is wavy as hell.