Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Launches Virtual Reality Headset For Galaxy Note 4

An anonymous reader writes Samsung has launched a virtual reality headset called Samsung Gear VR Innovator Edition. It uses the new Galaxy Note 4 for a screen and technology from Oculus VR. The headset comes with four visual settings that simulate experiences such as sitting in a theater or being on stage. Despite partnering with Oculus, the Gear VR won't run Oculus apps, but Samsung says porting titles over shouldn't be too hard. From the article: "This is Oculus' first consumer product and, bizarrely, it's on a Samsung device. Oculus VR CTO John Carmack personally led the mobile software development team at Oculus, and the software interface is all built in collaboration with Samsung. It's basic: Point a reticle in the middle of the screen at what you want to select and tap the touchpad to select it. The options are sparse and base level, and the only content management that exists right now is a store of sorts. It looks like the Google Play store to an extent, except it's floating in space.

12 of 24 comments (clear)

  1. We're still 6-10 months away by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    It's still 6-10 months before any facebook buyout related applications/tech should start to show up. So this is all still "startup trying to find its feet" exploration. We can't yet blame zuckerberg for any nonsense of this sort that occurs.

  2. How do I answer a call? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    With that device in that contraption and strapped to my head?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:How do I answer a call? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know. Have you considered hiding in a virtual world from all the external obligations that phone call represents?

    2. Re:How do I answer a call? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      It's a phone. Why the hell are you taking calls with it?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?... :)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:How do I answer a call? by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the question. Is your head yours, or do you rent it or something?

    4. Re:How do I answer a call? by Reisrdok · · Score: 1

      Facephone!!

  3. I don't know... by Junta · · Score: 1

    For one to call this 'nonsense' might be a tad unfair. This has some value. I personally want the equipment geared better for interactive gaming, but for non-gaming applications this could fit the bill fine (note they didn't even pretend to show a game, for good reason).

    This may be related to the facebook acquisition. It might have been pre-deal influence by Facebook or the thing Facebook found out to make them buy Oculus. I could see facebook betting a bit more money on laying claim to a company that seems to be building a software ecosystem around them with more than one vendor. I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook approaches the likes of Asus, evga, Dell, Lenovo, et al to try to have them take ownership of the PC hardware piece to leave their focus on software enablement.

    It's going to be a tough call if they can provide decent ROI on the 2 billion dollar acquisition. They'll need revenue from multiple fronts for something as invasive as this (VR won't be nearly as mainstream as the likes of Zynga games, it's just more of a burden than anything that has really lasted in the industry for the casual user).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:I don't know... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I call it nonsense because there's a real limitation to trying to use a touchscreen with a VR device over your eyes. It's petty, but I just found it rather silly.

    2. Re:I don't know... by Junta · · Score: 2

      Well technically the DK2 also has a touchscreen controller... There it's even sillier because it's never to be used and just on there since it's more trouble to rip it off than to leave it in the Samsung phablet part that's in there today.

      At least here the device can be pulled out and used independent of the headset, so it makes more sense.

      As a 50 dollar accessory for a note 4, it would be within the realm of reason. More than that and they are insane.

      If I were in the market for a phone right now and the pricing for that accessory were announced and reasonable, I'd probably get a Note 4.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:I don't know... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I personally want the equipment geared better for interactive gaming

      What is wrong with this for interactive gaming? The list of what they did makes it look very well suited for gaming:

      • Enabling real time scheduled multithreaded application processes at guaranteed clock rates
      • Context prioritized GPU rendering, enabling asynchronous time warp
      • Facilitating completely unbuffered display surfaces for minimal latency
      • Supporting low-persistence display mode for improved comfort, visual stability, and reduced motion blur / judder
      • variations of the Oculus Tracker and firmware built into the headset for extremely accurate, ultra low-latency 3DOF tracking.
      • sub-20 millisecond motion-to-photons latency, roughly equivalent to the most highly optimized experiences on DK2.

      A 1440p AMOLED display and cutting-edge GPU are the ideal building blocks for a self-contained VR headset, and using your cellphone to power it should make it much cheaper than any comparable alternative.

      My main concern, on the other hand, would be the weight of the phone hanging out at the front like that.

    4. Re:I don't know... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Okay, I'm going to pull an Internet impossibility and change my mind based on your perfectly reasonable assertions.

  4. Re:Why would you buy by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

    If I understand this article correctly, one could eventually just switch out the Galaxy Note 4 for a later model.