Chrome OS Can Now Run Android Apps With No Porting Required
An anonymous reader writes On Thursday, Google launched "App Runtime for Chrome (Beta)" which allows Android apps to run on Chrome OS without the need for porting. At the moment, only Duolingo, Evernote, Sight Words, and Vine are available on the platform with the rest of the Play Store's offerings to come later. Google "built an entire Android stack into Chrome OS using Native Client" in order to achieve this.
That makes my little Chromebox that much more awesome. Redmond be very afraid.
Even if it were perfect, almost no ChromeOS devices have touchscreens and almost all Android devices do (especially if you count on the ones Google even slightly endorses, not the media-player-mystery-HDMI-dongle stuff). For applications that are basically hobbled by the touchscreen, a keyboard and mouse will be an improvement. For those that are enhanced by, or actively dependent on, it, that will be a bit of a mess no matter how perfect the runtime is.
Unless those proportions change fairly markedly, it probably makes sense for them to start with some popular, mouse and keyboard friendly, applications that don't lean on native ARM blobs much or at all.
Some points here:
- Most Android apps are Java bytecode, not native code, so the underlying processor architecture is irrelevant (for those apps)
- x86 is a supported Android platform, so many apps that do require native code have x86 binaries available
- Intel provides an ARM emulator for the x86 version of Android so that x86 Android devices can run ARM binaries
- Some ChromeOS devices use ARM processors to begin with.
So your friend's husband bought a web-connected device, knowing fully well that they live in a rural area with shitty web connections?
What your you going to complain about next? Not being able to tow semi-trailers with your Yugo?
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
I mean, OS/2 running Windows apps was a huge push forward for IBM. Wine completely changed the Linux desktop picture, and BSD's Linux binary compatibility made it an effective super set of Linux, to the point nobody bothers to install the later (not to mention the similar capability of SCO Unix: they wouldn't be where they are today without it).
I hear that ChromOS is a nice platform and is doing well. I'm glad, in a "diversity is good" non-committed sort of way. I don't think this particular feature will change much.
Shachar