Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Working On a La Carte Internet TV Service

An anonymous reader writes: One of the reasons people have been fleeing cable TV in droves is the idea that they're paying for hundreds of channels but only using a handful. Even though that's not really true, Verizon is now working on an internet TV service that lets people pick and pay for only the channels they want. Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam said, "I think everyone understands it will go to a la carte. The question is what is that transition look like ... I don't think there is anyone that would stand up here and say the only way it's going to be offered five years from now is linear and it's going to be tied to your TV set because frankly they will miss the market and they will be the ones left behind."

3 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to see here by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its for mobile only. Wake us all up when plain old tv is available by IP (FiOS) a la carte.

  2. Re:I can't see this happening by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Informative

    Note that the reverse trend is happening. Thanks to the very low cost of production and distribution, there are many, many, many alternate "shows" out there that you can watch.

    Have you missed youtube entirely? What rock have you been hiding under? Also, the place with the most interesting display of documentaries and "non-primary" content is NetFlix. There is a *ridiculous* amount of youtube channels with interesting content.

    For example, as a violinist, I like Taylor Davis' work immensely - she mixes violin and many of the themes to movies and games I've loved....

    Remember when MTV was a close as you could get to stuff like this?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  3. Re:It is not just the "extra" channels... by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

    But I would most people to continue paying for cable tv. Someone has to foot the bill, making tv shows and content is expensive.

    How about the people who watch those shows? Why should I pay for the most expensive group of non-premium channels (ESPN) when I never, ever watch any ESPN channels? Today, my choice is limited to paying for ESPN or not getting the channels I really want (BBC*)

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!