Slashdot Mirror
Justice Sotomayor Warns Against Tech-Enabled "Orwellian" World
An anonymous reader writes: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke on Thursday to faculty and students at the University of Oklahoma City about the privacy perils brought on by modern technology. She warned that the march of technological progress comes with a need to enact privacy protections if we want to avoid living in an "Orwellian world" of constant surveillance. She said, "There are drones flying over the air randomly that are recording everything that's happening on what we consider our private property. That type of technology has to stimulate us to think about what is it that we cherish in privacy and how far we want to protect it and from whom. Because people think that it should be protected just against government intrusion, but I don't like the fact that someone I don't know can pick up, if they're a private citizen, one of these drones and fly it over my property."
but I don't like the fact that someone I don't know can pick up, if they're a private citizen, one of these drones and fly it over my property.
She's probably just fine with the *state* peeping into your (not her) business. That's the very definition of a self labeled "progressive". Guns, drones, private (no tax man involved) monetary interactions between people, healthcare, retirement, etc.
These things are the bailiwick of the state only. You're too stupid to be allowed to make these decisions.
Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
Freedom's bad, mmmkay? Leave it up to the people who know what they're doing to dish it out to you when you're ill, mmkay?
Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
Government workers are special people. But rejoice, dearheart, for you are a first class citizen! You have the right to remain silent, and anything you say or do WILL be used against you in the court of law. It's the second class and above that the first class has elected to handle such "dangerous" things. This is for umm, 'your" safety, yea that's it, "your" safety. (Phew almost didn't dig my way out of that one, that's why I'm a leader!)
Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
This and the "Automatic Lip Reading" story both approach the attitude of technophobia. I get it. People are affraid that new technologies will encroach on personal freedoms. But it's a futile attitude. One thing is certain --
progress will occur!
The only solution is for freedom lovers to co-opt the technology itself. Camera's everywhere are a problem? Then pass laws that require all government owned camera's to be publicly accessible on the web to everyone all the time. Drones are encroaching on personal property? Then develop technology for property owners to take over any drone entering private property. And legalize it nationwide.
You can't stop technological progress. You can only take control of the rules that make it unfair. That's what self-government is for -- to empower the populatioon to solve all of the new problems that the society encounters.
We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
Peeping toms are bad, mmmkay? Left up to me, I'd put a deer rifle on ANY drone over my "Ponderosa", just to be sure.
Best to fly higher than I can shoot and take less detailed pictures. You don't need to SEE what's going on on my property. If you think you do, you don't.
If you come around looking for your missing drone, don't expect to make it home.
*Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
Well, how does it smell, since you've obviously got it on you? I'd advise you in the future to ask someone for evidence first, especially if you are going to make demands after you've just insulted them via their speech. For example, a better way, "It smells like BS to me, would you please supply some evidence and additional information?
Now, would you please refer to sections B. and C below? To answer your question, you must angle the camera's down so that they record only up to the top of the fence or to the property line.Private property has an expectation of privacy in Georgia.
(B) For an owner or occupier of real property to use for security purposes, crime prevention, or crime detection any device to observe, photograph, or record the activities of persons who are on the property or an approach thereto in areas where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy; or
(C) To use for security purposes, crime prevention, or crime detection any device to observe, photograph, or record the activities of persons who are within the curtilage (fenced yard) of the residence of the person using such device. A photograph, videotape, or record made in accordance with this subparagraph, or a copy thereof, may be disclosed by such resident to the district attorney or a law enforcement officer and shall be admissible in a judicial proceeding, without the consent of any person observed, photographed, or recorded
http://www.ehow.com/info_83762...
Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.