Slashdot Mirror


Are Matt's Robot Hexapods Creepy or Cute? (Video)

University of Arizona grad student Matt Bunting doesn't come across as a mad scientist. That's a very good thing, because his robot hexapod creations are easy to imagine crawling across the USA in large hordes, devouring everything in their path and using all the electricity they come across to feed their Queen Hexapod, a 3-D printer mounted on a hexapod chassis that turns everything fed to it into more robots. Luckily, the real life Matt is an affable (self-described) "Roboticist, Electrical Engineer, Musician, and Rock Crawler" who freely admits that at this time his robotic creations have no practical application whatsoever. This is probably true, except for the fact that they can liven up a music video like mad, as you can see on YouTube in Pedals Music Video (featuring REAL robots) . Our little video is a lot simpler, of course. In it, we interview Matt and he tells us what he's up to with his robots, and gives some 'how to get started with robotics' advice for budding young engineers. (Alternate Video Link)

4 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. Missing option: Hipster by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

    3D printed legs, Intel Edison system board, machine vision camera and $4200 worth of drive motors.

    and all it does in the video is sit there and wobble like a drunk, white, middle aged guy at his daughters wedding reception.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  2. UnBetteridge's law of headlines by alexhs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are Matt's Robot Hexapods Creepy or Cute?

    Yes.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  3. Re:Um, creepy by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Or from the article summary title itself...

    Are Matt's Robot Hexapods Creepy or Cute?

    The correct response is Yes.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Re:I thought it was worse than you describe by s.petry · · Score: 2

    Probably to you I am old, but I have a critical ear for music. I proably know more bands than you youngsters, and bet I play music at least as loud. I have played Drums since age 4 when I received my first Ludwig concert snare, kit since 11 when I received my first Rogers kit, and percussion since it was required for concert and jazz band since age 13. I listen to a variety of music, which in my opinion requires some ability with a musical instrument or real (not synthesized) vocals. I dig progressive rock because it's the most challenging to play (usually) so you will usually find me working on playing Dream Theater, Liquid Tension Experiment, etc.. but I also play a lot of metal for warmup and exercise.

    I prefer a band that can perform live as well as they can in the studio, to me that's the mark of great musicians. I don't really have anything against a synthesizer because a great keyboardist integrates that into music. "Everything" being synthesized to me is just not music. It's one person with enough skill to enter some input into a program.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.