Slashdot Mirror


Snowden's Leaks Didn't Help Terrorists

HughPickens.com writes The Intercept reports that contrary to lurid claims made by U.S. officials, a new independent analysis of Edward Snowden's revelations on NSA surveillance that examined the frequency of releases and updates of encryption software by jihadi groups has found no correlation in either measure to Snowden's leaks about the NSA's surveillance techniques. According to the report "well prior to Edward Snowden, online jihadists were already aware that law enforcement and intelligence agencies were attempting to monitor them (PDF)." In fact, concerns about terrorists' use of sophisticated encryption technology predates even 9/11.

Earlier this month former NSA head Michael Hayden stated, "The changed communications practices and patterns of terrorist groups following the Snowden revelations have impacted our ability to track and monitor these groups", while Matthew Olsen of the National Counterterrorism Center would add "Following the disclosure of the stolen NSA documents, terrorists are changing how they communicate to avoid surveillance." Snowden's critics have previously accused his actions of contributing from everything from the rise of ISIS to Russia's invasion of the Ukraine. "This most recent study is the most comprehensive repudiation of these charges to date," says Murtaza Hussain. "Contrary to lurid claims to the contrary, the facts demonstrate that terrorist organizations have not benefited from the NSA revelations, nor have they substantially altered their behavior in response to them."

2 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. knew in 2006 by globaljustin · · Score: 1, Troll

    GP is right...if you're a router jockey, none of it was news

    also, it was first reported publicly **in 2006** right here: "NSA Has Massive Database of American's Phone Calls"

    Snowden only gave operational specifics like the names of the programs...he himself was either a dupe or blackmailed or self-deluded...and he's probably not a free man in Russia

    He does not get credit for "starting a national conversation"....because that conversation is dependent almost purely on how how mainstream news covers the event (we can scream until we are blue in the face here on /. but to influence non-techs you need mainstream news)

    We could have had a "national conversation" about the Patriot Act or in 2006 when this info was first released.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  2. Re:Biggest joke a hundred years later by Aighearach · · Score: 0, Troll

    If he had "risked everything" he would have stayed here, and his trial would have focused the issue and forced debate.

    He took the least risk he could to achieve his ends, which involved him escaping to whatever anti-American country would take him. Regardless of what else you think he is, he is clearly also a Traitor.