Slashdot Mirror


U2 and Apple Collaborate On 'Non-Piratable, Interactive Format For Music'

Squiff writes U2 and Apple are apparently collaborating on a new, "interactive format for music," due to launch in "about 18 months." (A direct interview is available at Time, but paywalled.) Bono said the new tech "can't be pirated" and will re-imagine the role of album artwork. Marco Arment has some suitably skeptical commentary: "Full albums are as interesting to most people today as magazines. Single songs and single articles killed their respective larger containers. ... This alleged new format will cost a fortune to produce: people have to take the photos, design the interactions, build the animations, and make the deals with Apple. Bono’s talking point about helping smaller bands is ridiculous ... There's nothing Apple or Bono can do to make people care enough about glorified liner notes. People care about music and convenience, period. As for “music that can’t be pirated”, I ask again, what decade is this? That ship has not only sailed long ago, but has circled the world hundreds of times, sunk, been dragged up, turned into a tourist attraction, went out of business, and been gutted and retrofitted as a more profitable oil tanker."

15 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Expert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " Bono said the new tech "can't be pirated" "

    Since when is Bono qualified to have an opinion on this subject?
    He should make songs and not talk about things he hasn't got a clue about.

    1. Re:Expert. by jrumney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't pirate something if it is already forced down everyone's throats.

    2. Re:Expert. by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Arrr matey, it doesn't remain to be seen if the music can be pirated, if an audio track can be heard it can be copied.

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    3. Re:Expert. by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, no, he's much, much less an expert than Dre is. As a respected producer at least Dre has some validity as a good ear, and he can evaluate the results of different parametric curves on tone signature, Bono can claim no such expertise in container formats unless he's gone back and studied CS while the world wasn't watching.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Expert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whether or not his new digital music format can or cannot be pirated is something that remains to be seen

      Can you listen to it with your headphones of choice? If so you can connect line out to the line in of any computer and record a very pirate-able wave file. Any distortion will be insignificant compared to what compression adds to it these days.
      Even if they start to send the audio encrypted to the headphones I can still place a high quality microphone in them and record the audio. (Assuming that the output from the headphones isn't crap, but then I don't want to listen to the original either.)

      You don't have to wait to see anything. It is not possible to prevent piracy. (Unless you shut down all forms of communication, if people can't communicate with each other they can't spread undesired information.)
      Even when it comes to concepts like sending an encrypted video stream to the TV to prevent movie piracy it doesn't work since a single person can just open the TV and grab the video data as it is sent to the LCD. (And as a worst case, point a video camera at the screen.)
      There is no point at where the prevention method is good enough to make it impractical to break it.
      Computer game companies are way ahead when it comes to copy protection and there we clearly see that it only requires one dedicated person that works through the binary to disable to protection, even server connected software have been proven breakable.
      The music and movie copy protections do not require even a fraction of the work compared to that and even then it is still not enough.

    5. Re:Expert. by brainnolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or to release it under public domain.

  2. confused by alphatel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How exactly is this supposed to make the end user feel good about either U2 or Apple?

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:confused by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it shows that neither know what they are talking about. If I can HEAR it, I can copy it. And the quality can get pretty damn good depending on how the sound is captured.

      Maybe when they build a gizmo that broadcasts the sound directly in to your brain...

  3. Challenge accepted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't they realize when they make statements like "can't be pirated", a whole bunch of people reply with "challenge accepted!" and will go to great lengths to do so?

  4. Apple's new streaming service? by rasmusbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only way to make something unpiratable is to have it be a continuous interaction between a client and a server where you control the server.

    I guess this music "format" is essentially going to be Apple's answer to Pandora, Spotify, et al.

  5. Undeletable by unapersson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a new form of distribution, everyone gets a copy which is undeletable. They make money by charging for a removal tool.

  6. Apple's post-peak celebrity embraces by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does Apple keep investing themselves in post-peak celebrities?

    Dre, Iovine and U2 may be influential but how much currency do they have among future music fans? Is it because the decision makers at Apple are all in their late 40s-to-50s and are merely caught up in the fandom of their youth?

    Shouldn't they be forming partnerships with artists with a ton of pull with 20-somethings? Do kids in their 20s even listen to U2, or is it something that 40-something moms crank up in their minivans along with an illicit Marlboro Light on their way to pick up the kids at soccer practice?

    If U2 had any hip credibility, it was 30 years ago. Can you imagine Apple rolling out the Macintosh in 1984 with a celebrity lineup of the Everly Brothers and Bill Haley & the Comets?

  7. The Titanic is UNSINKABLE. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, hubris! One of my favorite old-timey sins.

    You are of course correct. The signal must become analog at some point to make it into your head, and we have had the capability to capture analog signals since the dawn of the television age. You can crack open LCD panels and intercept signals for a more modern high tech version of this concept, of course.

    But you are forgetting the other side of the equation. When when someone makes that statement - "THIS CANNOT EVER BE PIRATED" - you are throwing down the gauntlet. And invariably some bored teenager will say "oh really is that so?" and make them eat their words. Usually by the following Saturday. Yes you can do an analog capture but by the time you warm up your soldering gun some kid in the Netherlands will have already got the torrent up.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go watch a Blu-Ray movie on my Linux box.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:The Titanic is UNSINKABLE. by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Devil's advocate:

      Things are different from the 2000s when everyone and his brother, sister, grandmother, and father in law was coming out with an "unhackable" DRM scheme. For one, the market has shifted from PCs/Macs to consoles for gaming. The PS4, Xbox One, and others have not been cracked yet, so piracy and hacking is at 0% on those platforms.

      We also didn't depend on user accounts. A background process like VAC or Blizzard's Warden didn't exist that would completely cut off access to services. All it would take is Apple running a similar process that sits in the background and looks for cracking tools, then locks any AppleIDs suspected of doing so. The days of running "unfuck.exe" are long gone, since it would get detected, and all access lost.

      Of course, there is video. Yes, there are SD copies and screeners, maybe even someone ballsy enough to cam and slip that on BitTorrent, but 1080i (true, not upsampled) movies are rare. Satellites have not have any real hacks in a decade. Even Apple's movie format has no working cracks with no deprotection utilities out, unless one wants to capture video and re-encode it with the generational quality loss.

      Yes, we will see some "cracks", such as saying World of Warcraft is cracked because someone is running a server emulator, but I will be surprised to see available, unprotected works that were protected in this format.

      Yes, DRM has been cracked in the past, but it gets harder and harder each cycle. Even Blu-Ray hasn't been fully cracked yet (it is still a race with each individual movie.)

  8. Easy by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interactive? Music? Apple? That's easy. They're going to make "Music apps" for iPhones and iPads.

    But those won't work on the iPod shuffle, the iPod nano and I'm guessing it won't work directly with the future Apple Watch either.

    If it's music, I don't want to "interact" with it, I just want to listen to it.