Slashdot Mirror


SkyOrbiter UAVs Could Fly For Years and Provide Global Internet Access

Zothecula writes The internet has become a critical means of communication during humanitarian crises and a crucial everyday tool for people around the world. Now, a Portuguese company wants to make sure everyone has access to it. Quarkson plans to use SkyOrbiter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to transmit internet access "to every corner of the world."

48 comments

  1. Naming by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please, please, PLEASE can the folks who are setting this up call it "Skynet"? Thanks.

    1. Re:Naming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second it.

    2. Re:Naming by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Also, please post something similar to /. again in a few months. I never get tired of hearing this stuff.

    3. Re:Naming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been a satellite communications network called Skynet since the 1960s so it would be confusing to name it Skynet as well.

    4. Re:Naming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also one of our local news stations here in Tucson calls their camera network around town "Skynet".

  2. Comcast will love that... by Squidlips · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So how are they going to finagle fees from us for this? Decoders? It is scandalous that we have to pay through the nose just for the right to be spied on ....

    1. Re:Comcast will love that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless internet will never be as fast as a wired connection. Wireless is only useful for convenience. When you really need to have reliability and speed, that's what you pay Comcast for. They don't even need to advertise - if you build the pipe, they will come.

    2. Re:Comcast will love that... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      So how are they going to finagle fees from us for this? Decoders?

      It is scandalous that we have to pay through the nose just for the right to be spied on ....

      Taxes.

      People think it's bad that corporations control the internet. I'm sure the NSA loves that particular conspiracy theory because what do you think the alternative to corporations is?

    3. Re:Comcast will love that... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 2

      Hellfire missiles. They have a way of motivating people.

    4. Re:Comcast will love that... by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      Wireless will never have the same potential for bandwidth that wired internet access has. It's up to the wired providers to actually implement enough bandwidth that wireless can't keep up. Given the shitty near monopoly incumbent cable operators we have in the US there very well could be faster wireless providers.

  3. "Provide Global Internet Access" by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Provide Global Internet Access

    And, just as likely, surveillance.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:"Provide Global Internet Access" by schlachter · · Score: 1

      could they over ride local wifi with high gain directional antennae for surveillance?

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  4. satellites? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    Isn't this already here with satellites? i.e. unmanned aerial vehicles

    1. Re:satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellites have much longer ping times and substantially less bandwidth.

    2. Re:satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because most existing ones are in geosynchronous orbit. You could orbit a whole fleet of cubesats at ~150km and get decent coverage, but you'd be limited by power requirements (both on the satellites -- low mass yields small solar panels, and to transmit back and forth -- you'd need to track directional antennas unlike geosynchronous, or get by with omnidirectional setups).

    3. Re:satellites? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Satellites have much longer ping times"

      Satellites at geostationary orbit have long ping times, but you can have satellites at lower orbits like a few hundred miles. It only adds a few ms to the ping time.

    4. Re:satellites? by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sattelites come in two main varieties both of which have their problems.

      GEO sattelites can cover the world with a handful of sattelites but they are a LONG way from anything on the ground and a long way up the gravity well. That limits the data rate possible with a given antenna size and RF bandwidth, it also makes them expensive to launch and makes the latency high (best case for round trip time on a GEO based sattelite internet service is ~500ms, protocols for on-demand upstream bandwidth allocation will make that much worse).

      LEO sattelites have much lower radio path loss and much lower theoretical latency but each sattelite has a relatively small coverage area and worse the sattelites are constantly moving which makes use of high gain antennas difficult, requires frequent handoffs, makes it impractical to focus coverage on areas with the most demand.

      A flying platform would be even closer to the ground than an LEO sattelite and would stay in a more or less fixed position allowing it to serve a fixed area. The question is can you make an economical permanent flying platform (either by lighter than air flight or by heavier than air flight with solar power)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:satellites? by LeadSongDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      LEO sats go past quickly, so you need bigger power budgets in lieu of beam steering. You also give up bandwidth to manage doppler. Best to use a mix: LEO channels for small packets with low latency, GEO channels for bandwidth. Smart routing and channel bonding does the rest.

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    6. Re:satellites? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      At 150km or higher than that your little cubie satellite will fall off the sky.

  5. lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powered? by raymorris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On their web site, I see a lot about what they wish they could do, and very little about how they'd manage to do it.
    They say their HA series is designed to stay aloft for up to five years at "all latitudes". "All latitudes precludes the use of solar power since it's dark for six months at a time at far north and far south latitudes, and most of their pictures clearly show no solar panels. So are they hoping for a magic battery that will last five years but not weigh hundreds of pounds, or are they planning on nuclear power? Submarines that stay out for years use nuclear power, so that is a proven option.

    Another option that's known to be somewhat workable at some latitudes is a hot air balloon, where the black balloon continually absorbs heat from the sun to keep the craft aloft. Their pictures show model planes, though, not balloons.

    Do these guys have any idea how to solve the most fundamental physics problems in the way, or do they just have a wish and nothing else? Their web site doesn't seem to indicate they've thought about how to do it, just how to get people to hand over cash, with no actual plan published.

     

  6. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashvertisment?

  7. You "could" do a lot of things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could these "fly for years"? Sure. Will they? Unlikely.

    You're talking about a solar power system, a battery backup system, a rotating assembly, and a bunch of "as lightweight as possible" materials held together by "as lightweight as possible" joints. Oh, and the communications array itself. Subject to constant hurricane-force winds. Flying maintenance-free for "years"?

    Call me when you get past "days."

  8. Good luck to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The military might find their services useful and affordable, most people in remote enough areas to need this can't afford it.

  9. Slashdoted, here's a gizmag article on it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you can't access their website, gizmag:
    http://www.gizmag.com/quarkson-skyorbiter/33912/

  10. nomenclature matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let's see. If it is nasty nerds peeking in windows we call them "drones." If it is well meaning corporations then they are "uav's." I am glad to see the hatred for individual tinkerers is this explicit.

  11. Re:lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powere by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Submarines that stay out for years use nuclear power, so that is a proven option since there is an ocean in the sky.

    Fixed that for you. :-p

    Otherwise, I agree with you.

  12. Re:lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powere by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    Their website is giving me a WordPress Error page after a lengthy timeout:

    Warning: mysql_connect(): Lost connection to MySQL server at 'waiting for initial communication packet', system error: 95 in /usr/share/wordpress/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1147

    Before bringing the "internet to every corner of the world", they need to bring a better database to their Wordpress.

  13. Re:lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powere by swb · · Score: 1

    Well, the sky is just a little less dense than the ocean so you need to work on your buoyancy.

  14. It has to be really cheap to succeed by Animats · · Score: 1

    This service has to be really cheap and fast to succeed. Iridium and GlobalStar already offer a satellite-based service. Iridium really does cover the entire planetary surface; GlobalStar has most of the planet, but not the polar areas. So it's all about being price-competitive.

  15. It's been tried... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    Funny enough it's been tried as a business concept, though under different circumstances. In the mid-90s a company called AngelCorp wanted to build a series of manned aircraft that could loiter at high altitudes for long periods of time to provide high speed internet access. This was shortly before DSL, CableModems, WIfi and T1/T3 connectivity at the workplace would pretty much saturate that market. Bad timing.

    Scaled Composites built one ship, the Proteus, a beautiful, revolutionary aircraft that is still in use today for many other payload missions such as airborne laser testing. The Proteus was also the uncle of White Knight I, the mothership for SpaceShipOne.

      The odd thing is, the AngelCorp website still exists, frozen in time.

    With advances in battery propulsion and cheap UAV / drone guidance systems, it could be a workable thing for providing temporary access to remote regions.

  16. Re:lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powere by flex941 · · Score: 1

    Naah, they need to bring a better web framework to their database.

  17. deja vu by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    something tells me I've read this before.

    http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/p... (viability study from this year)
    http://www.neowin.net/news/78-... (MSCI corporate venture to provide 3G backhaul from LEO (news from 2011). To date, I think about 0 have been actually deployed).
    http://www.bit-tech.net/news/h... (oh yes, this is one of the more recent ones by Google - again, nothing came of it).

    I don't think any of the microsats being launched from ISS are intended for trunking wireless. ICBW.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  18. Re:lots of wishing, no information. Nuclear powere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, 3D printers, Elon Musk, computers got better, therefore everything will get better.

  19. We live in the post wikileaks era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Quarkson plans to use SkyOrbiter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to transmit internet access "to every corner of the world."

    Quarkson plans to use SkyOrbiter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to track you "to every corner of the world."

  20. Quarkson by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Quarkson. Jeremey Quarkson?


    POWER!!

    1. Re:Quarkson by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      This could be the best internet... in the world.

      Also, ah-so karate chop.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  21. Facebook and Titan Aerospace by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    Simpsons did it! Oh, I mean there are other players in this same field. It'll be interesting to see who, if anyone, makes it to market.

  22. Perfect for 3rd world countries.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Like the USA and our barely working Internet infrastructure.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. true, not proven for flight, but endurance vehicle by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's a valid point, of course. Perhaps I should have been more specific and said the concept of a long- endurance vehicle being nuclear powered has been proven, but keeping the nuclear power source aloft for years is another question.

    Power for long-range airplanes is a tricky thing. More endurance requires more fuel, but that additional fuel is more weight, which increases fuel consumption. Many options would be counterproductive, weighing more than can be kept aloft by the energy they provide or store. I suspect that only nuclear fuel and a hot-air envelope can provide enough energy to keep themselves aloft for years.

  24. Re:true, not proven for flight, but endurance vehi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's pretty big difference between powering an aircraft and powering a submarine with nuclear power: With submarine, you have more water available for cooling than you could ever hope to use. And that's after ignoring weight.

    Instead of looking into reactors used in the sea, you should look into those used in space. Problem is tho, they are not even nearly as safe.

  25. CIA? NSA? Re:"Provide Global Internet Access" by davidwr · · Score: 2

    SkyOrbiter UAVs Could Fly For Years and Provide Global Internet Access

    They should have called it Complete Internet Access. They should also clarify that there will be No Surveillance Allowed.

    As for the name,

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  26. Alternative to Drone Strikes by Tokolosh · · Score: 2

    If all the money spent on military action in the Middle East were diverted to blanketing the area with these UAVs, together with an air-drop of 50 million tablets, the political outcome would be favorable to the West.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  27. We need a free, open and neutral Internet! by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 2

    Zothecula writes: "The internet has become a critical means of communication during humanitarian crises and a crucial everyday tool for people around the world." Very well put. I am not sure about all these schemes you read about to distribute Internet via balloon and now UAV. But the need is there. I suspect that some sort of distributed access scheme would help out in other situations. Many countries have segmented off "their" Internet from the rest of the world. I hear the Iranians have their own version of YouTube (Mullah approved) and everything. Looks like the Russians are following suit. Meanwhile in the good 'ol U.S. of A. you get the Internet that your corporate overlords say you get and anything they don't like is throttled or blocked. Perhaps a well thought out ad hoc Internet distribution scheme might help get around some of the censorship and interference that even first world countries currently enjoy.

  28. Beam it up Scotty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beamed microwave power is another option.

  29. They could be thinking that. 10Km antenna on plane by raymorris · · Score: 1

    They could be thinking of microwave energy. Of course that means they need a 10Km rectenna on the plane, which would be problematic to put it mildly. From their web site, there's no way to tell what they're thinking, or if they're thinking.

  30. Iridium 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an updated version of iridium, and that ended so well...

  31. Re:true, not proven for flight, but endurance vehi by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Use a radioisotope thermal generator then? The power may be not that much, but they are simple, relatively low tech and the power is always-on for years. Such generators were precisely built and operated to provide permanent power for years or decades without maintenance and in inacessible places. Might still be too heavy, and they're hardly more appetizing than nuclear waste.

    You sure would want to collect the generator safely after you're done with it, and even then I would be worried about people trying to shoot it down.
    PS : I have just hovered over your link and it is about RTGs. I missed them from your post because I believe they're not reactors.

  32. I prefer to go with balloons with a control tether by maitas · · Score: 1

    This looks like a cheaper approach https://smartech.gatech.edu/bi...