Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Campfires Led To the Rise of Storytelling

sciencehabit writes A study of evening campfire conversations by the Ju/'hoan people of Namibia and Botswana suggests that by extending the day, fire allowed people to unleash their imaginations and tell stories, rather than merely focus on mundane topics. As scientists report, whereas daytime talk was focused almost entirely on economic issues, land rights, and complaints about other people, 81% of the firelight conversation was devoted to telling stories, including tales about people from other Ju/'hoan communities. The team suggests that campfires allowed human ancestors to expand their minds in a similar way and also solidified social networks.

89 comments

  1. The campfire gave rise to two things by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The campfire gave rise to two things that permeate human society: religion and ghost stories.

    Unfortunately, both are about equally grounded in reality and truth.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by ljw1004 · · Score: 5, Funny

      And smores

    2. Re: The campfire gave rise to two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazing Stories.

    3. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by davydagger · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      ghost stories don't nearly have the record of death, destruction and subjegation as organized reliegon.

      I was going to say "never killed anyone", but yes, people believing in ghosts have killed people.

    4. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 0

      subjugation

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    5. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know, I've noticed that even though there's a strong impulse to make smores, and preparations made, it always ends up with everybody drunk and just burning the marshmallows on the end of a stick, eating all the chocolate and then running around the campfire naked before tripping over a branch, passing out and waking up covered in ticks and mosquito bites.

      I've been part of so many camping trips where there was every intention of making smores and it never seems to work out.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by davydagger · · Score: 0

      whats a good way to try to make an intellectual snub at someone without adding to the conversation?

      I know, check spelling and grammar.

    7. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to guess that this type of situation is a lot of the science that went into the discovery the article is bragging about.

      Oh BTW, been there too. Except for some reason, someone always has some fireworks and throws them in the fire because they got damp or something and we usually ended up losing at least one tent. It was safer to sleep half naked with the ticks than bundled up in a tent with shit that would keep burning- it would appear.

    8. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Campfires gave rise to story telling and conversation, leading to the expansion of the human mind. This started about 400,000 years ago, and continued until the mid 1950s, when television became widespread, and families stopped talking to each other. It has been downhill since then.

    9. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      whats a good way to try to make an intellectual snub at someone without adding to the conversation? I know, check spelling and grammar.

      Missing apostrophe in "whats" - should be "what's".

      Just getting into the swing of it.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Empiric · · Score: 0

      So, in summary, you're ignorant of history, religion, -and- ghost stories.

      But here is some peer-reviewed grounding for you.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    11. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Empiric · · Score: 2

      And nothing would match the bloodbath preceding existence of any religion, organized or not, that would be the sole reason (according to you) that you now exist (and the other hominids don't), as a product of evolution.

      Why suddenly drop context?

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    12. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, both religion and ghosts exist.

    13. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by msobkow · · Score: 1

      You can find "proof" of anything you want to on the internet. That doesn't make it true or real. Religion and ghost stories are the fantasies of idle minds, and nothing more. There isn't a single tale of religion that is substantiated by facts, especially Judeo-Christian-Muslim. Oh, sure, Mohammad existed, but he was a freakin' delusional schizophrenic who convinced his followers his fantasies were the "word of God."

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    14. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from the rather extensive finds that back that the Bible is actually quite a good history record and Jesus did exist.

    15. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by lgw · · Score: 1

      Many, many tales in many religious traditions are simply oral histories, eventually written down. There's quite a bit of good history there, both in stories at least "inspired by real events", and fairly accurate representations of customs and values of ancient peoples.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder my night time slashdot comments are so much more fantastic compared to the day time posts.

    17. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      That second link has been posted here recently enough that my browser still shows it as visited. It *uttterly* failed to support the claims of the person who posted it, leaving the impression that they hadn't actually read it. Or maybe read it and didn't understand it. Or maybe read it and understood it, but thought they could get away with misrepresenting it. Who knows...

      In your case... uhm... what claim about history, religion, or ghost stores do you think it supports? Merely posting a link doens't win a vague argument, nor does it make your personal beliefs real.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    18. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Many, many tales in many religious traditions are simply oral histories, eventually written down. There's quite a bit of good history there, both in stories at least "inspired by real events", and fairly accurate representations of customs and values of ancient peoples.

      They also tend to contain a lot of superstition, prejudice, ignorance, outright nonsense, and religious/social/political spin.

      (Just like secular literature.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    19. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Empiric · · Score: 0

      No, my beliefs being real is what makes my beliefs real.

      The link is peer-reviewed, authored-by-multiple-PhD's, published by probably the most prestigious medical journal in Europe, eyewitness accounts of direct correspondence between "religion's" claims and reality, as perceived precisely at the point when said "religion" predicts these. Note, -those in particular-, rather than random hallucinatory phenomena one might expect as a consequence of brain failure. You'll handwave this as coincidence, or have some twisted pseudo-logic as to how these aren't eyewitness reports in this particular context. It doesn't matter. Your opinion, as a soon-to-be-eliminated irrelevancy, by -your- worldview, also matters no more on this than anywhere else.

      Dodge and goalpost-shift as you will, imposing your maximum potential relevance, according to -you-, of a random internet guy whose positions have no potential weight or consequence (that is, no importance whatsoever). It is unquestionably "grounding" (i.e. evidence, no matter how intellectually-dishonest your criteria for "evidence" becomes in the follow-on post you will make).

      It may even have been me that linked the article previously, and if so, it was just as relevant then as now (feel free to directly lie again)--not sure, you've been a tedious goalless waste of Slashdot's time for quite a while now. Eh, could be.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    20. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      They also tend to contain a lot of superstition, prejudice, ignorance, outright nonsense, and religious/social/political spin.

      I did not realise /. predated the internet!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter how prestigious the publication is, if it doesn't actually support what you want to think it does.

      Last sentence of first paragraph:

      The subjective nature and absence of a frame of reference for this experience lead to individual, cultural, and religious factors determining the vocabulary used to describe and interpret the experience.

      Did you actually read that far? Or are you just citing it because some authority figure told you it supports your religious beliefs?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    22. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Empiric · · Score: 0

      And... so?

      Wherever you think this means that "the vocabulary used" invalidates the experiences quantified by the paper, you are wrong.

      Everything is described through cultural linguistic constructs. That's irrelevant to the reality of any given experience, and if your assertion as to what the sentence implies were what it in fact implied, there would be no reason to continue with the presentation of the study. Since they did in fact continue, we can fairly conclude that this wasn't the assertion--as we can also infer from the absence of your conclusion actually being anywhere in the statement.

      See, this is where I feel fundamentally required to respond to the statement not as an argument, not as a perception I consider incorrect, but as an outright deliberate lie. My basis for this is that you could not actually live as long as you have while generally believing what you assert to be true, is true, but rather you apply an entirely different set of criteria to religious concepts as you do every single day to every other subject, and you could not do otherwise.

      I'm glad in this case I didn't have to revisit the different commonplace forms of that here, and you, surprisingly, didn't make the claim that because there is an alternate scenario that is also supported by the evidence, it then becomes the case the evidence no longer supports the original interpretation that it in fact supports. As always, for everything, every day, you then have evidence for -both- scenarios. If you find the prime suspect in a bank robbery with a bag of cash with the bank's logo and a gun on his coffee table, noting he has a roommate who could have done it does not make that suddenly not evidence for the prime suspect's culpability. It is simply not, in itself, -proof- (the standard goalpost-shift here to an infinite-regress of expectation, as well as tantamount to demanding forced conversion, proof provided, the requester's choices now irrelevant). Nor is this, because it is -a- line of support (of the particular peer-reviewed sort commonly demanded), therefore the -only- line of support. I could go on at length regarding other lines of support (i.e. improbability of future prediction happening "by chance", historical notations of secular historians, martyrdom of contemporaries, etc.), but this is a waste of time if I don't perceive basic willingness to consider information on the same terms as every other topic in the requester's existence, and as basic reason calls for. Some don't have that. Maybe that's because they're simply lying hypocrites. Maybe you have an alternate explanation.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    23. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      But you forget about message degradation the further down the line a message is passed orally so that what comes out is COMPLETELY different than what went in.

      In fact kids play this game, except they call it Telephone. So you can understand that it's entirely likely the Jesus character is an amalgam of several other virgin birth and resurrection stories floating around at the time they finally wrote it down.

    24. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by operagost · · Score: 1

      Wow, your Girl Scout troop really knew how to party!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you decided to be the poo-flinging primate in this discussion, but acting as if there are no facts behind the Bible is utter nonsense and anti-intellectual. I'm not asking you to believe that Elijah was carried up in a flaming chariot, but to realize that most of the people, places, and events recorded have been corroborated by archaeology and contemporary sources. Meanwhile, when you make sweeping statements like "isn't a single tale of religion that is substantiated by facts", it sets a pretty low bar for people to dismiss you.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by operagost · · Score: 1

      You do realize that they had writing in 1st century Palestine, right? The gospels are in thousands of MS and established to date to the mid-first century. It's not telephone-- which isn't scientific in any case.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by lgw · · Score: 1

      They also tend to contain a lot of superstition, prejudice, ignorance, outright nonsense, and religious/social/political spin.

      It's polite to call that "customs and values of ancient peoples", no? Or don't you think humans centuries in the future will see your beliefs the same way?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by lgw · · Score: 1

      But you forget about message degradation the further down the line

      I think that's just what "oral history" means. However, it's not so random as you imply, when you have a class or caste of people dedicated to accurately repeating the tales through the generations.

      Of course, written language has been around for longer than most modern religions. How much got written down when, and how texts changed over the centuries due to scribes' errors and deliberate manipulation, is itself a fascinating geeky field, and quite scientific.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

      "quite good" is a very strong description to use for the Bible's historical accuracy. A more suitable description would be "rarely but occasionally gets it right".

    30. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      It's still vulnerable to survivor bias, ideological manipulations and political pressure.

    31. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by lgw · · Score: 1

      But this is true of all historical accounts. That doesn't mean it doesn't shed light on history, and doubly so if we see evolution over time, as that gives great insight precisely into ideological manipulations, political pressure, and the like of centuries past.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The selection bias in history/archeology to match the researcher's beliefs is staggering.

      History is written and rewritten by the winners. It's all bunk.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    33. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      But all historical accounts don't claim to be infallible word of a supreme deity.

    34. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by lgw · · Score: 1

      Nor do most believers, but that's orthogonal to the value of religious texts as historical documents. There's nothing so crazy that you can't find someone who believes it, but at least in the West there are very few literalists left.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      For example, take the battle of Jericho. This is an iconic story that is used as an example of the bible being a reliable history book.

      The problem is that the latest evidence shows that the city of Jericho was abandoned at the time of the "battle".

      Could you list out some examples of where the bible has been a reliable history book?

    36. Re:The campfire gave rise to two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iliad & Odyssey existed at the start only in speak form, it didn't degraded at all. They were bards that could recite them by memory without an error.

  2. It's got to be biological by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show me one person who can look away from an open flame during a time of relaxation.

    1. Re:It's got to be biological by TWX · · Score: 1

      I could introduce you to a couple of blind people that I know...

      Though I think that for one of them, staring intently into a campfire might have been a contributor.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:It's got to be biological by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I could introduce you to a couple of blind people that I know...

      Though I think that for one of them, staring intently into a campfire might have been a contributor.

      I have a little scar in one eyebrow where my younger brother poked me with a hot coathanger while toasting marshmallows at the beach. I'm about half an inch from being blind in one eye due to a campfire.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. Along the lines of: by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    When they got home, the hook was still in the door handle.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Along the lines of: by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      ...which proves that the Ju/'hoan invented the door handle.

    2. Re:Along the lines of: by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      ...which proves that the Ju/'hoan invented the door handle.

      And were passingly familiar with the hook.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  4. Will it burn? by Thud457 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Also the scientific method of formulating a hypothesis and performing an experiment to test it.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Will it burn? by jhantin · · Score: 1

      Also the scientific method of formulating a hypothesis and performing an experiment to test it.

      Slow down, cowboy! The article is about anthropology — 'social studies' — with some speculation thrown in. It doesn't have to be science, just 'news for nerds', whatever that means.

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
  5. And fish are good swimmers by flu1d · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thanks for the update!

  6. Experience with long distance hiking by itsenrique · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tried to hike the Pacific Crest Trail once, it's the one that runs from Mexico to Canada through the Desert, then the Sierras. We had to make 15-25+ miles without water (because there was none any closer), and that often meant hiking until or into the dark. I found that my whole appreciation of a campfire was very different than a marshmallow toasting boy scout at those times. As suggested by the summary, I craved the fire to "extend" the ability to talk to my girlfriend when we weren't hiking or preparing to hike, which was the entire day or longer. I suspect it was less ghost story telling and more story telling period. When you spend all the daylight gathering, hunting, getting water, setting up shelter, and preparing food the campfire is sort of like the original dinner table because everyone is there sharing. Not all the tasks were done by all the people, so the ability to come together and talk, perhaps not about "work" (survival) may have been an idea that sprouted back then. As an aside, I never use the word starving any longer, I think I experienced true early starvation for the first time out there. Early human life must have been gritty when things weren't bountiful.

    1. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you experienced was hunger. You know nothing of starvation.

    2. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      I knew what hunger was before. The deal is you can only carry so much food between re-supply points, and it without a doubt is not a enough. Up to 4-5 days, all that food on your back plus the days water means not very much food a day. If you burn 5000 calories a day but consume 1800 for enough days, you will start to starve. Slowly, of course, and never completely in the case of a long distance hike. I literally just couldn't carry enough to sustain me or heal the small injuries I was getting from hiking for 18 hours a day. Someone starving who is not on the move is in a very different way because they would do much better with less available nutrition (not just calories but minerals and vitamins). Where you draw the border between hungry and starving is blurry. Headaches? Diziness? Losing ability to form sentences? Focusing eyes becoming difficult? Vivid day-dreams, dreams and cravings that never seem to end? I only suggest you try something similar before telling me what I "know of". Do you know of starvation? If not then how do you know I don't? No qualifiers, no explanations, just "no you don't", and anonymous coward as well. Tell us about your days in the bush, a 3rd world country, or when the food stamps ran out or get out of here man.

    3. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Early human life must have been gritty when things weren't bountiful.

      With twelve hours of darkness per day (on average), and needing only eight hours sleep, they had a LOT of time in the dark while awake. Especially in winter. I reckon they must have had a lot of snuggling up time on their hands.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    4. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, you only had 1800kcal/day food rationing on average? You messed up your preparation/logistics planning in that case. You can easily cook up 3800kcal/day rations yourself(plenty of nuts, plenty of fat, dried fruit, dried meat etc. Skip grains etc, by mass you do not get the same amount of energy out of them, and makes you more thirsty than dried meat and dried fruit does), something I do when I go out for 2-3 week hikes, incl ski hikes along Kungsleden in winter(and contrary to expecations, you actually do carry a lot of fluids with you in winter if at all possible, because eating snow/drinking icecold water is a good way to weaken yourself)

      As for the general point: Yes, long hikes can easily lead to starvation, even when you have proper planning. Military units doing long range/duration recon/patrol can lose lots of weight despite chomping down massive amounts of energy. Some friends of mine did 3-week jungle patrols about. They consumed at LEAST 4.8k kcals per day, yet lost between 9 and 15kg of body mass, depending on person. On my ski hikes, I can come back after two weeks and having lost 7kg

    5. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by operagost · · Score: 1

      Being able to identify any natural food sources on your route (at least the fruit/root kind) is a big help.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Where I was unless you liked rattlesnake I doubt there was much, but I'm definitely no expert and was far from my home.

    7. Re:Experience with long distance hiking by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      You are correct that my planning wasn't that great, the other factor is even with ultralight gear previous injuries I had were causing me to lean heavily toward low pack weight even for food. I just wasn't strong enough. I may have exaggerated 1800, but no more than 2500 to be sure. When I was in town I probably had about 3000, but I found my stomach had shrunk by then and I couldn't even eat all that I imagined I wanted to.

  7. Interesting.... by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    That is interesting, please continue. Tell me s'more about these campfire activities.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well once upon a time there were dinosaurs. They were very big and scary, but there was this one guy who wasn't afraid of them. He calmly walked up to one and climbed on top, his name was Jesus. Riding his pet dinosaur he conquored many lands, the simpletons who lived at that time though because he was so powerful he must be a god and so they worshiped him.

  8. Frist Ghost? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    And then... Boo!

    Ahhhhhhhhhh!

  9. Social Networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wait, Facebook was invented around a campfire in Botswana?
    Probably Al Gore again.

  10. News??? by perry64 · · Score: 2

    I read the same thing on a Bill Cosby album liner forty-five years ago.

  11. And when they got home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And when they got home, there was a bloody hook attached to the cave door!

    Oh, and in my day we had to make s'mores out of two flat rocks, mud, and bird shit. It tasted awful and broke our teeth which absessed because we didn't have dentists and we liked it!

  12. Storytelling led to campfires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There they were, sitting around telling stories to each other and someone said "Y'know, it's pretty fuckin' cold tonight."

    "And dark," said another.

    "Billy," said the first, "Can you form a committee and brainstorm this issue, see if you can figure something out?"

    "Right on it!" said Billy. He always was a suck.

  13. Ancient Campfires by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They also led to the rise of marshmallows, binge drinking and running around the fire naked.

    God, I love camping.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Ancient Campfires by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      I think I saw your Scoutmaster on the news.

    2. Re:Ancient Campfires by PPH · · Score: 1

      Don't forget beans and flatulence.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Can I get a research grant? by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure this is true. We need to research this further. It's only 99 percent obvious, so clearly, we need more research. Where do we apply for a grant?

    --
    Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    1. Re:Can I get a research grant? by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I do science work so the government can circumvent our privacy and kill people more efficiently, our grants are always flowing full-tap! You should switch disciplines!

    2. Re:Can I get a research grant? by Livius · · Score: 1

      The next logical step is to research the story-telling of people drinking heavily at a bar.

    3. Re:Can I get a research grant? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      The next logical step is to research the story-telling of people drinking heavily at a bar.

      But you've got to research it while drinking heavily, so you'll understand the stories from the perspective of the intended audience.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Can I get a research grant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be more creative. Apply for the grant to investigate a cointel/disinfo channel based on nocturnal rural social gatherings. The boffins in Langley would eat it up.

  15. In Other News ........ by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    ... the Pope is a ... Oh damn, you guessed that already too?

  16. Beg To Differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would argue that the first fisherman gave rise to storytelling. I can recall, as a boy, when Moby Dick was a minnow and captain hook had two hands. She was a big'in I tell yee.

    1. Re:Beg To Differ by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with fish stories -- they smell and get bigger every time they are told. :-)

  17. Correlation is not.... by Livius · · Score: 1

    With a fire, people are brought together as a community. There is not enough light to go hunting or engage in any other practical activity, but there is enough light to communicate with gestures and facial expressions as well as verbally. So people will engage in conversation, assuming they're not engaged in some other nocturnal activity, but for all we know they were doing that in the dark before they had fire.

    1. Re:Correlation is not.... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      With a fire, people are brought together as a community. There is not enough light to go hunting or engage in any other practical activity, but there is enough light to communicate with gestures and facial expressions as well as verbally. So people will engage in conversation, assuming they're not engaged in some other nocturnal activity, but for all we know they were doing that in the dark before they had fire.

      Bumping into things?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Correlation is not.... by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Trying to sleep...

    3. Re:Correlation is not.... by crtreece · · Score: 1

      Bumping into things?

      There are things, and they are bumping. I guess that makes your statement correct.

      --
      file: .signature not found
  18. Look at who tells the stories now by koan · · Score: 1

    And you get why society is broken.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  19. Old News is Very Old by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    We've known this for a very long time. Longer than I've been here even.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  20. Croods by Gocho · · Score: 1

    So The Croods were right?

  21. Eyeshine, Paleo-Humans, Children & Campfires by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have noticed in myself and several others an extremely strong fear-reflex to orange eyeshine. The eyes need to appear suddenly, they must be perceived as being near, and most interesting -- it seems to peak out at an ruddy orange color. Blue and green are surprising, yellow can be alarming but into the orange there is an extreme response, a silent 'snap' in the upper spine like an electric shock followed by a sensation of warmth/adrenaline response. As a kid I would shine my flashlight into the bushes as I walked at night to find cats. Countless times I caught yellow or green reflections (even up close) I'd smile and say "gotcha!" Then one night I got a shine that was a dull ruddy orange, I think it was an old tomcat with cataracts... I was riveted to the spot with symptoms described above, with great effort I stepped backward then sideways, and (though I knew it was just a cat) found myself running home.

    Didn't think about it for years... until I encountered a young girl who loved Fantasia 2000. She'd watch it over and over. But as one particular moment approached she would hide her eyes under a blanket or even jump behind the couch. It was this moment . After the Firebird rose up moments later she'd be fine, sitting down watching intently. I started asking around. At least one other person had a similar reaction to orange eyeshine, and several others when given a choice chose orange as the eye color they'd least like to encounter at night.

    This led me into a theory. Imagine paleo-humans around a campfire. The adults exhausted or asleep from the strenuous activities of the day... but the children are alert and awake, keeping watch. They are watching for eyeshine on the fringes of camp. This makes sense because it is the children that predators are watching. Whether or not they were tasked with this duty, or even if it was an "eye game", it may be that we are descended from a successful lineage of children who kept watch at night and successfully sounded the alarm.

    Before people huddled around campfires this eyeshine predator fear response could not have been so strongly tuned to orange as it seems to be. Reflected moonlight may give you a faint flash of eyeshine if conditions are right. But when you are between the fire and the eyes it would be really bright, and a predominately orange fire would reflect mainly its own color. Only with the modern electric light would we 'see' those brilliant greens and yellows. So an eyeshine predator fear response would have developed after we tamed fire. As such it might be the most recent base instinct, and because it arises from firelight -- exclusively human.

    I have another theory too, it was the domestication of the canine that initially allowed us and our children to sleep through the night, leading into the elaborate REM sleep and dream cycle of modern humans that acts as a wellspring of intelligent creativity.

    And it has scarcely been one hundred years since we were paced by animals.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  22. The campfire is the "TV" of camping by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    No question of it, I've been on multiple big camping trips, mobile phones banned, things like that - and we just had a big big fire in the middle, sat around talking, relaxing and staring at the warm glow of logs slowly crumbling. It's incredibly mesmerising when there's nothing else to look at. Very relaxing.

    Drugs or alcohol may or may not assist but are not required!

  23. Re:Eyeshine, Paleo-Humans, Children & Campfire by pspahn · · Score: 1

    domestication of the canine

    In other words, the domestication of humans by the canine. They chose us, not the other way around.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  24. Is this yet another lg Nobel Prize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh! Night campfires ARE MADE for chatting, for what else?

  25. I heard "gossip" a main driver of language by peter303 · · Score: 1

    So people could keep tabs of what others were doing out of sight, e.g. on the hunt or left back at home. And when family groups hunkered down in larger groups during winter camp, they could catch up with more distant relatives.

    I heard this on Facebook. He-he. Social media is just the modern technological extension of primordial gossip.

  26. I feel more "alive" around the campfire by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Maybe because need to be more alert out in Nature. But I think its because 95% of human history centered around this.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:Eyeshine, Paleo-Humans, Children & Campfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have another theory too, it was the domestication of the canine that initially allowed us and our children to sleep through the night, leading into the elaborate REM sleep and dream cycle of modern humans that acts as a wellspring of intelligent creativity.

    So the reason my dog tries to run and will bark in its sleep is because they caught dreaming from humans?

    I suspect dreaming has been around longer than we have been human.

  29. Teaching literature the old-fashioned way by AlejoHausner · · Score: 1

    Some years ago my wife and I read Homer's Odyssey to each other over several nights, sitting outside next to a campfire. It really worked well. That's a story that is best told, not read. I wonder how much more effective it would be to cover ancient literature in this way: not read out of a book in classroom, but spoken out loud in a communal setting.