Slashdot Mirror


Do Specs Matter Anymore For the Average Smartphone User?

ourlovecanlastforeve writes: While reviewing a recent comparison of the Nexus 5 and the iPhone 6, OSNews staffer Thom Holwerda raises some relevant points regarding the importance of specs on newer smartphones. He observes that the iPhone 6, which is brand new, and the Nexus 5 launch apps at about the same speed. Yes, they're completely different platforms and yes, it's true it's probably not even a legitimate comparison, but it does raise a point: Most people who use smartphones on a daily basis use them for pretty basic things such as checking email, casual web browsing, navigation and reminders. Those who use their phones to their maximum capacity for things like gaming are a staunch minority. Do smartphone specs even matter for the average smartphone user anymore? After everyone releases the biggest phone people can reasonably hold in their hand with a processor and GPU that can move images on the display as optimally as possible, how many other moons are there to shoot for?

4 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Re:ObBillGates by manu144x · · Score: 1, Informative

    Didn't Bill Gates dismiss this enough saying it is not his phrase, he never said that?
    http://www.computerworld.com/a...

  2. Re:ObBillGates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't Bill Gates dismiss this enough saying it is not his phrase, he never said that?

    "When we set the upper limit of PC-DOS at 640K, we thought nobody would ever need that much memory." — William Gates, chairman of Microsoft, quoted in the April 29, 1985 issue of InfoWorld.

    "I have to say that in 1981, making those decisions, I felt like I was providing enough freedom for 10 years. That is, a move from 64k to 640k felt like something that would last a great deal of time. Well, it didn’t – it took about only 6 years before people started to see that as a real problem." — William Gates, chairman of Microsoft in a recorded speech to the Computer Science Club at the University of Waterloo about microcomputers.

    Looks like Bill's not too proud to revise history...

  3. Re:Maybe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Informative

    Thing is the iPhone 6 is only 326 PPI, while the 6 Plus is 401 PPI. If you couldn't see any improvement beyond the old Retina display level of about 320 PPI then why bother going to 401 PPI for the 6 Plus?

    The 6 Plus is basically an admission that the whole Retina display thing was nonsense. If you compare a 320 PPI display to a 400 or 500 PPI one you can see the difference at typical viewing distances. That's all there is to it, everything else was just hype.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Re:ObBillGates by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I'm not a Gates fan, this whole thing looks like stupid urban rumor.

    Looks like Bill's not too proud to revise history...

    It seems to me that Bill isn't revising history here. He made the 64k to 640k comment in 1981, but never said anything about not needing more than that. Then infoworld pops this quote with no reference or anything. They certainly didn't interview him so where on earth did they pull that quote from? A lot of people have looked into it, including people from that page you sourced this from, yet nobody could find a proper source.

    Which by the way, the page AC is referencing is here: http://quoteinvestigator.com/2...