Slashdot Mirror


Phablet Reviews: Before and After the iPhone 6

Velcroman1 writes Bigger is better. No, wait, bigger is worse. Well, which is it? Apple's newly supersized 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and the jumbo, 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus are a marked departure for the company, which has clung to the same, small screen size for years. It has gone so far as to publicly deride larger phones from competitors, notably Samsung, even as their sales grew to record highs. Tech reviewers over the years have tended to side with Apple, in general saddling reviews of the Samsung Galaxy Note – a 5.3-inch device that kicked off the phablet push in 2012 – with asides about how big the darn thing was. Are tech reviewers being fair when they review the iPhone 6 Plus? Here's what some of them said today, compared with how they reviewed earlier phablets and big phones from the competition.

14 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. what?!?! by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The press is biased towards Apple? You don't say...

    1. Re:what?!?! by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except if you actually go back and read what the press said, there was a little bump of "wow, that's a big phone" for the Galaxy Note and S3 - which were large phones for the time - and then stopped mentioning it. In fact, the general concensus over the past two years is that the iPhones are too small now. If you look up the iPhone 5/S reviews by each of those sites, you'll see the same sorts of remarks. The Nexus 4 really set the benchmark at about 5 inches as far as the press were concerned.

      The premise put forward by the article is, to put it bluntly, unsupported by the facts.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  2. Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These aren't reviews from "before ... the iPhone 6", they're exclusively reviews of the Galaxy Note and S3 - the first "phablets". Writers' tastes haven't changed because they're duplicitous hacks trying to find a way to hate Android; they've changed because of experience.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If by "suddenly" you mean "two years and dozens of four-to-six-inch-phones later", yes.

      That's less time than it took for the original iPhone to go from ridiculously oversized* to perfectly normal.

      *Ars Technica's review compares it unfavourably to the Razr.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Talk about an unsupported hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No, they actually say they started liking phablets the moment Apple did one, it is not their experience with other phablets. The most clear quote (actually admitting it) is from Lauren Goode who said about the Note:

      It’s still too big for a smartphone After testing it over the past week and a half, the awkwardness that came with carrying such a large, “notice me” phone outweighed the benefits of it, for me.

      And then about the iPhone 6 plus:

      Maybe I’m getting old, and my eyes are getting worse. Or maybe I’m stuck in Apple’s reality-distortion field (help). But something strange happened this week. I started to like a phablet.

      And they feel comfortable making damning statements about a non Apple device, while saying the same thing as politely as possible for the iPhone. E.g. compare a TechCrunch quote on the Note:

      I found that it was really difficult to get comfortable with the device, never feeling like I had complete control over it as I would with a smaller phone.

      With that on the iPhone:

      the additional size makes for a less ‘perfect’ ergonomic quality, something the iPhone 6 definitely achieves

      The worst they can say about the iPhone 6 plus is "less perfect", while adding that the iPhone 6 IS perfect. Until one month ago, of course, the iPhone 5/5S was the ergonomically perfect one, while Samsung Galaxy S3/4/5 where awkwardly large. I guess perfection just follows Apple wherever they go. "Journalists" just follow right behind.

  3. The traditional response by dontbemad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems to be a typical sort of response from a media that tends to bias Apple products. I make no criticism of Apple with that remark, only those responsible for reviewing their products fairly. I get the feeling that a huge number of these reviewers, rather that being classical "tech lovers" if you will, are more prone to have a brand or ecosystem identity that drives their judgement about a given product or product family.

    This kind of trend is fairly common across all major phone manufacturers, across both iOS and Android, and also across Apple and Google themselves. It is why I rarely take a phone review seriously, be it for a phone that I actually am interested in or one that I'm not. Having information about specs and hardware is a good place to start when deciding between two pieces of technology, but past that, a huge amount of one's enjoyment of a device can come from external factors, such as previous brand investment, ecosystem size and saturation, and even things as "trivial" as what one's friends are using.

    I try not to be terribly upset when I see Apple product reviewers exhibiting these signs of bias, since a large number of Android (and perhaps even some windows phone?) reviewers do the same things. I read and watch these reviews as I would watch news about politics: with a boulder sized grain of salt. While some truth may be found somewhere in the reviewer's statements, they still can and do fall prey to human shortcomings that affects us all.

  4. Re:I'm pleasantly surprised. by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of those that changed their tune, they commented about trying to operate the larger device with one hand. Apple moved some things around to make easier. And, it's lighter and thinner than it's 2012 predecessors - a benefit of time and manufacturing processes. Machined metal vs plastic makes a difference as well in terms of how rigid the device is and how that feels in one's hands. Again, the benefit of time to review existing products and improved manufacturing processes.

    So, I didn't hear any particular fan-dom responses because of Apple vs Android. I heard that Apple's take on it was a little more refined. One would expect that over the course of two years. Samsung will do the same on their next iteration.

    Being said, I am a big guy (6' 1") with large hands. The 6+ still feels awkward to me. If I opt for one of the newer models, I would, likely, go with the straight 6 over the 6+. But, I am not due for an upgrade for another year. I can wait.

    Of the best new features I would like to see? Improved battery life.

  5. Meh, anything Apple does is considered "cool". by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before switching to x86: x86 sucks ass! PowerPC all the way!

    After switching to x86: x86 is awesome! Glad we don't have PowerPC anymore!

  6. Re:In fairness ... by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've got a Note 3, and I frequently hold it up to my head to talk on it. I also gave up caring about what people think of based on what technology I use a couple of decades ago.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  7. Re:Different things for different people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's news to Apple

  8. Re:Very sad by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things?

    I've never been convinced it's well defined.

    It sometimes seems to carry some form of ironic post-modern cynicism, and some fashion sense which is either very modern or 70s/80s style in an ironic manner.

    In other cases it seems to be "people who like new things".

    Either way, I'm closer to the sore hip age than the hipster age, and they (fortunately) don't make skinny jeans for me. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Re:Very sad by tangent3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The rest of the world is not obliged to share your opinion, no matter how highly you think of yourself.

    I, too, do not see myself using a large phone. However these large phones are hugely popular, as can be seen by their sales figures and several of my colleagues, even small sized females, happily using these phones. I respect their choice and I applaud Android for allowing manufacturers to give customers a choice of picking a phone they like instead of dictating the customer's choice to them and insulting potential customers that choose differently.

  10. Re:Very sad by tobiasly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait, I thought hipsters were the guys who liked the new things? Like if you had an iPad and an iPhone you were a hipster, but if you had an old Android and a Lenovo laptop you were a legitimate human being.

    It depends on whether a critical mass of the general population also likes said new thing. When they were the ones waiting in line all night at the Apple store, it was all good. Now that the same lines are filled with people sleeping in trash bags to immediately flip them to China's gray market, not so much.

  11. The REAL problem is NO small flagships by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that Apple has joined the phablet bandwagon, we have another problem: manufacturers are only offering their premium devices in phablet, or near-phablet, sizes. Want the "smaller" iphone? Sure, but you have to give up camera features. Most of the Android phones are in a similar boat - you can get a 4-4.5" screen phone, but you'll give up memory, or speed, or camera functionality, LTE, or any of a number of other features. Smaller screens mean lower price points and cutting corners.

    Wouldn't it be nice it you really could choose a 3.5-4" screen phone that did everything else the larger models did?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?