Slashdot Mirror


Why India's Mars Probe Was So Cheap

schwit1 (797399) writes "Alan Boyle has some interesting thoughts on why it cost India so little, less than the budget of the movie Gravity, to build and send its probe Mangalyaan to Mars: 'The $74 million Mars Orbiter Mission, also known by the acronym MOM or the Hindi word Mangalyaan ("Mars-Craft"), didn't just cost less than the $100 million Hollywood blockbuster starring Sandra Bullock. The price tag is a mere one-ninth of the cost of NASA's $671 million Maven mission, which also put its spacecraft into Mars orbit this week. The differential definitely hints at a new paradigm for space exploration — one that's taking hold not only in Bangalore, but around the world. At the same time, it hints at the dramatically different objectives for MOM and Maven, and the dramatically different environments in which those missions took shape.' Read it all. It gives us a hint at the future of space exploration.

6 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. They outsourced their engineering to India by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Honestly, is there no lever the Indian government won't sink to to save money?

  2. Re:Way to compare apples to light bulbs by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    To say NASA needs to only use the $5000 car isn't in our long term interest.

    I couldn't agree more. Using a $5000 car would make NASA nearly irrelevant as a space agency.

  3. Re:to sum it up: by Scottingham · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had no idea what besan or jackfruit were... I will now stop comparing the two.

  4. Re: No US Contractors by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    India is well known for its lack of corruption.

  5. US Government by bradgoodman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you implying that the US Government overpays, spending money and managing projects in a wasteful or inefficient manner? I say good day to you sir!

  6. movies vs space by Ragica · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's disturbing all these comparisons between the budget of Hollywood movies and a space program. It's ridiculous... the space program may aim to eventually travel to the stars, but Hollywood movies are MADE FROM stars. Imagine if space programs had to build orbiters and probes out of actual stars... now you get the picture. The precious resource that Hollywood movies are made from far outshines any glorified firework.

    To look at it yet another way, Gravity took US ALL into space, in a way that probably felt more real to us than if we had actually gone into boring old space. Whereas the Indian mars orbiter didn't take anyone, not even Matt Daemon. It might send back a few snapshots and data hardly anyone will be interested in. We won't even get a T-Shirt out of it. There is no comparison.