FAA Clears Movie and TV Drones For Takeoff
alphadogg (971356) writes "The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration is taking its first major step toward opening up the skies for commercial drone use, allowing six TV and movie production companies to use drones to shoot video. Commercial flight of drones has been effectively banned by the FAA as it grapples with how to integrate drone traffic into controlled airspace while not compromising the safety of existing air traffic. But as the months have passed, it has come under increasing pressure from U.S. companies to make a ruling."
Oh, I get it. They finally made a centralized policy for drone use.
Individual - OH HELL NO!
Commercial - How much lobbying money do you have?
After all, TV shows are way more important than structural evaluations, aerial photography for site planning, roof inspections, and the myriad other commercial applications that are actually useful and safer than the way we currently do it. Sigh.
So, the left leaning (Hollywood production) companies get a benefit from the executive branch that other companies do not.
www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights
www.fairtax.org
After all, TV shows are way more important than structural evaluations, aerial photography for site planning, roof inspections, and the myriad other commercial applications that are actually useful and safer than the way we currently do it. Sigh.
Not to mention they grounded search & rescue drones. http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
It's obvious it's all about the money, not about anything else.
Be seeing you...
Indeed. Crop inspection drones are my favorite poster child for this. If a corn farmer in Iowa wants to fly a drone at 50 feet above his own farm consisting of 1200 contiguous acres of crops, I don't see how that in any way could be dangerous to anyone or anything. But the movie companies have lots of money to spend on lobbying and political donations.