Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Co-opts Ice Bucket Challenge Idea To Promote Coding In Latin America

theodp writes: Microsoft is aiming to offer free programming courses to over a million young Latin Americans through its Yo Puedo Programar and Eu Posso Programar initiatives ("I Can Program"). People between the ages of 12 and 25 will be able to sign up for the free online courses "One Hour Coding" and "Learning to Program," which will be offered in conjunction with Colombia's Coding Week (Oct. 6-10). The online courses will also be available in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Puerto Rico. "One Hour Coding" (aka Hour of Code in the U.S.) is a short introductory course in which participants will learn how the technology works and how to create applications, and it offers "a playful immersion in the computer sciences," Microsoft said in a statement. In the virtual, 12-session "Learning to Program" course, students will discover that "technical complexity in application development tools is a myth and that everyone can do it," the statement added. Taking a page from the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge its execs embraced, Microsoft is encouraging students to complete the Hour of Code and challenge four other friends to do the same (Google Translate).

96 comments

  1. Intention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's greed, right? I assume the goal isn't to help out people, but to flood the labor pool in order to benefit their company.

    1. Re:Intention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what? They still create jobs.

    2. Re:Intention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they're creating cheap employees.

    3. Re:Intention? by gnupun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly, so if we changed the school curriculum to teach business courses (including sales and marketing) at an early age, there would be competition to companies like microsoft. This would lead to more businesses being created. With more businesses around, there would be intense competition for qualified or even average workers and employee wages would have to rise.

      Right now, business is taught at a very late age to students -- near or above the age of 20 and is often prohibitively expensive. In other words, most people are taught to be employees. People with an aptitude for business should be taught early in the same way math is taught at an early age.

    4. Re:Intention? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Erh... no. The supply side never created jobs. Never has, never will. A job is created if, and only if, there is someone willing and able to pay for the goods and/or services that job creates. Nobody ever hired anyone unless he could either resell that person's work or he was forced due to regulations or circumstances.

      Don't buy the myth that employers create jobs If anything, it's in their interest to eliminate them. Them hiring is only a result of them being forced to do so.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Intention? by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      That's completely correct. Only people without money create jobs. The homeless person down by the river employs 4 people now. My single mother neighbor who has been accepting government assistance since her ten year old boy was born employs 2 full time employees which is ip from one before the recession hit.

      Now back to reality land. A job is created if enough funds are availible to compensate a person for the amount of value they add to an employer's product, service, or wealth. The ability to resell is not completely linked to this else there would be fewer grounds keepers, home health workers, maids, and so on. What makes a job is the the capital resources being availible to fullfil a want or need and that simply does not happen without excess money from somewhere. Employers create jobs more than non employers because they have the resources and the majority of framework involved already in place and are in a better position to capitalize on opertunity. You seem to confuse oppertunity with job creation. You should not do that because in a lot of situations, it is the ability to exploit that oppertunity not the fact that it exists.

    6. Re:Intention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Mr. Troll if you want to help out you can try Ron Jeremy's cum bucket challenge.

  2. Ditch diggers and codemonkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The one percent will always need them.

  3. 1 hour experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait 'til you shows up for an interview at Microsoft headquarters claiming to a programmer with "one hour of experience" and get laughed out of the office.

    1. Re:1 hour experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The web coder with one hour of experience in the latest flavor-of-the-month framework will get the job. The web coder with one hour of experience will laugh all the way to the bank, while programmers with twenty years of experience will end up volunteering at their local churches and living in poverty.

    2. Re:1 hour experience by allo · · Score: 2

      They guess, you will continue to learn after this hour, because you want to extend your program to do more cool stuff.

    3. Re:1 hour experience by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      The web coder with one hour of experience in the latest flavor-of-the-month framework will get the job.

      Especially if that framework has only existed for 15 minutes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. no Americans need apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nope, no programming jobs for American programmers. America is only for MBAs and bureaucrats. Programmers are elsewhere. Americans who don't want to be team players in the farcical football game that is the American "workplace" must necessarily be homeless and destitute, because there are no real jobs in America, none at all. Real work is done in the Overseas, not in America, because America is the land of the worthless.

    1. Re:no Americans need apply by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I didn't know that programming was something that only Americans were allowed to do. We'll just keep it a secret, then.

    2. Re:no Americans need apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and I'm sorry. I'm sure an American company known for abusing the H1-B visa program really has pure intentions when trying to raise a generation of coders in a third-world country, rather than promoting such educational programs in their own country of residence.

    3. Re:no Americans need apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must have really poor programming skills to be this insecure.

    4. Re:no Americans need apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just asking for russians analize your mom, to hell with EU and Fuck the EU...

    5. Re:no Americans need apply by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Nope, no programming jobs for American programmers. America is only for MBAs and bureaucrats. Programmers are elsewhere. Americans who don't want to be team players in the farcical football game that is the American "workplace" must necessarily be homeless and destitute, because there are no real jobs in America, none at all. Real work is done in the Overseas, not in America, because America is the land of the worthless.

      Last I looked at the map, Brazil was part of America.

  5. From your bedroom to your computer... by MindPrison · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...Microsoft wants Latin America to become the new India.

    You know, Rosalita from the Goonies (the 85s Steven Spielberg movie)? Everyone used to have a Latino maid, worker, dishwasher, grease-monkey doing all the hard work you don't want to. And then all the good jobs was outsourced to brainy India who had both the means and poverty to make it happen. Today most programmers come from India.

    Microsofts idea is nothing but pure genious. Remember the issues America have with skilled immigration these days? This could change it all.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:From your bedroom to your computer... by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Keep pursuing the cheapest labour and pretty soon you will have no one to sell your code to, as no one will be afford to buy the devices to put the code on. It's all about balanced economies, not the greatest possible exploitation, not unlimited growth, not the highest possible productivity which in reality implies the cheapest possible labour (when will you guys and gals wake up to that one, what did you really think all that spin about increasing productivity really meant).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. Anything for a FP Microsoft Story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You failed to approve submissions RE: Robin Williams death yet you push this shit?

    1. Re:Anything for a FP Microsoft Story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed to approve submissions RE: Robin Williams death yet you push this shit?

      Look: this site is about news for nerds, stuff that matters. This present topic IS news for nerds. Robin Williams' death was covered by every other news outlet in the western world, and did not need to be covered here because it had no damn tech aspect to it.

      Well, that is unless you are trying to warn your fellow geeks of the dangers of autoerotic asphyxiation. Maybe some sort of iChokeWarning app or something.

    2. Re:Anything for a FP Microsoft Story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clothed doesn't imply much. An otherwise naked man wearing socks is still clothed. But those Hollywood types make their piles of money by selling crap to idiots who are easily fooled by one little word like clothed.

    3. Re:Anything for a FP Microsoft Story! by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Or he really was clothed and they made a point of mentioning he was clothed because there are people who will infer autoerotic asphyxiation regardless of the facts.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    4. Re:Anything for a FP Microsoft Story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Everybody does not need to program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And judging by the problems many people have with word problems, not everybody has the analytical aptitude for even simple programs. By the way, how's that H1B visa trouble going, Microsoft?

    1. Re:Everybody does not need to program by koan · · Score: 1

      ^^^

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  8. Complexity by jones_supa · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the virtual, 12-session "Learning to Program" course, students will discover that "technical complexity in application development tools is a myth and that everyone can do it," the statement added.

    Well, I guess that avoids scaring the beginners away. But really, modern programming is often about managing hugely complex codebases with hundreds of thousands of lines of code. It's not the end of the world, and all that can be managed, but beyond writing some just-add-water toy apps, the technical complexity certainly is there.

    1. Re:Complexity by Seumas · · Score: 2

      "Everyone can do it". Therefore, you're worthless. We'll give you an instruction pamphlet on signing up for food stamps when you are hired, though!

    2. Re:Complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the virtual, 12-session "Learning to Program" course, students will discover that "technical complexity in application development tools is a myth and that everyone can do it," the statement added.

      Well, I guess that avoids scaring the beginners away. But really, modern programming is often about managing hugely complex codebases with hundreds of thousands of lines of code. It's not the end of the world, and all that can be managed, but beyond writing some just-add-water toy apps, the technical complexity certainly is there.

      My experience with people assigned to a task which requires some level of programming and the person has little to no experience much less aptitude has been unsurprisingly negative. But these people tend to be very adept at office politics so they get protected by management while anyone competent either develops severe mental illness or escapes from the "team" as quickly as possible. Why do corporate executives think programming is trivial?

    3. Re:Complexity by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Everyone can code in the same way that everyone can play soccer or bowling. Only a small number of people will be genuinely incapable of it, most people can master the basics, but it takes skill and perseverance to become good enough to make a living doing it, and only a handful make it to the top.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Complexity by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      A journey of a 1000 miles begins with one step.

      Everybody starts programming with toy apps, like Hello World.

      Yes, complexity exists. But you start by showing people it's not magic and incomprehensible, and then go from there.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Complexity by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      They do not think progrsmming is trivial. They think that as long as the magic smoke doesn't escape, the computer can do anything if the right incantations are being used.

      Seriously, a lot of them simply have no idea that it involes much more that downloading something or putting a disk in the coffe cup holder and click the right buttons in the right order. And when you do your job programming correctly, it is all they functionally need to know. It is a catch 22 i guess.

  9. It seems by koan · · Score: 2

    All tech giants really want is cheap labor, making tech giants a threat.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  10. Ice Bucket Challenge....? by Seumas · · Score: 1

    That's... not how the ice bucket challenged worked. The challenge was to EITHER pay $100 to a charity OR perform an action. So this is taking a page out of the ice bucket challenge . . . in . . . absolutely no ways whatsoever.

    1. Re:Ice Bucket Challenge....? by Barny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is more like a chain letter, but in reverse.

      It should be: "Get 4 other people to sign up OR Microsoft will teach you how to code"

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  11. What does this have to do with the ice bucket? by Tyr07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This makes absolutely no sense.

    This is Microsoft to offer free online courses in latin America.

    Not, you have to take this programming course or dump water on yourself or something.

    i'm super torn on this. I love that people are getting access to education that they don't usually get, but at the same time I feel that's just so later they can go 'Well, America doesn't have the skills we need, so we need cheap visa workers to work in this field.'

    1. Re:What does this have to do with the ice bucket? by allo · · Score: 1

      Why is op modded Troll?

    2. Re:What does this have to do with the ice bucket? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      What does this have to do with the ice bucket

      The ice bucket challenge was a ploy to secure funding. This is also a ploy to secure funding.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:What does this have to do with the ice bucket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so good, start your own company and compete against Microsoft in the marketplace. Then you can hire the workers you want.

    4. Re:What does this have to do with the ice bucket? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Yep.. but i don't think it is about jobs like most seem to jump to. I think it is about trying to tie future employment to MS products to avoid these countries from gravitating to cheaper opensource platforms and thereby making MS somewhat irrelevant in those markets. Right now, the biggest driver of MS products in those areas is compatability with US and other prefominate MS businesses. But as anymosity grows against the NSA and other spy agencies and the governments behind them along with the interoperability of web platforms that can change. So by locking a future generation into MS frameworks, they are securing future demand in these markets.

  12. Less Ice Bucket Challenge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More 'Chain Letter' spam.

  13. Re:Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Companies have a big incentive to train all the foreigners how to program at an early age, then have them take American jobs for pennies on the dollar when they're old. Save your money, programming is going to make peanuts in the near future.

    SFTU, n00b. In 2003, when I was getting out of college, offshoring to India was all the rage. It looked like the apocalypse for software devs in the US.

    A decade later, yep, were walking around in a bombed out career wasteland with no jobs to be found, dreaming of what it would be like if there were large companies trying to hire the best devs and offering huge salaries and perks for that privilege. Oh wait. No, we aren't. Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, et al, all do that. FFS, WhatsApp just got bought for eleventy billion dollars. It's probably the best time to be in software development, ever.

    Don't begrudge these kids sharing the joy of learning to code. What kind of small-minded person are you that would keep a child from the same kind of education that brought you so much fulfillment? Do you really live your life in fear that someone is going to take your job? Maybe you should take all that energy you are wasting on fearing others and trying to keep them down and put it into bettering yourself.

  14. Screw M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have fun with that when the self driving trucks hit the road in ~5 years. Maybe a Latin American will be programming them by then.

  15. Re: Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap you are a moron.

  16. Shut down this Anti-American company by MarcosYXY · · Score: 1

    Ice bucket? Rather bucket of proceeding against this Anti-American company. They plainly hate USA and and American workers.
    This company should be dissolved already. One day they cry about not being able to find people to fulfill jobs opening and next day lobbying for increase in H1B visas.

    We should identify companies like this and asked to move to India, China or Korea. If you hate America there is no place here for you.

    1. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. With their current management, they'll "downsize" themselves into oblivion soon enough.

    2. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this looks a lot like some plot hatched by Gates to throw American computer programmers out on the street so that they can be replaced with third world labor. I think there is more than a profit motive here, Gates and other globalists have a hatred of Americans and of America. These people have spent far too much time conversing with others in the upper crust elite classes, that view America and its constitution and American citizens with contempt due to the fact that they believe in individual liberty, which of course means limits to the power of the elites. They are obviously trying to get revenge against americans by setting up a system of discrimination against Americans. Some of these also believe that Americans "have had it to good" and need to be made to suffer, hence the full on assault against the American middle class. There are many layers to what is happening, though ultimately it is about power and the desire of this upper crust to obtain absolute power by consolidating political and economic power. Third world labor fits into that since they are easily exploitable for their third world wages which allow elites to acquire even greater and more vast sums of money for themselves, at the same time eliminating the American middle class. They obviously despise the middle class because here you have persons who still have an interest in what is best for commoners, but have some extra money that they could possibly pool with other middle class people to actually do something to defend themselves, if they ever got their act together. The elites would rather have entirely supordinate populations which are kept nearly on the brink of starvation and so have no extra spending money, and thus much less of a capability to, at least non-violently, fund, say campaign efforts.

      Those such as gates have a God complex and want to amass ever greater amounts of power to themselves. Once they get a taste of power and wealth, they become intoxicated with it, obsessed with maintaining it, and become psycopaths in their efforts to maintain it. Power corrupts. Either they do it as they consider themselves superior to the rest of the population intellectually, therefore, only they are fit to rule, or, they are entirely concerned with maintaining their own power and wealth and want to eliminate any and all opposition to that, or a combination of both. They view mexicans as being a low intellect, easily controlled, cheap source of labor which can be kept near the edge of poverty and thus easily enslaved.

      I am not the first to mention that the elites seem to have a contempt for European White America and have long wanted to do in the White Middle Class in the US. Mass immigration adn offshoring are ultimately rooted in a contempt and hatred of White people and seem designed and calculated to eliminate the countries white majority, rooted in a contempt for it. it also appears that the white birth rates have been intentionally suppressed through social engineering and engineered economic pressures, such as feminism, and saddling middle class families with ever expanding piles of college debt, and even social security which has been suspected as contributing to the low birth rates by reducing incentives to have children by replacing the traditional role of children in old age support of parents, which creates an incentive for people to have more children. White Americans should be insulted and outraged as this country was primarily built into what it is by this group. Millions of white Americans have died to defend the country. And now,, they are being thrown away like rubbish by the evil elites that run the country, because the elites view them with contempt, and as well the country itself with contempt. The elites want to establish a totalitarian regime in the USA and want to eliminate White America, especially conservative Republicans, which presents the most significant challenge to that. So is there a contempt and hatred of white americans which has reached genocidal proportions? You bet there is. Have the elites

    3. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can all you Tea Party losers who think "America owes me a job because I was born here" leave Slashdot and find some other site? This site is supposed to be for people who have talent and motivation.

      Christ, this is sickening.

    4. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      There is so much wrong with what you say, that every word coming from you is faulty. American computer programmers earned their qualifications upon their own merit. Most of them went to college and worked hard for many years, spending tens of thousands of dollars, for a hard earned college degrees in some of the most challenging academic courses. After they have spent, many tens of thousands, even in excess of a hundred grand, and many years of hard work on their college degree, with the promise that their hard work and effort would pay off, they have the rug pulled out on them by having the jobs they were promised stolen and given to a far less qualified foreigner who went to some third world degree mill college that can't hold a candle to the American college degree, and investing only 10% on their third world education that an American spent on their first world education.

      Secondly, you cannot have a country without borders. Yes, a primary qualification for a job in a country must be that you are a natural born with inherited citizenship. The US and its government exists for one purpose, to defend the interests of Americans, to secure its borders for its own people, and to defend its resources and jobs for the benefit of Americans. Indians et al already have their own country with its own government. You wouldnt expect the government of India to be interested in giving Indian jobs to American citizens. Its totally unreasonable and absurd, likewise, for the American government to be interested in giving American jobs for Indians, in fact to do so would be an act of treason and a violation of the primary responsibility of a government to defend the soveriegnty of the territory for its own people. The government of a country exists to serve the interests of its own citizens who were born in that country. Period. Full Stop. End of Story. If people of say India, want a job they need to work to fix their own countries problems and have every right to demand a government in India that works to secure that for them. It the same for Americans, Americans must demand that the government of their country serve the interest of American citizens and defend the sovereignty of the country from foreign incursions. The paramount purpose of a government of a country is serve its own people to defend the borders and that this is an essential thing that gives it legitimacy, and it is a severe violation of those responsibilities to aid and abet foreign incursions.

    5. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After they have spent, many tens of thousands, even in excess of a hundred grand, and many years of hard work on their college degree, with the promise that their hard work and effort would pay off, they have the rug pulled out on them by having the jobs they were promised stolen and given to a far less qualified foreigner who went to some third world degree mill college that can't hold a candle to the American college degree,

      I'm sorry if someone told you that you'd be set for life if you obtained a college degree at a reputable American college, because they were wrong. They'll always be wrong if they tell you something like that. The world changes quickly and has since the Industrial Revolution got underway in earnest about 200 years ago. Read up on the history of the Industrial Revolution, or go visit some of the museums in cities that had lots of textile mills, and you'll see that this happens in industry after industry. But it's not like nobody could get a job after the plant closed... the more adaptable ones quickly shifted to another line of work where they could make use of their practical knowledge of mechanics, machine tools, etc. Sometimes they had to move to a different part of the country.

      Businessmen are interested in making money for themselves and their shareholders. Some of them are nicer about it than others, might keep some trusted employees around a couple extra years after the cost/benefit falls out of their favor, but basically they're going to shift work to someplace else, or close out product lines, so they can stay in business *and* maintain a competitive edge.

      Everyone wishes the IT job market was like what it was from 1995-2000. I do too, but that wasn't normal. If you were old enough to be in the job market at the time, I hope you enjoyed it. That's maybe what IT workers in India have enjoyed over the last decade, but it will end for them too, if it hasn't already.

    6. Re:Shut down this Anti-American company by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I dont know how many times this must be repeated. The US and its resources belongs exclusively to the people of the country. The United States is the native born American people. The government is merely constituted for the purpose of defending their territorial domain from foreign incursions and serving the exclusive interests of the citizens. Are the citizens of any country the sole ones with exclusive right to employment within it? Yes. That is an essential part of very definition of what a country, citizenship and borders is. The only reason that Americans cannot find work is because of the traitorous actions of the US government that knowingly helped Indians steal their jobs. This didnt just happen. It was a result of intentional policies. Policies which were commited knowing that they would destroy the jobs and lives of American citizens. This is an act of treason. If you support this it can only be contempt of American workers.

      All H1B visas are about is rich people getting richer by paying workers less so they can grab more of the profits for themselves. The cost of this is the ruined lives of American citzens whose jobs have been stolen.

      We HAVE EVERY RIGHT to demand and expect that our government expel all H1B visa holders and seal the borders NOW and that is the only thing that can legitimize our government. If they refuse they have commited an act of severe neglect and delinquency, if not treason. Our government OWES this to US as the government is created for this purpose, its really the main and foremost reason it exists which is why in the Constitution defense is most prominently mentioned. The American people should demand that the Johnson Reed Act of 1924 be reconstituted along with the Naturalization Act of 1790 which would put back the restrictive immigration policies we had in the 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s.

  17. ?Puedo programar con Visual Studio RT? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dang it Slashdot, the Spanish opening question mark is not an RTL override!

    I think the problem is that Microsoft is known for selling computing devices that use technical measures to prevent their users from programming them. Can this Yo Puedo Programar course be completed on a Surface RT tablet? If not for entering code, then what's that keyboard for? How about on a Nokisoft phone with an HDMI monitor and a Bluetooth keyboard?

  18. Re:Screw M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Self-driving trucks? Only to move items between the rail terminal and the drone delivery center.

  19. Re:Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't begrudge these kids sharing the joy of learning to code. What kind of small-minded person are you that would keep a child from the same kind of education that brought you so much fulfilment (sic)?

    Most of us are self-taught and maybe we went to college or university at some point to obtain that piece of paper every human resources drone demands. Nobody needed to spoon-feed us. We were/are curious about computers and we learned to control them via writing computer programmes.

  20. trying to buy ipad and Makerbot in 1980? by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Erh... no. The supply side never created jobs. Never has, never will. A job is created if, and only if, there is someone willing and able to pay for the goods and/or services that job creates.

    Yeah I remember back in 1980 we were all going into the stores trying to buy ipads and 3D printers. After we consumers did the R&Dand speced out exactly what kind of iPad we wanted to buy, Apple ordered some from China and started selling them.

    Wait, maybe I'm remembering wrong. Maybe a bunch of companies hired a bunch of engineers, programmers, and product designers to come up with a variety of different computing devices, hoping that they'd come up with something people wanted to buy. Maybe people did not buy the first few tablet models, so for the first 15 years those companies were losing money trying. Maybe Maybe eventually one company, Apple, developed a version people would buy.

    I don't remember for sure, which of those two scenarios actually happened?

    1. Re:trying to buy ipad and Makerbot in 1980? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neither of those scenarios happened, so you are remembering wrong.

      Pad-like devices showed up in science fiction first. Some of the most visible examples are Star Trek (1966), 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1978). Millions and millions of people were introduced to the concept of handheld computing devices through fiction and lots of those people wanted one.

      One of those people was Alan Kay, who was a PhD candidate at the time. He developed the idea more fully into something he called a Dynabook in 1978, long before any company had even thought about anything of the sort.

      Science fiction authors gave us the idea and it was so appealing that people wanted it to exist. Companies eventually recognized the demand for those devices and worked toward creating them, but they didn't create the idea or the demand.

    2. Re:trying to buy ipad and Makerbot in 1980? by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Science fiction authors also gave us plenty of ideas we wouldn't want, not to mention technologies that are laughable (steam-powered dirigibles to commute to work?). They don't have a monopoly on ideas, nor do they consistently come up with ideas before everyone else. They are simply a popular conduit through which ideas flow.

  21. INTNENT is slave labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google canada, temporary foreign worker program....

    think hard

  22. Re: Intention? ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who wants to ride our dead horsey? Anyone? .. It's the same as indebted servitude for wizard clicking monkeys. This hour of code is considered an advanced degree in their countries, now they'll get sponsored H1 visas.. How come MS won't sponsor these programs in U.S. Or for anyone over 25? That's discrimination.
            Now that the profits are going out of the country, MS needs to recruit outside of the country and keep the loyalty to the monopoly because the programmers and consumers in the US have figured it out and are not buying the FUD anymore.

  23. Re: Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll still be able to get a job, it just won't pay what it used to.?

    No. You won't be able to get a job unless your skin is brown enough. It won't matter that you're actually willing to work for lower wages. If you're white, assumptions will be made.

  24. Re: Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree! I was looking for the Like button :-)

  25. Not the ice bucket challenge again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just yesterday I was thinking how refreshing it was that for the past couple weeks I did not come across any story, headline, or comment about that stupid ice bucket challenge.

    1. Re:Not the ice bucket challenge again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still works though. The "stupid ice bucket challenge" brought the Finnish Association of Muscle Disease an annual €44,000 funding in donations when the typical amount is some thousands per year.[1]

  26. Good analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developing desktop applications for Windows 3.1 with Kraig Brockschmidt's "Inside OLE" as the tutorial was a lot like having a bucket of ice water dumped on your head

  27. conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I notice you conveniently left Xerox out of the Dynabook story. The project originally called "the interim Dynabook" was renamed the Alto. Xerox had done the R&D to develop Kay's idea into a working machine. Around this time, Xerox owned part of Apple, so they invited Steve Jobs and other Apple people to Xerox Parc, where they had a look at the Alto (Dynabook) development version. The Apple folks really liked the GUI idea, so they worked and worked to transform it into something that could work in the real world, made of materials that actually existed. And that's how we got the desktop GUI.

    Kay had a wish "I wish for a kid's toy that's tablet sized, with a battery that lasts forever". Xerox and Apple started with the wish and developed something doable - and completely different from Kay's original vision. Kay jad wished for a children's device, Apple and Xerox created the desktop computer GUI for adults, something nobody had asked for.

    1. Re:conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by jpellino · · Score: 1

      Kay wished for a culture of symmetrical consumption and creation and a UI that anyone could use. He was smart enough to know that you better start with kids or it will never happen. Alto owes at least as much to NLS as to Dynabook.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    2. Re:conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      I didn't conveniently leave anything out. I highlighted the introduction of the idea and the demand from people that existed before any company (including PARC) started developing the idea into an actual product.

      The Dynabook concept was introduced two years before PARC was created, so it's a bit ridiculous to suggest that they created the idea.

    3. Re:conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Leaving out Xerox seems to be pretty common, and not just with tablets. Xerox was one of the first companies with a commercial "windowing" graphical interface too.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by retchdog · · Score: 1

      oh, don't bother. you can't resolve every stupid nitpick people bring up, and even if you did no one will bother reading past the "+5, Insightful" nitpick anyway.

      fuck this place.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:conveniently leave out Xerox, Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Xerox outsourced a lot of its engineering to HCL thus fulfilling it's desire to become a me-too (benchmark) purveyor of commodity printing, copying and document management "technologies."

  28. Fuck by pooh666 · · Score: 1

    the Bucket

  29. Personal profit == funding? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    The amount of funds that actually goes to ALS research from the Ice Bucket challenge is a very low percentage, while the people in charge of the charity are paying themselves well over living wages on the same charity dime. If you research various charities you will find that this is not a unique practice. I personally am very careful where my donations go, and would not donate to this one. This "charity" claims that 72.4% of the donations for "program expenses" which includes salaries. Here is a source in case you are interested, which shows that out of 24 million in donations they claim 21 million in "expenses" leaving a whopping 3 million for actual donation. Sadly this gets them a 4 star rating, because many charities only donate a fraction of a percent and yet can still be tax exempt "charities".

    Microsoft could easily be using this for a similar objective. Obviously these programs entitle them to a tax write off, but longer term leads to reduced developer pay so increased profits. India and China have been increasing in costs, and are not that far from the US in costs for developers today. Obviously this is also used for public relations (propaganda).

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Personal profit == funding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the 73 percent of the donations that go to program services do not include administrative expenses (including the CEO's salary), nor fundraising expenses. Those fall under different expense categories.

      I'm not saying they couldn't be doing more, but basically your comment is off mark

  30. Ageism by markus.neifer · · Score: 1

    So they are looking for young people only? But why?

  31. C# in 1 Hour! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Ballmer's gone, the boys can play.

  32. Who will pay off 1 trillion $ in student loans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our parents and students spent hundreds of thousands to pay for college. What do we get in return? Congress approved, H1B state educated (free) foreign workers.
    What do they care in Washington. Once USA is over they will put their butts in jets and fly to second homes in some remote country.

  33. Re:Screw M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will longer than five years for that on a macro scale!

  34. Type Microsoft...always late to the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ......this was so 3 months ago....

  35. It could hardly be more nakedly transparent. "These skills are expensive among our people, so third worlders please line up to train for your sweatshop jobs. At least a few of you will have aptitude, if we screen enough of you. We will pay you comparatively nothing so we can make more buckets of money, and you will like it because it's still more than you get now."

    And now, I fully expect to be tarred and feathered, for how awful and insensitive I am for merely noticing that the tech companies are doing this.

    1. Re:Wow by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. But it's akin to a pub/saloon/nightclub having a 'beer pong' game or some other drinking game set up. You 'have fun' and they sell booze.

      Nothing wrong with that if you want to drink like a fish. Likewise, if the Central Americans want to learn to program, sign up ...

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  36. Re:Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, FFS, you mean to tell me you never read a tutorial or stackexchange? I'm guessing you look down your nose at people who did a massive online courseware course, too.

    We are talking about a brief intro for kids, and you have a problem with that because you think those kids will eventually outcompete you?

    Fuck you, you small minded twat.

    I was autodidactic for years before college too, but even I read some fucking books and so forth. You act like these Latin American kids are getting some unfair advantage. Really? Really?!

    Fuck you again.

  37. Re: Welp, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap, I was making well over 100k/yr within 3 years of graduating in 2003, despite the bleak outlook.

    Maybe the problem is you, not these scary brown-colored kids learning to program. I hate your kind for trying to keep children from learning just so you can try to protect your marginal employability. That's pretty evil of you.

    FFS, improve yourself and your skillset. Be less of a codemonkey cog and more of a valuable asset a company would be sad to lose. Then leverage that to your advantage.

  38. how's this for co-opting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, that's what I call co-opting an ice bucket challenge
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF4trMQuZbk

  39. technical complexity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "technical complexity in application development tools is a myth ... everyone can do it"

    Well, maybe anyone can code like Microsoft... but that's not really something to aspire to

  40. Re:Welp, we're screwed by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Oh, FFS, you mean to tell me you never read a tutorial or stackexchange?

    Those things were not available to me in 1986, when I wrote my first game. The computer came with a reference for BASIC. I read it. I started programming. I went to the library to get more information. I programmed some more. I got my hands on the computer reference. I programmed some more. I don't ever recal reading something called a "tutorial", but I do remember reading a lot of other peoples code published in magazines.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  41. ALS foundation invented the chain letter? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    The one-year view of world history seems to those of us older than about twelve to be somewhat short-sighted.