Slashdot Mirror


Nixie Wearable Drone Camera Flies Off Your Wrist

MojoKid writes Over the past couple of years, drones have become popular enough to the point where a new release doesn't excite most people. But Nixie is different. It's a drone that you wear, like a bracelet. Whenever you need to let it soar, you give it a command to unwrap, power it up, and let it go. From the consumer standpoint, the most popular use for drones is to capture some amazing footage. But what if you want to be in that footage? That's where Nixie comes in. After "setting your camera free", the drone soars around you, keeping you in its frame. Nixie is powered by Intel's Edison kit, which is both small enough and affordable enough to fit inside such a small device.

63 comments

  1. The future... by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The future is now. And it's freaking cool, man.

    Oh, I'm sure some nay-sayers will be like "but who really needs this?"

    To which I say "need? Who cares about need?"

    1. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, for some values of "now" that don't include any indication that the product actually exists beyond crude and only semi-functional one-off prototyptes...

    2. Re:The future... by matfud · · Score: 1

      Where is my propeller driven beanie hat with a camera. Now that would be useful.
      http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like...

    3. Re:The future... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      I don't need this, but I do need an automated fly swatter that is programmed to recognize and destroy annoying miniature drones.

    4. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sure some nay-sayers will be like "but who really needs this?"

      To which I say "need? Who cares about need?"

      Abraham Maslow, that is who.

  2. One more for the toy collection.... by canatech · · Score: 1

    Might have to click a button further down the list on the Slashdot 'Toy Collection' Poll.

  3. I would use this almost never by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    A far away photo of myself? Tripod and camera. I would use this drone camera almost never

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:I would use this almost never by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lol.. then this isn't exactly designed with you in mind.

      The concept is that whenever, doing whatever, that you are doing, you can easily deploy this thing, it will follow you and then return ready to do it again. So it is not comparable to a tripod and a camera as you sometimes never know what you might come across when hiking, biking or whatever. Even in a city environment (I don't know about using around cops at they might shoot it or arrest you or something), there can be times when you want something documented. With this, you do not need to lug around a camera and tripod and hope all the action happens only have you set it up and is times perfectly with the timer on the camera. You simply think hmm.. This is interesting, I want video/pictures, undo a clasp, make a gesture with your hand, a few seconds later, you have them.

    2. Re:I would use this almost never by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The example video shows several hypothetical scenarios, and half could indeed be done by tripod. But the demo riding down an off-road trail with video trailing behind would be hard to capture even if you had a live cameraman.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:I would use this almost never by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mountain-bike, and a drone following would be pretty amazing. Helmet mounted cams generally produce poor video -- lots of vibration, and it doesn't really capture what you are doing at all, air, drops, gap jumps, the incline ... none of it is really discernible.

      Plus you can't see yourself or your bike.

      Best a normal person can hope for right now is to have a friend following reasonably closely filming you with their helmet cam. But its still full of vibration, and still isn't terribly compelling video.

      A drone camera might be a lot better.

    4. Re:I would use this almost never by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Except when you want to deploy it and get some pictures, it will already be broken. Imagine a tiny flying drone with little propellers strapped to your wrist while hiking through the woods and seriously tell me it won't get damaged by brush and branches that slap at you as you walk past. The working camera is always going to be more useful than the one that is broken when you need it.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    5. Re:I would use this almost never by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      (I don't know about using around cops at they might shoot it or arrest you or something)

      Worse than that, and possibly more likely, they would shoot YOU and arrest IT!

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  4. It's not real, it's just a rendering by MpVpRb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if an actual prototype has been built

    1. Re:It's not real, it's just a rendering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the videos in tfa does show a _very_ crude prototype (with only a small part of the suggested/promised functionality) and also an enormous (by "put it on your wrist" standards), seemingly non-foldable copter which was likely used for the videos. Most likely this is primarily a feeler looking for large investors, or potential employers. Anyone can come up with a nice concept (including countless Sci-Fi writers) it's delivering an actual, practical product, on schedule, within budget, and at sufficient scale that's the tricky part.

    2. Re:It's not real, it's just a rendering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's in the final round of a contest for seed money from Intel; thus, the title of the video, "Make It Wearable Finalists".

  5. That's beautiful. by Animats · · Score: 1

    That's a beautiful little project.

  6. Awesome Concept by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a freaking fantastic piece of tech -- but it really needs to be given a much larger budget and a better design team to make this something the masses would wear. But for a prototype, it's just fine. Hopefully someone with the design sense of Apple will buy them and take this to the next level. Other applications like a Personal Assistant or Scout would be great add-ons for usage as well.

    1. Re:Awesome Concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple? Come on. Who wants the iDrone that costs $749 unlocked or $359 with a 2 year lock in iMyMovie? And who wants to be told that they are flying it wrong when it turns out that the thing has a habit of "returning" to random strangers with similar hair? ("iDrone; fly it when you are alone only - otherwise you are flying it wrong").

    2. Re:Awesome Concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an initial prototype, competing for seed money in a contest from Intel; the video title expresses that, at least. :-)

    3. Re:Awesome Concept by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      He said design sense of Apple, not marketing department of Apple.

  7. It's sorta something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sorta something from a low-budget science fiction TV show..

  8. At the very least by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    I can see military uses for a tiny lightweight personal spotter like this.

    Otherwise, if it's cheap and it can track its 'owner' well enough it could be the next fad for YouTube clips.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  9. Only good on calm days by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Informative

    The trouble with little multi-rotors is that the slightest breeze sends them sailing. They're fun to fly indoors but not very useful outside.

    1. Re:Only good on calm days by koan · · Score: 2

      Depends on the size, something as small as a Blade 350QX can handle moderate wind quite well.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Only good on calm days by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 1

      Because it is 18" on a side and weighs nearly 2 pounds.

    3. Re:Only good on calm days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's what I call small.

    4. Re:Only good on calm days by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      You realize this thread is about something far smaller and lighter than a 350QX, right?

    5. Re:Only good on calm days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, exactly. I fly a not-so-tiny copter and winds faster than 3mph will cause it to move everywhere but where I want/need it. Something that fit on your wrist wouldn't need much wind at all to lose it. I don't see the reviews on this thing being very positive IF it ever gets released.

  10. Bummer by koan · · Score: 2

    I am heavily into multirotor construction and design, I also love FPV and routinely film with a gimbal and several types of cameras.
    So this disappoints me to see this offering, there are a lot of morons out there with their Phantoms causing problems.

    Past a certain size these things are flying lawn mowers and if you take a look at the number of youtube videos of people flying these over people and property it's disgusting.

    I'm certain my favorite thing in the World will be outlawed due to the number of idiots out there, and this "toy" makes it even more likely.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all it took was DJI making a package drone (the Phantom) that any moron could buy and fly briefly until they damage a prop or burn out a motor. The idiots buy Phantoms in droves and do thing with them that anger everyone. This toy would just accelerate that.

      I don't know any professional that bothers with DJI aside from the Naza controllers.

    2. Re:Bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whaaa whaaa whaaa. You sound like every other hobby nerd. Can we get a shout out from all of our laser and homemade rocketry dorks? Oh and god, the light pollution! How could I forget about that!

    3. Re:Bummer by Zenin · · Score: 1

      I get what you're saying, but this project isn't likely to cause a major issue like the Phantom has.

      What they are designing is going to need to be about the size of a Blade Nano QX. I've no idea how they plan to get all that technology in such a tiny quad, but assuming they do the "impact" of one of these hitting someone will be practically nothing. The micro/nano size quads just don't have the power, mass, or prop size do to significant harm (unless maybe, it actually hits you in the eye).

      --
      My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    4. Re:Bummer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the HAM operators complaining about wireless pollution...

  11. Re:Still Too Early by koan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where do I put my money?

    Back in your wallet, this thing is a joke.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  12. Nixie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nixies are already a thing, I'd appreciate it if you chose a different name.

    UNLESS said drone is equipped with Nixie tubes. That would be wonderful.

    1. Re:Nixie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apples and windows too...

    2. Re:Nixie by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Nixie tube != Nixie drone

      And nixie tubes suck, DMD all the way. :p

    3. Re:Nixie by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Well if they're going for the pixie motif, I'd go with the Wristie. It's a pixie that flies from your wrist. However, I am afraid to go check Urban Dictionary to see if Wristie is already taken :O

    4. Re:Nixie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder the battery life is so short--each tube draws a few milliamps at 170V. Actually, though, the nixie tube might be on the operator's wrist and not on the drone itself. Image here

  13. Re:Still Too Early by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Object recognition is hard, which is why they didn't mention it.
    Object tracking is not. It's done all the time. How do you think a Kinect works?

  14. Just what we all need by canadiannomad · · Score: 3, Informative

    More people taking selfies....

    --
    Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
  15. These guys must be Luddites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see where the 3D printer is in that video. Indeed, unless they release the files so I can 3D print one at home, they are cave dwelling Luddites.

    1. Re:These guys must be Luddites by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you could probably 3D print most of the body and rotors, then add the electronics, camera and motors. But those would probably be the most expensive parts, anyway.

      (And, yes, I do realize you were making a joke, but I'd imagine that someone out there with a 3D printer is already building their own version of such a device)

  16. Paging Bruce Sterling... by blincoln · · Score: 1

    The Artificial Kid's drone camera entourage has entered the building.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  17. No videos of it flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't any videos of it flying (there's shots of it taking off but there is no videos of it flying) while there are plenty of videos of other things flying. There's a reason for this: they can't get this design to fly reliably because the arms aren't rigid enough and never will be.

    Having an idea doesn't mean it'll work.

  18. Sure, this is doable by jtara · · Score: 1

    It's only a concept, but, sure, this is doable.

    You could probably do it with a Parrot ar.drone. In fact, I presume it's already been done.

    I won an ar.drone 2.0 in a hackathon. I have to be honest, and say that, really, I won an ar.drone 2.0 by wandering down to a hackathon in my hotel seeking pizza and aspirin, found them, and then stuck around for a while. I showed somebody which API call to make to save an image in the Rhodes mobile platform, and got a drone as a contributor to the "honorable mention" Motorola team entry. (The Motorola employees weren't eligible for a prize, and they had a LOT of drones to give away...)

    Anyway, I haven't played with it much yet. I was remarking to a friend how limited it is by the WiFi range, and they remarked that it would still be ideal for having the drone follow you around. The ar.drone seems to have everything it would need to do that.

    Of course, it won't fit on your wrist.

    The device in the video is a very similar configuration in smaller packaging.

    1. Re:Sure, this is doable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's only a concept, but, sure, this is doable.

      You could probably do it with a Parrot ar.drone. In fact, I presume it's already been done.

      Yes, but the Parrot drone has to sit on your shoulder, not your wrist.

  19. I can see this being useful for... by Guest316 · · Score: 2

    ...people who'd like to videograph themselves playing with their kids or pets. Holding a camera in front of your face gets in the way of that kind of spontaneity, and a stationary camera on a tripod wouldn't be much use for following action.

  20. Vaporware... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Sure... You can tell it's the future cause the vaporware now comes as vaporwear.

    From TFA:

    Absolutely no information about availabilty seems to be listed anywhere, but if you head on over to the official website (linked to below), you can add your email to the company's mailing list to keep up-to-date.

    And videos are just your run of the mill advertisement for imaginary products.
    Showing diddly-squat of actual operation or even wearing of the product, while showing instead obviously fake videos of them throwing the "prototype" off screen (which does not even clip on to the hand at this point) and "drone footage" which is too well focused and stabilized to be from a wrist-mountable drone camera, obviously NOT wrist-mountable drones flying around, 3D renderings, and not even a single 360-degree shot to prove it was done with at least a camera hanging off of a drone (or a movable crane).

    Oh... It's a part of a contest sponsored by Intel?
    With prizes of $50,000 to finalists (10) and a $500,000 grand prize (1)?

    Well why didn't you say so? I've got a design for a floating cloud sofa I could have entered.
    It's like this only with an "intel inside" logo taped to it.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  21. Re:Still Too Early by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    How do you think a Kinect works?

    Magnets?

  22. Edison my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That board just came out. Sure they slapped it into a drone and made it all work. 95% of the peripherals aren't out yet in breakout form, and it has a connector design that will take more than a few OSHPark runs to get right. It is an interesting concept, but these guys just slapped cool brands on it to get attention.

  23. 50 shades of BLAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So. Apple has no design sense either unless you enjoy blah, flat, shades of grey and white. Oh hell, I forgot. I'm totally wrong. They've got patents for rounded corners! What did we do before rounded corners? Get our shins fucked up by the coffee table, that's what!

    1. Re:50 shades of BLAH by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't have shades of grey and white. They have silver, "space gray" (whatever that means) and gold bling.

  24. Uh oh by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    So this plus an Oculus Rift connected to a wearable computer == 3rd person POV for your own life?

    As long as the batteries hold out, anyway. So, 20 seconds or so.

    1. Re:Uh oh by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      For an over-the-shoulder view, just run a power cable from a battery belt to the drone :).

  25. spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turns its camera on you. Except someone will immediately hack this to take pictures of other people and things, and then you have a spying device.

  26. My first thought: by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    Bug bomb activated. Bug bomb searching, Thodin!

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  27. all it needs now by tomkost · · Score: 2

    is real time streaming to an offsite storage. this way police can be filmed whenever they stop you or anyone else for that matter. You just need a laser aiming system to reset the focal point to others as needed.

  28. Nixie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nixies are already a thing, I'd appreciate it if you chose a different name.

    UNLESS said tubes are made of/by actual nixies. That would be wonderful.

  29. Blurred lines by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    The lines between gaming and trading are becoming thinner every year. Here is a perfect example : Cryptocollider.com a gaming , trading hybrid they are calling it.

  30. "Life. Reading. Negative." by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

    "Mr. Incredible. Terminated."

  31. Here is a video showing how awesome these shows ar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a video showing how awesome these shows are going to be - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO5b_SxObbQ