Correct, thanks. Users can opt out of running the tool and the data certainly isn't user-identifiable. Back away from the tinfoil hat. If you want complete security and privacy, unplug every data-capable device you own from the internet.
Actually, you have that quite backwards. They've spent the most R&D for these high-end enthusiast chips, on the data center EPYC/Naples architecture which is where the profit margins are. It just so happens that a subset of these chips, when pared down a bit, also works for high-end enthusiast desktop. Ryzen 7 and 5 were developed for desktop. ThreadRipper was born out of Naples/server/EPYC arch, which as you noted is where the money is.
You definitely did not have a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (note with the "Ti" on the end, that's key), since November. The CEO of the company just announced them on 2/28 on NDA lift and they just began shipping in market yesterday.
I get that and actually typically do tone things down for a Slashdot submission. However, on this one, agreed I didn't. So, fair enough. That said, those are indeed well-founded opinions of this product.
It's not an ad, it's a straight-up review of a product. And why would you buy discrete speakers to attach to an all-in-one PC that's supposed to typify product convenience and simplicity (the product type, like iMac etc). People don't use all-in-ones in the home or office because they want to treat them like a PC to connect things to, they're supposed to be "all-in-one" - hence the product category. Dell just made the all-in-one more complete, in my opinion, with this system.
It's funny you mention this. In discussions with Intel, the reps were very forthcoming about the fact that Microsoft charges $15 for a Win 10 license on a device with 2GB of RAM or less, but once you get up to 4GB or higher, it's a $100 upcharge. Totally agreed. With all the free Win 10 upgrades they're handing out, that policy is asinine.
On Amazon, I see GTX 970s for $290 - http://amzn.to/1PPGikI - That's a full $50 - $60 more than the 380X or a 20% premium or so, for about 10 - 15% more performance. This card is 25 - 30% faster than a 4GB GTX 960, for about a 10% premium. So, not sure how fine a line it is but it's definitely an incremental step up from a 960 for a good chunk less than a 970, with the caveat I would toss in that's "if" AMD AIB partners actually hit that $229 MSRP AMD is claiming.
I'll even paste the text for you here... look for these words. Words are a powerful thing.. .
"Original Full Res 4K 2X AA Shots: Shot 1, Shot 2, Shot 3, Shot 4"
Slashdot Mirror
Correct, thanks. Users can opt out of running the tool and the data certainly isn't user-identifiable. Back away from the tinfoil hat. If you want complete security and privacy, unplug every data-capable device you own from the internet.
Live benchmark recorded here versus a dual-socket Xeon Platinum 8180 server: https://hothardware.com/news/a...
Hothardware, say not more. The amusing part is they are always behind yet can't even properly copy other peoples published specs. it is 48GB not 96.
Side note: "say not more" ... Grammar and spelling - like gravity, such a bitch.
Hence, the error and typo. Correct and thank you.
That was a typo obviously, and related to NVLink scaling across Quadro RTX 8000 GPUs. Thanks for the kinds words though. Competitor perhaps, AC?
That was a typo obviously, and associated with the NVLink scaling with two GPUs for a total of 96GB or 2x48.
And you're an anonymous coward pile of shit. Beat it troll.
Actually, you have that quite backwards. They've spent the most R&D for these high-end enthusiast chips, on the data center EPYC/Naples architecture which is where the profit margins are. It just so happens that a subset of these chips, when pared down a bit, also works for high-end enthusiast desktop. Ryzen 7 and 5 were developed for desktop. ThreadRipper was born out of Naples/server/EPYC arch, which as you noted is where the money is.
ahh. that makes sense then. :)
You definitely did not have a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (note with the "Ti" on the end, that's key), since November. The CEO of the company just announced them on 2/28 on NDA lift and they just began shipping in market yesterday.
I get that and actually typically do tone things down for a Slashdot submission. However, on this one, agreed I didn't. So, fair enough. That said, those are indeed well-founded opinions of this product.
It's not an ad, it's a straight-up review of a product. And why would you buy discrete speakers to attach to an all-in-one PC that's supposed to typify product convenience and simplicity (the product type, like iMac etc). People don't use all-in-ones in the home or office because they want to treat them like a PC to connect things to, they're supposed to be "all-in-one" - hence the product category. Dell just made the all-in-one more complete, in my opinion, with this system.
Totally agreed
Sounds all reasonable to me but folks like Elon Musk would beg to differ with the notion that self-aware AI are that far off.
Anonymous coward, from the flaming a-hole that likes to hide department.
http://grammarist.com/usage/an... - see it's a thing, in electronics.
It's funny you mention this. In discussions with Intel, the reps were very forthcoming about the fact that Microsoft charges $15 for a Win 10 license on a device with 2GB of RAM or less, but once you get up to 4GB or higher, it's a $100 upcharge. Totally agreed. With all the free Win 10 upgrades they're handing out, that policy is asinine.
Agreed on the latter sentiment but careful on the 960 pricing. 4GB 960 cards are $209ish...
On Amazon, I see GTX 970s for $290 - http://amzn.to/1PPGikI - That's a full $50 - $60 more than the 380X or a 20% premium or so, for about 10 - 15% more performance. This card is 25 - 30% faster than a 4GB GTX 960, for about a 10% premium. So, not sure how fine a line it is but it's definitely an incremental step up from a 960 for a good chunk less than a 970, with the caveat I would toss in that's "if" AMD AIB partners actually hit that $229 MSRP AMD is claiming.
That has been corrected. It is 14nm.
This has been corrected in the post. Intel is in fact using their 14nm node for Knights Landing.
I'll even paste the text for you here... look for these words. Words are a powerful thing.. . "Original Full Res 4K 2X AA Shots: Shot 1, Shot 2, Shot 3, Shot 4"
The LINKS and the TEXT that points to the LINKS under the 4K galleries! They link to raw 4K images HELLO? READ. You can apologize now.
Did you bother actually look at the RAW screen shots linked at full res, dipshit? Guess not. RTFA
Thanks. It's something fun and light with over-the-top hardware and a quick view of a couple of high-end configs.