Slashdot Mirror


Arducorder, Next Open Source Science Tricorder-like Device, Nears Completion

upontheturtlesback writes: The Arducorder Mini, an Arduino-compatible pocket-sized handheld sensing tool and the next in line of open source science tricorder-like devices designed by Dr. Peter Jansen, is nearing completion. Where the previous models have included about a dozen sensors spanning atmospheric, electromagnetic, and spatial readings, an exciting video of the new prototype shows this model includes sensors for spectroscopy, low-resolution thermal imaging, and radiation sensing. The development is open with the project build logs and most recent source schematics, board layouts, and firmware available on github. This project is an entry in the Hack a Day Prize for a trip to space.

56 comments

  1. Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Noishkel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As said this could be an interesting device. But I'm not really sure what this will allow anyone to do. Sure it's all well and good that you can collect data with it, but you'll have to be able to interpret this data into something that's useful. And that's not even touching the fact that this thing would be fragile as hell without a very well design and weather proofed case.

    But as with any project like this I comment the designers for thinking up a new and interesting device. And who knows. Maybe the next generation of device might be useful.

  2. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I comment the designers for thinking up a new and interesting device

    They didn't think up a new and interesting device. They're trying to duplicate something they saw on a sci-fi TV show, thats primary use was exploration of alien planets - not exactly something I'd use on a regular basis. This is a solution in search of a problem - and it doesn't even do what it's supposed to do worth a damn.

  3. tricoder-LIKE by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Jim, i'm a doctor, not a LIKE.

  4. Pff... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    A tricorder's nice and all, but you wanna see real technological innovation? Here, I got your technological innovation right here:

    https://vine.co/v/O7jjJMi5wTa

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Pff... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      A tricorder's nice and all, but you wanna see real technological innovation? Here, I got your technological innovation right here:

      https://vine.co/v/O7jjJMi5wTa

      He's dead, Jim.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    2. Re:Pff... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Flying cat is not amused. He and a killer bunny will come after you.

  5. The killer feature by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 2

    Is there currently technology that senses the distance and density of matter and requires nothing be behind the object? If this device had the capability to graphically display this information I think that would impress more than anything else. You could scan for a broken bone, find lost objects in the grass (assuming they were more dense than the grass/dirt), or find studs or electrical wiring behind drywall in buildings.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    1. Re:The killer feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there currently technology that senses the distance and density of matter and requires nothing be behind the object?

      No.

    2. Re:The killer feature by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      Ultrasound, x-rays or similar tech wouldn't work?

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    3. Re:The killer feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Forward Mass Sensor would disagree with you.

      http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10...

      Only been around for 49 years though.

      http://www.regnirps.com/Gravio...

    4. Re:The killer feature by Immerman · · Score: 1

      X-rays though I don't think are a viable general-purpose option. Firstly it would be ridiculously dangerous to allow people to walk around with sufficiently powerful ionising radiation sources - ask Madame Curie about the dangers of X-rays. More to the point though X-rays don't bounce of all that much except for very glancing blows (which wouldn't send the reflected ray back to you) - they mostly either pass through things or get absorbed, which means your receiver has to be on the opposite side of the thing you're looking at to see the stuff that makes it through. Still, could be good for looking for extremely dense materials such as uranium that can reflect X-rays, except for the whole "blasting whatever you're looking at with ionizing radiation" thing. That's not going to go over well.

      Sonar could concievably do it, with a good enough microphone(s) and analytic software. Might take a whole array of microphones, or at least a decent acoustic lens though. After all we know dolphins have absolutely stunning acoustic imaging capacity with which they can readily look inside one another, and I'm reasonably certain there is no magic involved. However their is the issue that our sonar technology doesn't yet even hold a candle to a olphins innate abilities, plus sonar works far less effetively in air than in water, especialy for seeing inside of things. The more dramatic the density change, the stronger the reflection of energy - while water and flesh are approximately the same density, the air/flesh boundary will almost completely reflect your sonic pulse. So to see inside something you'll need to first be able to filter out the initial surface reflection, then pick up on the much, much fainter secondary reflection from internal structures. And it will be MUCH fainter, because the pulse which bounces off the bone will again be mostly reflected at the air boundary on it's way back to your detector. And that will be happening in every direction, so rather than a clean image you're going to sort of get an "accoustic glow" from all those sound waves leaking out as they bounce around inside the target willy nilly. Theoretically we could extract useful imaging data from that glow, but currently we can't even reconstruct a decent fetal image in a situation where air boundaries are eliminated from the equations.

      Maybe the best bet is those new ultra-high-speed optical cameras that can see around corners by firing ultra-short laser pulses at a target and then collecting and analyzing the individual photons that make it back in order to recreate the environment that reflected them. Won't wok so well for opaque objects, but an awful lot of stuff is only translucent, allowing photons to bounce inside it before escapng again, and I imagine the resolution will eventually get good enough to reconstruct such volumes.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:The killer feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your whole first paragraph is pretty much a chain of incorrect and false statements in the face of x-ray backscattering equipment. This uses x-ray sources considerably weaker than used for medical x-rays, involves x-rays that actually do scatter backwards from the target, via. Compton scattering, and works quite well with stuff that are not "extreme dense materials."

    6. Re:The killer feature by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 1

      They also don't have very good penetrating power and still rely on exposing people to dangerous ionizing radiation. It's not as if you can image someone's bones using the naturally-occurring X-rays in the environment, unless that person happens to be standing naked on the moon.

  6. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the next generation of device might be useful.

    I saw what you did there. :-)

  7. damn kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say something about the damn kids, but we had the BasicStamp ...

  8. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by tepples · · Score: 1

    They're trying to duplicate something they saw on a sci-fi TV show, thats primary use was exploration of alien planets

    Some places on Earth are just as alien as anything you saw on Trek. How explored is the ocean floor?

  9. radar, backscatter , sometimes ultrasound by raymorris · · Score: 3

    Check out ground penetrating radar. Also, TSA uses backscatter, which works in a similar way - it doesn't REQUIRE anything to be behind the subject, you get a clearer image if you have a plain background (where plain means uniform reflection of the frequency used). Ultrasound works some some applications, but the image is rather blurry unless you have a very expensive unit.

    I don't know if either is available in an inexpensive, low resolution hobbyist version. I'd bet there are some old units, two generations behind, on ebay. Now I'm off to Google for hobbyist radar .

    A tricorder which combines low-quality short- range radar, backscatter, infrared and ultrasound might be very useful - infrared would see pipes in the wall, maybe the combination of radar and ultrasound would show the studs, etc.

    1. Re:radar, backscatter , sometimes ultrasound by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      We're getting some good answers here. Since it has a screen like a phone, the "mode" button could change which program controlled how the input graphs were rendered, like OpenGL display lists in a game. The x-ray/backscatter method could have a red button and audibly beep when it's on to warn people. Maybe a mass spectrometer to sniff the air in front of it (and compare the results to a database of known sample patterns) would make it truly boss. If someone farted, the tricorder would have the answer.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  10. Re:Arduyawn by tepples · · Score: 1

    So what other microcontroller to which ordinary people can solder things should people be using instead of an AVR?

  11. Re:Arduyawn by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you think was limiting it? You think someone who wants to design a (say) 15GHz sampling oscilloscope will stop because of the Arduino?

    On the other hand, why not use an Arduino? I don't need a 32 bit monster "micro" controller running embedded Linux to flash the headlights on my RC car. I use a bare-bones PIC but someone who is happy with the "get it done" approach of an Arduino, what is wrong with that?

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  12. Non-constructive critisim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moar sensors!!!!!1!!!!!

    RF receiver
    radar/sonar/chronographs/stud/fish finders
    hyperspectral imaging
    holographic projector (see "The Chase")
    interferometer

  13. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    How explored is the ocean floor?

    Or, for that matter, downtown LA?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to be alien like.

    The main purpose was to determine if the enviroment was hostile to them. Of course they did other crap but think about where we need to know if the enviroment is hostile.

    Think off fire response, motor vehicle accidents, threat assesments for dignitaries, yet another way to find electronic listening devices, and so on.

    Of course it might need a little work before it is ready and reliable but there is a use that may be right around tbe corner- litteraly

  15. Re:Arduyawn by emh203 · · Score: 0

    Let's see.... Some Examples... Freescale Freedom Platform NCP LPC Xpresso TI Stellaris Launch Pad. Each have ARM Cortex M0/M3/M4 variants. All those options are less than an Arduino. They each have accessible IO, lots of tool chain options and aren't crippled by the Arduino front end. (i.e. real debuggers) NXP even has M0 parts in an 8-pin dip. Arduino is like the guitar hero version of a microcontroller. Sure, you may look cool and sound OK tethered to a game machine but in the end you are slapping 4 plastic buttons.

  16. Re:Arduyawn by iggymanz · · Score: 0

    you're right, that's way too much computer for typical simple embeded app. a four bit S1C60 should be more than enough in most cases

  17. Terahertz radar by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Low-cost terahertz radar imaging is going to be very useful in handheld devices. You really can see a short distance into many materials. Great for seeing pipes and electrical wiring in walls. The day will come when that's a standard tool one buys at Home Depot.

    Until that's working, a cooled IR imager would be useful. Those are great for finding heat leaks in houses, but currently cost too much.

    1. Re:Terahertz radar by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Soon to be nicknamed the 'Nudie-cam.'

    2. Re:Terahertz radar by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes but will it also be able to analyze composition? I don't want a temperature probe; I already have that. I want to scan my soil and discover the nitrogen content, phosphor content, etc.

    3. Re:Terahertz radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it takes alot of tuning to see someone's genitals with Thz cameras. your more likely to be seeing their musculature and fat deposits.

      in the very least, you could definitely tell who has real boobs or very well made implants.

    4. Re:Terahertz radar by fhage · · Score: 1

      Soon to be nicknamed the 'Nudie-cam.'

      Obligatory (SFW) pic worth 1K words. [Google image search result for "Terahertz imaging"].

      Note to self: THz-camo underwear market will be big. Get in early.

  18. Re:Arduyawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure, you may look cool and sound OK tethered to a game machine but in the end you are slapping 4 plastic buttons.

    With Guitar Hero, you are stuck just imitating someone else, while at the end of the day the Arduino still contains a programmable microcontroller that can solve new, original problems. I had not used one until about 6 months ago, when a friend was trying to start up a project that would eventually be maintained and expanded by students. He came to me to get a skeleton hardware setup going for demo purposes, as I had plenty of other mcu experience. I had a basic program up and running in less than a minute, and had the whole thing done in a couple hours including documentation. i've spent more time dealing with customer support, including with one of the products you named, just to get a basic program compiled and programmed into the device due to bugs in their software.

    Would I use one in a production environment? No, there are a lot cheaper and more powerful chips that a professional engineer can incorporate into a compact design. But when it comes to suggesting a project for someone learning, or building something that others will pick up and modify to learn, there are a wide variety of situations it will work just fine. I gave one to a friend's son for his birthday, and he had fun getting things going even with minimal programming experience. Now he is learning how to read datasheets for information as his projects get more and more detailed... something that other setups would require be done in reverse order: learn to read datasheets before getting something working, not a path that is easy with kids (or a lot of adults too).

  19. Re:Holy dog shit, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess this explains your presence.

  20. Re:Arduyawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody cares.

  21. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    das raycis

  22. Re:Making is for losers. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    That's an excellent idea, until you want something that the big businesses won't make because the demand isn't high enough and/or there's not enough profit to be made.

  23. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can already think of four or five uses for this. Things I'd want to use it for, and that I can see from the video I'd be able to make use of without any extensive training.

    Suggesting this doesn't have real utility only demonstrates a severe lack of imagination.

  24. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    As said this could be an interesting device. But I'm not really sure what this will allow anyone to do.

    The point isn't what you can do with it, the point is that it's fun to build it and to experiment with all of the sensors. Perhaps that experimentation will spark some ideas for building things that actually are useful, but even that's a second-order concern.

  25. Re: Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious. What would you like to use it for?

  26. Re:Making is for losers. by rdwulfe · · Score: 2

    YEAH! Give up any form of creativity or control! Let's keep anything innovative or interesting out of the hands of normal, every day people! What the heck do they know? Let Sony and Microsoft and Apple make things, because they're infinitely more creative and innovative than this guy, who made a neat looking toy that looks fun to use and enjoyable to put together! Screw all that! Be happy with the nondescript thing in the box on the shelf, that everyone else has, too, so you don't have to think on your own!

    Down with science, down with brai--

    Wait, why are you even on Slashdot?

  27. Smartphone Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not cut out the display, speaker, and wifi, and interface with a cellphone via the headphone jack? Would seem to be a simpler and less costly option. Plus, you get all the advantages of a smartphone. Obviously, not needing a cellphone has its advantages too though.

    1. Re:Smartphone Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not needing a cellphone? What are you, amish?

    2. Re:Smartphone Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I imagine this device would use a lot less power than a cellphone and cost a lot less, which could be very valuable in certain areas of the world.

  28. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by swillden · · Score: 1

    As said this could be an interesting device. But I'm not really sure what this will allow anyone to do.

    The point isn't what you can do with it, the point is that it's fun to build it and to experiment with all of the sensors. Perhaps that experimentation will spark some ideas for building things that actually are useful, but even that's a second-order concern.

    This.

    What happened to the slashdot of old?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  29. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    What happened to the slashdot of old?

    Kids these days, that's what...
    Now; welcome to my lawn...

  30. Re:Interesting. But might end up as more of a toy. by necro81 · · Score: 1

    They're trying to duplicate something they saw on a sci-fi TV show, thats primary use was exploration of alien planets

    No, the tricorder's primary use was exposition, not exploration.

    TV Show Watcher: What the heck is going on there?
    Star Trek Character: (consults tricorder) There appears to be a radiation surge from other there, indicating a portal will soon appear and introduce this week's source of conflict.
    TV Show Watcher: Thanks, informative tricorder!

  31. Re:Arduyawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've spent more time dealing with customer support, including with one of the products you named, just to get a basic program compiled and programmed into the device due to bugs in their software.

    Just to clarify what the other poster probably intended: one can spend a long time debugging other mcu systems, especially newer ones that have not been out for long. I've had a few come in that took quite a bit of work to prove what exactly went wrong and that it was a compiler or debugging software error. That takes a lot of back and forth with customer support, and a pretty good understanding of what the device should be doing to track down why it isn't working. Simpler systems that just work are good for learning so you can build up that understanding and intuition about such things before dealing with bigger potential messes. And for a lot of people, there is no need for a more powerful or different setup after that. Even though there are other systems that can accomplish this, the Arduino fills that role just fine.

  32. Re:Arduyawn by tshawkins · · Score: 1

    He is using a 32bit monster, its a pic32 device, a chipkit32 clone. Its running an emulation of the io of the 8bit aurduino through wiring. Its not a common of garden aurduino 8bit avr.

  33. Theremin module would be cool by Jimbo+God+of+Unix · · Score: 1

    It would be really cool to see a Theremin-based monitor for this, like this site:

    https://www.googlesciencefair.com/projects/en/2014/04d4d5dd602bdab802a76b48c24b3e1e29679611a5bfa55c34ed4f40df8294cf

    They talk about being able to monitor more than just breathing with it.

  34. Thermo Scientific X-Ray Fluorescence.. by RealGene · · Score: 1

    This is pretty close: http://www.thermoscientific.co...

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  35. We don't need no stinkin' multimeter! by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 1

    --The multimeter could be an interesting device. But I'm not really sure what this will allow anyone to do. Sure it's all well and good that you can collect data with it, but you'll have to be able to interpret this data into something that's useful. --

    The devices already all have uses, but scientific instruments are typically expensive. Something like this could potentially replace a whole lot of instruments, just as the multimeter did, and it could also be cheap enough to be useful for school or home science kit usage.

    Basically, it already has a ton of usages right out of the box plus, if it achieves wide distribution, people will think up all kinds of new uses for it.

  36. YES; Radar by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 1

    For $10, you can buy a radar-equipped stud-finder and use it to locate the frame behind your sheetrock.

    Laser rangefinders can also locate distance to laser-reflective sources and there are many other similar technologies, such as those used in autofocus cameras.

    I don't know of any portable technology that could be used to find a broken bone without exposing people to ionizing radiation, but I'm sure we'll figure it out one day.

  37. Ghost Hunters by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    This would be the holy grail for any kind of modern "ghost hunter", it does electromagnetic, thermal, radiation, infrared.. etc..

    Doesn't matter if they don't have a fucking clue how it actually works, it'll be a status symbol for the disenfranchised-with-reality crowd who love to play scientist.
    I used to be one of those people interested in ghost hunting, until I got more involved with it, and saw the sheer amount of wishful thinking, ignorance, and general lack of logic applied.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  38. Re:Arduyawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a PIC man myself.

    "Paku-paku-paku"